BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2016, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 54 - 57, 01.02.2016

Abstract

Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces

Year 2016, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 54 - 57, 01.02.2016

Abstract

Bovine enteroviruses are thought to be mild pathogenic or non pathogenic viral gastroenteretis agents. However there are some cases where
they are identified from cattle having different symptoms. They can also be used as markers of environmental contamination. Enterovirus family
has fast replication capacity and can be used as potential vectors. For this purpose isolation and molecular studies concerning Enteroviruses
are currently increasing. In this study 10 cattle feces samples were used for evaluation of 4 different extraction methods for investigation of
bovine enteroviruses. These methods comprise of TRIzol LS (Life Technologies), QIAamp Viral RNA mini kit (Qiagen), NucleoSpin RNA
(Macherey-Nagel) and phenol-chloroform extraction. All procedures performed in BSL-2 cabinet and RNA yield of extracts were analysed in
Bio-spec (Shimadzu) spectrophotometer. This RNA templates were then tested by Verso 1 step RT PCR (Thermo Scientific) kit with spesific
for Enterovirus 5’UTR primers. And observed for band formation. While QIAmp Viral RNA kit had the shortest protocol, it did not have as
much sensitivity as TRIzol LS and TRIzol was determined as the most sensitive method to make extraction of bovine enteroviruses from feces.

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA64ZR72JN
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Nüvit Coşkun This is me

İlke Karayel This is me

Feray Alkan This is me

Publication Date February 1, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 9 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Coşkun, N., Karayel, İ., & Alkan, F. (2016). Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 9(1), 54-57.
AMA Coşkun N, Karayel İ, Alkan F. Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces. Tarım Bilim. Araşt. Derg. (online). February 2016;9(1):54-57.
Chicago Coşkun, Nüvit, İlke Karayel, and Feray Alkan. “Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces”. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi 9, no. 1 (February 2016): 54-57.
EndNote Coşkun N, Karayel İ, Alkan F (February 1, 2016) Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi 9 1 54–57.
IEEE N. Coşkun, İ. Karayel, and F. Alkan, “Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces”, Tarım Bilim. Araşt. Derg. (online), vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 54–57, 2016.
ISNAD Coşkun, Nüvit et al. “Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces”. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi 9/1 (February 2016), 54-57.
JAMA Coşkun N, Karayel İ, Alkan F. Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces. Tarım Bilim. Araşt. Derg. (online). 2016;9:54–57.
MLA Coşkun, Nüvit et al. “Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces”. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, vol. 9, no. 1, 2016, pp. 54-57.
Vancouver Coşkun N, Karayel İ, Alkan F. Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces. Tarım Bilim. Araşt. Derg. (online). 2016;9(1):54-7.