The Ethical Compass of Digital Classrooms: Teachers’ Perspectives on AI Ethics in Education

Year 2026, Volume: 10 Issue: 1 , 99 - 155 , 31.03.2026

Ayten Arslan

https://izlik.org/JA92YE57HC

Abstract

The aim of the study is to examine primary school teachers’ perspectives on the ethics of artificial intelligence [AI] in education in depth. The research was conducted using a phenomenological design. The study group consisted of 62 primary school teachers working in Türkiye. Data were analyzed using an inductive content analysis approach, allowing themes and categories to emerge directly from the participants’ responses. The results indicate that teachers recognize both the potential benefits and challenges of AI in classroom settings. Participants highlighted concerns regarding ethical risks, the need for effective control and oversight of AI tools, precautions against technical problems, and the impact of security vulnerabilities on student data. Teachers also emphasized the importance of ensuring privacy, fairness, and equal opportunities in AI-supported education, as well as informing stakeholders about AI decision-making processes. Furthermore, the results underscore the necessity of establishing clear ethical rules and assigning accountability for AI errors. These insights provide a comprehensive understanding of responsible AI implementation in educational contexts and offer guidance for policymakers, administrators, and educators aiming to integrate AI technologies in ways that enhance learning while upholding ethical and security standards.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence , ethics , artificial intelligence ethics , primary school teachers , education.

Ethical Statement

The study was reviewed by the Muş Alparslan University Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee. The ethics review decision was issued on 10.02.2025 with Decision No 182174.

Supporting Institution

No financial or institutional support was received for this research.

Thanks

The author declares that no individual or organization contributed to the study other than the author.

Dijital Sınıfların Etik Pusulası: Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Eğitimde Yapay Zekâ Etiğine Yönelik Görüşleri

https://izlik.org/JA92YE57HC

Abstract

Çalışmanın amacı, sınıf öğretmenlerinin eğitimde yapay zekâ [YZ] etiğine ilişkin görüşlerini derinlemesine incelemektir. Araştırma, fenomenolojik desen kullanılarak yürütülmüştür. Çalışma grubunu, Türkiye’de bir ilde görev yapan 62 sınıf öğretmeni oluşturmaktadır. Veriler, katılımcıların yanıtlarından temalar ve kategorilerin doğrudan ortaya çıkmasına olanak tanıyan tümevarımsal içerik analizi yaklaşımıyla analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçlar, öğretmenlerin sınıf ortamlarında YZ’nin kullanımının hem potansiyel yararlarını hem de karşılaşılabilecek güçlüklerini fark ettiklerini göstermektedir. Sınıf öğretmenleri etik riskler, YZ araçlarının etkili biçimde kontrol edilmesi ve denetlenmesi gerekliliği, teknik sorunlara karşı alınması gereken önlemler ile güvenlik açıklarının öğrenci verileri üzerindeki etkilerine ilişkin kaygılarını dile getirmiştir. Öğretmenler ayrıca, YZ destekli eğitimde gizlilik, adalet ve fırsat eşitliğinin sağlanmasının önemini vurgulamış; YZ’nin karar verme süreçleri hakkında tüm paydaşların bilgilendirilmesi gerektiğini belirtmiştir. Bununla birlikte, bulgular YZ’ye ilişkin açık etik kuralların oluşturulması ve YZ kaynaklı hatalar için sorumluluğun net biçimde tanımlanması gerekliliğine işaret etmektedir. Elde edilen bu sonuçlar, eğitim bağlamında sorumlu yapay zekâ uygulamalarına ilişkin kapsamlı bir anlayış sunmakta ve öğrenmeyi desteklerken etik ve güvenlik standartlarını gözeten YZ entegrasyonu hedefleyen politika yapıcılar, yöneticiler ve eğitimciler için yol gösterici nitelik taşımaktadır.

Keywords

Yapay zekâ , etik , yapay zekâ etiği , sınıf öğretmenleri , eğitim.

Ethical Statement

Çalışma, Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırmalar ve Yayın Etiği Kurulu tarafından incelenmiştir. Etik kurul kararı, 10.02.2025 tarihinde gerçekleştirilen 182174 sayılı karar ile alınmıştır.

Supporting Institution

Bu araştırma kapsamında herhangi bir mali veya kurumsal destek alınmamıştır.

Thanks

Yazar, çalışma sürecine kendisi dışında herhangi bir kişi ya da kurumun katkı sağlamadığını beyan etmektedir.

References

• Ahmed, Z. E., Hashim, A. H. A., Saeed, R. A., & Saeed, M. M. (2024). AI-enhanced education: Bridging educational disparities. In AI-enhanced teaching methods (pp. 1-20). IGI Global
• Aksakal, Ş., Emre, İ., & Özbek, M. (2024). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin yapay zekaya ilişkin tutumlarının belirlenmesi [Determining classroom teachers’ attitudes towards artificial intelligence]. The Journal of New Approaches in Education, 7(1), 1-13.
• Albahijan, N., Al-Suraibi, H., Alotaibi, J. A., & Alotaibi, K. (2025). Artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Computers and Informatics, 4(1), 9-61. https://doi.org/10.59992/ijci.2025.v4n1p1
• Aldossari, M. (2024). Enhancing user experiences in ai-driven decision-making. Online Journal of Robotics & Automation Technology, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.33552/ojrat.2024.03.000552
• Ali, H. Y., & Okon, O. E. (2024). Balancing innovation and ethics: educators’ perspectives on the role of ai in education. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 6(9), 128-139. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/volume06issue09-14
• Araujo Sandoval, O. I. (2024). El impacto de la inteligencia artificial en el aprendizaje activo. Horizon Nexus Journal, 2(4), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.70881/hnj/v2/n4/43
• Arranz-Garcia, O. A., García, M. D. C. R., & Alonso-Secades, V. (2025). Perceptions, strategies, and challenges of teachers in the integration of artificial intelligence in primary education: A systematic review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 24, 1-48. https://doi.org/10.28945/5458
• Bayan, F. M. (2024). The ethics of AI: Navigating the moral dilemmas of artificial intelligence. Arab Journal for Scientific Publishing, 7(66), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.36571/ajsp661
• Bensason, İ., Dericioğlu Egemen, A., Kaspi, R., Küzeci, E., Sezgin, Ö., & Uyan, B. (2024). Yapay zekâ etik ilkeleri ve hukuki düzenlemeler raporu [Report on artificial intelligence ethics and legal regulations]. Türkiye Yapay Zekâ İnisiyatifi. Retrieved 15 April, 2025 from https://turkiye.ai/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/TRAI-Yapay-Zeka-Etik-Ilkeleri-ve-Hukuki-Duzenlemeler-Raporu-Mayis-2024-5.pdf
• Bernardo, G., Bernardo M., & Fuentes, A. (2024). La ética de la inteligencia artificial en el campo educativo. Mundo Científico Internacional (MUCIN), 8, 40-50. https://doi.org/10.59333/mucin.e8.3
• Bhat, M. (2024, June 23-26). Creative explainable AI tools to understand algorithmic decision-making. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition, New York, NY, USA, (pp. 10-16), Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3635636.3664622
• Bhavana, S., Jayashree, K., & Rao, T. V. N. (2025). Navigating AI biases in education: A foundation for equitable learning. In AI applications and strategies in teacher education (pp. 135-160). IGI Global.
• Binns, R. (2018). Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (pp. 149-159). PMLR.
• Bölükbaş, F. A., Engin, K., Polat, E. B., & Budak, K. S. (2023). Do we support ethical behavior in digital tool use in early childhood?. In Critical roles of digital citizenship and digital ethics (pp. 206-234). IGI Global.
• Brundage, M., Avin, S., Clark, J., Toner, H., Eckersley, P., Garfinkel, B., Dafoe, A., Scharre, P., Zeitzoff, T., Filar, B., Anderson, H., Roff, H., Allen, G. C., Steinhardt, J., Flynn, C., Ó hÉigeartaigh, S., Beard, S., Belfield, H., Farquhar, S., ... & Amodei, D. (2018). The malicious use of artificial intelligence: Forecasting, prevention, and mitigation. Apollo-University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.07228
• Bu, Q. (2022). Ethical risks in integrating artificial intelligence into education and potential countermeasures. Science Insights, 41(1), 561-566. https://doi.org/10.15354/si.22.re067
• Chisega-Negrilă, A. M. (2024). Teaching and learning in an AI-powered world. Bulletin of “Carol I”. National Defence University, 13(3), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.53477/2284-9378-24-33
• Contreras, M. R., & Jaimes, J. O. P. (2024, October). AI ethics in the fields of education and research: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Symposium on Accreditation of Engineering and Computing Education (ICACIT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
• Council of the EU. (2023, December 9). Artificial intelligence act: Council and Parliament strike a deal on the first rules for AI in the world. Council of the EU. Retrieved 27 May, 2025 from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023/12/09/artificial-intelligence-act-council-and-parliament-strike-a-deal-on-the-first-worldwide-rules-for-ai/
• Crawford, K. (2021). The atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University.
• Creswell, J. W. (2016). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni [Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches]. (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Trans. Eds.). Siyasal.
• Çam, M. B., Çelik, N. C., Güntepe, E. T., & Durukan, Ü. G. (2021). Öğretmen adaylarının yapay zekâ teknolojileri ile ilgili farkındalıklarının belirlenmesi [Determining teacher candidates’ awareness of artificial intelligence technologies]. Hatay Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 18(48), 263-285.
• Çetin, M., & Aktaş, A. (2021). Yapay zeka ve eğitimde gelecek senaryoları [Artificial intelligence and future scenarios in education]. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(Special Issue on Educational Sciences), 4225-4268. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.911444
• Dimitriadou, E., & Lanitis, A. (2023). A critical evaluation, challenges, and future perspectives of using artificial intelligence and emerging technologies in smart classrooms. Smart Learning Environments, 10(12), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00231-3
• Duarte, N., Pérez, Y. M., Beltran, A., & García, M. B. (2023, May 9-11). Use of artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review. In Proceedings of the 4th South American International Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Conference, Lima, Peru, (pp. 614-624), IEOM Society International.
• Edam, S. M. (2024). AI in educational design and technological development. In AI-Enhanced teaching methods (pp. 25-60). IGI Global.
• European Commission (EC). (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Retrieved 27 May, 2025 from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
• Filiz, O., Kaya, M. H., & Adıgüzel, T. (2025). Teachers and AI: Understanding the factors influencing AI integration in K-12 education. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 17931-17967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13463-2
• Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for ai in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
• Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good ai society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds & Machines, 28, 689-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
• Görentaş, M., & Çiftçi, H. (2024). Avrupa Birliği yapay zekâ yasası çerçevesinde yargılamada yapay zekâ kullanımının değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the use of artificial intelligence in legal proceedings within the framework of the European Union artificial intelligence act]. İzmir Barosu Dergisi, 89(1), 177-203.
• Gouseti, A., James, F., Fallin, L., & Burden, K. (2024). The ethics of using AI in K-12 education: A systematic literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 34(2), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2024.2428601
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82.
• Guggemos, J., Schmidt, J., & Happ, R. (2024). A matter of power: prospective teachers’ attitudes towards the ethical principles of artificial intelligence use in education. Deleted Journal, 38(1), 73-97. https://doi.org/10.62350/rruc7209
• Huang, L. (2023). Ethics of artificial intelligence in education: Student privacy and data protection. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 16(2), 2577-2587. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.23.re202
• Ismail, I. A., & Aloshi, J. M. R. (2025). Data privacy in AI-driven education: An in-depth exploration into the data privacy concerns and potential solutions. In AI Applications and strategies in teacher education. IGI Global.
• Ivanov, S. (2023). The dark side of artificial intelligence in higher education. The Service Industries Journal, 43, 1055-1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2023.2258799
• Jackson, K., & Papa, R. (2023, October 18). Artificial intelligence in education (AIED) for student well-being. Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Retrieved 29 Jan. 2026, from https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-1921
• Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389-399.
• Jose, D. (2024). Data privacy and security concerns in ai-integrated educational platforms. Recent trends in Management and Commerce, 5(2), 87-91. https://doi.org/10.46632/rmc/5/2/19
• Kamenskih, A. (2022). The analysis of security and privacy risks in smart education environments. Journal of Smart Cities and Society, 1(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.3233/SCS-210114
• Karan, B., & Angadi, G. R. (2023). Potential risks of artificial intelligence integration into school education: A systematic review. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 43(3-4), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/02704676231224705
• Kaya, A., Şahin, Ç., & Demir, D. (2023). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin dijital okuryazar olma durumları [Digital literacy status of primary school teachers]. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 12(4), 818-834. https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.1418200
• Keskin, D., & Sevli, O. (2024). Eğitimde yapay zekâ ve etik [Artificial intelligence and ethics in education]. In International Topkapı Congress III, İstanbul, Türkiye.
• Kölemen, C. Ş. (2024). Artificial intelligence technologies and ethics in educational processes: Solution suggestions and results. Innoeduca, 10(2), 201-216. https://doi.org/10.24310/ijtei.102.2024.19806
• Köse, B., Radıf, H., Baysal, İ., & Demirci, N. (2023). Öğretmen görüşlerine göre eğitimde yapay zekanın önemi [The importance of artificial intelligence in education according to teachers’ views]. Journal of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences, 9(71), 4203-4209. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/JOSH AS.74125
• Kurt, M. (2024). Eğitim yöneticilerinin yapay zeka teknolojilerini kullanmaya yönelik görüşlerinin belirlenmesi [Determining the views of education administrators on the use of artificial intelligence technologies]. (Publication No. 896191) [Master thesis, Marmara University]. National Thesis Center.
• Leong, W. Y., Leong, Y. Z., & Leong, W. S. (2025). Artificial intelligence in education. In Proceedings of the IET International Conference on Engineering Technologies and Applications (ICETA 2024) (pp. 183-184). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2024.4341
• Li, H. (2023). AI in education: Bridging the divide or widening the gap? Exploring equity, opportunities, and challenges in the digital age. Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research, 8(1), 355-360. https://doi.org/10.56028/aehssr.8.1.355.2023
• Li, R., & Dan, F. (2024). Exploring the Path of Teacher Dominance in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 10(5), 626-630. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.10.5.626-630
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
• Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-16). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
• Lubis, E. F., Hidayah, H. F., Adelia, N., & Nasution, A. F. (2024). The role of teachers in developing student character in the digital age. Education achievement: Journal of Science and Research, 5(2), 543-552. https://doi.org/10.51178/jsr.v5i2.1975
• Ma, X., & Jiang, C. (2023). On the ethical risks of artificial intelligence applications in education and its avoidance strategies. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 14, 354-359. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v14i.8868
• Malik, P. K. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in education: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, 8(6), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM35475
• Matta, N., Abel, M. H., & Karray, H. (2023). Why ethics is important to consider in AI. In Proceedings of the 20th ACS/IEEE International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
• Meylani, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence in the education of teachers: A qualitative synthesis of the cutting-edge research literature. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 12(24), 600-637. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1477709
• Mishara, P. (2024). The ethical implications of AI in education: Privacy, bias, and accountability. Journal of Informatics Education and Research, 4(2), 3550-3556. https://doi.org/10.52783/jier.v4i2.1827
• MoDastoni, D.A. (2023). Exploring methods to make AI decisions more transparent and understandable for humans. Advances in Engineering Innovation, 3, 32-36. https://doi.org/10.54254/2977-3903/3/2023037
• Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
• Mubofu, C., & Kitali, L. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: Ethics & responsible implementation. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.32674/9rjyjp52
• Ninaus, M., & Sailer, M. (2022). Closing the loop – The human role in artificial intelligence for education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 956798. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.956798
• Owino, B. A., & Paschal, M. J. (2023). AI and ethics in education: Implications and strategies for responsible implementation. In Creative AI tools and ethical implications in teaching and learning (pp. 196-211). IGI Global.
• Öksüz Gül, F. (2024). Eğitimde yapay zekâ: Eğitim fakültesi akademisyenleri için fırsatlar ve riskler [Artificial intelligence in education: Opportunities and risks for education faculty academics]. Medeniyet Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(2), 71-97.
• Özer, S., Akgül, S., & Yıldırım, A. (2023). Okullarda yapay zekâ kullanımına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri [Teachers’ views on the use of artificial intelligence in schools]. Ulusal Eğitim Dergisi, 3(10), 1776-1794.
• Paschal, M. J., & Melly, I. K. (2023). Ethical guidelines on the use of AI in education. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0205-7.ch013
• Patrizi, N., Girolami, A., & Crescenzi, C. (2025). Il contributo dell’intelligenza artificiale per la qualificazione dei processi di istruzione [The contribution of artificial ıntelligence to the qualification of educational processes]. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), (30), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2024-030-patr
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage.
• Pedró, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366994
• Pentland, A. (2021). Optimized human–AI decision making: A personal perspective. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 778-780). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462244.3479880
• Pinto, F., & Garcia, A. (2024). Facing constitutive and normative aspects of different philosophical currents when approaching AI ethics. In Anais da 1ª Conferência Latino-Americana de Ética em Inteligência Artificial. SBC. https://doi.org/10.5753/laai-ethics.2024.32470
• Roshanaei, M., Olivares, H., & Lopez, R. R. (2023). Harnessing AI to foster equity in education: Opportunities, challenges, and emerging strategies. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, 15(4), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.4236/jilsa.2023.154009
• Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
• Ružičić, V., Cvetković, S., & Mitrović, K. (2024). Advancing the teaching method in the era of widespread artificial intelligence application: An explorative study. In Proceedings of the 10th International Scientific Conference Technics, Informatics and Education (TIE) (pp. 161-168). University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Technical Sciences Čačak. https://doi.org/10.46793/tie24.161r
• Sahoo, M. (2024). Ethics in AI: Critical skills for the new world. In Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference (ADIPEC). https://doi.org/10.2118/222249-MS
• Sain, Z. H., & Lawal, U. S. (2024). Morality in higher education’s AI integration: Examining ethical stances on implementation. Journal of Educational Management Research, 3(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.61987/jemr.v3i1.351
• Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
• Salloum, S. A. (2024). AI perils in education: Exploring ethical concerns. In A. Al-Marzouqi, S. A. Salloum, M. Al-Saidat, A. Aburayya, & B. Gupta (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: The power and dangers of ChatGPT in the classroom (Vol. 144, pp. 669-675). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52280-2_43
• Santhoshkumar, S. P., Susithra, K., & Prasath, T. K. (2023). An overview of artificial intelligence ethics: Issues and solution for challenges in different fields. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Capsule Networks, 5(1), 69-86. https://doi.org/10.36548/jaicn.2023.1.006
• Schaeffer, D., Coombs, L., Luckett, J., Marin, M., & Olson, P. (2024). Risks of AI applications used in higher education. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 22(6), 60-65. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.6.3457
• Schleiss, J., Günther, K., & Stober, S. (2022). Protecting student data in ML pipelines: An overview of privacy-preserving ML. In M. M. Rodrigo, N. Matsuda, A. I. Cristea, & V. Dimitrova (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: Posters and late breaking results, workshops and tutorials, industry and innovation tracks, practitioners’ and doctoral consortium (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 13356). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_109
• Sethy, A., Shaik, N., Yadavalli, P., & Anandaraj, S. (2024). 9 AI: Issues, concerns, and ethical considerations. In V. de Albuquerque, P. Raj & S. Yadav (Ed.), Toward artificial general intelligence: Deep learning, neural networks, generative AI. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111323749-009
• Seyhan, A. (2024). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin eğitimde yapay zeka kullanımına ilişkin görüşleri [Social studies teachers’ views on the use of artificial intelligence in education]. The Journal of International Educational Sciences, 11(41), 100-125. https://doi.org/10.29228/INESJOURNAL.78798
• Seyrek, M., Yıldız, S., Emeksiz, H., Şahin, A., & Türkmen, M. T. (2024). Öğretmenlerin eğitimde yapay zeka kullanımına yönelik algıları [Teachers’ perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence in education]. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR), 11(106), 845-856. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11113077
• Solak, Y., Dal, H. O., Çınkır, G., & Onu, F. N. (2025). Yapay zekâ etiği: Eğitimde kullanımının sınırları ve sorumlulukları [Ethics of artificial intelligence: limits and responsibilities of its use in education]. Socrates Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Researches, 11(49), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14762322
• Sontay, G., Kazancı, Y., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2024). Öğretimde yapay zekâ uygulamaları hakkında sınıf öğretmenleri ne düşünüyor? [What do classroom teachers think about artificial intelligence applications in teaching?] Istanbul Education Journal, 1(1), 98-120. https://doi.org/10.71270/istanbulegitim.istj.1586392
• Şenocak, D., Bozkurt, A., & Koçdar, S. (2024). Exploring the ethical principles for the implementation of artificial intelligence in education. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1351-0.ch010
• Thiebes, S., Lins, S., & Sunyaev, A. (2021). Trustworthy artificial intelligence. Electronic Markets, 31, 447-464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00441-4
• Uygun, D. (2024). Teachers’ perspectives on artificial intelligence in education. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(1), 931-939. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.01.005
• Van Manen, M. (2016). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Routledge.
• Viberg, O., Cukurova, M., Feldman-Maggor, Y., Alexandron, G., Shirai, S., Kanemune, S., Wasson, B., Tømte, C., Spikol, D., Milrad, M., Coelho, R., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2024). What explains teachers’ trust in AI in education across six countries? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35, 1288-1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00433-x
• Wangdi, P. (2024). Integrating artificial intelligence in education: Trends and opportunities. International Journal of Research in STEM Education, 6(2), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v6i2.1722
• Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995
• Williamson, B., Eynon, R., Knox, J., & Davies, H. (2023). Critical perspectives on AI in education: Political economy, discrimination, commercialization, governance and ethics. In B. Boulay, A. Mitrovic & K. Yace (Eds.), Handbook of artificial intelligence in education (pp. 553-570). Edward Elgar.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Seçkin.
• Yılmaz, N., & Çakır, R. (2024). Öğretmenlerin eğitimde yapay zeka kullanımı farkındalığı [Teachers’ awareness of the use of artificial intelligence in education]. International Congresses on Education. Balıkesir, Türkiye. Retrieved 17 April 2025 from https://www.erpacongress.com/upload/dosya/erpa-2024_fulltext_book-of-proceedings_167827c7eb4125.pdf#page=92
• Yolcu, H. H. (2024). Yapay genel zeka çağında öğretmen rolünün yeniden tanımlanması: Öngörüler [Redefining the teacher’s role in the era of artificial general intelligence: Prognosticate]. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(1), 155-167. https://doi.org/10.51948/auad.1383166
• Zainuddin, N. (2024). Does artificial intelligence cause more harm than good in schools? International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v14i1.10432
• Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0