DEVELOPING AN ADOLESCENT SUBJECTIVE WELL BEING SCALE

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4, 975 - 989, 01.12.2009

Ali Eryılmaz

Öz

The aim of this study is to develop Adolescent Subjective Well Being Scale. In this
study, the data were collected from 250 participants including 156 females and 94
males between 14-18 years old. The researcher formed 35 items with respect to lay
theories of adolescent and subjective well being theory, and gave these items to
participants. The analyses for reliability and validity of the scale showed that there
were four factors explaining 61.64 % variance of the scale, which was composed of
15 items. The internal consistency for the scale was found .86 and the findings
showed that Adolescent Subjective Well Being Scale was a valid and reliable
instrument.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Subjective well being, validity, reliability, scale, adolescent

ERGEN ÖZNEL İYİ OLUŞ ÖLÇEĞİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ

Öz

Yetişkin mutluluğu ile ilgili oldukça çok çalışma yapılmıştır. Buna karşın ergen ve çocuk mutluluğu ile ilgili çalışmaların oldukça yeni olduğu görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada ergen öznel iyi oluş ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmaya 14-18 yaşları arasında 156 kız ve 94 erkek olmak üzere toplam 250 ergen katılmıştır. Yapılan analizlerin sonucunda, dört boyutlu 15 maddeden oluşan açıklanan varyansı %61.64 olan bir ölçek elde edilmiştir. Ölçeğin iç tutarlık katsayısı .86 ve Spearman Brown değeri .83; test tekrar test yöntemine dayalı güvenirlik değeri ise .83’tür. Analizlerin sonucunda ergen öznel iyi oluş ölçeğinin güvenilir ve geçerli olduğu bulunmuştur. Ölçeğin, ileride yapılacak çalışmalar için kullanılabileceği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Öznel iyi oluş, geçerlik, güvenirlik, ölçek, ergen

Kaynakça

• Andrews, F.M., Withey, S.B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.
• Bradburn, N., Coplavitz, D. (1965). Reports of happiness. Chicago: Aldine.
• Brickman, P., Campbell, D.T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning good
• society. In M.H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation-Level Theory (pp.287-305). New York: Academic Press.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2003). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi elkitabı: istatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
• Cacioppo, J.T., Gardner, W.L., Bernston, G.G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form folows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 839-855.
• Cantor, N. (1990). From taught to behavior: Having and doing in the study of personality and cognition. American Psychologist, 45, 735-750.
• Deiner, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 95. 3, 542- 575.
• Deiner, E. (2001). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national Index. American Psychologist, Vol.55. No.1, 34-43.
• Eryılmaz, A., Yorulmaz, A. (2006a). Lay theories of happinness for adolescent. Xth EARA (European Association of the Research on Adolescence). Conference, on May 2-6, 2006, in Antalya-TURKEY.
• Eryılmaz, A. , Yorulmaz, A. (2006b). Way of being happy for adolescent. Xth EARA (European Association of the Research on Adolescence). Conference, on May 2-6, 2006, in Antalya-TURKEY.
• Furnham, A., Cheng, H. (2000). Lay theories of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies. 1:227-246. Kluwer Academic Publishers: NL.
• Headey, B., Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731-739.
• Heubner, E.S., Laughlin, J.E., Ash, C., Gilman, R. (1998). Further validation of the multidimensional student life satisfaction scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assesment, 16pp, 118-134.
• Heubner, E.S., Suldo, S.M., Valois, R.R., Darne, J.W., Zullig, K. (2004). Brief multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale: Sex, race, and grade effects for high school sample. Psychological Reports, 94, pp.351-356.
• Joronen, K., Kurki, A. (2005). Familial contribution to adolescent subjective well- being. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 11,3,125-133.
• Katia, R., Paivi, A.K., Pekka,L. (2002). Adolescent subjective well-being and realized values. Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 38, Issue 3,p254-263.
• Kozma, A., Stones, M.J. (1980). Measurement of happiness: Development of the memorial university of newfoundlend scale of happiness. Journal of Gerontology, 35, 906-912.
• Köker, S. (1991). Normal ve sorunlu ergenlerin yaşam doyumu düzeyinin karşılaştırılması. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, A.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Lu, L., Gılmour, R., Kao, S.F. (2001). Cultural values and happiness: An esat-west- dialogue. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(4).477-493.
• Lucas, R. E. , Deiner, E., Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616-628.
• Lucas, R.E., Clark, A.E., Georgellis, Y., Deiner, E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 84, No.3, 527-539.
• Lyubommirsky, S. (2001). Why are some people happier than others: The role of cognitive and motivational processes in well-being. American Psychologist, Vol.56. No.3, 239-249.
• Maslow, A.H. (1987). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row Publisher.
• Myers, D., Deiner, E. (1995). Who is happy. American Psychological Society, Vol. 6. No.1.p19.
• Nalbant, A. (1993). 15-22 Yaşları arasında bulunan ilahevindeki, gözetim altındaki ve suç işlememiş gençlerin benlik saygısı ve yaşam doyumu düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, A.Ü. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Park, N. (2004). The role of subjective well-being in positive youth development. The ANNALS of American Acedemy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 591, No.1, 25-39.
• Palys, T.S., Little, B.R. (1983). Perceived life satisfaction and organization of personal project systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1221-1230.
• Pesseschkian, N. (1980). Positive family therapy: Frankfurt: Fischer Verlog.
• Rask, K., Kurki,P.A., Paavilainen, E. (2003). Adolescent subjective well-being and family dynamics. Scand J.Carin Sci, 17, 129-138.
• Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L. (2000). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166.
• Sandvik, E., Deiner, E., Seidlitz, L. (1993). Subjective well-being: The convergence and stability of self report and non-self report measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 317-342.