ETİK DURUM ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN GEÇERLİLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Abstract

İdealizm ve görecilik olmak üzere iki alt boyuttan oluşan Forsyth’nin (1980) Etik Durum Ölçeği, (EDÖ) işletmeden eğitim alanına tüm dünyada farklı ülke ve kültürlerde yapılan araştırmalarda yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada EDÖ’nün geçerlilik ve güvenirliği toplam 543 lisans öğrencisi üzerine yapılan uygulamayla incelenmiştir. Yapı geçerliliğini değerlendirmek için ölçeğin maddeleri temel bileşenler çözümlemesi yoluyla faktör çözümlemesine tabi tutulmuştur. Sonuçlar toplam varyansın % 51.07’sını açıklayan iki faktörlü bir yapı ortaya koymuştur. Cronbach alfa yöntemiyle ölçülen iç tutarlılık güvenirliği toplam 19 madde için .90, idealizm faktörü için .92 ve görecilik faktörü için .84 olarak bulunmuştur. Sonuç olarak, EDÖ’nin Türkçe formuna ilişkin bulgular ölçeğin geçerli ve güvenilir olduğunu göstermiştir.

Keywords

• Etik durum, idealizm, görecilik, EDÖ

A STUDY OF THE RELAIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF ETHICS POSITION QUESTIONNAIRE

Abstract

Forsyth’s (1980) Ethics Position Questionnaire (EPQ), which includes two subscales measuring idealism and relativism domains, has been extensively used from business to education context in cross-cultural and national studies across the world. In the present study, we investigated the reliability and validity of the EPQ based on 543 undergraduate students In order to assess construct validity of the questionnaire, the scale items were subjected to an explanatory factor analysis with principal component analysis. The results revealed two factors accounted for 51.07 % of the variance in the items. Internal consistency reliability measured via Cronbach’s coefficient alpha was found .90 for total 19 items, and .92 and .84 for idealism and relativism factors respectively. Over all, our findings report a satisfactory reliability and validity of the Turkish version of EPQ.

Keywords

• Ethics position, idealism, realtivism, EPQ

References

1. Barnet, T., Bass, K. ve Brown, G. (1994). Ethical ideology and ethical judgment regarding ethical issues in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 469– 480.
2. Barnet, T., Bass, K. ve Brown, G. (1996). Religiosity, ethical ideology, and intentions to report a peer’s wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1161–1174.
3. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi ders kitabı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
4. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
5. Davis, M. A., Andersen, M. G. ve Curtis, M. B. (2001). Measuring ethical ideology in business ethics: A critical analysis of the ethics position questionnaire. Journal of Business Ethics, 32, 35-55.
6. Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxanomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 (1), 175-185.
7. Forsyth, D. R. ve Berger, R. E. (1982). The effects of ethical ideology on moral behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 117, 53-56.
8. Forsyth, D. R. (1992). Judging the morality of business practices: The influence of personal moral philosophy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 461-470.

9. Forsyth, D. R., Nye, J. L. ve Kelley, K. (2001). Idealism, relativism, and the ethic of caring. The Journal of Psychology, 122 (3), 243-248.
10. Forsyth, D. R.; O’Boyle, E. H. ve McDaniel Michael, A. (2008). East meets west: A meta-analytic investigations in idealism and relativism. Journal of Business Ethics, 83 (4), 813-833.
11. Forsyth, D. R. ve Berger, R. E. (1982). The effects of ethical ideology on moral behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 117, 53-56.
12. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
13. Guttman, L. (1954). Some necessary conditions for common-factor ananlysis. Psychometrika, 19, 149-161.
14. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E. ve Tatham, R. L. (1987). Multivariate data analysis, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
15. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
16. Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development, Vol.1: The philosophy of moral development, Harper & Row.
17. Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgement of the child. London: Routledge and Kegan.
18. Redfern, K. ve Crawford, J. (2004). An empirical investigation of the ethics position questionnaire in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 199-210.
19. Schlenker, B. R. ve Forstyth, D. R (1977). On the ethics of psychological research. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 369-296.
20. Stevens, J. (1996). Applied Multivaried Statistics for the Social Sciences. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
21. Tansey, R. Brown, G. Hyman, M. R. ve Dawson, L. E. (1994). Personal moral philosophy and the moral judgments of salespeople, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 14 (1), 59-75.
22. Thomson, B. (2004). Explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis. Washington: American Psycgological Association.
23. Vaus, D. (2002). Analyzing social science date. London: Sage Publication.
24. Yazıcı, S. (2001). Felsefeye giriş. Ankara: Alfa Yayınevi.
25. Yurtseven, G. (1999). Ethical beliefs and creativity. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13 (4), 747-754.
26. Yurtseven, G. (2000). Ethical beliefs and tolerance of ambiguity. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 28(2), 141-148.