BibTex RIS Cite

KÜRESELLEŞME, BİRLEŞMİŞMİLLETLER VE ULUSLARARASI SOSYAL DÜZEN ARAYIŞI

Year 2005, Issue: 13, 103 - 121, 01.02.2005

Abstract

Neo-Liberal yaklaşıma göre, piyasa mekanizmasına bırakılan ekonomik küreselleşme dünya refahınıartırmaktadır. Ne var ki, küresel yoksulluk gibi sosyal sorunların ekonomik küreselleşmeye eşlik ettiği gözlenmektedir. Bu çalışmada, ekonomik küreselleşmeye eşlik eden küresel yoksulluk gibi uluslararasısosyal sorunlar ve bu sorunlara çözüm arayan ILO ve BM gibi kuruluşların çalışmalarıana hatlarıyla ele alınmış, bunların yeterlilik düzeyi tartışılmışve bir uluslararasısosyal düzenin oluşturulmasıgereği üzerinde durulmuştur. Çalışmanın hazırlanmasında birincil ve ikincil kaynaklar taranmış; yorumlayıcı, analitik ve ampirik yöntemlerden yeri geldikçe yararlanılmıştır. Çalışmada, ekonomik küreselleşme sürecine dünya barışıiçin önemli olan küresel yoksulluk gibi sosyal sorunların eşlik ettiği, ancak uluslararasıdüzeyde sorunun çözümü için yeterli önlemler alınmadığısonucuna varılmıştır. Bu nedenle, dünya barışıile istikrarının tesisi ve korunmasıiçin uluslararasıdüzeyde önemli olan aktörler ve kamuoyunun söz konusu sorunların çözümlenmesine aktif olarak katılmasıve sorumluluk üstlenmesi gerekmektedir.

References

  • Altvater, E. ve Mahnkopf, B. (1996), Grenzen der Globalisierung. Ökonomie, Ökologie und Politik in der Weltgesellschaft, Münster.
  • Arrighi, G. etl. (2003), “Industrial Convergence, Globalization, and the Persistence of the North-South Divide”in, Studies in Comparative International Development, Bahar.
  • Brainard, L. (2003), “Compassionate Conservatism Confronts Global Poverty”, Washington Quarterly, Bahar.
  • Braun, M. (1995), “Arbeitnehmerrechte im Welthandel, Sozialklauseln, Eine neue Perspektive gesellschaftlichen Handelns?”, INEF Report, Heft 14, Universität Duisburg; Sautter, H. (1995), “Sozialklauseln für den Welthandel - Wirtschaftsethik betrachtet”, in, Hamburger Jahrbuch für Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftspolitik, Cilt 40.
  • Büyükbaş, H (2004), “Dünya Siyaseti: Küreselleşeme, Bölgeselleşme ve Türkiye”, Avrasya Dosyası, Bahar.
  • Dedeoğlu, B. (2003), Uluslararası Güvenlik ve Strateji, Der Yay. İst.
  • Emmerij, L. (1994), “Contemporary Challenges for Labour Standards Resulting from Globalization”, in, Sengenberger, W. ve Campbell, D. (Hg.), International Labour Standards and Economic Interdependence. Genf.
  • F. A. von Hayek (1981), Recht, Gesetzgebung und Freiheit, Cilt 2, Landesberg/L.
  • Firebaugh, G. (1999), “Empirics of World Income Inequality”, American Journal of Sociology104.
  • Herman, Edward S. (2004), “Greater Inequality, Greater Instability”, Monthly Review, An Independent Socialist Magazine, Nisan.
  • Internationale Politik, Mayıs 2004, Nr. 5, 59. Yıl.
  • Insel, A. (2001), “İki Yoksulluk Tanımıve Bir Öneri”, Yaz, Toplum ve Bilim.
  • Jones, B. G. (2001), “Explaining Global Poverty: A Realist Critique of the Orthodox Approach”, Journal of Critical Realism (incorporating Alethia) 4.1, May.
  • Klotz, Valentin (1986), “Das Aufsichtssystem der Internationalen Arbeitsorganisation zur Überwachung der Durchführung internationaler Arbeitsnormen”, içinde, Demokratie und Recht. Yıl 14, Sayı 1.
  • Lee, E. (1997), “Globalization and Labour Standards, A Review of Issues” In, International Labour Review. Cilt 136, Sayı 2.
  • Morse, D. (1969), The Origin and Evolution of the ILO and its Role in the World Community. Ithaca.
  • Oruç, Y. M. (2001), “Küresel Yoksulluk ve Birleşmiş Milletler”, Toplum ve Bilim, Yaz.
  • Peacock, W. etl., (1988), “Divergence and Convergence in International Development, A Decomposition Analysis of Inequality in the World System.” American Sociological Review 53.
  • Saurin, J. (1996), “Globalisation, Poverty, and the Promises of Modernity”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 25, (3).
  • Sauter, H. (2000), “Die Internationale Sozialordnung”, in, F. Nuschler (Hg.), Entwicklung und Frieden im Zeichen der Globaliserung, Bonn.
  • Sengenberger, W. (1994), “Für konstruktiven Wettbewerb”. In, Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Sozialordnung (…) (Hg.), Weltfriede durch soziale Gerechtigkeit, Baden-Baden.
  • Senghaas-Knobloch, Eva (1979), Reproduktion von Arbeitskraft in der Weltgesellschaft. Zur Programmatik der Internationalen Arbeitsorganisation. Frankfurt/M.
  • Stiftung für Entwicklung und Frieden (Hg.) (2003), Globale Trends 2004/2005, Bonn.
  • Stiglitz, J. (2003), Küreselleşme ve Büyük Hayal Kırıklığı, Plan B Yay. İst.
  • UNDP (2002) (Almanca baskısı), Bericht über menschliche Entwicklung 2002, New York, Bonn.
  • Von Baratta, M. (Hg.) (2001), Fischer Weltalmanach 2002, Frankfurt/M.
  • World Bank (2003), Global Economic Prospects 2003, Washington, D. C.
  • Vazquez, L. (2003), Kapitalizm ve Küresel Refah, (der.), Liberte Yay. Ankara.
  • Yates, M. D., “Poverty and Inequality in the Global Economy”, Monthly Review, An Independent Socialist Magazine, Şubat 2004.
  • Zaschke, W. (1994), “Internationale Sozialpolitik als Netzwerkpolitik”, PROKLA, Sayı 97.
Year 2005, Issue: 13, 103 - 121, 01.02.2005

Abstract

According to New Liberal approach, economic globalization motivated by market mechanism produces world welfare. However, it has been observed that global social problems such as global poverty accompanied with the process of economic globalization haven’t been solved in the international level. In this paper it has been discussed that international social problems such as global poverty accompanying with the process of economic globalization and the works of ILO and UN which search for solutions to these problems have been held and sufficiency level of these has been discussed and it has been focused on the fact that it should be formed an international social order for an appropriate solution. It has been applied to primary and secondary sources and benefited from descriptive-analytical and empirical methods. In this study it has been concluded that such social problems as global poverty which is significant for the world peace have been accompanied with the process of economic globalization but it has not been taken sufficient measurements to solve the problem in the international level. It is necessary for building and protecting world peace and stability, international actors and public significance in the international level should participate and take responsibility in solving the problems mentioned above in an active way

References

  • Altvater, E. ve Mahnkopf, B. (1996), Grenzen der Globalisierung. Ökonomie, Ökologie und Politik in der Weltgesellschaft, Münster.
  • Arrighi, G. etl. (2003), “Industrial Convergence, Globalization, and the Persistence of the North-South Divide”in, Studies in Comparative International Development, Bahar.
  • Brainard, L. (2003), “Compassionate Conservatism Confronts Global Poverty”, Washington Quarterly, Bahar.
  • Braun, M. (1995), “Arbeitnehmerrechte im Welthandel, Sozialklauseln, Eine neue Perspektive gesellschaftlichen Handelns?”, INEF Report, Heft 14, Universität Duisburg; Sautter, H. (1995), “Sozialklauseln für den Welthandel - Wirtschaftsethik betrachtet”, in, Hamburger Jahrbuch für Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftspolitik, Cilt 40.
  • Büyükbaş, H (2004), “Dünya Siyaseti: Küreselleşeme, Bölgeselleşme ve Türkiye”, Avrasya Dosyası, Bahar.
  • Dedeoğlu, B. (2003), Uluslararası Güvenlik ve Strateji, Der Yay. İst.
  • Emmerij, L. (1994), “Contemporary Challenges for Labour Standards Resulting from Globalization”, in, Sengenberger, W. ve Campbell, D. (Hg.), International Labour Standards and Economic Interdependence. Genf.
  • F. A. von Hayek (1981), Recht, Gesetzgebung und Freiheit, Cilt 2, Landesberg/L.
  • Firebaugh, G. (1999), “Empirics of World Income Inequality”, American Journal of Sociology104.
  • Herman, Edward S. (2004), “Greater Inequality, Greater Instability”, Monthly Review, An Independent Socialist Magazine, Nisan.
  • Internationale Politik, Mayıs 2004, Nr. 5, 59. Yıl.
  • Insel, A. (2001), “İki Yoksulluk Tanımıve Bir Öneri”, Yaz, Toplum ve Bilim.
  • Jones, B. G. (2001), “Explaining Global Poverty: A Realist Critique of the Orthodox Approach”, Journal of Critical Realism (incorporating Alethia) 4.1, May.
  • Klotz, Valentin (1986), “Das Aufsichtssystem der Internationalen Arbeitsorganisation zur Überwachung der Durchführung internationaler Arbeitsnormen”, içinde, Demokratie und Recht. Yıl 14, Sayı 1.
  • Lee, E. (1997), “Globalization and Labour Standards, A Review of Issues” In, International Labour Review. Cilt 136, Sayı 2.
  • Morse, D. (1969), The Origin and Evolution of the ILO and its Role in the World Community. Ithaca.
  • Oruç, Y. M. (2001), “Küresel Yoksulluk ve Birleşmiş Milletler”, Toplum ve Bilim, Yaz.
  • Peacock, W. etl., (1988), “Divergence and Convergence in International Development, A Decomposition Analysis of Inequality in the World System.” American Sociological Review 53.
  • Saurin, J. (1996), “Globalisation, Poverty, and the Promises of Modernity”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 25, (3).
  • Sauter, H. (2000), “Die Internationale Sozialordnung”, in, F. Nuschler (Hg.), Entwicklung und Frieden im Zeichen der Globaliserung, Bonn.
  • Sengenberger, W. (1994), “Für konstruktiven Wettbewerb”. In, Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Sozialordnung (…) (Hg.), Weltfriede durch soziale Gerechtigkeit, Baden-Baden.
  • Senghaas-Knobloch, Eva (1979), Reproduktion von Arbeitskraft in der Weltgesellschaft. Zur Programmatik der Internationalen Arbeitsorganisation. Frankfurt/M.
  • Stiftung für Entwicklung und Frieden (Hg.) (2003), Globale Trends 2004/2005, Bonn.
  • Stiglitz, J. (2003), Küreselleşme ve Büyük Hayal Kırıklığı, Plan B Yay. İst.
  • UNDP (2002) (Almanca baskısı), Bericht über menschliche Entwicklung 2002, New York, Bonn.
  • Von Baratta, M. (Hg.) (2001), Fischer Weltalmanach 2002, Frankfurt/M.
  • World Bank (2003), Global Economic Prospects 2003, Washington, D. C.
  • Vazquez, L. (2003), Kapitalizm ve Küresel Refah, (der.), Liberte Yay. Ankara.
  • Yates, M. D., “Poverty and Inequality in the Global Economy”, Monthly Review, An Independent Socialist Magazine, Şubat 2004.
  • Zaschke, W. (1994), “Internationale Sozialpolitik als Netzwerkpolitik”, PROKLA, Sayı 97.
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Hakkı Büyükbaş This is me

Kenan Ören This is me

Publication Date February 1, 2005
Published in Issue Year 2005 Issue: 13

Cite

APA Büyükbaş, H., & Ören, K. (2005). KÜRESELLEŞME, BİRLEŞMİŞMİLLETLER VE ULUSLARARASI SOSYAL DÜZEN ARAYIŞI. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(13), 103-121.

24108 28027 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License