Improving of Simple Selection Index to Determine Oat (Avena sativa L.) Genotypes for Dual Purpose Production

Year 2025, Volume: 30 Issue: 1, 35 - 42, 23.06.2025

Tevrican Dokuyucu , Tuğba Başkonuş , Ziya Dumlupınar

https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.1587314

Abstract

Selection indices might be crucial to develop multipurpose genotypes in most environments for oat production. In this study, it was aimed to improve simple selection index value to determine oat genotypes for dual purpose production. The research was carried out in Kahramanmaraş conditions for consecutive two years between 2020-21 and 2021-22. In the research, a total number of 28 oat genotypes (10 landraces and 18 commercial cultivars) were used as plant materials and, plant height (PH), panicle numbers m2 (PN m2), grain number per panicle (GNP), 1000-grain weight (1000-GW), harvest Index (HI), dry hay yield (DHY) and grain yield (GY) traits were investigated. Based on grain yield and dry hay yield, formula of selection index value for dual purposed oat genotypes was determined; SI (Selection Index) = (AGYG (Average Grain Yield of Each Genotype) – AGYE (Average Grain Yield of Genotypes by the Experiments)/AGYE) + (ADHYG (Average Dry Hay Yield of Each Genotype)-ADHYE (Average Dry Hay Yield by Experiments)/ADHYE). Total selection index value was also obtained by collecting of selection index values belong to other investigated traits and dual purposed selection index values of oat genotypes.
According to the results, TL227 with 0.455 value had the highest selection index which will be used in order to determine of dual purposed oat genotypes. This genotype was also followed by Kahraman (0.414), Kırklar (0.344) and TL341 (0.264) oat genotypes. These oat genotypes with higher selection index value may be suggested for both DHY and GY. Total selection index vales also pointed out same oat genotypes for experiment region. The results also showed that formula of this simple selection index value may be applied for the other cereals such as corn, wheat, barley sorghum etc. and as well as the other traits.

Keywords

dry hay yield , dual purposed , grain yield , oat genotypes , selection index value , yield related traits

Supporting Institution

This study was a project that was financed by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University

Project Number

2021/7-8D

Thanks

This research was also a part of the PhD thesis of Tuğba BAŞKONUŞ whom also supported by Council of Higher Education as a fellowship on Sustainable Agriculture in 100/2000 program.

References

• Achleitner, A., Tinker, N. A., Zechner, E., & Buerstmayr. H. (2008). Genetic diversity among oat varieties of worldwide origin and associations of AFLP markers with quantitative traits. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 117, 1041-1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-008-0843-y
• Akkaya, A., Dokuyucu, T., Kara, R., & Akcura, M. (2006). Harmonization ratio of post- to pre-anthesis durations by thermal times for durum wheat cultivars in a Mediterranean environment. Eur. J. Agron., 24, 404-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2005.10.005
• Altuner, F., & Ulker, M. (2019). Effects of different sowing densities and nitrogen rates on yield and yield components on oat (Avena sativa L.). Academic Studies on Natural and Health Sciences, 299-319.
• Assefa, G. (2006). Avena sativa L. In: M. Brink, & G. Belay, (Eds.), Cereals and pulses/Céréales et légumes ecs., (pp. 28-32) PROTA Publishing.
• Ataman, C. (2022). The effects of nitrogen fertilizer with tea waste applications on yield and herbal characterıstic of oat (Avena sativa L.) The Institute of Sciences, Ordu University Field Crops Master Thesis, pp. 61.
• Basaran, U., Copur Dogrusoz, M., Gulumser, E., & Mut, H. (2017.). Hay yield and quality of intercropped sorghum-sudan grass hybrid and legumes with different seed ratio. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 22(1), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.301834
• Caliskan, M., & Koc, A. (2019). Morphological characterization of oat landraces belonging to the Western Mediterranean Region. Biotech Studies, 28(1), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.21566/tarbitderg.581083
• Cerı̇, S., & Acar, R. (2019). Use of cool climate cereals as green and dry forage in animal feeding. Journal of Bahri Dagdas Crop Research, 8(3), 178-194.
• Dariush, M., Ahad, M., & Meysam, O. (2006). Assessing the land equivalent ratio (LER) of two corn [Zea mays L.] varieties intercropping at various nitrogen levels in Karaj, Iran. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 7(2), 359-364.
• Donald, C. M., & Hamblin, J. (1976). The biological yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria. Advances in Agronomy, 28, 361-405.
• Dumlupinar, Z., Kara, R., Dokuyucu, T., & Akkaya, A. (2012). Correlation and path analysis of grain yield and yield components of some Turkish oat genotypes. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 44(1), 321-325.
• Dumlupinar, Z., Tekin, A., Herek, S., Tanrıkulu, A., Dokuyucu, T., & Akkaya, A. (2017). Evaluating some Turkish originated oat genotypes for some agronomic traits. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 5(7), 763-772. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v5i7.763-772.1181
• Duzme, M. (2020). Adaptation of some oat genotypes for supplementary irrigation in Sanliurfa. Harran University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Field Crops, pp. 65.
• Ercan, K., Tekin, A., Herek, S., Kurt, A., Kekec, E., Olgun, M. F., Dokuyucu, T., Dumlupinar, Z., & Akkaya, A. (2016). Performance of local oat lines in Kahramanmaras conditions. KSU J. Nat. Sci., 19(4), 438-444.
• Fang, H., Baret, F., Plummer, S., & Schaepman‐Strub, G. (2019). An overview of global leaf area index (LAI): Methods, products, validation, and applications. Reviews of Geophysics, 57(3),739-799. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000608
• Francia, E., Pecchioni, N., Nicosia, O. L. D., Paoletta, G., Taibi, L., Franco, V., ... &d Delogu, G. (2006). Dual-purpose barley and oat in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research, 99(2-3), 158-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.04.006
• Gautam, S. K., Verma, A. K., & Vishwakarma, S. R. (2006). Genetic variability and association of morpho-physiological characters in oat (Avena sativa L.). Journal of Farm Science, 15(1), 82-83.
• Halil, D. S., & Uzun, A. (2019). Seed yield and some quality characteristics of oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes growing at Bursa ecological conditions. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Bursa Uludag University, 33(2), 293-305.
• Hocaoglu, O. (2020). Determination of nitrogen use efficiencies of several oat cultivars in Canakkale ecological conditions. Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Doctoral Dissertation in Field Crops, pp. 71.
• Hocaoglu, O. (2022). Analysing growth patterns of selected Turkish oat cultivars using sigmoidal models. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 27(1), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.1064138
• Iannucci, A., Codianni, P., & Cattivelli, L. (2011). Evaluation of genotype diversity in oat germplasm and definition of ideotypes adapted to the Mediterranean environment. International Journal of Agronomy. 1:870925. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/870925
• JMP®, 2020. Version 15.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989–2020.
• Kahraman, T., Avcı, R., & Yıldırım, M. (2021). Determination of grain yield, yield components and quality traits of oat genotypes (A. sativa L.). KSU J. Agric Nat., 24(5), 1003-1010. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.763934
• Kececioglu, Y., Kara, R., & Dokuyucu, T. (2021). Determination of genetic differences and improvements of some oat genotypes in terms of morphological and agricultural characteristics. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 8(1), 103-115. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.816927
• Kılınc, K., & Gokkus, A. (2022). Effects of different harvesting times on yield and quality of oat and triticale. Acta Natura et Scientia, 3(2),108-115. https://doi.org/10.29329/actanatsci.2022.352.03
• Nawaz, N. N., Abdul Razzaq, A. R., Zulifaqar Ali, Z. A., Sarwar, G., & Yousaf, M. (2004). Performance of different oat (Avena sativa L.) varieties under the agro-climatic conditions of Bahawalpur-Pakistan. International Journal of Agricultural Biol., 6(4), 624-626.
• Rezai, A., Frey, K. J. (1990). Multivariate analysis of variation among wild oat accessions seed traits. Euphytica, 49, 111-119.
• Sabanduzen, B., & Akcura, M. (2017). Evaluation of grain yield and yield components of oat genotypes in Canakkale Conditions. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 4(2),101-108.
• Sinclair, T. R. (1998). Historical changes in harvest index and crop nitrogen accumulation. Crop Science, 38(3), 638-643.
• Sonkaya, M. 2019. The effect of zinc fertilizers on for some plant properties and quality characteristics on oat (Avena sativa L.) Ordu University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Field Crops, pp. 50.
• Suttie, J. M., & Reynolds, S. G. (2004). Fodder Oats: A World Overview. http://www.fao.org./docrep/008/y5765e/y5765e00.htm. (Accessed October 12, 2024)
• Yasar, C. (2021). Determination of yield and yield components of some oat varieties in Eskisehir ecological conditions. Eskisehir Osmangazi University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Field Crops, pp. 60.
• Yilmaz, N., & Sonkaya, M. (2020). The effect of zinc fertilizers on for some plant properties and quality characteristics on oat (Avena sativa L.) Journal of Academic Agriculture. 9(1), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.29278/azd.695873
• Zhang, W., Bao, D., Lu, B., & Zhang, Q. (2014). The mathematical characteristics on ideal wheat stem structure in late growth period. BioTechnology An Indian Journal, 10(18), 10567-10572.