Nohut üretiminde farklı ekim yöntemlerinin verim ve verim unsurları üzerine etkileri

Abstract

Araştırmada, kuru ve sulu tarım koşullarında nohut üretiminde farklı ekim yöntemleri ile kombine hububat mibzeri (U1 ve T1) ve pnömatik tek çift sıra çapraz hassas mibzer (U2 ve T2) kullanılmıştır. Denemeler, Türkiye, Konya İli, Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Uygulama ve Araştırma Çiftliği'nde yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada, bitki boyu, ilk bakla yüksekliği, bakla sayısı ve bitkide tane sayısı, baklada tane sayısı, bin tane ağırlığı, birim alandan tane verimi ve hasat indeksi gibi özellikler incelenmiştir. Sonuçlara göre, ekim yöntemlerinin verim ve verim unsurları üzerine etkileri, sulu tarım koşullarında bitkide tane sayısı, tane verimi ve biyolojik verim bakımından, kuru tarım koşullarında ise bitkide bakla sayısı, baklada tane sayısı, tane verimi, biyolojik verim ve hasat indeksi bakımından önemli bulunmuştur. Sulu tarım koşullarında birim alandan en yüksek tane verimi 1756 kg ha-1 ile U2 uygulamasında elde edilmiştir. U1 uygulamasında 1193 kg ha-1 olarak bulunmuştur. Kurak tarım koşullarında birim alandan en yüksek tane verimi T2 uygulamasında 1150 kg ha-1 olarak bulunmuştur. T1 uygulamasında ise 830 kg ha-1 olarak bulunmuştur. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, sulu veya kuru tarım koşullarında nohut üretiminde, verim ve bazı verim özelliklerindeki avantajları nedeniyle, pnömatik hassas çift sıralı çapraz ekim makinesi kullanılarak çapraz ekim yöntemi U2 ve T2 uygulamaları önerilebilir.

Keywords

• Nohut,
• Ekim yöntemi,
• Verim,
• Biyolojik verim

Effects of Different Sowing Methods on Yield and Yield Components in Chickpea Production

Abstract

In the research, combined grain seeder (U1 and T1) and pneumatic single double row cross precision seeder (U2 and T2) with different sowing methods were used in chickpea production in dryland and irrigated farming conditions. The trials were carried out at the Application and Research Farm of Selçuk University, Faculty of Agriculture, Konya Province, Türkiye. In the research, traits such as plant height, first pod height, number of pods and grain number per plant, number of grains per pod, thousand grain weight, grain yield per unit area and harvest index were investigated. According to the results, the effects of sowing methods on yield and yield components were found to be significant in terms of number of grains per plant, grain yield and biological yield under irrigated farming conditions, and in terms of number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index under dry farming conditions. Under irrigated farming conditions, the highest grain yield per unit area was 1756 kg ha-1 in the U2 application. Under U1 application, it was 1193 kg ha-1. Under dryland farming conditions, the highest grain yield per unit area was 1150 kg ha-1 in the T2 application. Under T1 application, it was 830 kg ha-1. Based on the results, for chickpea production under irrigated or dryland farming conditions, the cross-sowing method, using a pneumatic precision double-row cross-seeder, can be recommended in the U2 and T2 applications due to its advantages in yield and some yield characteristics.

Keywords

• : Chickpea
• sowing methods
• Yield
• Biological yield

References

1. Akçin, A. (1988). Food Grain Legumes Textbook, Selcuk University Faculty of Agriculture Publications, Konya (Türkiye), 43-8. (In Turkish)
2. Anonymous. (2024). Türkiye Meteorology General Directorate. 8th Meteorology Regional Directorate, Konya Bihari, B., Kushwaha, H. S., & Vaidya, M. S. (1992). Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) to irrigation and fertilization.
3. Biçer, B. T., & Anlarsal, A. E. (2004). Determination of vegetative and agronomic characteristics in some chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) village cultivars. Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 10 (4): 289-396. (In Turkish)
4. Chauhan, M. P., & Singh, I. S. (1998). Genetic variability, heritability and expected genetic advance for seed yield and other quantitative characters over two years in lentil. LENS Newsletter (ICARDA) | Lentil Experimental News Service Volume 25 Issue 1-2 ISSN 0257-7143
5. Doğan, Y., & Çiftçi, V. (2019). Effects of different plant densities and sowing methods on yield and some yield components in some chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties in Van ecological conditions. Bahri Dağdaş Journal of Plant Research, 8(1), 91-105. ISBN:2148-3205 (In Turkish)
6. Erman, M., Çiftçi, V., & Geçit, H. H. (1997). A Study on Relationships Between Traits and Path Coefficient Analysis in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(03), 43-46. (In Turkish). https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000000327
7. Günal, M. E. (2019). Determination of some operational parameters in chickpea sowing with pneumatic single grain seeder. Master's thesis. Iğdır University, Institute of Science. Türkiye (In Turkish)
8. Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1984). New chickpea varieties for winter sowing and mechanical harvesting. ed: Printed by M. S. Zevlaris & Sons Ltd. Strovolos: MPKV; Maharastra Technical Bulletin 58: 1-8.

9. Heege, H. J. (1993). Seeding Method Performance for Cereals, Rape and Beans. Transactions of the ASAE, 36(3), 653 – 661.
10. Işık, A., Karaman, Y., & Zeren, Y. (1986) A Research on Some Characteristics of Planting and Threshing of Second Crop Soybean, Publications of Turkish Agricultural Equipment Institution, Publication No: 43, Ankara. (In Turkısh)
11. Sandhu, J. S., & Mangat, N. S. (1999). Correlation Path Analysis in Late Sown Chickpea. Plant Breeding Abstracts, 6 (10): 1435.
12. Sarımurat, M. Ş. (2017). Determination of Yield and Quality Characteristics of Some Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties Grown in Van Ecological Conditions. Master’s thesis. Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Institute of Science, (Türkiye) (In Turkish)
13. Saxena, M. C., Silim, S. N., & Singh, K. B. (1990). Effect of supplementary ırrigation during reproductive growth on winter and spring chickpea in a mediterranean environment. Journal of Agricultural Science. 114, 285-293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600072671
14. Singh, K. B., Bejiga, G., & Malhotra, R. S. (1990). Associations Some Characters With Seed Yield İn Chickpea Collections. Euphytica, 49: 83-88.
15. Sing, V., & Dixit, R. S. (1992). Effect of moisture regime and sowing date on chickpea (Cicer arietinum l.) Indian journal of Agronomy 37 (4): 739-743.
16. Toğay, N., Toğay, Y., Erman, M., Doğan, Y., & Çiğ, F. (2005). Effects of Different Plant Densities on Yield and Yield Components in Some Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties under Dry and Irrigated Conditions. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(04), pp. 417-421. (In Turkish)
17. Vural, H., & Karasu, A. (2007). Variability studies in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties grown in Isparta, Turkey. Revista Científica UDO Agricola,7(1):35-40. (In Turkish)
18. Yadav, V. S., Singh, D., Yadav, S. S., Kumar, J., & Singh, D. (1999). Correlation And Path Analysis İn Chickpea. Annals of Agricultural Research, 20 (4): 461-464.