Uluslararası Adalet Divanı ’nda Görülen Davalara Dostane Katılım (Amicus Curiae) ve Dostane Mütalaa (Amicus Brief) Usulü

Year 2019, Issue: 38, 315 - 342, 04.04.2019

Oğuz Kaan Pehlivan

Abstract

Uluslararası Adalet Divanı çekişmeli yargılama ve danışma kararları olmak üzere ikili bir çözüm mekanizmasına sahiptir. Her iki durumda da devletlerin taraf ehliyeti vardır. BM organları ile 16 uzmanlık kuruluşu danışma görüşü almak için Divan’a başvurabilir. Bunun yanı sıra, devletler kendilerini ilgilendiren davalara müdahale yoluyla katılarak taraf olabilirler. 

Bu çalışmada, Uluslararası Adalet Divanı yargı süreçlerinde dostane katılım\mütalaa kurumu ele alınacak, üçüncü kişilerin davaya katılımı ile bilgi ve belge sunmaları tartışılacaktır. Divan Statüsü 38. madde uyarınca ilgili uluslararası antlaşmalar ve hükümleri, örf ve adet hukuku ile hukukun genel prensipleri ile Divan kararları, içtihatlar ve doktrin tartışmaları ışığında dostane müdahale kurumunun hukuki temelleri araştırılacaktır. 

Keywords

Uluslararası Adalet Divanı, Dostane Katılım

References

• Allison Lucas. “Friends of the Court? The Ethics of Amicus Curiae Brief Writing in First Amendment Litigation.” Fordham Law Journal, Vol. 26 (1999). Dinah Shelton, ‘The Participation of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Judicial Proceedings’, American Journal of International Law 88 (1994). Christian Tomuschat, Andreas Zimmermann, Christian J. Tams, Karin Oellers-Frahm (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, (2012). Francis Bacon, The works of Francis Bacon, Baron of Verulam, Viscount St. Alban, and Lord High Chancellor of England, in five volumes, Vol. 1, Reink Books, (2017). Gleider I. Hernandez, ‘Non-State Actors from the Perspective of the International Court of Justice’, içinde Participants in the International Legal System-Multiple Perspectives on Non-State Actors in International Law (d’Aspremont, J., ed., 2011). Hüseyin Pazarcı, Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri, 2. Kitap, Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara, (2014). Hüseyin Pazarcı, Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri, 4. Kitap, Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara (2016). Jacob Giles, The Law-Dictionary: Explaining The Rise, Progress, And Present State Of The English Law, In Theory And Practice; Defining And Interpreting The Terms Or Words Of Art; And Comprising Copious Information, Historical, Political, And Commercial, On The Subjects Of Our Law, Trade, And Government, (1797). John S. Garrison, Friendship and Queer Theory in the Renaissance: Gender and Sexuality in Early Modern England, Routledge, (2014) Luigi Crema, ‘Testing Amici Curiae in International Law: Rules and Practice’, Italian Yearbook of International Law, 22, (2012). Michael J. Harris. “Amicus Curiae: Friend or Foe? Suffolk Journal of Trial and Appellate Advocacy, Vol. 5 (2000). Michael K. Lowman. “The Litigating Amicus Curiae: When Does the Party Begin after the Friends Leave?” American University Law Review Vol. 41, No. 4, (1992). Ömer İlhan Akipek, Milletlerarası Adalet Divanı, Sevinç Matbaası, Ankara, (1974). Paolo Palchetti, “Opening the International Court of Justice to Third States: Intervention and Beyond”, Max Plank Yearbook of United Nations Law, Volume 6, 2002. Pierre-Marie Dupuy “Article 34” içinde Christian Tomuschat, Andreas Zimmermann, Christian J. Tams, Karin Oellers-Frahm (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, (2012). Roberts Y. Jennings, “The International Court of Justice After Fifty Years”, The American Journal of International Law, Vo. 89, No.3, (1995). Severine Menetrey, L’Amicus Curiae, vers un Principe de Droit International Procédural?, Universite Pantheon-Assas, Paris, (2009). Samuel Krislov. “The Amicus Curiae Brief: From Friendship to Advocacy.” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 72 (1963). Yargı Kararları ICJ, Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary-Slovakia), Order, 5 February, ICJ Reports,(1997). ICJ, Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports (2010). ICJ, Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports (2004). ICJ, Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports (1996). ICJ, International Status of South-West Africa, Advisory Opinion ICJ Reports (1950). ICJ, Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras), Judgement of 8 October 2007, ICJ Reports, (2007). ICJ, Aerial Incident of 3 July 1988 (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), ICJ Reports, Correspondance, (1996). ICJ, Colombian-Peruvian asylum case, Judgment of November 20th 1950, ICJ Reports, (1950). ICJ, Corfu Channel case, Judgment of April 9th, 1949, ICJ Reports, (1949). ICJ, Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria: Equatorial Guinea intervening), Judgment, ICJ Reports, (2002). ICJ, Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943 (Italy/France, United Kingdom and United States of America), Judgment, ICJ Reports, (1954). ICJ, Case Concerning The Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta) Application by Italy for Permission to Intervene, ICJ Reports, (1984).