İşgücü Piyasasında Yaşanan Dönüşümler: Standart Dışı İstihdam ve Çalışan Yoksulluğu İlişkisi

Year 2024, , 413 - 453, 28.10.2024

Mustafa Aykaç , Sefa Kaya

https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2024.04.20

Abstract

1970’lerde Fordist üretim sisteminin çöküşü ve akabinde uygulamaya konulan Neoliberal ekonomi politikalarıyla, hem piyasaların serbestleştirilmesi teşvik edilmiş ve hem de devletin piyasalar üzerindeki müdahale gücü ve rolü ideolojik olarak dönüştürülmüştür. Neoliberal politikaların yükselişi ise esnekleştirme ve kuralsızlaştırma şeklinde işgücü piyasasındaki şartları dönüştürmüş ve Standart Dışı İstihdam (SDİ) yaygın bir istihdam biçimi olarak ön plana çıkmıştır. Bu durum literatürde SDİ ve kayıt dışı istihdamın yaygınlaşması, işgücü piyasası bölümlenmesi, içeridekiler-dışardakiler ve ikili işgücü piyasası yaklaşımları ile açıklanmakta ve çalışan yoksul kavramı ile ilişkilendirilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, SDİ ile çalışan yoksulluğu arasındaki ilişkiyi makro ve mikro düzeyde eklektik yaklaşımla analiz etmektir. Bu makalede, SDİ ile çalışan yoksulluğu arasındaki ilişkinin gerçekliğini tasvir etmek için karşılaştırmalı bir yaklaşım benimsenmiş ve içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu makalede çalışan yoksulluğunun, işgücü piyasalarının kutuplaşması ve düşük kaliteli işlerin yaygınlaşması ile ilgili endişeleri artırdığı ve SDİ edilenlerin görece daha yüksek yoksulluk riskine maruz kaldığını ileri sürmektedir. SDİ ile ilgili insan onuruna yaraşır işlerin yetersizliğinin tespit edilmesi ve gerekli düzenlemelerin yapılması önerilmektedir.

Keywords

İşgücü Piyasası, Esnekleşme, Neoliberalizm, Çalışan Yoksulluğu, Standart Dışı İstihdam

Labour Market Dynamics: Examining the Link between Non-Standard Employment and In-Work Poverty

Abstract

With the collapse of the Fordist production system in the 1970s and the subsequent Neoliberal economic policies implemented, the liberalisation of markets was encouraged, and the intervention power and role of the state on the markets were ideologically transformed. The rise of neoliberal policies, in the form of flexibilisation and deregulation, transformed the conditions of the labour markets and resulted in the expansion of non-standard employment (NSE). The literature explains this situation by the spread of NSE and informal employment, labour market segmentation, insiders-outsiders, and dual labour market approaches. It is associated with the concept of the working poor. This study uses an eclectic approach to analyse the connection between NSE and in-work poverty at macro and micro levels. This paper adopts a comparative approach and uses the content analysis method to depict the reality of the relationship between NSE and working poverty. This article argues that concern over in-work poverty, the polarisation of labour markets, and the expansion of low-quality jobs has recently increased, and those employed in non-standard jobs are more likely to be exposed to the risk of poverty. It is recommended that the inadequacy of decent work related to NSE be identified and the necessary arrangements made. Further research and policy changes are needed to thoroughly understand and address these issues.

Keywords

Labour Market, Flexibilization, Neoliberalism, In-Work Poverty, Non-Standard Employment

References

• Açıkalın, N. (2007), “Enformel Sektör ve Yoksulluk: Kentsel İşgücü Pazarı Üzerine Etkileri, İstanbul ve Gaziantep Örnekleri”, Sosyoekonomi, 6(6), 43-62.
• Aggarwal, A. & N. Kumar, (2012), Structural Change, Industrialization and Poverty Reduction: The Case of India, UN ESCAP, South and South West Asia Office, New Delhi-110016, India.
• Airio, I. (2008), Change of Norm? In-Work Poverty in a Comparative Perspective, Studies in social security and health 92, Kela Research Department, Finland: Helsinki.
• Amuedo-Dorantes, C. & R. Serrano-Padial (2010), “Labor market flexibility and poverty Dynamics”, Labour Economics, 17(4), 632-642.
• Anderson, A.S. & F. Nielsen (2002), “Globalization and the Great U-Turn: Income Inequality Trends in 16 OECD Countries”, American Journal of Sociology, 107(5), 1244-1299.
• Anderson, C.J. & J. Pontusson (2007), “Workers, worries and welfare states: Social protection and job insecurity in 15 OECD countries”, European Journal of Political Research, 46(2), 211-235.
• Andreß, H.-J. & H. Lohmann (2008), The Working Poor in Europe: Employment, Poverty and Globalisation, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Arestis, P. et al. (2020), “Employment Protection Legislation and Labour Income Shares in Europe”, Panoeconomicus, 67(3 Special Issue), 291-308.
• Arısoy, B. & Z. Parlak (2022), “Standart Dışı Çalışma ve Diğer Çalışma Şekilleri”, Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 5(5), 657-669.
• Arnold, D. & J.R. Bongiovi (2013), “Precarious, Indormalizing, and Flexible Work: Transforming Concepts and Understandings”, American Behavioral Scientist, 57(3), 289-308.
• Aykaç, M. & G. Murat (2023), “Dijitalleşme ve Emek Piyasaları”, içinde:G. Murat & S. Dursun (eds.), Endüstri 4.0 ve Çalışma Hayatında Yeni Eğilimler (43-85), İstanbul: Efeakademi Yayınları.
• Aykaç, M. (1996), “Esneklik ve Çalışma Hayatı”, İ.Ü. İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, (Sabahaddin Zaim’e Armağan), İstanbul.
• Aykaç, M. (2021a), “Sosyal İçerme: Nezih Bir Toplum Yolunda Kapılar Açmak”, içinde: E. Yüksel-Oktay & Y. Çölgeçen (eds.), Sosyal İçerme ve Dezavantajlı Gruplar (1-16), İstanbul: Filiz Kitabevi.
• Aykaç, M. (2021b), “Küresel Salgın ve Sosyo-ekonomik Etkileri”, içinde: N. Demircan-Çakar vd. (eds.), COVID 19 Sürecinde Sosyoekonomik ve Politik Etkileri (281-307), Kocaeli: Umuttepe Yayınları.
• Bakır, H. (2018), “Neo-liberalizmin Hegemonyası Altında Türkiye Emek Piyasası”, Çalışma ve Toplum, 3(58), 1459-1480.
• Barbieri, P. & S. Scherer (2009), “Labour Market Flexibilization and Its Consequences in Italy”, European Sociological Review, 25(6), 677-692.
• Bazillier, R. et al. (2014), Employment Vulnerability in Europe: Is There A Migration Effect?, <https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01203755/document>, 17.06.2023.
• Bercusson, B. (2009), European Labour Law, Cambridge, Cambridge: University Press.
• Blau, F.D. & L.M. Kahn (2002), At Home and Abroad: U.S. Labor Market Performance in International Perspective, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
• Blossfeld, H.-P. et al. (2011), Globalized labour markets and social inequality in Europe, Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• BLS (2014), “A Profile of the Working Poor”, 2012 BLS Reports, March.
• Bodea, G. & E. Herman (2014), “Factors behind working poverty in Romania”, Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 711-720.
• Bosch, G. (2006), “Working Time and the Standard Employment Relationship”, in: J.-Y. Boulin et al. (eds.), Decent Working Time: New Trends, New Issues (41-64), Geneva: International Labour Organisation.
• Boulin, J.-Y. et al. (2006), “Decent Working Time In Industrialized Countries: Issues, Scopes and Paradozes”, in: J.-Y. Boulin et al. (eds.), Decent Working Time: New Trends, New Issues (13-40), Geneva: International Labour Organisation.
• Brülle, J. et al. (2019), “Changing labour market risks in the service economy: Low wages, part-time employment and the trend in working poverty risks in Germany”, Journal of European Social Policy, 29(1), 115-129.
• Bulut, A. (2023), “Informal Economy and Financial Development: The Role of Institutions”, Sosyoekonomi, 31(55), 195-209.
• Çakır, Ö. (2009), “Avrupa Birliği’nde Güvenceli Esneklik ve Eğilimler”, Sosyoekonomi, 10(10), 77-94.
• Canelas, C. (2015), “Poverty and informality in Ecuador”, UNU-WIDER, WIDER Working Paper 2015/112, Finland: Helsinki.
• Canelas, C. (2019), “Informality and poverty in Ecuador”, Small Bus Econ, 53, 1097-1115.
• Cantillon, B. (2011), “The paradox of the social investment state; growth, employment and poverty in the Lisbon Agenda’”, Journal of European Social Policy, 21(5), 432-449.
• Crettaz, E. & G. Bonoli (2011), “Worlds of Working Poverty: National Variations in Mechanisms”, in: N. Fraser et al. (eds.), Working Poverty in Europe A Comparative Approach (46-69), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Crettaz, E. (2011), Fighting Working Poverty in Postindustrial Economies: Causes, Trade-Offs and Policy Solutions, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Crettaz, E. (2011a), “Working Poverty among Immigrants and ‘Ethnic Minorities’: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evidence across Welfare Regimes”, MAPS Working Papers Series 3/2011, University of Neuchatel.
• Crettaz, E. (2013), “A state-of-the-art review of working poverty in advanced economies: theoretical models, measurement issues and risk groups”, Journal of European Social Policy, 23(4), 347-362.
• Crettaz, E. (2015), “Poverty and material deprivation among European workers in times of crisis”, International Journal of Social Welfare, 24, 312-323.
• Daldal, Ş. (2010), Kuralsız Kapitalizm Batağında Emek, 1.Baskı, İstanbul: Alan Yayıncılık.
• DiPrete, T.A. et al. (2003), “Work and pay in flexible and regulated labor markets: A generalized perspective on institutional evolution and inequality trends in Europe and the US”, WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP I 2003-109, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin.
• Eichhorst, W. et al. (2010), “The Impact of the Crisis on Employment and the Role of Labour Market Institutions”, IZA Discussion Paper 5320, Institute for the Study of Labor.
• Eißel, D. et al. (2014), Welfare State at Risk Rising Inequality in Europe, Springer International Publishing.
• Emmenegger, P. et al. (2012), The age of dualization: the changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Eurofound (2017), In-Work Poverty In The EU, Publications Office of The European Union, Luxembourg.
• Eurostat (N/A), EU-Istatistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) Instrument, <https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do>, 20.05.2023.
• Eurostat (N/A), Involuntary Temporary Employment, <https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/>, 31.10.2023.
• Eurostat (N/A), In-work at-risk-of-poverty rate by full-/part-time work - EU-SILC Survey, <https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do>, 30.06.2023.
• Eurostat (N/A), In-work at-risk-of-poverty rate by type of contract, <https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do>, 30.06.2023.
• Eurostat (N/A), Part-time employment as percentage of the total employment, by sex and age (%), <https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do>, 30.06.2023.
• Eurostat (N/A), Part-time Employment, <https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/lfs/overview>, 31.10.2023.
• Eurostat (N/A), Part-time Employment, Involuntary, <https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/lfs/database>, 30.12.2023.
• Eurostat (N/A), Temporary employees as percentage of the total number of employees, by sex, age and citizenship (%), <https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do>, 30.06.2023.
• Eurostat (N/A), Temporary Employment, <https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/lfs/database>, 31.10.2023.
• Evans, B.M. & S. Mcbride (2017), “The Austerity State: An Introduction”, in: S. McBride & B.M. Evans (eds.), The Austerity State (3-21), University of Toronto Press.
• Ferreiro, J. & C. Gomez (2018), “Employment Protection and Labor Market Performance in Europe Union Countries during The Great Recession”, FMM Working Paper, No. 31, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Macroeconomic Policy Institute (IMK), Forum for Macroeconomics and Macroeconomic Policies (FFM), Düsseldorf.
• Fraser, N. et al. (ed.) (2011), Working Poverty in Europe A Comparative Approach, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Gasparini, L. & L. Tornarolli (2009), “Labor informality in Latin America and the Caribbean: patterns and trends from household survey microdata”, Desarrollo y Sociedad, 63, 13-80.
• Goerne, A. (2011), “A Comparative Analysis of In-Work Poverty in the European Union 15”, in: N. Fraser et al. (eds.), Working Poverty in Europe. A Comparative Approach (15-45), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Gregory, M. et al. (2001), “Jobs for the skilled: how technology, trade, and domestic demand changed the structure of UK employment, 1979-90”, Oxford Economic Papers, 53, 20-46.
• Güllü, G. (2021), Seçilmiş OECD Ülkelerinde Karşılaştırmalı Emek Piyasaları Analizi, 1. Baskı, Ankara: Savaş Yayınevi.
• Gümüş, İ. (2020), “Esping-Andersen ve Refah Rejimi Tartışmaları: Teorik Bir Değerlendirme”, Ekonomi Maliye İşletme Dergisi, 3(1), 101-117.
• Gündoğan, N. (2007), Yoksulluğun Değişen Yüzü Çalışan Yoksullar, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları, NO.1727.
• Günther, I. & A. Launov (2012), “Informal Employment in Developing Countries: Opportunity or Last Resort?”, Journal of Development Economics, 97(1), 88-98.
• Hacker, J.S. et al. (2013), “The Insecure American: Economic Experiences, Financial Worries, and Policy Attitudes”, Perspectives on Politics, 11(01), 23-49.
• Halleröd, B. & D. Larsson (2008), “In-Work Poverty in a Transitional Labour Market: Sweden, 1988-2003”, in: H.-J. Andreß & H. Lohmann (eds.), The Working Poor in Europe: Employment, Poverty and Globalization (155-178), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Halleröd, B. et al. (2015), “In-work poverty and labour market trajectories: Poverty risks among the working population in 22 European countries”, Journal of European Social Policy, 25(5), 473-488.
• Harati, R. (2013), “Heterogeneity in the Egyptian Informal Labour Market: Choice or Obligation?”, Revue d’´economie politique, 123(4), 623-639.
• Harvey, D. (2005), A Brief History of Neoliberalism, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Hemerijck, A. & W. Eichorst (2009), “Whatever Happened to the Bismarckian Welfare State? From Labor Shedding to Employment-Friendly Reforms”, Discussion Paper No. 4085, The Institute for the Study of Labor.
• Horemans, J. & I. Marx (2013), “Should We Care about Part-Time Work from a Poverty Perspective? An Analysis of the EU15 Countries”, in: M. Koch & M. Fritz (Eds.), Non-Standard Employment in Europe: Paradigms, Prevalence and Policy Responses (169-189), Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Horemans, J. (2014), “Polarisation of Non-standard Employment in Europe: Exploring a Missing Piece of the Inequality Puzzle”, Social Indicators Research, 125(1), 171-189.
• Horemans, J. (2017), “Atypical Employment and In-Work Poverty”, Ipswich Working Paper 1, Ku Leuven Research Institute For Work and Society, Belgium.
• Horemans, J. (2018), “Atypical employment and in-work poverty”, in: H. Lohmann & I. Marx, (eds.), Handbook on In-Work Poverty (146-170), Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
• Horemans, J. et al. (2016), “Hanging in, but only just: part-time employment and in-work poverty throughout the crisis”, IZA J Labor Studies, 5.
• ILO (2016), Non-Standard Employment Around the World - Understanding Challenges, Shaping Prospects, Geneva.
• ILO (2019), Decent Work and Economic Growth, <https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/sdg-2030/goal-8/lang--en/index.htm>, 26.5.2023.
• ILO (2019a), World Employment Social Outlook-Trends 2019, Geneva.
• ILO (2020), “World Employment and Social Outlook - Trends 2020”, Flagship Report, ILO, Geneva.
• ILO (N/A), Non-standard forms of employment, <https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/non-standard-employment/lang--en/index.htm>, 26.01.2024.
• ILOSTAT (2018), Status in Employment, ILO Modelled Estimates, Nov. 2018, <https://www.ilo.org/ilostat/faces/oracle/webcenter/portalapp/pagehierarchy>, 10.4.2023.
• ILOSTAT, “Paid Employment vs Vulnerable Employment”, Spotlight on Work Statistics, 3 June 2018.
• Jha, P. & P. Mishra (2022), “Persistent Vulnerabilities in the World of Work and Contemporary Capitalism: Some Reflections on India”, The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 65, 347-372.
• Kalleberg, A.L. (2000), “Nonstandard employment relations: Part-time, temporary and contract work”, Annual Revival Sociology, 26, 341-365.
• Kaya, S. (2019), “Türkiye’de Çalışan Yoksulluğu: Politikalar ve Öneriler”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi, SBE.
• Kaya, S. (2022), “Avrupa Refah Rejimlerinde Çalışan Yoksulluğu: Birleşik Krallık, Almanya, İspanya ve İsveç Örnekleri”, içinde: A.T. Öcal (ed.), Yoksulluk Ekseninde Sosyal Politika: Güncel Sorunlar ve Tartışmalar (1-37), Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
• Kazgan, G. (2012), “2008 Küresel Krizi: Nedenleri, Etik İlkeleri ve İktisat Eğitimi”, Discussion Paper, No. 2012/98, Turkish Economic Association, Ankara.
• KEİG (2014), Çalışma Yaşamında Eğretilik, Eğreti İstihdam ve Atipik İstihdam İlişkisi, <http://kasaum.ankara.edu.tr/files/2013/02>, 03.04.2023.
• Keller, B. & H. Seifert (2005), “Atypical Employment and Flexicurity”, Management Revue, 3(16), 304-323.
• Keune, M. (2015), “Trade unions, precarious work and dualisation in Europe”, in: W. Eichhorst & P. Marx (eds.), Non-Standard Employment in Comparative Perspective (378-400), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• King, D. & D. Rueda (2008), “Cheap Labor: The New Politics of ‘Bread and Roses’ in Industrial Democracies”, Perspectives on Politics, 6(02), 279-297.
• Kingdon, G. & J. Knight (2007), “Unemployment in South Africa, 1995-2003: Causes, Problems and Policies”, Journal of African Economies, 16(5), 813-848.
• Koch, M. & M. Fritz (2013), Non-Standard Employment in Europe: Paradigms, Prevalence and Policy Responses, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Koch, M. (2013), “Employment Standards in Transition: From Fordism to Finance-Driven Capitalism”, in: M. Koch & M. Fritz (eds.), Non-Standard Employment in Europe: Paradigms, Prevalence and Policy Responses (29-45), Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Krueger, A. & J.S. Pischke (1997), “Observations and Conjectures on the U.S. Em-ployment Miracle”, NBER Working Paper 6146, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Lang, C. et al. (2013), “Atypical forms of employment contracts in times of crisis”, Working Paper 2013.03, European Trade Union Institute.
• Larner, W. (2000), “Neo-liberalism, Policy, Ideology, Governmentality”, Studies in Political Economy, 63(1), 5-25.
• Lehweb-Litzmann, R. (2012), “Flexible employment, poverty and the household”, Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 18(1), 69-81.
• Liotti, G. & R.R. Canale (2020), “Poverty and Labour Market Institutions in Europe”, Panoeconomicus, 67(3 Special Issue), 277-290.
• Liotti, G. et al. (2018), “Does Labour Market Flexibility Reduce Youth Unemployment in Time of Crisis? Evidence from Italian Case”, The Empirical Economics Letters, 17(10), 1219-1226.
• Lloyd, A. (2018), The Harms of Work-An ultra-realist account of the service economy, Bristol: Bristol University Press.
• Loayza, N.V. et al. (2009), “Informality in Latin America and the Caribbean”, Policy Research Working Paper 4888, World Bank.
• Lohmann, H. & I. Marx (2008), “The Different Faces of In-Work Poverty across Welfare State Regimes”, in: H.-J. Andreß & H. Lohmann (eds.), The Working Poor in Europe: Employment, Poverty and Globalisation (17-46), Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Lohmann, H. & I. Marx (2018), Handbook on In-Work Poverty, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Lohmann, H. (2009), “Welfare States, Labour Market Institutions and the Working Poor: A Comparative Analysis of 20 European Countries”, European Sociological Review, 25(4), 489-504.
• Mahiroğulları, A. (2012), “XXI. Yüzyıla Girerken Sendikacılık: Günümüzde Değişim, Dönüşüm ve Gelecek İçin Arayışlar”, Emek ve Toplum, 1(1), 9-33.
• Maitre, B. et al. (2012), “Low Pay, in-Work Poverty and Economic Vulnerability: A Comparative Analysis Using EU-SILC”, Manchester School, 80(1), 99-116.
• Marx, I. & B. Nolan (2014), “In-Work Poverty”, in: B. Cantillon & F. Vandenbroucke (eds.), Reconciling Work and Poverty Reduction: How Successful Are European Welfare States? (131-156), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Marx, I. et al. (2012), “Can higher employment levels bring down relative income poverty in the EU? Regression-based simulations of the Europe 2020 target”, Journal of European Social Policy, 22(5), 472-486.
• Marx, K. (1975), Kapital Birinci Cilt-Kapitalist Üretimin Eleştirel Tahlili, Alaattin Bilgi (çev.), Ankara: Sol Yayınları.
• Marx, P. (2015), “Theoretical Perspectives on the Political Behaviour of Temporary Workers”, in: The Political Behaviour of Temporary Workers, Work and Welfare in Europe (33-58), Palgrave Macmillan, London.
• Maurizio, F. (2020), “Market income inequality and welfare state redistribution in Europe: some facts and policy suggestions”, in: M.C. Marcuzzo et al. (eds.), Economic Policy, Crisis and Innovation-Beyond Austerity in Europe (133-149), London and New York-Routledge.
• Maurizio, R. (2012), “Labour informality in Latin America: the case of Argentina, Chile, Brazil and Peru”, Working Paper 165, Brooks World Poverty Institute.
• Metin, B. & M.M. Özaydın (2016), Çalışma ve Refah, 2.Baskı, Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
• Millan-Smitmans, P. (2010), Poverty and informal employment in Argentina, <https://www.bu.edu/econ/files/2012/11/dp208.pdf>, 15.01.2023.
• Nelson, K. (2012), “Counteracting material deprivation: The role of social assistance in Europe”, Journal of European Social Policy, 22(2), 148-163.
• Nielsen, F. & A.S. Alderson (2002), “Globalization and the Great U-Turn: Income Inequality Trends in 16 OECD Countries”, American Journal of Sociology, 107(5), 1244-1299.
• O’Higgins, N. & V. Moscariello (2017), “Labour Market Institutions and Youth Labour Markets: Minimum Wages and Youth Employment Revisited”, Working Paper No. 223, ILO Employment Policy Department, Geneva.
• Öcal, A.T. & S. Kaya (2019), “Türkiye’de Çalışan Yoksulluğunu Önlemeye Yönelik Politikalar”, içinde: Endüstri 4.0’dan Toplum 5.0’a Çalışmanın Geleceği: STK’lar ve Sendikalar, 10. Uluslararası Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları Kongresi Tam Metin Bildiriler Kitabı (577-594), Bandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi.
• Öcal, A.T. (2014a), “Avrupa Birliği’nde Uzun Dönemli İşsizlik Sorunu”, Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, 20(1), 1157-1176.
• Öcal, A.T. (2014b), “Güvenceli Esneklik Gündemi: 2008 Mali Krizi Sonrası Danimarka İşgücü Piyasası”, Sosyal Güvenlik Dergisi, 4(1), 59-86.
• Ostry, J.D. et al. (2016), “Neoliberalism: oversold?”, Finance and Development, 53(2), 38-41.
• Parlak, Z. & S. Özdemir (2011), “Esneklik Kavramı ve Emek Piyasalarında Esneklik”, Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları, 60(1), 1-60.
• Parlak, Z. & Y. Ak (2022), “Çalışan Yoksulluğu: AB ve Türkiye’de Durum Analizi”, Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 13(1), 117-143.
• Pena-Casas, R. & M. Latta (2004), Working Poor In The European Union, Europan Foundation for The Improvement of Living and Conditions.
• Ritzer, G. & P. Dean (2019), Globalization The Essentials, Second Edition, Wiley Blackwell.
• Schwander, H. & S. Häusermann (2013), “Who is in and who is out? A risk-based conceptualization of insiders and outsiders”, Journal of European Social Policy, 23(3), 248-269.
• Şenses, F. (2008), Küreselleşmenin Öteki Yüzü: Yoksulluk, 4. Baskı, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Shipman, A. et al. (2018), The New Power Elite Inequality, Politics and Greed, Anthem Press.
• Sissons, P. et al. (2018), “Linking the sectoral employment structure and household poverty in the United Kingdom”, Work, Employment and Society, 32(6), 1078-1098.
• Standing, G. (2009), Work after Globalization, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Swank, D.H. & J.C. Martin (2009), “The Political Foundations of Inequality in Post-Industrial Capitalist Democracies”, APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper, Available at SSRN: <https://ssrn.com/abstract=1450184>.
• Tangain, A.S. (2005), “Monitoring Flexicurity Policies in the EU with Dedicated Composite Indicators”, WSI-Diskussionpapier, No.137.
• Taylor-Gooby, P. et al. (2015), “Can ‘New Welfare’ Address Poverty through More and Better Jobs?”, Journal of Social Policy, 44, 83-104.
• Vogel, S. (2018), Marketcraft: How Governments Make Markets Work, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Vosvo, L. F. (2010), Managing The Margins - Gender, Citizenship, and the International Regulation of Precarious Employment, Oxford University Press.
• Webster, C. et al. (2016), “Informality, property rights, and poverty in China’s ‘Favelas’”, World Development, 78, 461-476.
• Wegrzyn, G. (2018), “Structural changes in employment - opportunities and threats for the situation of women in the labour market”, Studia i Prace WNEIZ US, 51(3), 301-312.
• Weil, D. (2014), The Fissured Workplace: Why Work Became So Bad for So Many and What Can be Done to Improve It, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Whittaker, D.H. et al. (2020), Compressed Development: Time and Timing in Economic and Social Development, Oxford University Press.
• Yılmaz, M. (2019), “Neoliberal kapitalizmde istihdam ilişkilerinin dönüşen yapısı: Standart-dışı çalışma formlarının yükselişi”, OPUS-Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(20), 1710-1734.
• Yücel, Y. & Ö. İzdeş (2017), “Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde ‘İnsana Yakışır İş’i Ölçmek: Türkiye İçin Öneriler”, Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 28(104), 1-37.