Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

1920 – 1960 YILLARI ARASINDA ABD’DE AİLE SOSYOLOJİSİ

Year 2019, , 215 - 253, 29.04.2019
https://doi.org/10.18490/sosars.559106

Abstract

1920’li yıllarda ABD’de ayrı bir alan olarak ortaya çıkan aile sosyolojisi
çalışmalarında farklı yaklaşımların benimsendiğini gözlemek mümkündür. Ancak
hızlanan sanayileşme ve modernleşme süreçleri bireye ontolojik öncelik
kazandırmıştır. Bu nedenle 1940’lı yıllara kadar bireyi toplumsala bağlı fakat
aynı zamanda kendi başına bir özne olarak ele alıyor oluşu nedeniyle sembolik
etkileşimci yaklaşım aile çalışmalarında öne çıkmıştır. 1945 sonrasında ise
ABD’nin küresel bir güç olarak dünya sahnesinde yerini alması hem toplumsal
gelişmelerin açıklanmasında hem de aile çalışmalarında teorik çerçeve oluşturma
ihtiyacını doğurmuştur. Yapısal işlevselci yaklaşım ve onun temsilcisi sayılan
Talcott Parsons’ın kuramı bu dönemde alanı belirleyici hale gelmiştir.



Bu çalışma ile amaçlanan 1920-1960 yılları arasında ABD’de aile
sosyolojisinde öne çıkan teorik yaklaşımları açıklamak ve bu yaklaşımların
benimsenmesinde toplumsal ihtiyaç, beklenti ve genel konjonktürün yanı sıra
sosyoloji disiplinindeki genel eğilimlerin ne yönde etkili olduğunu
göstermektir. Bu çerçevede 1960’lı
yıllara kadar ABD’de sosyoloji alanında hangi yaklaşımların öne çıktığı
üzerinde durulmaktadır. Aynı zamanda aile alanını belirleyen yaklaşımlar
çerçevesinde ortaya konan çalışma ve kavramlara değinilmektedir. 

References

  • Angell, R. C. (1936). The Family Encounters The Depression. Newyork: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  • Backhouse, R. E. & Fontaine, P. (2010). The Social Sciences and Their Histories. The History of Social Sciences since 1945 içinde. Newyork: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bell, D. (1960). The End of Ideology: The Exhaustion of Political Ideas in Fifties. Newyork: Free Press.
  • Boss, P.G., Doherty W.J, LaRossa R., Schumm W.R. & Steinmetz, S.K. (1993). Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods a Contextual Approach. Boston: Springer.
  • Bruce, S., & Yearley, S. (2006). Family. The Sage Dictionary of Sociology. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Burgess, E. W. (March 1926). The Family as a Unity of Interacting Personalities. The Family. Vol VII, No. 1, 3- 10.
  • Christensen, H.T. (1964). Development of the Family Field of Study, Handbook of Marriage and the Family, Chicago: McNally.
  • Cooley, C.H. (1922). The Social Self. The Meaning of I, Human Nature and the Social Order içinde. Newyork: Charles Scribner's Sons.
  • Cooley, W.C. (1956). Social Organization a Study of the Larger Mind. Newyork: Charles Scribner's Sons.
  • Coşkun, İ. (1989). Modernleşme Kuramı Üzerine. Sosyoloji Dergisi, 3(1), 289-304.
  • Cuff, E. C., Sharrock, W. W. & Francis, D. W. (2013). Sosyolojide Perspektifler. Ü. Tatlıcan (Çev.). İstanbul: Say Yayınları.
  • Darwin C.R. (1859). On The Origin Of Species By Means Of Natural Selection, Or The Preservation Of Favoured Races İn The Struggle For Life. London: John Murray.
  • Darwin C.R. (1871). The Descent Of Man, And Selection İn Relation To Sex. London: John Murray.
  • Dechaux, J. H. (2011). Sosyolojik Düşünce Sözlüğü. M. Borlandi, R. Boudon, M. Cherkaoui, & B. Valade (Ed.). İstanbul: İletişim.
  • Deseran, F. A. & Falk, W.W. (1982). Women as Generalized Other and Self Theory A Strategy for Emprical Research. Sex Roles, Vol.8, No.3, 283-297.
  • Durkheim, E. (1978). Conjugal Family. On Institutional Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 229-239; originally published in Revue Philosophique 90: 1 – 14.
  • Eisenstadt, S.N. (1985). Macro Societal Analysis Background, Development and Indications. S.N. Eisenstadt & H.J Helle (ed.). Macrosociological Theory I içinde. London: SAGE.
  • Erkilet, A. (2007). Toplumsal Yapı ve Değişme Kuramları. İstanbul: Hece.
  • Esgin, A. (2008). Anthony Giddens Sosyolojisi. Ankara: Anı.
  • Eslinger, K.E., Clarke, A.C. & Dynes R. R. (May, 1972). The Principle of Least Interest, Dating Behavior, and Family Integration Settings. Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 34, No. 2, 269-272.
  • Frazier, E.F. (1932). The Negro Family in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gecas, V. & Tsushima, T. Symbolic Interactionism. Marriage and Family Encyclopedia, (çevrimiçi) http//family.jrank.org/pages/1679/Symbolic-Interact, 29 Kasım 2013
  • Gillespie, A. (2005). G.H. Mead Theorist of the Social Act. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 19-39.
  • Holmwood, J. (2011). Sociology after Fordizm: Prospects and Problems. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(4), 537–556.
  • Kasapoğlu, A. (2012). Ünite 1 Sosyolojik Yaklaşımlar Temelinde Aile Kuramları. Aile Sosyolojisi. Eskişehir: T.C. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Açıköğretim Fakültesi Yayını.
  • Kasapoğlu, A. (2013). Sosyolojik Teorinin Özellikleri ve Tipleri, Don Martindale, Klasik Sosyoloji Kuramları Ders Notları. Ankara.
  • Kaya, T. (2011). Chicago Okulu: Chicago’ya Özgü Bir Perspektif. Sosyoloji Dergisi, 3(22), 367-383.
  • Klein, D.M. & White J.M. (1996) Family Theories: an Introduction. Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Kuper, A. (Jun 1985). Durkheim's Theory of Primitive Kinship. The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 36. No. 2, 224-237.
  • Lazarsfeld, P. F. & Rosenberg, M. (1955). The Language of Social Research: A Reader in The Methodology of The Social Sciences. New York: Free Press.
  • Lumpkin, K.D. (1933). The Family: A Study in Member Roles. University of North Carolina Press.
  • Macionis, J. (2012). Sosyoloji. V. Akan (Çev.) Ankara: Nobel.
  • Malinowski, B. & H. Ellis (1929). The Sexual Life of Savages in North-Western Melanesia: An Ethnographic Account of Courtship, Marriage, and Family Life Among the Natives of the Trobriand Islands, British New Guinea. London: George Routledge & Sons.
  • Millar, L.D., Brenda, B. & May, J.V. (2000). Sociology of the Family Investigating Family Issues. Baston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Mowrer, E.R. (1927). The Study of Family Disorganization: An Introduction to Sociological Analysis. Chicago: The University Of Chicago Press.
  • Örnek, C. (2013). Hegemonya Mücadelesi Bağlamında Filantropi ve Sosyal Bilimler: 1953 Yalova Konferansı Örneği. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 46(2), 141–166.
  • Parsons, T. (1943). The Kinship System of the Contemporary United States. American Anthropologist. New Series, 45(1), 22–38.
  • Parsons, T. (1954). The Incest Taboo in Relation to Social Structure and the Socialization of the Child. The British Journal of Sociology, 5(2), 101–117.
  • Parsons, T. (1955). The American Family. T. Parsons & R. F. Bales (Ed.). Family, Socialization and Interaction Process içinde. Illinois: The Free Press.
  • Parsons, T. (1965). The Normal American Family. P. M. Farber & R. Wilson (Ed.). Man and Civilization: The Family Search for Survival içinde. Newyork: McGraw Hill.
  • Radcliffe-Brown, A.R. (1952). Structure and Function in Primitive Society. London: Cohen& West.
  • Reynolds, L. T., Herman N.J. & Altamire K.R. (2003). Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
  • Rousseau, N. (2002). Charles Horton Cooley Concept of the Looking Glass Self. Self, Symbols & Society içinde, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Scanzoni, J. & Kingsbury, N. (2013) Structural Functionalism. Marriage and Family Encyclopedia, (çevrimiçi) http://family.jrank.org/pages/1645/Structural-Functional-Theory.html
  • Shaffer, L.S. (Jan 2005). From Mirror Self-Recognition to the Looking-Glass Self Exploring the Justification Hypothesis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47-65.
  • Sklair, L. (Mar 1970). The Fate of the 'Functional Requisites' in Parsonian Sociology. The British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 21, No. 1. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Steinmetz, G. (2005). Scientific Authority and The Transition to Post-Fordism the Plausibility of Positivism in U.S. Sociology since 1945. Steinmetz, G. (ed.). The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences Positivism and its Epistemological Others. Durham: NC Duke University Press.
  • Steinmetz, G. (2007). American Sociology Before and After World War Two The (Temporary) Settling of a Disciplinary Field. Craig Calhoun (Ed.). Sociology in America. The ASA Centennial History, 314-366.
  • Swingewood, A. (1998). Sosyolojik Düşüncenin Kısa Tarihi. Osman Akınhay (Çev.). Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları.
  • Şavran, T. G. (2013). Unite 1 İşlevselcilik-I Talcott Parsons, Modern Sosyoloji Tarihi. Eskişehir: T.C. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını, No: 2304. T.C. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı. (2011). Türkiye’de Aile Yapısı Araştırması. Ankara
  • Thomas, W.I. & Znaniecki, F. (1918-1920). The Polist Peasant in Europe and America. 5 Vols. Boston: Richard G. Badger. (Vol 1 ve Vol 2 Chicago University of Press tarafından basılmıştır.)
  • Waller, W. & Hill, R. (1951). The Family: A Dynamic İnterpretation. Ft Worth, TX, US: Dryden Press.
  • Wallace, R. A. & Wolf, A. (2004). Çağdaş Sosyoloji Kuramları: Klasik Geleneğin Genişletilmesi. Leyla Elburuz & Rami Ayas (Çev.). İstanbul: Doğu Batı Yayınları.
  • Wells, W.D. (1955) The Language of Social Research Edited by Paul F. Lazarsfeld and Morris Rosenberg. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 5:3, 323.
Year 2019, , 215 - 253, 29.04.2019
https://doi.org/10.18490/sosars.559106

Abstract

References

  • Angell, R. C. (1936). The Family Encounters The Depression. Newyork: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  • Backhouse, R. E. & Fontaine, P. (2010). The Social Sciences and Their Histories. The History of Social Sciences since 1945 içinde. Newyork: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bell, D. (1960). The End of Ideology: The Exhaustion of Political Ideas in Fifties. Newyork: Free Press.
  • Boss, P.G., Doherty W.J, LaRossa R., Schumm W.R. & Steinmetz, S.K. (1993). Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods a Contextual Approach. Boston: Springer.
  • Bruce, S., & Yearley, S. (2006). Family. The Sage Dictionary of Sociology. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Burgess, E. W. (March 1926). The Family as a Unity of Interacting Personalities. The Family. Vol VII, No. 1, 3- 10.
  • Christensen, H.T. (1964). Development of the Family Field of Study, Handbook of Marriage and the Family, Chicago: McNally.
  • Cooley, C.H. (1922). The Social Self. The Meaning of I, Human Nature and the Social Order içinde. Newyork: Charles Scribner's Sons.
  • Cooley, W.C. (1956). Social Organization a Study of the Larger Mind. Newyork: Charles Scribner's Sons.
  • Coşkun, İ. (1989). Modernleşme Kuramı Üzerine. Sosyoloji Dergisi, 3(1), 289-304.
  • Cuff, E. C., Sharrock, W. W. & Francis, D. W. (2013). Sosyolojide Perspektifler. Ü. Tatlıcan (Çev.). İstanbul: Say Yayınları.
  • Darwin C.R. (1859). On The Origin Of Species By Means Of Natural Selection, Or The Preservation Of Favoured Races İn The Struggle For Life. London: John Murray.
  • Darwin C.R. (1871). The Descent Of Man, And Selection İn Relation To Sex. London: John Murray.
  • Dechaux, J. H. (2011). Sosyolojik Düşünce Sözlüğü. M. Borlandi, R. Boudon, M. Cherkaoui, & B. Valade (Ed.). İstanbul: İletişim.
  • Deseran, F. A. & Falk, W.W. (1982). Women as Generalized Other and Self Theory A Strategy for Emprical Research. Sex Roles, Vol.8, No.3, 283-297.
  • Durkheim, E. (1978). Conjugal Family. On Institutional Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 229-239; originally published in Revue Philosophique 90: 1 – 14.
  • Eisenstadt, S.N. (1985). Macro Societal Analysis Background, Development and Indications. S.N. Eisenstadt & H.J Helle (ed.). Macrosociological Theory I içinde. London: SAGE.
  • Erkilet, A. (2007). Toplumsal Yapı ve Değişme Kuramları. İstanbul: Hece.
  • Esgin, A. (2008). Anthony Giddens Sosyolojisi. Ankara: Anı.
  • Eslinger, K.E., Clarke, A.C. & Dynes R. R. (May, 1972). The Principle of Least Interest, Dating Behavior, and Family Integration Settings. Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 34, No. 2, 269-272.
  • Frazier, E.F. (1932). The Negro Family in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gecas, V. & Tsushima, T. Symbolic Interactionism. Marriage and Family Encyclopedia, (çevrimiçi) http//family.jrank.org/pages/1679/Symbolic-Interact, 29 Kasım 2013
  • Gillespie, A. (2005). G.H. Mead Theorist of the Social Act. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 19-39.
  • Holmwood, J. (2011). Sociology after Fordizm: Prospects and Problems. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(4), 537–556.
  • Kasapoğlu, A. (2012). Ünite 1 Sosyolojik Yaklaşımlar Temelinde Aile Kuramları. Aile Sosyolojisi. Eskişehir: T.C. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Açıköğretim Fakültesi Yayını.
  • Kasapoğlu, A. (2013). Sosyolojik Teorinin Özellikleri ve Tipleri, Don Martindale, Klasik Sosyoloji Kuramları Ders Notları. Ankara.
  • Kaya, T. (2011). Chicago Okulu: Chicago’ya Özgü Bir Perspektif. Sosyoloji Dergisi, 3(22), 367-383.
  • Klein, D.M. & White J.M. (1996) Family Theories: an Introduction. Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Kuper, A. (Jun 1985). Durkheim's Theory of Primitive Kinship. The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 36. No. 2, 224-237.
  • Lazarsfeld, P. F. & Rosenberg, M. (1955). The Language of Social Research: A Reader in The Methodology of The Social Sciences. New York: Free Press.
  • Lumpkin, K.D. (1933). The Family: A Study in Member Roles. University of North Carolina Press.
  • Macionis, J. (2012). Sosyoloji. V. Akan (Çev.) Ankara: Nobel.
  • Malinowski, B. & H. Ellis (1929). The Sexual Life of Savages in North-Western Melanesia: An Ethnographic Account of Courtship, Marriage, and Family Life Among the Natives of the Trobriand Islands, British New Guinea. London: George Routledge & Sons.
  • Millar, L.D., Brenda, B. & May, J.V. (2000). Sociology of the Family Investigating Family Issues. Baston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Mowrer, E.R. (1927). The Study of Family Disorganization: An Introduction to Sociological Analysis. Chicago: The University Of Chicago Press.
  • Örnek, C. (2013). Hegemonya Mücadelesi Bağlamında Filantropi ve Sosyal Bilimler: 1953 Yalova Konferansı Örneği. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 46(2), 141–166.
  • Parsons, T. (1943). The Kinship System of the Contemporary United States. American Anthropologist. New Series, 45(1), 22–38.
  • Parsons, T. (1954). The Incest Taboo in Relation to Social Structure and the Socialization of the Child. The British Journal of Sociology, 5(2), 101–117.
  • Parsons, T. (1955). The American Family. T. Parsons & R. F. Bales (Ed.). Family, Socialization and Interaction Process içinde. Illinois: The Free Press.
  • Parsons, T. (1965). The Normal American Family. P. M. Farber & R. Wilson (Ed.). Man and Civilization: The Family Search for Survival içinde. Newyork: McGraw Hill.
  • Radcliffe-Brown, A.R. (1952). Structure and Function in Primitive Society. London: Cohen& West.
  • Reynolds, L. T., Herman N.J. & Altamire K.R. (2003). Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
  • Rousseau, N. (2002). Charles Horton Cooley Concept of the Looking Glass Self. Self, Symbols & Society içinde, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Scanzoni, J. & Kingsbury, N. (2013) Structural Functionalism. Marriage and Family Encyclopedia, (çevrimiçi) http://family.jrank.org/pages/1645/Structural-Functional-Theory.html
  • Shaffer, L.S. (Jan 2005). From Mirror Self-Recognition to the Looking-Glass Self Exploring the Justification Hypothesis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47-65.
  • Sklair, L. (Mar 1970). The Fate of the 'Functional Requisites' in Parsonian Sociology. The British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 21, No. 1. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Steinmetz, G. (2005). Scientific Authority and The Transition to Post-Fordism the Plausibility of Positivism in U.S. Sociology since 1945. Steinmetz, G. (ed.). The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences Positivism and its Epistemological Others. Durham: NC Duke University Press.
  • Steinmetz, G. (2007). American Sociology Before and After World War Two The (Temporary) Settling of a Disciplinary Field. Craig Calhoun (Ed.). Sociology in America. The ASA Centennial History, 314-366.
  • Swingewood, A. (1998). Sosyolojik Düşüncenin Kısa Tarihi. Osman Akınhay (Çev.). Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları.
  • Şavran, T. G. (2013). Unite 1 İşlevselcilik-I Talcott Parsons, Modern Sosyoloji Tarihi. Eskişehir: T.C. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını, No: 2304. T.C. Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı. (2011). Türkiye’de Aile Yapısı Araştırması. Ankara
  • Thomas, W.I. & Znaniecki, F. (1918-1920). The Polist Peasant in Europe and America. 5 Vols. Boston: Richard G. Badger. (Vol 1 ve Vol 2 Chicago University of Press tarafından basılmıştır.)
  • Waller, W. & Hill, R. (1951). The Family: A Dynamic İnterpretation. Ft Worth, TX, US: Dryden Press.
  • Wallace, R. A. & Wolf, A. (2004). Çağdaş Sosyoloji Kuramları: Klasik Geleneğin Genişletilmesi. Leyla Elburuz & Rami Ayas (Çev.). İstanbul: Doğu Batı Yayınları.
  • Wells, W.D. (1955) The Language of Social Research Edited by Paul F. Lazarsfeld and Morris Rosenberg. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 5:3, 323.
There are 54 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Zehra Zeynep Sadıkoğlu 0000-0003-0251-6652

Publication Date April 29, 2019
Submission Date July 23, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

APA Sadıkoğlu, Z. Z. (2019). 1920 – 1960 YILLARI ARASINDA ABD’DE AİLE SOSYOLOJİSİ. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 22(1), 215-253. https://doi.org/10.18490/sosars.559106

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi / Journal of Sociological Research

SAD / JSR