Research Article

Investigating the Effect of Intercultural Communication Apprehension on Intercultural Willingness to Communicate with Structural Equation Modeling

Number: 48 August 29, 2022
TR EN

Investigating the Effect of Intercultural Communication Apprehension on Intercultural Willingness to Communicate with Structural Equation Modeling

Abstract

Intercultural communication anxiety is expressed as fear or anxiety associated with communicative actions established or planned to be established with groups of different cultures and ethnicities. This anxiety, which can manifest itself in the education processes of international students, who are important actors of intercultural communication, can negatively affect the willingness of students to communicate with other ethnic groups. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the effect of international students' intercultural communication apprehension on intercultural willingness to communicate with a proposed research model. 290 (164 male, 126 female) international students studying in Kayseri participated in the research. Structural equation model was used in data analysis in this study, in which data were collected by questionnaire method. As a result of the analysis, the proposed research model was confirmed. As a result of the research, it has been determined that intercultural communication apprehension has a negative effect on the intercultural willingness to communicate

Keywords

Intercultural Communication, Intercultural Communication Apprehension, Intercultural Willingness to Communicate, International University Students

References

  1. Ay, E., E. Kavuran, & N. Turkoglu (2018). Intercultural communication apprehension scale (PRICA): validity and reliability study in turkish. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 11(3): 1638-1646. http://www.internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org/docs/35_turkoglu_original_11_3.pdf.
  2. Balcı, S., N. Öğüt, & N. Barbakh (2020). Yabancı uyruklu öğrencilerin kültürlerarası iletişim kaygısı ile yalnızlık düzeyleri arasında bir bağlantı var mı? Turkish Studies - Social, 15(3): 965-982. https://doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.39411
  3. Barraclough, R., D.M. Christophel, & J. McCroskey (1998). Willingness to communicate: A cross‐cultural investigation. Communication Research Reports, 5(2): 187-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824098809359822
  4. Berger, C.R., & R.J. Calabrese (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2): 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x
  5. Bozkaya, M., & İ. Erdem Aydın (2010 Kültürlerarası iletişim kaygısı: Anadolu Üniversitesi Erasmus Öğrencileri Değişim Programı örneği. Anadolu Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(39): 29-42. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iuifd/issue/22854/244025
  6. Choi, J., & R. Tamborini (1988). Communication‐acculturation and the cultivation hypothesis: A comparative study between two Korean communities in the U.S. Howard Journal of Communications, 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646178809359669
  7. Desjarlais, R., Eisenberg, L., Good, B. ve Kleinman, A. (1995). World Mental Health. Problems and Priorities in Low-Income Countries. New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. Gudykunst, W. B., & T. Nishida (2001). Anxiety, uncertainty, and perceived effectiveness of communication across relationships and cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,(25), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(00)00042-0
  9. Gudykunst, W. B., & Y.Y. Kim (1997). Communicating with Strangers: An Approach to Intercultural Communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  10. Gudykunst, W.B. (1995). Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory. In R. Wiseman (ed.), Intercultural Communication Theory (8-58). Thousands Oaks: CA: Sage.
APA
Koçak, Ö. F. (2022). Investigating the Effect of Intercultural Communication Apprehension on Intercultural Willingness to Communicate with Structural Equation Modeling. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 48, 118-128. https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.1097145
AMA
1.Koçak ÖF. Investigating the Effect of Intercultural Communication Apprehension on Intercultural Willingness to Communicate with Structural Equation Modeling. SUSBED. 2022;(48):118-128. doi:10.52642/susbed.1097145
Chicago
Koçak, Ömer Faruk. 2022. “Investigating the Effect of Intercultural Communication Apprehension on Intercultural Willingness to Communicate With Structural Equation Modeling”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, nos. 48: 118-28. https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.1097145.
EndNote
Koçak ÖF (August 1, 2022) Investigating the Effect of Intercultural Communication Apprehension on Intercultural Willingness to Communicate with Structural Equation Modeling. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 48 118–128.
IEEE
[1]Ö. F. Koçak, “Investigating the Effect of Intercultural Communication Apprehension on Intercultural Willingness to Communicate with Structural Equation Modeling”, SUSBED, no. 48, pp. 118–128, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.52642/susbed.1097145.
ISNAD
Koçak, Ömer Faruk. “Investigating the Effect of Intercultural Communication Apprehension on Intercultural Willingness to Communicate With Structural Equation Modeling”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 48 (August 1, 2022): 118-128. https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.1097145.
JAMA
1.Koçak ÖF. Investigating the Effect of Intercultural Communication Apprehension on Intercultural Willingness to Communicate with Structural Equation Modeling. SUSBED. 2022;:118–128.
MLA
Koçak, Ömer Faruk. “Investigating the Effect of Intercultural Communication Apprehension on Intercultural Willingness to Communicate With Structural Equation Modeling”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, no. 48, Aug. 2022, pp. 118-2, doi:10.52642/susbed.1097145.
Vancouver
1.Ömer Faruk Koçak. Investigating the Effect of Intercultural Communication Apprehension on Intercultural Willingness to Communicate with Structural Equation Modeling. SUSBED. 2022 Aug. 1;(48):118-2. doi:10.52642/susbed.1097145