INTERPRETING STREET INTERVIEWS ON TURKİSH ECONOMY THROUGH NIETZSCHE’S CONCEPT OF RESSENTIMENT

Abstract

Beginning in 2018 and climaxing by the end of 2021, economic problems in Türkiye have been a significant subject matter of the country. Hence, taking a great deal of attention, street interviews broadcasted on YouTube have concentrated on the Turkish economy. They have showed that the great majority of Turkish citizens complain about the way Turkish economy is. However, disagreeing and going against the majority, with their similar tendencies, opinions, and reactions, a number of interviewees who personally state that they are from low-income groups and supporters of Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, AKP) tend to bend the fact about the Turkish economy as they not only present their own economic circumstances better than they actually are but also reject the existence of the economic distress the country has been going through even though it is admitted by the state authorities. As an answer to such a contradiction, this study suggests that it could be explained through the theoretical framework of Nietzschean concept of ressentiment and concentrates on victimization, polarization, revaluation, blaming others for failures, and glorification of sufferings which are both the essential ingredients of the ressentiment and tangible issues in the street interviews. In line with this purpose, it, first, presents the way Turkish economy has been and the ressentiment triggering discourses of the state authorities. Then, in order to have a first-hand information about both the interviews and the interviewees, it conducts a semi-structured interview with Mehmet Koyuncu-the interviewer of a popular YouTube channel called Sade Vatandaş (Ordinary Citizen)-exemplifying the subject by analyzing the responses of the interviewees.

Keywords

• Turkish economy
• Street Interviews on YouTube
• Ressentiment

Interpreting Street Interviews on Turkish Economy through Nietzsche’s Concept of Ressentiment

Abstract

Beginning in 2018 and climaxing by the end of 2021, economic problems in Türkiye have been a significant subject matter of the country. Hence, taking a great deal of attention, street interviews broadcasted on YouTube have concentrated on the Turkish economy. They have showed that the great majority of Turkish citizens complain about the way Turkish economy is. However, disagreeing and going against the majority, with their similar tendencies, opinions, and reactions, a number of interviewees who personally state that they are from low-income groups and supporters of Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, AKP) tend to bend the fact about the Turkish economy as they not only present their own economic circumstances better than they actually are but also reject the existence of the economic distress the country has been going through even though it is admitted by the state authorities. As an answer to such a contradiction, this study suggests that it could be explained through the theoretical framework of Nietzschean concept of ressentiment and concentrates on victimization, polarization, revaluation, blaming others for failures, and glorification of sufferings which are both the essential ingredients of the ressentiment and tangible issues in the street interviews. In line with this purpose, it, first, presents the way Turkish economy has been and the ressentiment triggering discourses of the state authorities. Then, in order to have a first-hand information about both the interviews and the interviewees, it conducts a semi-structured interview with Mehmet Koyuncu-the interviewer of a popular YouTube channel called Sade Vatandaş (Ordinary Citizen)-exemplifying the subject by analyzing the responses of the interviewees.

Keywords

• Turkish economy
• Street Interviews on YouTube
• Ressentiment

References

1. Açikgöz, Ömer, and Aslı Günay. 2020. “The Early Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on the Global and Turkish Economy.” Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 50 (9): 520–26. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-2004-6.
2. Ahmed, Sara. 2014. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh University Press.
3. Anadolu Ajansı. 2021. Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: Sondaj filomuza dördüncü gemimizi ekledik. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/politika/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-sondaj-filomuza-dorduncu-gemimizi-ekledik/2423076. Accessed: 20.12.2024.
4. Anadolu Ajansı. 2022. Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan "Türkiye Yüzyılı" vizyonunu açıkladı. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/politika/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-turkiye-yuzyili-vizyonunu-acikladi/2723379. Accessed: 15.12.2024.
5. Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
6. Aydin, Mustafa, M. Çelikpala, E. Yeldan, M. Güvenç, O.Z. Zaim, B.B. Hawks, E.C. Sokullu, et al. 2021. “Türkiye Eğilimleri – 2021 Kantitatif Araştırma Raporu.” [Turkey Trends 2020 Quantitave Research Report] İstanbul. Kadir Has Üniversitesi https://www.khas.edu.tr/sites/khas.edu.tr/files/inline-files/turkiye-egilimleri-web-basin.pdf.
7. Aydoğdu, A. G., & İlhan, E. (2020). Alternatif Bir İletişim Aracı Olarak YouTube: 2019 Yerel Seçimlerinde Sokak Röportajları Yapan Siteler Üzerine Bir İnceleme. [YouTube as an Alternative Communication Tool: A Review on Sites Conducting
8. Street Interviews in the 2019 Local Elections] Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 23(2), 433-442. https://doi.org/10.29249/selcuksbmyd.688536.

9. Aytaç, Selim Erdem. 2024. “Economic Voting in the 2023 Turkish General Election.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 24 (2): 363–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2024.2324524.
10. Berkowitz, Peter. 1995. Nietzsche: The Ethics of an Immoralist. Cambridge: Harward University Press.
11. Brotherton, Robert. 2013. “Towards a Definition of ‘conspiracy Theory’’. The British Psychological Society 88:9–14. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspag.2013.1.88.9
12. Bulunuz, Aysun, and Ayşegül Baykan. 2023. “Same Border, Different Subject Constructions: The Daily Shopping Visitors and the Refugees across the Turkish-Bulgarian Border in Kırklareli, Turkey.” RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, no. 37 (December), 1303–14. https://doi.org/10.29000/RUMELIDE.1406074.
13. Burkhauser, Richard V, Kevin Corinth, and Douglas Holtz-Eakin. 2021. “Policies to Help the Working Class in the Aftermath of COVID-19: Lessons from the Great Recession.” SSRN Electronic Journal, January. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3798919.
14. Capelos, Tereza, and Nicolas Demertzis. 2018. “Political Action and Resentful Affectivity in Critical Times.” Humanity & Society 42 (4): 410–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597618802517.
15. Capelos, Tereza, and Alexia Katsanidou. 2018. “Reactionary Politics: Explaining the Psychological Roots of Anti Preferences in European Integration and Immigration Debates.” Political Psychology 39 (6): 1271–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/POPS.12540.
16. Capik, Mehmet, Hasan Kolaylı, and Ali Osman Yılmaz. 2013. “A Comparative Study on the Energy Demand of Turkey: Coal or Natural Gas.” Energy Exploration & Exploitation ·. Vol. 31: 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1260/0144-5987.31.1.119.
17. Cinar, Kursat. 2024. “The Historical Roots of Right-Wing Populism in Turkey: A Spatial Examination of the DP, ANAP, and AKP Governments.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 24 (1): 121–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2023.2176195.
18. Corbin, Juliet, and Anselm Strauss. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. California: Sage Publications.
19. Çelik, Ayşe Betül, and Evren Balta. 2020. “Explaining the Micro Dynamics of the Populist Cleavage in the ‘New Turkey.’” Mediterranean Politics 25 (2): 160–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2018.1507338.
20. Daily Sabah. 2014. President: Turkey is against the denial of religious rights and assimilation. https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/2014/12/08/president-erdogan-speaks-at-the-5th-religious-council. Accessed: 27.12.2024.
21. Demertzis, Nicolas. 2020. The Political Sociology of Emotions: Essays on Trauma and Ressentiment. London: Routledge.
22. Elçi, Ezgi. 2024. “Right-Wing Populism in Turkey and the 2023 Elections.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 24 (2): 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2024.2338502.
23. ENAGrup. 2022. “Aylık Enflasyon Haber Bülteni.” https://enagrup.org/bulten/202112.pdf?v1. Enerji Piyasası Düzenleme Kurulu. 2024. Petrol fiyat bülteni sorgulama [Petroleum price bulletin query]. https://bildirim.epdk.gov.tr/bildirim-portal/faces/pages/tarife/petrol/yonetim/bultenSorgula.xhtml Accessed: 02.01.2025.
24. Euronews. 2022. ABD Green Card başvurusu: Türkiye’den kaç kişi Yeşil Kart’a başvuruyor, çıkma olasılığı ne? https://tr.euronews.com/2022/10/22/abd-green-card-basvurusu-turkiyeden-kac-kisi-yesil-karta-basvuruyor-cikma-olasiligi-ne. Accessed: 02.12.2024.
25. Fareld, Victoria. 2016. “Ressentiment as Moral Imperative: Jean Améry’s Nietzschean Revaluation of Victim Morality.” In Re-Thinking Ressentiment, edited by Jeanne Riou and Mary Gallagher, 53–71. Bielefeld: Verlag.
26. Ferrari, Diogo. 2021. “Perceptions, Resentment, Economic Distress, and Support for Right‐wing Populist Parties in Europe.” Politics and Governance 9 (3): 274–87. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.3961.
27. Grigoriadis, Ioannis N., and Esra Dilek. 2018. “Struggling for the Kurdish Vote: Religion, Ethnicity and Victimhood in AKP and BDP/HDP Rally Speeches.” Middle Eastern Studies 54 (2): 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2017.1402300.
28. Gumuscu, Sebnem. 2024. “The AKP and Stealth Islamization in Turkey.” Turkish Studies 25 (3): 371–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2024.2320725.
29. HalkTV. 2022. Nebati: TL dipte, rahat olun. https://halktv.com.tr/ekonomi/nebati-tl-dipte-rahat-olun-669221h Accessed: 22.03.2024.
30. Hoggett, Paul. 2018. “Ressentiment and Grievance.” British Journal of Psychotherapy 34 (3): 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJP.12365.
31. Kiss, Balázs. 2021. “Double Ressentiment: The Political Communication of Kulturkampf in Hungary.” Politics and Governance 9 (3): 227-36. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4053.
32. Kubilay, Murat M. 2022. “The Turkish Economy under the Presidential System.” October 13, 2022. https://www.mei.edu/publications/turkish-economy-under-presidential-system.
33. Lemert, Charles. 2018. Social Theory: Multicultural, Global, and Classic Readings. New York: Routledge.
34. Marcus, George E. 2000. “Emotions in Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 3 (1): 221–50. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.221.
35. Mardin, Şerif. 1973. “Center-Periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics?” Daedalus 102 (1): 169–90.
36. Meltzer, Bernard N., and Gil Richard Musolf. 2002. “Resentment and Ressentiment.” Sociological Inquiry 72 (2): 240–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-682X.00015.
37. Meredith, Thomas. 2020. “The Radical Goals of Slave Morality in Nietzsche’s on the Genealogy of Morality.” Review of Politics 82 (2): 247–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670520000182.
38. Naisbitt, Barry, Janine Boshoff, Dawn Holland, Ian Hurst, Iana Liadze, Corrado Macchiarelli, Xuxin Mao, Patricia Sanchez Juanino, Craig Thamotheram, and Kemar Whyte. 2021. “Global Economic Outlook – the World in Its Grip: Covid-19.” National Institute Economic Review 255 (February):e2. https://doi.org/10.1017/NIE.2021.7.
39. Nassauer, Anne, and Nicolas M. Legewie. 2021. “Video Data Analysis: A Methodological Frame for a Novel Research Trend.” Sociological Methods & Research 50 (1): 135–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118769093.
40. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1967. On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo. Edited and translated by Walter Kaufman. Random House US.
41. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1979. “On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense.” In Philosophy and Truth: Selections from Nietzsche’s Notebooks of the Early 1870’s, edited by Daniel Breazeale, 79–101. New Jersey: Humanities Press International.
42. Orhangazi, Özgür, and A. Erinç Yeldan. 2021. “The Re-Making of the Turkish Crisis.” Development and Change 52 (3): 460–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/DECH.12644.
43. Ottati, Victor C. 2001. “The Psychological Determinants of Political Judgement.” In Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intraindividual Processes, 615–35. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
44. Owen, David. 2007. Nietzsche’s Geneaology of Morality. Stocksfield: Acumen.
45. Payne, Christine. 1967. “The Death of Truth – Guilt, Anxiety, Dread, and Hope: Nietzschean Confessions.” In Nietzsche and Critical Social Theory: Affirmation, Animosity, and Ambiguity, edited by Christine A. Payne and Michael J. Roberts, 381–405. Leiden: Brill.
46. Reginster, Bernard. 1997. “Nietzsche on Ressentiment and Valuation.” Vol. 57. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2953719.
47. Rodax, Natalie, Markus Wrbouschek, Katharina Hametner, Sara Paloni, Nora Ruck, and Leonard Brixel. 2024. “Ressentiment As Morally Disclosive Posture? Conceptual Issues from a Psychological Point of View.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 15 (2): 423–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13164-021-00546-5/METRICS.
48. Sade Vatandaş. 2022a. “19 Yaşında Genç Hükümeti Yerden Yere Vurdu! Alkışlar Hava Uçuştu!” YouTube Video, 13:13. January 23, 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqCqeh7ulYU.
49. Sade Vatandaş. 2022b. “Çöpten Ceket Alan Adam Ekonomi Güzel Dedi! Duyan Sinir Krizi Geçirdi. 1.BÖLÜM” YouTube Video, 0:23. January 5, 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stLfQoPj47E.
50. Sade Vatandaş. 2024a. “Amca Erdoğan'ı Öyle Bir Anlattı ki Sanırsın Ülkeyi Biz Yönettik Ona Ayıp Ettik! Sokak Röportajları” YouTube Video, 1:50. October 2, 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkzPmrze7n8.
51. Sade Vatandaş. 2024b. “Bu Ak Partili Abiler Sizi Çıldırtacak” YouTube Video, 1:50. May 13, 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3aDwOu9A4o.
52. Sade Vatandaş. 2024c. “Muhabiri Delirten Sokak Röportajı” YouTube Video, 5:35. June 10, 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4qzAcYv4tA.
53. Salmela, Mikko, and Tereza Capelos. 2021. “Ressentiment: A Complex Emotion or an Emotional Mechanism of Psychic Defences?” Politics and Governance 9 (3): 191–203. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4251.
54. Scheler, Max. 1994. Ressentiment. Marquette University Press.
55. Selçuk, Orçun. 2016. “Strong Presidents and Weak Institutions: Populism in Turkey, Venezuela and Ecuador.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16 (4): 571–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2016.1242893.
56. Simmel, Georg. 2009. Sociology: Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms: Volume I. Boston: Brill.
57. Sözcü. 2023. Erdoğan: Ekonomideki sıkıntıların sebebi siyasi. https://www.sozcu.com.tr/erdogan-ekonomideki-sikintilar-siyasi-wp7780170. Accessed: 12.12.2024.
58. Strong, Tracy B. 1975. Friedrich Nietzsche and the Politics of Transfiguration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
59. Şenses, Fikret. 2022. “The Long and Bitter Fall: An Account of Events That Shook the Turkish Economy during September-December 2021 COMMENT.” New Perspectives on Turkey 66 (February):180–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/NPT.2022.5.
60. Tokdoğan, Nagehan. 2020. “Reading Politics through Emotions: Ontological Ressentiment as the Emotional Basis of Current Politics in Turkey.” Nations and Nationalism 26 (2): 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12546.
61. TRT Haber. 2024. Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: Biz bitti demeden hiçbir şey bitmez. https://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-biz-bitti-demeden-hicbir-sey-bitmez-851349.html. Accessed: 28.12.2024.
62. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Merkez Bankası. 2021. “Gösterge Niteliğindeki Merkez Bankası Kurları.” September 1, 2021. https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/kurlar/kurlar_tr.html.
63. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. 2022. “Tüketici Fiyat Endeksi, Aralık 2021.” January 3, 2022. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Tuketici-Fiyat-Endeksi-Aralik-2021-45789#:~:text=T%C3%9C%C4%B0K%20Kurumsal&text=T%C3%9CFE%27de%20(2003%3D100,%19%2C60%20art%C4%B1%C5%9F%20ger%C3%A7ekle%C5%9Fti.
64. Ure, Michael. 2015. “Resentment/ Ressentiment.” Constellations 22 (4): 599–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12098.
65. Yilmaz, Zafer. 2017. “The AKP and the Spirit of the ‘New’ Turkey: Imagined Victim, Reactionary Mood, and Resentful Sovereign.” Turkish Studies 18 (3): 482–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2017.1314763.
66. Yurdakul, Afşin. 2020. “The Impact of Polarization on Turkey’s Information Environment.” Centre for Economics and Foreign Policy Studies.