Zararlı yazılımlar sahip oldukları
yeteneklerden ötürü bilgisayar ve sistemlere büyük tehlike oluşturmaktadır.
Etkin tespit sistemlerinin gelişmesinden aynı şekilde etkilenerek daha
tehlikeli ve donanımlı hale gelmektedirler. Otomatik bir tespit sistemi
geliştirmek için, zararlı yazılımlar iyi analiz edilmeli ve gelişim meyilleri
doğru tespit edilmelidir. Zararlı yazılımların çalıştığı bilgisayarda yarattığı
etkiler ve kod yapısı ayrıntılı incelenmeli ve öyle önlem alınmalıdır. Bu
çalışmada önerilen tespit sistemi, zararlı yazılımın hem davranış hem kod
yapısı bilgisini kullanarak Markov zinciri yöntemi ile istatistiksel bir anlam
çıkarmaktadır. Daha sonra derin öğrenme teknikleri ile temellendirilmiş model
melez veri kaynağı ile eğitilmiş ve tespit ortamı hazırlanmıştır. Yaptığımız
testler sonucunda önerilen tespit yöntemi %96,8’lik doğruluk göstermiştir.
Malware poses a great danger to
computers and systems due to their capabilities. They are also affected by the
development of effective detection systems and become more dangerous and
equipped. In order to develop an automated detection system, malware must be
well analyzed, and inclination of their evolution should be accurately understood. The runtime
effects of malicious software on the computer and code structure should be
examined in detail and precautions should be taken. The detection system
proposed in this study makes a statistical meaning with Markov chain method
using both behavior and code structure knowledge of malware. Then the model
based on deep learning techniques is trained with the hybrid data source and
detection environment is prepared. As a result of the tests we performed, the
accuracy of the detection method was 96.8%.
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Journal Section | Makaleler(Araştırma) |
Authors | |
Publication Date | December 17, 2019 |
Published in Issue | Year 2019 Volume: 12 Issue: 2 |
Article Acceptance
Use user registration/login to upload articles online.
The acceptance process of the articles sent to the journal consists of the following stages:
1. Each submitted article is sent to at least two referees at the first stage.
2. Referee appointments are made by the journal editors. There are approximately 200 referees in the referee pool of the journal and these referees are classified according to their areas of interest. Each referee is sent an article on the subject he is interested in. The selection of the arbitrator is done in a way that does not cause any conflict of interest.
3. In the articles sent to the referees, the names of the authors are closed.
4. Referees are explained how to evaluate an article and are asked to fill in the evaluation form shown below.
5. The articles in which two referees give positive opinion are subjected to similarity review by the editors. The similarity in the articles is expected to be less than 25%.
6. A paper that has passed all stages is reviewed by the editor in terms of language and presentation, and necessary corrections and improvements are made. If necessary, the authors are notified of the situation.
. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.