BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2007, Issue: 18, 225 - 243, 01.08.2007

Şaban Çalış Erdem Özlük

Abstract

Idealism-Realism debate is the first one among the great debates in the IR as an academic field emerged after the World War I. Known as the founding debate of the discipline, this debate has not contributed only in setting up the terminology of the field, but also determined its boundaries. Even though some argue that this debate can be depicted as an academic fiction or a reflex rather than a real theoretical debate happened between rival academicians, it has not shaped the discipline’s future only. Also, it acted a valuable reference point both for the students of international relations and policymakers. It is, therefore, impossible to conceive the history of the discipline and current debates unless the rift between the two traditional approaches, their basic arguments, roots and actors effective up to the beginning of the 1950s are understood properly and comprehensively

Keywords

Idealism Realism International Relations First Great Debate

References

  • Ashworth, Lucian M. (2002). “Did the Realist-Idealist Great Debates Really Happen? A Revisionist History of International Relations”, International Relations, Vol. 16, No. 1.
  • Badie, Bertrand. (2001). “Realism Under Praise or A Requiem? The Paradigmatic Debate in International Relations”, International Political Science Review, Vol. 22, No. 3.
  • Balleck, Barry J. Beer, Francis A. (1994). “Realist/Idealist Texts: Psychometry and Semantics”, Peace Psychology Review, Vol. 1, No. 1.
  • Banks, Michael. (1985). “The Inter-Paradigm Debate”, International Relations: A Handbook of Current Theory, (ed), M. Light, A. J. R. Groom, London: Pinter Publishers.
  • Booth, Ken. (1991). “Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in Theory and Practice”, International Affairs, Vol. 67, No. 3.
  • Bostanoğlu, Burcu. (1999). Türkiye-ABD İlişkilerinin Politikası; Kuram ve Siyasa, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
  • Brooks, Thom. (2002). “Hegel’s Theory of International Politics: A Reply to Jaeger”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 28, No. 3.
  • Brown Tindall, George. (1988). America: A Narrative History Volume 2, New York: WW. Norton Company.
  • Bull, Hedley. (1981). “Hobbes and the International Anarchy”, Social Research, Vol. 48, No. 4.
  • Bull, Hedley. (2001). “Theory of International Politics 1919-1969”, International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science Vol. I, (ed), Andrew Linklater, New York: Routledge.
  • Burchill, Scott. (2001). “Liberalism”, Theories of International Relations, (ed), Scott Burchill, New York: Palgrave.
  • Burchill, Scott. (2001). “Realism and Neorealism”, Theories of International Relations, (ed), Scott Burchill, New York: Palgrave.
  • Burchill, Scott. (2005). National Interest in International Relations Theory, Gordonsville: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Burham, Peter. (2001). “Marx, International Political Economy and Globalisation”, Capital and Class, Vol. 75.
  • Cable, James. (19981. “The Useful Art of International Relations”, International Affairs, Vol. 57, No. 2.
  • Carr, Edward H. (1946). Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, London: Macmillan.
  • Carr, Edward H. (1999). Milliyetçilik ve Sonrası, Çev. Osman Akınhay, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Cavallar, George. (2001). “Kantian Perspectives on Democratic Peace: Alternatives to Doyle”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 27.
  • Cozette, Murielle. (2004). “Realistic Realism? American Political Realism, Clausewitz and Raymond Aron on the Problem of Means and Ends in International Politics”, The Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 27, No. 3.
  • Crawford, Robert M. (1998). “Political Realism in International Theory”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 92, No. 1.
  • Çalış, Şaban. (2008). Türkiye-Avrupa Birliği İlişkileri: Kimlik Arayışı, Politik Aktörler ve Değişim, Ankara: Nobel.
  • Çalış, Şaban. Erdem Özlük. (2007). “Jeopolitik: Mekânın Siyasallaştırılması ve Suiistimali”, Zeynep Dağı, (ed.), Uluslararası Politikayı Anlamak, İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
  • Dallek, Robert. (1991). “Woodrow Wilson, Politician”, The Wilson Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 4.
  • Denemark, Robert A. (1999). “World System History: From Traditional International Politics to the Study of Global Relations”, International Studies Review, Vol. 1, No. 2.
  • Donnelly, Jack. (2000). Realism and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dougherty, James E. Pfaltzgraff, Robert L. (1981). Contending Theories of International Relations, New York: Harper Row Publishers.
  • Doyle, Michael. (1986). “Liberalism and World Politics”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 80, No. 4, 1986, s. 1152.
  • Doyle, Michael. (1995). “Liberalism and World Politics Revisited”, Charles W. Kegley, (ed), Controversies in International Theory, New York: St. Martin Press.
  • Doyle, Michael. (1999). “Peace Liberty and Democracy: Realists and Liberals Contest a Legacy”, (ed), M. Cox, G.J. Ikenberry, American Democracy Promotion, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Doyle, Michael. (2000). “A More Perfect Union? The Liberal Peace and the Challenge of Globalization”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 26.
  • Dunn, Frederick S. (1948). “The Scope of International Affairs”, World Politics, Vol. 1, No. 1.
  • Dunne, Andrew P. (1996). International Theory: To the Brink and Beyond, Westport: Greenwood Press.
  • Eralp, Atila. (1996). “Uluslararaası İlişkiler Disiplininin Oluşumu: İdealizm- Realizm Tartışması”, Atila Eralp (ed), Devlet, Sistem ve Kimlik: Uluslararası İlişkilerde Temel Yaklaşımlar, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Falk, Richard A. (1983). The End of World Order: Essays on Normative International Relations, New York: Holmes&Meier.
  • Falk, Richard A. (1989). “Normative International Politics: A General Introduction”, World Politics Debat(ed), (ed), Herbert M. Levine, New York: McGrow-Hill Book.
  • Farnsworth, David N. (1992). International Relations: An Introduction, Chicago: Nelson- Hall Publishers.
  • Ferguson, Yale H. Mansbach, Richard W. (1988). The Elusive Quest: Theory and International Politics, Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
  • Folker, Jennifer S. (2002). “Realism and the Constructivist Challenge: Rejecting, Reconstructing, or Rereading”, The International Studies Review, Vol. 4, No. 1.
  • Forde, Steven. (1992). “Varieties of Realism: Thucydides and Machiavelli”, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 54, No. 2.
  • Forde, Steven. (1998). “Hugo Grotius on Ethics and War”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 92, No. 3.
  • Fozouni, Bahman. (1995). “Confutation of Political Realism”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 39.
  • Franceschet, Antonio. (2000). “Popular Sovereignty or Cosmopolitan Democracy? Liberalism, Kant and International Reform”, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 6, No. 2.
  • Franceschet, Antonio. (2001). “Sovereignty and Freedom: Immanuel Kant’s Liberal Internationalist Legacy”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 27.
  • Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor. (1996). “Kant Democracy and History”, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 7, No. 4.
  • Gavin, Francis J. (1997). “The Wilsonian Legacy in the Twentieth Century”, Orbis, Vol. 41, No. 4.
  • Gismondi, Mark. (2004). “Tragedy Realism and Postmodenity: Kulturpessimismus in the Theories of Max Weber, E. H. Carr, Hans J. Morgenthau and Henry Kissinger”, Diplomacy and Statecraft, Vol. 15, No. 3.
  • Goldberg, Harvey. (1953). “Jaurés and the Theory of International Relations”, The Historian, Vol. 16, No. 1.
  • Goldfischer, David. (2002). “E. H. Carr: A Historical Realist Approach for the Globalisation Era”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 28.
  • Griffiths, Martin. (1992). Realism, Idealism and International Politics: A Reinterpretation, London: Routledge.
  • Grotius, Hugo. (2001). On the Law of War and Peace, Çev, A. C. Campbell, Kitchener: Batoche Books.
  • Haas, Mark L. (1999). “Reinhold Niebuhr's Christian Pragmatism: A Principled Alternative to Consequantialism”, The Review of Politics, Vol. 61, No.4.
  • Harrison, Ewan. (2002). “Waltz, Kant and Systemic Approaches to International Relations”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 28.
  • Harrison, Wagner, R. (1994). “Peace, War, and the Balance of Power”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 88, No. 3.
  • Heckscher, August. (1994). “Wilsonianism: A Comment: Response to David Fromkin”, World Policy Journal, Vol. 11, No. 3.
  • Herz, John H. (1950). “Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma”, World Politics, Vol. 2, No. 2.
  • Herz, John H. (1981). “Political Realism and Human Interests”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2.
  • Hobden, Stephen. (1999). “Theorising the International System: Perspectives from Historical Sociology”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 25.
  • Hobsbawm, Eric. (1999). Kısa 20. Yüzyıl 1914-1991: Aşırılıklar Çağı, Çev. Yavuz Alogan, İstanbul: Sarmal Yayınevi.
  • Hollis, Martin. Smith, Steve. (1990). Explaining and Understanding International Relations, New York: Clarendon Press.
  • Holsti, Kalevi J. (1998). “Scholarship in An Era of Anxiety: The Study of International Politics During the Cold War”, Tim Dunne, et al., (ed), The Eighty Years’ Crisis: International Relations 1919-1999, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Howe, Paul. (1994). “The Utopian Realism of E. H. Carr”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 20, No. 3.
  • Jaeger, Hans-Martin. (2002). “Hegel’s Reluctant Realism and the Transnationalisation of Civil Society”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 28.
  • Kaplan, Morton. (1961). “Is International Relations A Discipline?”, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1961.
  • Kavalski, Emilian. (2007). “The Fifth Debate And The Emergence Of Complex International Relations Theory: Notes On The Application of Complexity Theory to the Study of International Life”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 20, No. 3.
  • Kegley, Charles W. (1998). “The Neoidealist Moment in International Studies? Realist Myths and the New International Realities”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 37.
  • Kegley, Charles W. Wittkopf, Eugene R. (1993). World Politics: Trend and Transformation, New York: St. Martin Press.
  • Kegley, Charles W. Wittkopf, Eugene R. (1996). American Foreign Policy; Pattern and Process, New York: St. Martin Press.
  • Keohane, Robert O. Nye, Joseph S. (1981). “Realism and Complex Interdependence”, Perspectives on World Politics, (ed), M. Smith, R. Little, M. Shacleton, London: The Open University Press.
  • Keohane, Robert O. Nye, Joseph S. (1989). Power and Interdependence, New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
  • Keohane, Robert O. Nye, Joseph S. (1998). “Power and Interdependence in the Information Age”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 77, No. 5.
  • Kissinger, Henry. (1998). Diplomasi, Çev. İbrahim H. Kurt, Ankara: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları.
  • Kohn, Hans. (1955). Nationalism; Its Meaning and History, Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Company.
  • Kramer, Mark. (2001). “Realism, Ideology, and the End of the Cold War: A Reply to William Wohlforth”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 27.
  • Lapid, Yosef. (1989). “The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Relations Theory in a Post-Positivist Era”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 3.
  • Lebow, Richard Ned. Kelly, Robert. (2001). “Thucydides and Hegemony Athens and the United States”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 27.
  • Legro, Jeffrey W. Moravcsik, Andrew. (1999). “Is Anybody Still A Realist?”, International Security, Vol. 24, No. 2.
  • Lenin, Vladamir I. (1998). Ulusların Kendi Kaderini Tayin Hakkı, Çev. Muzaffer Erdost, Ankara: Sol Yayınları.
  • Lenin, Vlamidir I. (1998). Kapitalizmin Son Aşaması, Emperyalizm, Çev. Kenan Somer, Ankara: Bilim ve Sosyalizm Yayınları.
  • Lijphart, Arend. (1974). “The Structure of the Theoretical Revolution in International Relations”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 1.
  • Lipson, Leslie. (2000). Uygarlığın Ahlaki Bunalımları: Manevi Bir Erime mi Yoksa İlerleme mi?, Çev. Jale Ç. Yeşiltaş, İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları.
  • Little, Richard. (1999). “Historiography and International Relations”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 25.
  • Loriaux, Michael. (1992). “The Realist and Saint Augustine: Skepticism, Psychology and Moral Action in International Relations Thought”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 36.
  • Lynch, Allen. (2002). “Woodrow Wilson and the Principle of National Self- determination’: A Reconsideration”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 28.
  • Mayall, James. (1994). “Nationalism in the Study of International Relations”, Contemporary International Relations; A Guide to Theory, (ed), A.J. Groom, Margot Light, London: Pinter Publishers.
  • McKillen, Elizabeth. (2001). “Ethnicity, Class and Wilsonian Internationalism Reconsidered”, Diplomatic History, Vol. 25, No. 4.
  • Mearsheimer, John J. (2005). “E. H. Carr versus Idealism: The Battle Rages On”, International Relations, Vol. 19, No. 2.
  • Mix, Dean A. Hawley, Sandra M. (1998). Global Politics, Belmont: West/Wadsworth.
  • Moravcsik, Andrew. (2000). “The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe”, International Organization, Vol. 54
  • Moravcsik, Andrew. (2001). “Liberal International Relations Theory: A Social Scientific Assessment”, Weathead Center for International Affairs, Working Papers.
  • Morgenthau, Hans J. (1981). “Another Great Debate: The National Interest of the US”, Perspectives on World Politics, (ed), M. Smith, R. Little, London: The Open University Press.
  • Morgenthau, Hans J. (1993). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Morgenthau, Hans J. Thompson, Kenneth W. (2000). “A Realist Theory of International Politics”, Herbert M. Levine, (ed), World Politics Debat(ed), New York: McGrow-Hill Book.
  • Mowle, Thomas S. (2003). “Worldviews in Foreign Policy: Realism, Liberalism and External Conlict”, Political Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 3.
  • Navon, Emmanuel. (2001). “The Third Debate Revisited”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 27.
  • Osiander, Andreas. (1998). “Rereading Early Twentieth-Century International Relations Theory: Idealism Revisited”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 42.
  • Özlük, Erdem. (2006). Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplininde Gelenekselcilik Davranışsalcılık Tartışması ve Çağdaş Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorilerine Etkisi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Konya, Selçuk Üniversitesi.
  • Padelford, Norman J. Lincoln, George A. (1967). The Dynamics of International Politics, New York, The Macmillan Company.
  • Palan, Ronen P. Blair, Brook M. (1993). “On the Origins of the Realist Theory of International Relations”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 19.
  • Panagakou, Stamatoula. (2005). “The Political Philosophy of the British Idealists”, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 7, No. 1.
  • Pastusiak, Longin. (1969). “A Marxist Approach to the Study of International Relations”, East Europen Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 3.
  • Pevehouse, Jon C. (2004). “Interdependence Theory and the Measurement of International Conflict”, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 66, No. 1.
  • Ponton, Geoffey. Gill, Peter. (1989). Introduction to Politics, London: Basil Blackwell.
  • Porter, Brian. (2002). “Lord Davies, E. H. Carr and the Spirit Ironic: A Comedy of Errors”, International Relations, Vol. 16, No. 1.
  • Quirk, Joel. Vigneswaran, Darshan. (2005). “The Construction of an Edifice: The Story of a First Great Debate”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 31.
  • Reynolds, Charles. (1992). The World of States: An Introduction to Explanation and Theory, Vermont: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Rich, Paul. (2002). “Reinventing Peace: David Davies, Alfred Zimmern and Liberal Internationalism in Interwar Britain”, International Relations, Vol. 16
  • Robinson, Thomas W. (1969). “National Interests”, James Rosenau, (ed.), International Politics and Foreign Policy, New York: The Free Press.
  • Rosecrance, Richard N. (2002). “War and Peace”, World Politics, Vol. 55, No.1.
  • Rosgwald, Mordecai. (2005). “Idealism and Realism in Politics”, Modern Age, Vol. 47, No. 1.
  • Rourke, John T. (2001). International Politics on the World Stage, Dushkin: McGraw-Hill.
  • Schmidt, Brian C. (1998). “Lessons From the Past: Reassessing the Interwar Disciplinary History of International Relations”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 42.
  • Schmidt, Brian C. (2002). “Anarchy, World Politics and the Birth of a Discipline: American International Relations, Pluralist Theory and the Myth of Interwar Idealism”, International Relations, Vol. 16, No. 1.
  • Scott, Shirley V. (2004). “Is There Room for International Law in Realpolitik?: Accounting for the US Attitude Towards International Law”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 30.
  • Smith, Hazel. (1994). “Marxism and International Relations Theory”, A. J. Groom, Margot Light, (ed), Contemporary International Relations; A Guide to Theory, London: Pinter Publishers.
  • Smith, Tony. (1995). “A Wilsonian World”, World Policy Journal, Vol. 12 No.2.
  • Snow, Donald M. Brown, Eugene. (2000). International Relations; The Changing Contours of Power, New York: Longman.
  • Sofka, James R. (2001). “The Eighteenth Century International System: Parity or Primacy?”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 27.
  • Spegele, Roger D. (1982). “Rediscovering Debates in the International Studies: Morton Kaplan’s System Epistemelogy Revisited”, Theory and Decision, Vol. 14, No. 3.
  • Spegele, Roger D. (1987). “Three Forms of Political Realism”, Political Studies, Vol. 35.
  • Thies, Cameron G. (2002). “International Relations Theory: The Case of the Idealist–Realist Debate”, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 8, No. 2.
  • Thies, Cameron G. (2002). “Progress, History and Identity in International Relations Theory: The Case of the Idealist–Realist Debate”, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 8, No. 2.
  • Thompson, Kenneth W. (1966). “The Study of International Politics: A Survey of Trends and Development”, William C. Olson, Fred A. Sondermann, (ed), The Theory and Practice of International Politics, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Thompson, Kenneth W. (1982) “Unity and Contradiction in the Theory and Practice of International Relations”, The Review of Politics, Vol. 44, No. 3.
  • Tortola, Domenico. (2005). “Twenty Years’ Crisis by Edward H. Carr”, Crossroads, Vol. 5, No. 1.
  • Trachtenberg, Marc. (2003). “The Question of Realism: A Historian’s Review”, Security Studies, Vol. 13, No. 1.
  • Vasquez, John A. (1997). “The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 91, No.4.
  • Viotti, Paul R. Kauppi, Mark V. (2001). International Relations and World Politics; Security, Economy, Identity, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Yurdusev, A. Nuri. (2006). “Thomas Hobbes and International Relations: From Realism to Rationalism”, Australian Journal International Affairs, Vol. 60, No. 2.
  • Walt, Stephen M. (1997). “The Progressive Power of Realism”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 91, No. 4.
  • Waltz, Kenneth N. (1967). “International Structure, National Force and the Balance of World Power”, Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 21, No. 2.
  • Waltz, Kenneth N. (1993). “Emerging Structure of International Politics”, International Security, Vol. 18, No. 2.
  • Waltz, Kenneth. (1996). “From Theory of International Politics”, John A. Vasquez, (ed), Classics of International Relations, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
  • Welch, David A. (2003). “Why International Relations Theorists Should Stop Reading Thucydides”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 29.
  • Wendt, Alexander. (2001). Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Widenor, William C. (1999). “Making the World Safe for Democracy: A Century of Wilsonianism and Its Totalitarian Challengers”, The Historian, Vol. 61, No. 3.
  • Wight, Colin. (2002). “Philosophy of Social Science and International Relations”, W. Carlsnaes, et al., (ed), Handbook of International Relations, London: Sage Publications.
  • Williams, Howard. (1996). International Relations and the Limits of Political Theory, London: Macmillan.
  • Williams, Howard. et al.., (1993). A Reader in International Relations and Political Theory, Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Williams, Michael C. (2005). The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations: Cambridge Studies in International Relations: No. 100, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wilson, Peter. (1995). “Introduction: The Twenty Years’ Crisis and Category of Idealism in International Relations”, David Long, Peter Wilson, (ed), Thinkers of the Twenty Years’ Crisis, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Wolfers, Arnold. (1969). “The Pole of Power and the Pole of Indifference”, James Rosenau, (ed), International Politics and Foreign Policy, New York: The Free Press.
  • Zimmern, Alfred. (1936). “The New Phase in International Affairs”, The Contemporary Review, No. 150.

ULUSLARARASI İLİŞKİLER TARİHİNİN YAPISÖKÜMÜ: İDEALİZM-REALİZM TARTIŞMASI

Year 2007, Issue: 18, 225 - 243, 01.08.2007

Şaban Çalış Erdem Özlük

Abstract

Birinci Dünya Savaşısonrasında özgün bir çalışma alanıolarak doğan Uluslararası İlişkiler disiplininin bir asırlık tarihinde ortaya çıkmışbüyük tartışmalardan ilki İdealizm-Realizm tartışmasıdır. “Kurucu Tartışma” olarak da adlandırılan bu tartışma, bir yandan alanın terminolojisinin yerleşmesini sağlamış, öte yandan da disiplinin sınırlarınıçizmiştir. Bu tartışma, her ne kadar gerçek bir tartışma olmaktan ziyade akademik bir fictionveya reflexolarak karşımıza çıksa da; sadece disiplinin geleceğini şekillendirmekle kalmamışhem Uluslararası İlişkiler öğrencilerine hem de politika yapımcılarına köklü bir referans noktasıolarak disiplindeki yerini almıştır. 1919-1950 yıllarıarasında etkili olan tartışmayı, tartışmanın aktörlerini, tarihini, temel argümanlarınıve iki paradigma arasındaki ayrım noktalarınıanlamaksızın disiplinin bugününde etkili olan tartışmalarıanlayabilmek ve disiplinin tarihini özümseyebilmek mümkün değildir.

Keywords

İdealizm Realizm Uluslararası İlişkiler Birinci Büyük Tartışma

References

  • Ashworth, Lucian M. (2002). “Did the Realist-Idealist Great Debates Really Happen? A Revisionist History of International Relations”, International Relations, Vol. 16, No. 1.
  • Badie, Bertrand. (2001). “Realism Under Praise or A Requiem? The Paradigmatic Debate in International Relations”, International Political Science Review, Vol. 22, No. 3.
  • Balleck, Barry J. Beer, Francis A. (1994). “Realist/Idealist Texts: Psychometry and Semantics”, Peace Psychology Review, Vol. 1, No. 1.
  • Banks, Michael. (1985). “The Inter-Paradigm Debate”, International Relations: A Handbook of Current Theory, (ed), M. Light, A. J. R. Groom, London: Pinter Publishers.
  • Booth, Ken. (1991). “Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in Theory and Practice”, International Affairs, Vol. 67, No. 3.
  • Bostanoğlu, Burcu. (1999). Türkiye-ABD İlişkilerinin Politikası; Kuram ve Siyasa, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
  • Brooks, Thom. (2002). “Hegel’s Theory of International Politics: A Reply to Jaeger”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 28, No. 3.
  • Brown Tindall, George. (1988). America: A Narrative History Volume 2, New York: WW. Norton Company.
  • Bull, Hedley. (1981). “Hobbes and the International Anarchy”, Social Research, Vol. 48, No. 4.
  • Bull, Hedley. (2001). “Theory of International Politics 1919-1969”, International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science Vol. I, (ed), Andrew Linklater, New York: Routledge.
  • Burchill, Scott. (2001). “Liberalism”, Theories of International Relations, (ed), Scott Burchill, New York: Palgrave.
  • Burchill, Scott. (2001). “Realism and Neorealism”, Theories of International Relations, (ed), Scott Burchill, New York: Palgrave.
  • Burchill, Scott. (2005). National Interest in International Relations Theory, Gordonsville: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Burham, Peter. (2001). “Marx, International Political Economy and Globalisation”, Capital and Class, Vol. 75.
  • Cable, James. (19981. “The Useful Art of International Relations”, International Affairs, Vol. 57, No. 2.
  • Carr, Edward H. (1946). Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, London: Macmillan.
  • Carr, Edward H. (1999). Milliyetçilik ve Sonrası, Çev. Osman Akınhay, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Cavallar, George. (2001). “Kantian Perspectives on Democratic Peace: Alternatives to Doyle”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 27.
  • Cozette, Murielle. (2004). “Realistic Realism? American Political Realism, Clausewitz and Raymond Aron on the Problem of Means and Ends in International Politics”, The Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 27, No. 3.
  • Crawford, Robert M. (1998). “Political Realism in International Theory”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 92, No. 1.
  • Çalış, Şaban. (2008). Türkiye-Avrupa Birliği İlişkileri: Kimlik Arayışı, Politik Aktörler ve Değişim, Ankara: Nobel.
  • Çalış, Şaban. Erdem Özlük. (2007). “Jeopolitik: Mekânın Siyasallaştırılması ve Suiistimali”, Zeynep Dağı, (ed.), Uluslararası Politikayı Anlamak, İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
  • Dallek, Robert. (1991). “Woodrow Wilson, Politician”, The Wilson Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 4.
  • Denemark, Robert A. (1999). “World System History: From Traditional International Politics to the Study of Global Relations”, International Studies Review, Vol. 1, No. 2.
  • Donnelly, Jack. (2000). Realism and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dougherty, James E. Pfaltzgraff, Robert L. (1981). Contending Theories of International Relations, New York: Harper Row Publishers.
  • Doyle, Michael. (1986). “Liberalism and World Politics”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 80, No. 4, 1986, s. 1152.
  • Doyle, Michael. (1995). “Liberalism and World Politics Revisited”, Charles W. Kegley, (ed), Controversies in International Theory, New York: St. Martin Press.
  • Doyle, Michael. (1999). “Peace Liberty and Democracy: Realists and Liberals Contest a Legacy”, (ed), M. Cox, G.J. Ikenberry, American Democracy Promotion, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Doyle, Michael. (2000). “A More Perfect Union? The Liberal Peace and the Challenge of Globalization”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 26.
  • Dunn, Frederick S. (1948). “The Scope of International Affairs”, World Politics, Vol. 1, No. 1.
  • Dunne, Andrew P. (1996). International Theory: To the Brink and Beyond, Westport: Greenwood Press.
  • Eralp, Atila. (1996). “Uluslararaası İlişkiler Disiplininin Oluşumu: İdealizm- Realizm Tartışması”, Atila Eralp (ed), Devlet, Sistem ve Kimlik: Uluslararası İlişkilerde Temel Yaklaşımlar, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Falk, Richard A. (1983). The End of World Order: Essays on Normative International Relations, New York: Holmes&Meier.
  • Falk, Richard A. (1989). “Normative International Politics: A General Introduction”, World Politics Debat(ed), (ed), Herbert M. Levine, New York: McGrow-Hill Book.
  • Farnsworth, David N. (1992). International Relations: An Introduction, Chicago: Nelson- Hall Publishers.
  • Ferguson, Yale H. Mansbach, Richard W. (1988). The Elusive Quest: Theory and International Politics, Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
  • Folker, Jennifer S. (2002). “Realism and the Constructivist Challenge: Rejecting, Reconstructing, or Rereading”, The International Studies Review, Vol. 4, No. 1.
  • Forde, Steven. (1992). “Varieties of Realism: Thucydides and Machiavelli”, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 54, No. 2.
  • Forde, Steven. (1998). “Hugo Grotius on Ethics and War”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 92, No. 3.
  • Fozouni, Bahman. (1995). “Confutation of Political Realism”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 39.
  • Franceschet, Antonio. (2000). “Popular Sovereignty or Cosmopolitan Democracy? Liberalism, Kant and International Reform”, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 6, No. 2.
  • Franceschet, Antonio. (2001). “Sovereignty and Freedom: Immanuel Kant’s Liberal Internationalist Legacy”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 27.
  • Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor. (1996). “Kant Democracy and History”, Journal of Democracy, Vol. 7, No. 4.
  • Gavin, Francis J. (1997). “The Wilsonian Legacy in the Twentieth Century”, Orbis, Vol. 41, No. 4.
  • Gismondi, Mark. (2004). “Tragedy Realism and Postmodenity: Kulturpessimismus in the Theories of Max Weber, E. H. Carr, Hans J. Morgenthau and Henry Kissinger”, Diplomacy and Statecraft, Vol. 15, No. 3.
  • Goldberg, Harvey. (1953). “Jaurés and the Theory of International Relations”, The Historian, Vol. 16, No. 1.
  • Goldfischer, David. (2002). “E. H. Carr: A Historical Realist Approach for the Globalisation Era”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 28.
  • Griffiths, Martin. (1992). Realism, Idealism and International Politics: A Reinterpretation, London: Routledge.
  • Grotius, Hugo. (2001). On the Law of War and Peace, Çev, A. C. Campbell, Kitchener: Batoche Books.
  • Haas, Mark L. (1999). “Reinhold Niebuhr's Christian Pragmatism: A Principled Alternative to Consequantialism”, The Review of Politics, Vol. 61, No.4.
  • Harrison, Ewan. (2002). “Waltz, Kant and Systemic Approaches to International Relations”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 28.
  • Harrison, Wagner, R. (1994). “Peace, War, and the Balance of Power”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 88, No. 3.
  • Heckscher, August. (1994). “Wilsonianism: A Comment: Response to David Fromkin”, World Policy Journal, Vol. 11, No. 3.
  • Herz, John H. (1950). “Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma”, World Politics, Vol. 2, No. 2.
  • Herz, John H. (1981). “Political Realism and Human Interests”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2.
  • Hobden, Stephen. (1999). “Theorising the International System: Perspectives from Historical Sociology”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 25.
  • Hobsbawm, Eric. (1999). Kısa 20. Yüzyıl 1914-1991: Aşırılıklar Çağı, Çev. Yavuz Alogan, İstanbul: Sarmal Yayınevi.
  • Hollis, Martin. Smith, Steve. (1990). Explaining and Understanding International Relations, New York: Clarendon Press.
  • Holsti, Kalevi J. (1998). “Scholarship in An Era of Anxiety: The Study of International Politics During the Cold War”, Tim Dunne, et al., (ed), The Eighty Years’ Crisis: International Relations 1919-1999, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Howe, Paul. (1994). “The Utopian Realism of E. H. Carr”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 20, No. 3.
  • Jaeger, Hans-Martin. (2002). “Hegel’s Reluctant Realism and the Transnationalisation of Civil Society”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 28.
  • Kaplan, Morton. (1961). “Is International Relations A Discipline?”, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1961.
  • Kavalski, Emilian. (2007). “The Fifth Debate And The Emergence Of Complex International Relations Theory: Notes On The Application of Complexity Theory to the Study of International Life”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 20, No. 3.
  • Kegley, Charles W. (1998). “The Neoidealist Moment in International Studies? Realist Myths and the New International Realities”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 37.
  • Kegley, Charles W. Wittkopf, Eugene R. (1993). World Politics: Trend and Transformation, New York: St. Martin Press.
  • Kegley, Charles W. Wittkopf, Eugene R. (1996). American Foreign Policy; Pattern and Process, New York: St. Martin Press.
  • Keohane, Robert O. Nye, Joseph S. (1981). “Realism and Complex Interdependence”, Perspectives on World Politics, (ed), M. Smith, R. Little, M. Shacleton, London: The Open University Press.
  • Keohane, Robert O. Nye, Joseph S. (1989). Power and Interdependence, New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
  • Keohane, Robert O. Nye, Joseph S. (1998). “Power and Interdependence in the Information Age”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 77, No. 5.
  • Kissinger, Henry. (1998). Diplomasi, Çev. İbrahim H. Kurt, Ankara: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları.
  • Kohn, Hans. (1955). Nationalism; Its Meaning and History, Princeton: D. Van Nostrand Company.
  • Kramer, Mark. (2001). “Realism, Ideology, and the End of the Cold War: A Reply to William Wohlforth”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 27.
  • Lapid, Yosef. (1989). “The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Relations Theory in a Post-Positivist Era”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 3.
  • Lebow, Richard Ned. Kelly, Robert. (2001). “Thucydides and Hegemony Athens and the United States”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 27.
  • Legro, Jeffrey W. Moravcsik, Andrew. (1999). “Is Anybody Still A Realist?”, International Security, Vol. 24, No. 2.
  • Lenin, Vladamir I. (1998). Ulusların Kendi Kaderini Tayin Hakkı, Çev. Muzaffer Erdost, Ankara: Sol Yayınları.
  • Lenin, Vlamidir I. (1998). Kapitalizmin Son Aşaması, Emperyalizm, Çev. Kenan Somer, Ankara: Bilim ve Sosyalizm Yayınları.
  • Lijphart, Arend. (1974). “The Structure of the Theoretical Revolution in International Relations”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 1.
  • Lipson, Leslie. (2000). Uygarlığın Ahlaki Bunalımları: Manevi Bir Erime mi Yoksa İlerleme mi?, Çev. Jale Ç. Yeşiltaş, İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları.
  • Little, Richard. (1999). “Historiography and International Relations”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 25.
  • Loriaux, Michael. (1992). “The Realist and Saint Augustine: Skepticism, Psychology and Moral Action in International Relations Thought”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 36.
  • Lynch, Allen. (2002). “Woodrow Wilson and the Principle of National Self- determination’: A Reconsideration”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 28.
  • Mayall, James. (1994). “Nationalism in the Study of International Relations”, Contemporary International Relations; A Guide to Theory, (ed), A.J. Groom, Margot Light, London: Pinter Publishers.
  • McKillen, Elizabeth. (2001). “Ethnicity, Class and Wilsonian Internationalism Reconsidered”, Diplomatic History, Vol. 25, No. 4.
  • Mearsheimer, John J. (2005). “E. H. Carr versus Idealism: The Battle Rages On”, International Relations, Vol. 19, No. 2.
  • Mix, Dean A. Hawley, Sandra M. (1998). Global Politics, Belmont: West/Wadsworth.
  • Moravcsik, Andrew. (2000). “The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe”, International Organization, Vol. 54
  • Moravcsik, Andrew. (2001). “Liberal International Relations Theory: A Social Scientific Assessment”, Weathead Center for International Affairs, Working Papers.
  • Morgenthau, Hans J. (1981). “Another Great Debate: The National Interest of the US”, Perspectives on World Politics, (ed), M. Smith, R. Little, London: The Open University Press.
  • Morgenthau, Hans J. (1993). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Morgenthau, Hans J. Thompson, Kenneth W. (2000). “A Realist Theory of International Politics”, Herbert M. Levine, (ed), World Politics Debat(ed), New York: McGrow-Hill Book.
  • Mowle, Thomas S. (2003). “Worldviews in Foreign Policy: Realism, Liberalism and External Conlict”, Political Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 3.
  • Navon, Emmanuel. (2001). “The Third Debate Revisited”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 27.
  • Osiander, Andreas. (1998). “Rereading Early Twentieth-Century International Relations Theory: Idealism Revisited”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 42.
  • Özlük, Erdem. (2006). Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplininde Gelenekselcilik Davranışsalcılık Tartışması ve Çağdaş Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorilerine Etkisi, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Konya, Selçuk Üniversitesi.
  • Padelford, Norman J. Lincoln, George A. (1967). The Dynamics of International Politics, New York, The Macmillan Company.
  • Palan, Ronen P. Blair, Brook M. (1993). “On the Origins of the Realist Theory of International Relations”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 19.
  • Panagakou, Stamatoula. (2005). “The Political Philosophy of the British Idealists”, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 7, No. 1.
  • Pastusiak, Longin. (1969). “A Marxist Approach to the Study of International Relations”, East Europen Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 3.
  • Pevehouse, Jon C. (2004). “Interdependence Theory and the Measurement of International Conflict”, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 66, No. 1.
  • Ponton, Geoffey. Gill, Peter. (1989). Introduction to Politics, London: Basil Blackwell.
  • Porter, Brian. (2002). “Lord Davies, E. H. Carr and the Spirit Ironic: A Comedy of Errors”, International Relations, Vol. 16, No. 1.
  • Quirk, Joel. Vigneswaran, Darshan. (2005). “The Construction of an Edifice: The Story of a First Great Debate”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 31.
  • Reynolds, Charles. (1992). The World of States: An Introduction to Explanation and Theory, Vermont: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Rich, Paul. (2002). “Reinventing Peace: David Davies, Alfred Zimmern and Liberal Internationalism in Interwar Britain”, International Relations, Vol. 16
  • Robinson, Thomas W. (1969). “National Interests”, James Rosenau, (ed.), International Politics and Foreign Policy, New York: The Free Press.
  • Rosecrance, Richard N. (2002). “War and Peace”, World Politics, Vol. 55, No.1.
  • Rosgwald, Mordecai. (2005). “Idealism and Realism in Politics”, Modern Age, Vol. 47, No. 1.
  • Rourke, John T. (2001). International Politics on the World Stage, Dushkin: McGraw-Hill.
  • Schmidt, Brian C. (1998). “Lessons From the Past: Reassessing the Interwar Disciplinary History of International Relations”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 42.
  • Schmidt, Brian C. (2002). “Anarchy, World Politics and the Birth of a Discipline: American International Relations, Pluralist Theory and the Myth of Interwar Idealism”, International Relations, Vol. 16, No. 1.
  • Scott, Shirley V. (2004). “Is There Room for International Law in Realpolitik?: Accounting for the US Attitude Towards International Law”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 30.
  • Smith, Hazel. (1994). “Marxism and International Relations Theory”, A. J. Groom, Margot Light, (ed), Contemporary International Relations; A Guide to Theory, London: Pinter Publishers.
  • Smith, Tony. (1995). “A Wilsonian World”, World Policy Journal, Vol. 12 No.2.
  • Snow, Donald M. Brown, Eugene. (2000). International Relations; The Changing Contours of Power, New York: Longman.
  • Sofka, James R. (2001). “The Eighteenth Century International System: Parity or Primacy?”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 27.
  • Spegele, Roger D. (1982). “Rediscovering Debates in the International Studies: Morton Kaplan’s System Epistemelogy Revisited”, Theory and Decision, Vol. 14, No. 3.
  • Spegele, Roger D. (1987). “Three Forms of Political Realism”, Political Studies, Vol. 35.
  • Thies, Cameron G. (2002). “International Relations Theory: The Case of the Idealist–Realist Debate”, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 8, No. 2.
  • Thies, Cameron G. (2002). “Progress, History and Identity in International Relations Theory: The Case of the Idealist–Realist Debate”, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 8, No. 2.
  • Thompson, Kenneth W. (1966). “The Study of International Politics: A Survey of Trends and Development”, William C. Olson, Fred A. Sondermann, (ed), The Theory and Practice of International Politics, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Thompson, Kenneth W. (1982) “Unity and Contradiction in the Theory and Practice of International Relations”, The Review of Politics, Vol. 44, No. 3.
  • Tortola, Domenico. (2005). “Twenty Years’ Crisis by Edward H. Carr”, Crossroads, Vol. 5, No. 1.
  • Trachtenberg, Marc. (2003). “The Question of Realism: A Historian’s Review”, Security Studies, Vol. 13, No. 1.
  • Vasquez, John A. (1997). “The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 91, No.4.
  • Viotti, Paul R. Kauppi, Mark V. (2001). International Relations and World Politics; Security, Economy, Identity, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Yurdusev, A. Nuri. (2006). “Thomas Hobbes and International Relations: From Realism to Rationalism”, Australian Journal International Affairs, Vol. 60, No. 2.
  • Walt, Stephen M. (1997). “The Progressive Power of Realism”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 91, No. 4.
  • Waltz, Kenneth N. (1967). “International Structure, National Force and the Balance of World Power”, Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 21, No. 2.
  • Waltz, Kenneth N. (1993). “Emerging Structure of International Politics”, International Security, Vol. 18, No. 2.
  • Waltz, Kenneth. (1996). “From Theory of International Politics”, John A. Vasquez, (ed), Classics of International Relations, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
  • Welch, David A. (2003). “Why International Relations Theorists Should Stop Reading Thucydides”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 29.
  • Wendt, Alexander. (2001). Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Widenor, William C. (1999). “Making the World Safe for Democracy: A Century of Wilsonianism and Its Totalitarian Challengers”, The Historian, Vol. 61, No. 3.
  • Wight, Colin. (2002). “Philosophy of Social Science and International Relations”, W. Carlsnaes, et al., (ed), Handbook of International Relations, London: Sage Publications.
  • Williams, Howard. (1996). International Relations and the Limits of Political Theory, London: Macmillan.
  • Williams, Howard. et al.., (1993). A Reader in International Relations and Political Theory, Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Williams, Michael C. (2005). The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations: Cambridge Studies in International Relations: No. 100, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wilson, Peter. (1995). “Introduction: The Twenty Years’ Crisis and Category of Idealism in International Relations”, David Long, Peter Wilson, (ed), Thinkers of the Twenty Years’ Crisis, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Wolfers, Arnold. (1969). “The Pole of Power and the Pole of Indifference”, James Rosenau, (ed), International Politics and Foreign Policy, New York: The Free Press.
  • Zimmern, Alfred. (1936). “The New Phase in International Affairs”, The Contemporary Review, No. 150.
There are 142 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Şaban Çalış This is me

Erdem Özlük This is me

Publication Date August 1, 2007
Published in Issue Year 2007 Issue: 18

Cite

APA Çalış, Ş., & Özlük, E. (2007). ULUSLARARASI İLİŞKİLER TARİHİNİN YAPISÖKÜMÜ: İDEALİZM-REALİZM TARTIŞMASI. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(18), 225-243.

24108 28027 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License