Abstract
Analyzing the laryngeal cancer operations data by
the k-means algorithm. In this study, a software
tool was developed to analyze the laryngeal
cancer operations data by using the k-means
algorithm, which is a clustering algorithms in data
mining. The algorithm was used to point out the
intensities in the data set and to displayed in
charts. The software which was run on real-world
medical data, is a tool for taking desicions and it
can be used to support research, to enhance
supervision, and to aid in teaching activities.
According to our search, there is not any
application, which is similar to this.
Abstract
Bu çalışmada, veri madenciliğinde bir kümeleme tekniği olan k-means algoritmasını kullanan bir yazılım geliştirilerek, gırtlak kanseri ameliyat verilerinin analizinin yapılması amaçlanmıştır. K-means algoritması ile veri kümesi içindeki yoğunlaşmalar belirlenmiş ve grafik aracılığı ile görüntülenmiştir. Gerçek tıbbi veriler kullanılarak geliştirilen yazılım, karar vermede yardımcı bir araçtır, araştırma, denetim ve eğitim amacıyla kullanılabilir. Literatür taramasında benzer başka bir çalışmaya rastlanmamıştır.
Details
| Other ID | JA37GT34JC |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Makaleler(Araştırma) |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 24, 2016 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2006 Volume: 2 Issue: 1 - Volume: 2 Issue: 1 |
Cite
Article Acceptance
Use user registration/login to upload articles online.
The acceptance process of the articles sent to the journal consists of the following stages:
1. Each submitted article is sent to at least two referees at the first stage.
2. Referee appointments are made by the journal editors. There are approximately 200 referees in the referee pool of the journal and these referees are classified according to their areas of interest. Each referee is sent an article on the subject he is interested in. The selection of the arbitrator is done in a way that does not cause any conflict of interest.
3. In the articles sent to the referees, the names of the authors are closed.
4. Referees are explained how to evaluate an article and are asked to fill in the evaluation form shown below.
5. The articles in which two referees give positive opinion are subjected to similarity review by the editors. The similarity in the articles is expected to be less than 25%.
6. A paper that has passed all stages is reviewed by the editor in terms of language and presentation, and necessary corrections and improvements are made. If necessary, the authors are notified of the situation.
.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.