THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY OF PROFESSIONAL SELF EFFICACY SCALE FOR VOLLEYBALL COACH

Year 2018, Volume: 16 Issue: 2, 162 - 177, 01.08.2018

Çalık Veli Koçak Özbay Güven

Abstract

The aim of this research is to develop a measurement tool with psychometric properties that will measure the professional self-efficacy of the volleyball coaches. There were 174 men (78,7%) and 47 women (21,3%) who were active coaches in different stages of the research (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 levels) 221 volleyball coaches participated voluntarily. In the analysis of the data, item total test correlation, KMO and Barlett Sphericity test, confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis were used. After the analyzes made, it was determined that the scale had a structure of 29 items and 5 sub-dimensions (Motivation Efficacy, Technical Teaching Efficacy, Personality Building Efficacy, Leadership and Team Management Efficacy, Condition and Tactic Efficacy). The load values of the items range from .452 to .850. Confirmatory factor analysis (DFA) results were χ2 / sd = 1.88, RMSEA = 0.064, RMR = 0.037, NFI = 0.96, NNFI = 0.98, CFI = 0.98, GFI = 0.91 and AGFI = 0.88. In order to test the reliability level of the scale, Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficient were calculated .891. As a result; It is determined that the scale that develops to measure the professional self-efficacy of the volleyball coaches as a result of the validity and reliability study is a usable measurement tool

Keywords

Coach, Self-Efficacy, Volleyball

VOLEYBOL ANTRENÖRÜ MESLEKİ ÖZ YETERLİK ÖLÇEĞİ GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı voleybol antrenörlerinin mesleki öz yeterliklerini ölçebilecek psikometrik özelliklere sahip bir ölçme aracı geliştirmektir. Araştırmaya Türkiye’de farklı kademelerde (1. 2. 3. 4. ve 5. kademe) faal olarak antrenörlük yapan 174’ü erkek (% 78,7), 47’si kadın (% 21,3) olmak üzere 221 voleybol antrenörü gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde madde toplam test korelasyonu, KMO ve Barlett Sphericity testi, açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi kullanılmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonrasında ölçeğin 29 madde ve 5 alt boyutlu (Motivasyon Yeterliği, Teknik Öğretim Yeterliği, Kişilik Kazandırma Yeterliği, Liderlik-Takım Yönetimi Yeterliği, Kondisyon-Taktik Yeterliği) bir yapıya sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Maddelerin yük değerleri .452 ile .850 arasında değişmektedir. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) sonuçları χ2/ sd=1.88, RMSEA=0.064, RMR=0.037, NFI=0.96, NNFI=0.98, CFI=0.98, GFI=0.91 ve AGFI=0.88 olarak bulunmuştur. Ölçeğin güvenirlik seviyesini test etmek için ise Cronbach’s Alpha güvenirlik katsayısı .891 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Sonuç olarak; yapılan geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması sonucunda voleybol antrenörlerinin mesleki öz yeterliklerini ölçmek amacıyla geliştiren Voleybol Antrenörü Mesleki Öz Yeterlik Ölçeğinin (VAMYÖ) kullanılabilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu belirlenmiştir

Keywords

Antrenör, Öz Yeterlik, Voleybol

References

• Amman T, İkizler HC, Karagözoğlu C (2000): Sporda sosyal bilimler. Ankara: Alfa.
• Ashton PT (1985): Motivation and teacher's sense of efficacy. In C. Ames ve R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 2. The classroom milieu (141-174). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
• Bandura A (1977): Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
• Bandura A (1982): Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
• Bandura A (1986): Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
• Bandura A (1997): Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
• Bandura A (2001): Social cognitive theory: an angetic perspective. Annual Reviev of Psychology. 54(1), 1-26.
• Bandura A (2005): Evolution of social cognitive theory. In K. G. Smith ve M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management (9-35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Baker A (2008): The influence of coaching efficacy on team cohesion and performance. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, University of Windsor. Ontario.
• Brown EW (Ed.). (1992): Youth soccer: A complete handbook. Dubuque, LA: Brown ve Benchmark.
• Byrne BM, Campbell LT (1999): Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(5), 555–574.
• Başer E (1998): Uygulamalı spor psikolojisi. Ankara. Bağırgan.
• Büyüköztürk Ş (2011), Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem.
• Caprara GV, Barbaranellı C, Steca P, Malone PS (2006): Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students' academic achievement: a study at the school level. Journal Of School Psychology, 44, 473-490.
• Chelladurai P (1980): Leadership in sport organizations. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 5, 226-231.
• Coladarci T (1992): Teachers' sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 323-337.
• Cole DA (1987): Methodological contributions to clinical research, utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(4), 584-594.
• Coşkun E, Özer B, Tiryaki EN (2010): Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının özel alan yeterlik algılarının değerlendirilmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 123-136.
• Çokluk O, Şekercioğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş (2010): Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve Lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem.
• Denham CH, Michael JJ (1981): Teacher sense of efficacy: A definition of the construct and a model for further research. Educational Research Quarterly, 5, 39-63.
• Fabrigar, LR, Wegener, DT, MacCallum, RC, and Strahan, EJ. (1999): Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research”. Psychological Methods 4(3), 272-299.
• Feltz DL, Chase MA, Moritz SE, Sullivan PJ (1999): A conceptual model of coaching efficacy: Preliminary investigation and instrument development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 765- 776.
• Field A (2005): Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE.
• Frias CM, Dixon RA. (2005): Confirmatory factor structure and measurement invariance of the memory compensation questionniare. Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 168-178
• Foster JJ (2001): Data analysis using spss for Windows versions 8-10: A beginner's guide. London: SAGE Publications.
• Gençer RT, Kiremitçi O, Boyacıoglu H (2009): Psychometric properties of coaching efficacy scale (CES): A study on Turkish coaches. Nwsa: Sports Sciences, 4(2), 143-153.
• George D, Mallery M (2010): SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference, 17.0 update. USA: Pearson Higher Education.
• Gibson S, Dembo MH (1984): Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569-582.
• Guskey TR, Passaro PD (1994): Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 627-643.
• Henson RK (2001): Relationships between preservice teachers self-efficacy, task analysis and classroom management beliefs. The Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Assocation Sunulmuş Poster Bildiri,. February 1-3. New Orleans, LA.
• Heslin PA (1999): Boosting Empowerment by Developing Self-Efficacy. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 37, 52–64.
• Hofstetter CR, Zuniga S, Dozier DM (2001): Media self-efficacy: validation of a new concept. Mass Communication ve Society, 4(1), 61–76.
• Holland JL (1997): Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
• Horn TS (1992): Leadership effectiveness in the sport domain. In T. S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
• Horn TS (2002): Coaching effectiveness in the sport domain. In T. S. Horn (ed), Advances in sport psychology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
• Hoy WK, Woolfolk AE (1993): Teacher's sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. Elementary School Journal 93, 355-372.
• Kline RB (2010): Methodology in the social sciences: Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
• Kocak, F, Ewert, AW. (2017): Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Environmentally Desirable Responding Scale (EDRS). Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 20(2), 68- 76.
• Kowalski CL (2007): An analysis of coaching efficacy in volunteer soccer coaches. Doktora Tezi. University of Northern Iowa. Iowa.
• Köksal, F. (2008): Antrenörlerin Liderlik tarzları ile öz yeterlikleri arasındaki ilişki. Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
• Leonard BJ, Skay, CL, Rheinberger JD (1998): Self-management development in children and adolescents with diabetes: the role of maternal self-efficacy and confiict, Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 13(4), 224-233.
• Maddux JE (1995): Self-efficacy theory: An introduction. In J. E. Maddux (Ed). Self-efficacy, adaption, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application. New York: Plenium.
• Miller NE, Dollard J (1941): Social Learning and Imitation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Magle AB (2010): The influence of the coach-athlete relationship on coaching efficacy. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, University of New Hampshire, New Hampshire.
• Malete L, Feltz D (2000): The effects of a coaching education program on coaching efficacy. The Sport Psychologist. 14,(3), 410-417.
• Marsh H, Balla J, Mcdonald R (1988): Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391-410.
• Marsh H, Hau K, Artelt C, Baumert J, Peschar J (2006): OECD's brief self-report measure of educational psychology's most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311–360
• Myers ND, Feltz DL, Chase MA, Reckase MD, Hancock GR (2008): The coaching efficacy scale II- High school teams. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(6), 1059-1076.
• Pajares F (2002): Overview of Social Cognitive Theory and Self-efficacy. 25 Ağustos 2015 tarihinde http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/eff.html.pdf. sayfasından erişilmiştir.
• Pajares F, Schunk DL (2002): Self and self-belief in psychology and education: an historical perspective. Improving Academic Achievement. New York: Academic Press.
• Park JK (1992): Construction of the Coaching Confidence Scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Michigan State University, East Lansing.
• Rad LS, Gharehgozli S (2013): Collective efficacy based on the coaching efficacy in female profesional basketball teams. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 3(2), 469-475.
• Sönmez V (2005): Bilimsel araştırmalarda yapılan yanlışlıklar. Eurasian Journal of educational Research, 18, 150-170.
• Sönmez V, Alacapınar FG (2011): Örneklendirilmiş bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Scates A, Linn M, Kowalick V (2003): Complete conditioning for volleyball. 1.st. ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
• Schunk DH, (2009): Learning theories an educational perspective. (Şahin, M. Çev. Ed.). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
• Tavşancıl E (2010): Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Ankara: Nobel.
• Tezbaşaran A (1997): Likert tipi ölçek geliştirme kılavuzu. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
• Türkiye Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (2008): Öğretmen yeterlikleri: Öğretmenlik mesleği genel ve özel alan yeterlikleri. Ankara. Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü.
• United Kingdom Coaching Strategy Association (2002): Sport coach, coaching retrieved, 26 Mayıs 2015 tarihinde, http,//www.brainmac.demon.co.uk/coaching.html. sayfasından erişilmiştir.
• Ural A, Kılıç İ (2006): Bilimsel araştırma süreci ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Ankara: Detay.
• Vargas-Tonsing TM, Warners AL, Feltz DL (2003): The predictability of coaching efficacy on team efficacy and player efficacy in volleyball. Journal of Sport Behavior. 26(4). 396-407.
• Wood R, Bandura A (1989): Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14, 361–384.
• Wulf G (2007): Attention and motor learning. Champaign: Human Kinetics.
• Ziyagil MA, Sevimli D (2013): Avrupa birliği ile uyum sürecinde yükseköğretimde antrenörlük eğitiminin yeniden yapılanması. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(1), 9-28.