Tax Administration Efficiency in 35 OECD Countries: DEA Method

Year 2024, , 475 - 499, 31.01.2024

Sevilay Ece Gümüş Özuyar , Ayça Özekin

https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2024.01.21

Abstract

The efficiency of the tax administration should be evaluated for both tax costs and tax revenue. Modest tax cost, on the other hand, reduces tax losses by raising the taxpayer’s voluntary compliance and increasing the public revenue. Moreover, fast and accurate taxation minimises the risk of the Tanzi effect as it shortens the taxation process. This research aims to detect the tax administration efficiency of 35 selected OECD countries in 2019 via DEA. The year is chosen to avoid the imbalances created by Covid-19. Efficiency scores are acquired under fixed and varying effects to the scale assumptions via two separate models, providing information on scale and technical activities.

Keywords

Tax Administration, Effectiveness, Data Envelopment Analysis, OECD Countries

35 OECD Ülkesinde Vergi İdaresinin Etkinliği: VZA Yöntemi

Abstract

Vergi idarelerinin etkinliği gerek vergi maliyetleri gerekse vergi gelirleri bakımından analiz edilmelidir. Vergi maliyeti düşüklüğü mükellefin gönüllü uyumunu artırmak suretiyle vergi kayıplarını azaltır ve toplam kamu geliri miktarını artırır. Üstelik hızlı ve doğru vergilendirme, vergileme sürecini kısalttığından Tanzi etkisinin ortaya çıkma riskini de azaltır. Bu bilgiler dahilinde bu çalışmanın amacı, Veri Zarflama Analizi yöntemiyle 2019 yılı için seçilmiş 35 OECD ülkelerindeki vergi idarelerinin etkinliğinin saptanmasıdır. Bu yıl, Covid-19’un yarattığı dengesizliklerden korunmak adına seçilmiştir. Etkinlik skorları, ölçeğe sabit ve değişen etkiler varsayımları altında farklı modeller kurularak elde edilmiştir ve incelenen ülkeler için ölçek ve teknik etkinlikler saptanmıştır.

Keywords

Vergi İdaresi, Etkinlik, Veri Zarflama Analizi, OECD

References

• Aladağ, Z. vd. (2018), “Akademik Birimlerin Veri Zarflama Analizi ve Promethee Yöntemleri ile Performans Değerlendirmesi: Kocaeli Üniversitesi Örneği”, Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 34(1), 1-13.
• Alm, J. & D. Duncan (2014), “Estimating tax agency efficiency”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 34(3), 92-110.
• Ayçin, E. (2019), Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Bilgisayar Uygulamalı Çözümler, (1. Basım), Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
• Aziz, S.A. & A.R.S Al-Harethi (2018), “Factors Determining Tax Administration Efficiency in Hadhramout, Yemen: Perception from Individual Taxpayers”, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Accounting Studies (ICAS 2018) 16-17 October 2018, Penang, Malaysia.
• Banker, R.D. et al. (1984), “Some Models For Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
• Banker, R.D. et al. (1989), “An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis with Some of Its Models and Their Uses”, Res. Gov. Non-Profit Account, 5, 125-163.
• Barros, C.P. (2005), “Performance measurement in tax offices with a stochastic frontier model”, Journal of Economic Studies, 32(6), 497-510.
• Bogetoft, P. & L. Otto (2011), Benchmarking with DEA, SFA and R, New York: Springer.
• Boussofiane, A. et al. (1991), “Applied Data Envelopment Analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research, 52(1), 1-15.
• Charnes, A. et al. (1978), “Measuring The Efficiency of Decision-Making Units”, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
• Cooper, W.W. et al. (2000), Data Envelopment Analysis A Comprehensive Text With Models, USA: Springer.
• Cooper, W.W. et al. (2011), “Data Envelopment Analysis: History, Models, and Interpretations”, in: Handbook On Data Envelopment Analysis (1-39), Springer, Boston, MA.
• Crandall, W. & M. Kidd (2010), Revenue Administration: A Toolkit for Implementing a Revenue Authority. Technical Notes and Manuals, 10/08, IMF Fiscal Affairs Department.
• Çağlar, A. (2003), “Veri Zarflama Analizi ile Belediyelerin Etkinlik Ölçümü”, Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
• Çaşkurlu, E. & C.B. Arslan (2021), Kamu Maliyesine Giriş, 4. Baskı, Gazi Kitabevi: Ankara.
• Dalton, H. (1954), Principles of Public Finance, Routledge: London.
• Due, J.F. (1963), Maliye: Bir İktisadi Analiz, (Çev. S. Görgün & İ. Önder), İstanbul.
• Dyson, R.G. et al. (2001), “Pitfalls and Protocols in DEA”, European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 245-259.
• Eliaçık, R.İ. (2010), Adalet Devleti: Ortak İyinin İktidarı, İkinci Baskı, İnşa Yayınları: İstanbul.
• Emrouznejad, A. & G.R. Amin (2009), “DEA Models for Ratio Data: Convexity Consideration”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33(1), 486-498.
• Erdem, M.B. (1978), Vergi Yönetimi ve Örgütlenmesi, Eskişehir İktisadi ve Ticari İlimler Akademisi Tez 233/154, Eskişehir.
• Erdem, M.B. (1981), Vergi Yönetimi ve Örgütlenmesi, Eskişehir: Eskişehir İktisadi ve Ticari İlimler Akademisi Yayıncılık.
• Farrell, M.J. (1957), “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency”, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 120, 253-281.
• Forsund, F.R. et al. (2015), “Productivity of tax offices in Norway”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 43(3), 269-279.
• Golany, B.A. & Y. Roll (1989), “An Application Procedure for Data Envelopment Analysis”, Omega, 17(3), 237-250.
• González, P.E.B. & E.V. Rubio (2013), “The Efficiency of The Regional Management Centres of The Tax Administration in Spain”, Journal of US-China Public Administration, 10(1), 49-56.
• Güler, H. & H. Kaba (2018), “The Efficiency of Tax Administration in Turkey”, in: A. Gorecka et al. (eds.), Economic Issues in Retrospect and Prospect II (301-315), IJOPEC Publication: London.
• IMF, OECD, UN, WBG (2016), Enhancing the Effectiveness of External Support in Building Tax Capacity in Developing Countries, <https://www.oecd.org/tax/enhancing-the-effectiveness-of-external-support-in-building-tax-capacity-in-developing-countries.pdf>, 25.05.2023.
• ISORA (2022), International Survey on Revenue Administration, <https://data.rafit.org/?sk=5a3bd47d-bec2-41a9-8f37-e5dbb98e3dcf&sId=1637191076670>, 25.04.2022.
• ISSAI The International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (2009), Fundamental Principles of Performance Auditing, INTOSAI General Secretariat: Vienna.
• Katharaki, M. & M. Tsakas (2010), “Assessing the efficiency and managing the performance of Greek tax offices”, Journal of Advances in Management Research, 7(1), 58-75.
• Kaynar, O. vd. (2005), “Veri Zarflama Analizi ile OECD Ülkelerinin Telekomünikasyon Sektörlerinin Etkinliğinin Ölçülmesi”, ÇÜ İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1), 37-57.
• Khezrimotlagh, D. (2015), “How to Deal With Numbers of Decision Making Units And Variables in Data Envelopment Analysis”, 13th International Conference On Data Envelopment Analysis.
• Khezrimotlagh, D. et al. (2013), “Nonlinear Arash Model in DEA”, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5(17), 4268-4273.
• Kirchler, E. (2010), The Economic Psychology of Tax Behavior, Illustrated Edition, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
• Koopmans, T.C. (1951), “An Analysis of Production as an Efficient Combination of Activities”, in: T.C. Koopmans (ed.), Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Cowles Commission for Research in Economics (33-97), Monograph No. 13, Wiley.
• Kumar, S. & R. Gulati (2008), “An Examination of Technical, Pure Technical and Scale Efficiencies in India Public Sector Banks Using Data Envelopment Analysis”, Euroasian Journal of Business And Economics, 1(2), 33-69.
• Lewis, B.D. (2006), “Local government taxation: An analysis of administrative cost inefficiency”, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 42, 213-33.
• Mackenzie, O.K. (2021), “Efficiency of Tax Revenue Administration in Africa”, Stellenbosch University Economic Working Papers, WP02/2021.
• Mandl, U. et al. (2008), The effectiveness and efficiency of public spending, European Economy-Economic Papers Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
• Messere, K. & J.P. Owens (1985), “International Comparisons of Tax Levels: Pitfalls and Insights”, 41st Conference of the International Institute of Public Finance (93-119), Madrid.
• Moesen, W. & A. Persoon (2002), “Measuring and Explaining the Productive Efficiency of Tax Offices: A Non-parametric Best Practice Frontier Approach”, Tijdschrift Voor Economie En Management, 47(3), 399-416.
• OECD (2014), Tax Administration in OECD Countries: Comparative Information Series (2004), Centre for Tax Policy and Administration, <https://www.oecd.org/tax/forum-on-tax-administration/publications-and-products/comparative/CIS-2004.pdf>, 25.05.2023.
• Pastor, J.T. et al. (2022), Benchmarking Economic Efficiency, Switzerland: Springer.
• Pedraja-Chaparro, F. et al. (1999), “On The Quality of The Data Envelopment Analysis Model”, The Journal of Operational Research Society, 50(6), 636-644.
• Ren, J. et al. (2019), “Performance Evaluation of Pallet Rental Companies: Non-Oriented Super-Efficiency Integer-Valued DEA Model”, IEEE Xplore, 7, 151628-151637.
• Robinson, L. & J. Slemrod (2011), “Understanding Multidimensional Tax Sysytems”, International Tax and Public Finance, 19(2), 237-267.
• Roghanian, P. et al. (2012), “Productivity Through Effectiveness and Efficiency in the Banking Industry”, The 2012 International Conference on Asia Pacific Business Innovation and Technology Management Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 550-556.
• Ruy, S. & S. Lee (2013), “An exploratory study of efficiency in tax jurisdictions”, Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 34, 46-49.
• Seligman, E.R.A. (1925), Essays in Taxation, 10th edition, The Macmillan Co.: New York.
• Smith, A. (1776 [2005]), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Welfare of Nations, The Electronic Classics Series: The Pennsylvania State University.
• Şenyüz, D. (1995), Vergilendirmede Yükümlü Psikolojisi, Bursa.
• Tanzi, V. & H. Zee (2001), Tax Policy for Developing Countries, IMF Economic Issues, Washington D.C.
• Tepe, M. (2006), “Kıyaslama Çalışmasında Veri Zarflama Analizi Kullanımı”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Thanassoulis, E. et al. (1987), “Relative Efficiency Assessments Using Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application to Data on Rates Departments”, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 38(5), 397-411.
• Thirtle, C. et al. (2000), “Size Does Matter: Technical and Scale Efficiency in Indian State Tax Jurisdictions”, Review of Development Economics, 4, 340-352.
• Tiley, J. (1978) Revenue Law, Butterworths: London.
• Tosun, U. & M.C. Güran (2002), “Vergi İdarelerinde Etkinlik Arayışları: Vergi Dairelerinde Etkinlik Ölçümüne Yönelik Bir Deneme”, HÜ İİBF Dergisi, 20(2), 187-215.
• Ubaidillah, M. & N. Amah (2020), “The Role of Administrative Modernization in Shaping Tax Moral to Increase Taxpayer Compliance: Case Study in Madiun, Indonesia”, Semestre Económico, 23(55), 221-238.
• Villar-Rubio, E. et al. (2016), “Relative Efficiency within a tax administration: The effects of result improvement”, Revista Finanzas y Politica Economica, 9(1), 135-149.
• Zhou, P. et al. (2010), “Weighting and Aggregation in Composite Indicator Construction: A Multiplicative Optimization Approach”, Social Indicators Research, 96, 169-181.