FARKLI DÖNER EĞE SİSTEMLERİ İLE PREPARE EDİLMİŞ KÖK KANAL DENTİNİNE 3 FARKLI FİBER-POST SİSTEMİNİN BAĞLANMA DAYANIMLARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 254 - 260, 17.12.2019

Arslan Terlemez , Hakkı Çelebi Emine Begüm Büyükerkmen Nimet Ünlü , Emre Korkut

https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.432790

Abstract

Amaç: Bu in-vitro
araştırmadaki amaç iki farklı endodontik döner eğe sistemi ile prepare edilmiş
kök kanallarına yerleştirilmiş 3 farklı fiber post sisteminin push-out bağlanma
dayanımlarının karşılaştırılmasıdır.

Gereç ve Yöntemler:42 adet
çekilmiş tek köklü insan alt premolar dişin kronları uzaklaştırıldı. Kökler iki
gruba ayrılarak bir grup Wave One, diğer grup ise TF Adaptive endodontik döner
alet sistemi ile kök kanalları prepare edildi. FRC, GC ve Rely-X olmak üzere 3
farklı fiber post sitemi kök kanallarına simante edildi. Simantasyon işlemi
çift aşamalı polimerize olan Rely-X Unicem ile gerçekleştirildi. Düşük hızlı
elmas frezler kullanılarak su soğutması altında 1.00
mm ± 0.05
mm kalınlığında horizontal kesitler alındı. Push-out
testi universal test cihazında 1mm/dk olacak şekilde yapıldı ve elde edilen
veriler üç yönlü varyans analizi  ve
tukey ile P˂0.05
seviyesinde değerlendirildi.

Bulgular:Kök kanal preperasyon tekniği,
fiber post türü ve dişin koronal orta veya apical bölgesinden alınan kesitler
arasında bağlanma dayanımı yönünden istatistiksel olarak bir fark olmadığı
bulundu. (p>0,05)

Sonuçlar:Farklı döner eğe sistemleri ile hazırlanmış kök
kanalına farklı post sistemlerinin bağlanma dayanımı arasında fark
bulunmamaktadır. 

Anahtar Kelimeler:fiber post sistemleri, endodontik döner eğe
sistemleri, bağlanma dayanımı

Keywords

fiber post sistemleri, endodontik döner eğe sistemleri, bağlanma dayanımı

References

• Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A (2005) Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:321-329.
• Bitter K, Meyer‐Lueckel H, Priehn K, Kanjuparambil J, Neumann K, Kielbassa A (2006) Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentine. Int. Endod J 2006;39:809-818.
• Bitter K, Noetzel J, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM (2007) Effect of silanization on bond strengths of fiber posts to various resin cements. Quintessence International 2007;38.(2).
• Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Krejci I, Meyer J-M, Pashley DH (2003) Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dental Materials 2003;19:199-205.
• Braem M, Lambrechts P, Van Doren V, Vanherle G (1986) The impact of composite structure on its elastic response. J Dent Res 65(5), 648-653.
• Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E (2012) Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single‐file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J 45(5), 449-461.
• Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, Arslan H, Ertas ET (2014) Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. J Endod 40(6), 852-856.
• D’Arcangelo C, D’Amario M, Prosperi GD, Cinelli M, Giannoni M, Caputi S (2007) Effect of surface treatments on tensile bond strength and on morphology of quartz-fiber posts. J Endod 33(3), 264-267.
• Davidson C, De Gee A, Feilzer A (1984) The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 63(12), 1396-1399.
• Drummond J, Sakaguchi R, Racean D, Wozny J, Steinberg A (1996) Testing mode and surface treatment effects on dentin bonding. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 32(4), 533-541.
• ER RF, Sindel J, Kramer N, Petschelt A (1999) Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 24, 147-155.Feilzer A, De Gee A, Davidson C (1987) Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66(11), 1636-1639.
• Gallo JR, Miller T, Xu X, Burgess JO (2002) In vitro evaluation of the retention of composite fiber and stainless steel posts. J Prosthodont 11(1), 25-29.
• Gambarini G, Gergi R, Grande NM, Osta N, Plotino G, Testarelli L (2013) Cyclic fatigue resistance of newly manufactured rotary nickel titanium instruments used in different rotational directions. Aust Endod J 39(3), 151-154.
• Gambarini G, Gergi R, Naaman A, Osta N, Al Sudani D (2012) Cyclic fatigue analysis of twisted file rotary NiTi instruments used in reciprocating motion. Int Endod J 45(9), 802-806.
• Gambarini G, Glassman G (2013) TF Adaptive: A Novel Approach to Nickel-Titanium Instrumentation “Rotary when you want it, Reciprocation when you need it”. Oral Health Dental Journal 22, 30.
• Gambarini G, Rubini AG, Al Sudani D ve ark. (2012) Influence of different angles of reciprocation on the cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 38(10), 1408-1411.
• Gergi R, Osta N, Bourbouze G, Zgheib C, Arbab‐Chirani R, Naaman A (2015) Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro‐computed tomography. Int Endod J 48(2), 162-170.
• Goracci C, Fabianelli A, Sadek FT, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M (2005) The contribution of friction to the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts. J Endod 31(8), 608-612.
• Goracci C, Tavares AU, Fabianelli A ve ark. (2004) The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls: comparison between microtensile and push‐out bond strength measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 112(4), 353-361.
• Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Tay FR, Ferrari M (2005) Fatigue resistance and structural characteristics of fiber posts: three-point bending test and SEM evaluation. Dental Materials 21(2), 75-82.
• Kececi AD, Kaya BU, Adanir N (2008) Micro push-out bond strengths of four fiber-reinforced composite post systems and 2 luting materials Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105(1), 121-128.
• King P, Setchell D (1990) An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil 17(6), 599-609.
• Marzouk AM, Ghoneim AG (2013) Computed tomographic evaluation of canal shape instrumented by different kinematics rotary nickel-titanium systems. J Endod 39(7), 906-909.
• Mitchell CA, Orr JF, Connor KN, Magill JP, Maguire GR (1994) Comparative study of four glass ionomer luting cements during post pull-out tests. Dental Materials 10(2), 88-91.
• Morris MD, Lee K-W, Agee KA, Bouillaguet S, Pashley DH (2001) Effects of sodium hypochlorite and RC-prep on bond strengths of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod 27(12), 753-757.
• Nikaido T, Takano Y, Sasafuchi Y, Burrow M, Tagami J (1999) Bond strengths to endodontically-treated teeth. Am J Dent 12(4), 177-180.
• Patierno J, Rueggeberg F, Anderson R, Weller R, Pashley DH (1996) Push‐out strength and SEM evaluation of resin composite bonded to internal cervical dentin. Dent Traumatol 12(5), 227-236.
• Perdigao J, Gomes G, Augusto V (2007) The effect of dowel space on the bond strengths of fiber posts. J Prosthet Dent 16(3), 154-164.
• Ruddle CJ, Machtou P, West JD (2013) The shaping movement 5th generation technology. Dent Today 32(4), 94.
• Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K (2004) Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated posts on bonding of resin cement. Oper Dent- 29(1), 60-68.
• Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K (2004) Retention and failure morphology of prefabricated posts. Int J Prosth 17(3).
• Schwartz RS, Robbins JW (2004) Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod 30(5), 289-301.
• Silness J, Gustavsen F, Hunsbeth J (1979) Distribution of corrosion products in teeth restored with metal crowns retained by stainless steel posts. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 37(6), 317-321.
• Sudsangiam S, van Noort R (1999) Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose. J Adhes Dent 1(1), 57-67.
• Versiani MA, Leoni GB, Steier L ve ark. (2013) Micro–computed tomography study of oval-shaped canals prepared with the Self-adjusting File, Reciproc, WaveOne, and Protaper Universal systems. J Endod 39(8), 1060-1066.
• Vichi A, Grandini S, Davidson CL, Ferrari M (2002) An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions. Dental Materials 18(7), 495-502.
• Wan J, Rasimick BJ, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS (2011) A comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance in reciprocating and rotary nickel‐titanium instruments. Aust Endod J 37(3), 122-127.
• Webber J, Machtou P, Pertot W, Kuttler S, Ruddle C, West J (2011) The WaveOne single-file reciprocating system. Roots 1(1), 28-33.
• Xible AA, de Jesus Tavarez RR, de Araujo CdRP, Bonachela WC (2006) Effect of silica coating and silanization on flexural and composite-resin bond strengths of zirconia posts: An in vitro study. J Prosth Dent 95(3), 224-229.