Creative Self-Efficacy Scale: Validity and Reliability Study of Adaptation to Turkish

Year 2025, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 423 - 439, 30.06.2025

Emine Sur

Abstract

The aim of this study is to adapt the “Creative Self-Efficacy” scale developed by Lamb et al. (2025) to Turkish. After obtaining the necessary permissions, the scale items, whose original language was English, were translated into Turkish by two field experts who were fluent in both Turkish and English. The translations were examined by three academicians who are doctors in the field of Turkish education and then by three academicians who are fluent in both languages and work in the field of curriculum. In line with their suggestions, the scale items were rearranged and finalized. Validity and reliability analyses of the study were conducted based on the data collected from 583 university students. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed in the Amos package program to determine structural validity, and Cronbach alpha analysis was performed in the SPSS program to determine reliability. As a result of the confirmatory factor analysis, it was seen that the GFI, CFI, NFI, RMSA values showed a perfect fit for the scale model; and the AGFI, TLI values showed an acceptable fit. Cronbach alpha value was calculated to determine the reliability coefficient of the creative self-efficacy scale, and the Cronbach alpha coefficient of the scale was found to be .94. There are no reverse items in the 7-point Likert-type scale.

Keywords

Creativity , self-efficacy , creative self-efficacy

Ethical Statement

Name of the board that conducted the ethical evaluation: Necmettin Erbakan University Social and Human Sciences Date of ethical evaluation decision: 24/01/2025 Ethical evaluation document number: 2025/40

Yaratıcı Öz Yeterlik Ölçeği: Türkçeye Uyarlama Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Lamb vd. (2025) tarafından geliştirilen “Yaratıcı Öz Yeterlik” ölçeğini Türkçeye uyarlamaktır. Gerekli izinler alındıktan sonra orijinal dili İngilizce olan ölçek maddeleri, Türkçeye ve İngilizceye hâkim olan iki alan uzmanı tarafından Türkçeye çevrilmiştir. Yapılan çeviriler Türkçe eğitimi alanında doktor olan üç akademisyen, ardından her iki dile hâkim öğretim programı alanında çalışan üç akademisyen tarafından incelenmiştir. Onlardan gelen öneriler doğrultusunda ölçek maddeleri yeniden düzenlenmiş ve son şekli verilmiştir. 583 üniversite öğrencisinden toplanan veriden hareketle araştırmanın geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yapı geçerliliğini belirleyebilmek için Amos paket programında doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, güvenilirliği belirleyebilmek için SPSS programında cronbach alfa analizi yapılmıştır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonunda GFI, CFI, NFI, RMSA değerleri ölçek modelinin mükemmel bir uyumu; AGFI, TLI değeri kabul edilebilir uyumu olduğu görülmüştür. Yaratıcı öz yeterlik ölçeğinin güvenirlik katsayısını belirlemek amacıyla cronbach alfa değeri hesaplanmış ve ölçeğin cronbach alfa katsayısı .94 olarak bulunmuştur. Yaratıcı öz yeterlik ölçeği 20 maddeden oluşan tek faktörlü bir ölçektir. 7’li likert tipinde hazırlanmış ölçekte ters madde bulunmamaktadır.

Keywords

Yaratıcılık , öz yeterlik , yaratıcı öz yeterlik

Ethical Statement

Etik değerlendirmeyi yapan kurul adı: Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Etik değerlendirme kararının tarihi: 24/01/2025 Etik değerlendirme belgesi sayı numarası: 2025/40

References

• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
• Bahar, H. H. (2019). Sınıf öğretmen adaylarında akademik öz-yeterlik algısının akademik başarıyı yordama gücü. Elementary Education Online, 18(1), 149-157. doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2019.527178
• Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 447–457. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1804_4
• Beghetto, R. A., ve Karwowski, M. (2017). Toward untangling creative self-beliefs. (Ed. In M. Karwowski ve J.C. Kaufman), The creative self: Effects of self-efficacy, mindset and identity (ss. 4–24). Academic Press.
• Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W. J. ve Thordike, R. M. (1973). Cross-Cultural research methods. New York: John Wiley ve Sons.
• Çam, Z., Eşkisu, M., Kardaş, F., Saatçioğlu, Ö., ve diğerleri (2020). Problem çözme ve umut arasındaki ilişkide öz-yeterliliğin aracılık rolü. Katılımcı Eğitim Araştırması, 7(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.4.7.1
• Dehghani, F., Barkhordari-Sharifabad, M., Sedaghati-kasbakhi, M. ve Fallahzadeh, H. (2020). Effect of palliative care training on perceived self-efficacy of the nurses. BMC Palliative Care, 19(63), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00567-4
• Haase J., Hoff, E. V., Hanel, P. H. P. ve Innes-Ker, A. (2018). A meta-analysis of the relation between creative self-efficacy and different creativity measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1411436
• Hsu, M., Sheng, H., ve Hsueh, F. (2011). Creative self-efficacy and innovative behavior in a service setting: Optimism as a moderator. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(4), 258-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01430.x
• Hu, L., ve Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Karwowski, M. (2011). It doesn't hurt to ask…But sometimes it hurts to believe: Polish students' creative self-efficacy and its predictors. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(2), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021427
• Karwowski, M. (2012). Did curiosity kill the cat? relationship between trait curiosity, creative self-efficacy and creative personal ıdentity. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 8(4), 547–558. doi:10.5964/ejop.v8i4.513
• Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., ve Wiśniewska, E. (2018). Measuring creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 28, 45–57.
• Kafková, P. ve Urban, K. (2024). Vztah mezı vnímanou osobní účınností, vnıtřní motıvací a kreatıvním výkonem u vysokoškolských studentů. Československá psychologie, XVIII(4), 372-387. DOI: 10.51561/cspsych.68.4.372
• Krathwohl, D., R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory ve Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
• Kurupınar, A. ve Aydoğan, Y. (2020). Zekâ oyunlarına yönelik tutum ölçeğinin (ZOTÖ) geliştirilmesi: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Turkish Studies Education, 15(6), 4383-4400. https://dx.doi.org/10.47423/TurkishStudies.46454
• Lamb, K., N., Boedeker, P., Kettler, T. (2025). Measuring creative self-efficacy: Instrument development and validation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101738
• Liu, W., Pan, Y., Luo, X., Wang, L., ve Pang, W. (2017). Active procrastination and creative ideation: The mediating role of creative selfefficacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 227–229.
• Maddux, J., E. (2002). Self-Efficacy (C. R. Snyder Shane J. Lopez, Editors). In Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 277–287). Oxford Unıversıty Press.
• Mukaka, M., M. (2012). Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Medical Journal, 24(3), 69-71.
• Puente‐Diaz, R., ve Cavazos‐Arroyo, J. (2018). An exploration of some antecedents and consequences of creative self‐efficacy among college students. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 52(3), 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.149
• Royston, R. ve Reiter-Palmon, R. (2019). Creative self-efficacy as mediator between creative mindsets and creative problem-solving. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 53, 472-481. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.226
• Saputro, I. N., Sukatiman , S., Haris Setiawan, A., ve Intan Sari, A. (2024). The Role of social support to foster creative thinking of vocational students ın university: mediating effect of creative self-efficacys. Qubahan Academic Journal, 4(3), 607–618. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n3a619
• Shaw, A., Kapnek, M. ve Morelli, N., A. (2021). Measuring creative self-efficacy: an ıtem response theory analysis of the creative self-efficacy scale. Frontier Psychology, 12, 1-7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678033
• Tan, A., Ho, V. ve Yong, L. (2007). Singapore high school students’ creativity efficacy. New Horizons in Education, 55(3), 96-106.
• Tao, R., Zhang, H., Geng, L., Li, Y., ve Qiu, J. (2025). The ınfluence of trait and state creative self-efficacy on creative behavior: an experimental study using false feedback. Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), 18. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/bs15010018
• Tierney, P., ve Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020952
• Tierney, P., ve Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137-1148. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069429
• Valquaresma, A., Coimbra, J., L. ve Costa, P. (2022). Creative self-efficacy scale for children and adolescents (cases): A development and validation study. International Journal of Psychology Research, 15(1), 55-69. DOI: 10.21500/20112084.5329