- Submissions to Turkish Academic Research Review should be original articles evaluating previous studies in the field and should produce new and worthwhile ideas and perspectives.
- An article to be published in Turkish Academic Research Review should not have been previously published or accepted for publication elsewhere. Papers presented at a conference or symposium may be accepted for publication if this is clearly indicated.
- This journal uses double-blind review fulfilled by at least two reviewers (Double-blind peer review: Reviewers are unaware of the identity of the authors, and authors are also unaware of the identity of reviewers.) In addition, all articles are checked by means of a program in order to confirm they are not published before and avoid plagiarism
- Type of peer review: Turkish Academic Research Review uses double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are hidden from each other, throughout the review process. Referee names are kept strictly confidential. Referee identities may only be disclosed to journal Editorial Board members, who are also instructed to maintain confidentiality. He authors and reviewers are responsible to show their efforts to conceal the identities from being known to each other. This involves the authors, and reviewers (who upload documents as part of their review) checking to see if the following steps have been taken with regard to the text and the file properties: The authors of the document have deleted their names from the text, with "Author" and year used in the references and footnotes, instead of the authors' name, article title, etc. With Microsoft Office documents, author identification should also be removed from the properties for the file.
- The review process: Section Editor is assigned to handle the editorial process by Editors. Submission is typically sent to two reviewers for evaluation. Then, Section Editor works with two reports, and submit a unified report to the author(s). Article in order to be accepted to the journal must take a positive evaluation from two referees. When necessary, the third referee or the advisory committee may be asked to contribute to the evaluation process.
- Length of Review Process: The publication process of the accepted work lasts 2-6 months from the date of receipt.
- Plagiarism policy: Plagiarism is defined to present a portion or all the work of others as their own. Duplication or self-plagiarism is the reuse of a portion or all of the work in another article without citing the original work.
Peer Review Process
Last Update Time:
July 8, 2024