Türkiye’de HIV pozitif bireylerde yapılmış epidemiyolojik çalışmaların bibliyometrik incelemesi

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de HIV pozitif bireylerde yapılmış epidemiyolojik çalışmaların bibliyometrik açıdan değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Türkiye’de HIV pozitif bireylerde yapılmış çalışmalara 1 Kasım 2015 tarihinde Pubmed, Türk Medline, Ulakbim veri tabanları ve Türk HIV/AIDS dergisi taranarak ulaşıldı. Bulgular: Ulaşılan 204 çalışmanın %89.1’i gözlemsel tanımlayıcı çalışmaydı. En sık çalışma tipi olgu sunumuydu (%48.5). Analitik çalışmalar en sık kesitsel tipteydi (%23.7). Makalelerin %67.2’si Türkçe, %32.8’i İngilizce yayınlanmıştı. Çalışmaların %92.6’sı genel hasta grubunda yapılmıştı. Olgu sunumu/serisi tipindeki çalışmaların konuları en sık fırsatçı enfeksiyonlar (%41.3) ve komplikasyonlar (%16.3); diğer çalışmaların konuları en sık HIV/AIDS epidemiyolojisi (%18.1) ve tedaviydi (%17.0). Çalışmaların %47.1’i tek uzmanlık alanı tarafından yürütülmüştü. İlk isim yazarların %76.9’u Ankara, İstanbul veya İzmir’de; %55.4’ü üniversite hastanesinde, %37.3’ü eğitim ve araştırma hastanesinde çalışmaktaydı. Uzmanlık alanları en sık enfeksiyon hastalıkları ve klinik mikrobiyoloji (%47.1) ve tıbbi mikrobiyolojiydi (%22.1). Türkçe makalelerin %33.8’inde ”HIV'li/AIDS'li hasta/olgu, HIV enfeksiyonlu olgu/hasta’’ ifadeleri kullanılmıştı, ancak bu ifadenin kullanımı zaman içinde azalma eğilimi göstermekteydi (p trend= 0.007). Sonuç: Türkiye’de HIV pozitif bireylerde genel hasta grubu dışındaki bireyleri daha fazla ele alan, analitik tipte, çok disiplinli, ulusal düzeyde ve görece az çalışılmış konularda çalışmalar yürütülmelidir. 

Keywords

• HIV,AIDS,Türkiye,epidemiyolojik çalışma

Bibliometric investigation of epidemiologic studies in HIV positive individuals in Turkey

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the bibliometrics of epidemiologic studies in HIV positive individuals in Turkey. Methods: We reached the epidemiologic studies through Pubmed, Türk Medline, Ulakbim databases and ”Türk HIV/AIDS” journal on November 1, 2015. Results: Among 204 studies 89.1% were observational descriptive and the most frequent type was case report (48.5%). Cross-sectional (23.7%) was the most common type among analytic studies. Article’ were published in Turkish (67.2%) and English (32.8%). The great majority (92.6%) of the studies were conducted in general patient population. The most studied topics were opportunistic infections (41.3%) and complications (16.3%) among the case series/reports types of studies; whereas HIV/AIDS epidemiology (18.1%) and treatment (17.0%) were more common ones among the other studies. The proportion of the studies carried out by a single specialty was 47.1%. First-name authors work in university hospitals (55.4%), teaching and research hospitals (37.3%) and 76.9% were from Istanbul, Ankara, or Izmir. The frequent specialties were infectious diseases (47.1%) and medical microbiology (22.1%). Researchers used stigmatizing statements in 33.8% of the articles that were in Turkish referring to HIV positive individuals, although this type of statements tended to decline over time (p trend = 0.007). Conclusion: Researchers should conduct analytic, multi-disciplinary and nationwide studies on HIV positive individuals in Turkey, particularly in non-general patient groups and on relatively less studied topics.

Keywords

• HIV,AIDS,Turkey,epidemiologic study

References

1. 1. Murray CJL, Ortblad KF, Guinovart C, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence and mortality for HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria during 1990– 2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014;384(9947):1005-1070.
2. 2. Gordis L. Epidemiology. Philadelphia:.Elsevier/Saunders, 2009.
3. 3. Bonita R, Beaglehole R, Kjellström T. Basic Epidemiology. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2006.
4. 4. Onyancha OB, Ocholla DN. A comparative study of the literature on HIV/AIDS in Kenya and Uganda: a bibliometric study. Libr Inform Sci Res 2004;26:434-447.
5. 5. Patra SK, Chand P. HIV/AIDS research in India: a bibliometric study. Libr Inform Sci Res 2007;29:124-134.
6. 6. Oleckno WA. Epidemiology: Concepts and Methods. Illinois: Waveland Press, 2008.
7. 7. Wedi CO, Kirtley S, Hopewell S, Corrigan R, Kennedy SH, Hemelaar J. Perinatal outcomes associated with maternal HIV infection: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Lancet HIV 2016;3(1):33-48.
8. 8. White AB, Mirjahangir JF, Horvath H, Anglemyer A, Read JS. Antiretroviral interventions for preventing breast milk transmission of HIV. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(10):CD011323.

9. 9. Bastard M, Poulet E, Nicolay N, Szumilin E, Balkan S, Pujades-Rodriguez M. Pediatric access and continuity of HIV care before the start of antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2016. [Epub ahead of print]
10. 10. Li Z, Hsieh E, Morano JP, Sheng Y. Exploring HIV-related stigma among HIV-infected men who have sex with men in Beijing, China: a correlation study. AIDS Care 2016;3:1-8.
11. 11. Rezaei-Soufi L, Davoodi P, Jazaeri M, Niknami H. The comparison of root caries experience between HIV-positive patients and HIV-negative individuals in a selected Iranian population. Int J Dent Hyg 2011;9(4):261-265.
12. 12. Adachi K, Klausner JD, Xu J, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis and neisseria gonorrhoeae in HIV-infected pregnant women and adverse ınfant outcomes. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2016;35(8):894-900.
13. 13. Alpsar D, Agacfidan A, Lübke N, et al. Molecular epidemiology of HIV in a cohort of men having sex with men from Istanbul. Med Microbiol Immun 2013;202(3):251-255.
14. 14. Yoldaş O, Ağaçfidan A, Lübke N, et al. Determination of drug resistance and virus typology in HIV-1-positive pediatric patients in Istanbul, Turkey. Intervirology 2014;57(5):297-299.
15. 15. Marukutira T, Huprikar S, Azie N, Quan SP, Meier-Kriesche HU, Horn DL. Clinical characteristics and outcomes in 303 HIVinfected patients with invasive fungal infections: data from the Prospective Antifungal Therapy Alliance registry, a multicenter, observational study. HIV/AIDS (Auckland, NZ) 2014;6:39-47.
16. 16. Gastaca M, Agüero F, Peter S, et al. Liver retransplantation in HIV-ınfected patients: A multicenter and multinational cohort study [abstract]. Am J Transplant 2013;13(suppl 5).
17. 17. Fogel JM, Wang L, Parsons TL, et al. Undisclosed antiretroviral drug use in a multinational clinical trial (HIV Prevention Trials Network 052). J Infect Dis 2013;208(10):1624–1628.
18. 18. Adeoye-Agboola DI, Evans H, Hewson D, Pappas Y. Factors influencing HIV disclosure among people living with HIV/AIDS in Nigeria: a systematic review using narrative synthesis and metaanalysis. Public Health 2016;136:13-28.
19. 19. Mamotte N, Wassenaar D. Voluntariness of consent to HIV clinical research: A conceptual and empirical pilot study. J Health Psychol 2016. [Epub ahead of print]
20. 20. Bynum SA, Wigfall LT, Brandt HM, Julious CH, Glover SH, Hébert JR. Social and structural determinants of cervical health among women engaged in HIV care. AIDS Behav 2016. [Epub ahead of print]
21. 21. Logie C, Gadalla TM. Meta-analysis of health and demographic correlates of stigma towards people living with HIV. AIDS Care 2009;21(6):742-753.
22. 22. Hekimoğlu CH, Kaptan F. Kronik hepatit B, kronik hepatit C ve insan immün yetmezlik virusu infeksiyonu olgularında stigmatizasyon algılarının karşılaştırılması. Klimik Derg 2014;27(2):69-72.
23. 23. Sociological Association Vulnerability Assessment of people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Turkey. United Nations Development Programme; Ankara. November 2007.
24. 24. Kasapoğlu A, Kuş E. The role of gender in the stigmatization of people living with HIV/AIDS in Turkey, J Gender Stud 2008;17(4):359-368.
25. 25. Kose S, Mandiracioglu A, Mermut G, Kaptan F, Ozbel Y. The social and health problems of people living with HIV/AIDS in Izmir, Turkey. Eurasian J Med 2012;44(1):32-39.
26. 26. Avcikurt C, Koroglu O, Koroglu A, Avcikurt AS. HIV/AIDS awareness and attitudes of tour guides in Turkey. Cult Health Sex 2011;13(2):233-243.
27. 27. Nur N. Turkish school teachers’ knowledge and attitudes toward HIV/AIDS. Croat Med J 2012;53(3):271- 277.
28. 28. Akgun Kostak M, Unsar S, Kurt S, Erol O. Attitudes of Turkish midwives and nurses working at hospitals towards people living with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Int J Nurs Pract 2012;18(5):437-444.
29. 29. HIV/AIDS Sorular. http://pozitifyasam.org/tr/sss.html (Erişim tarihi: 20.05.2016)
30. 30. Yegen C. Türk yazılı basınının HIV/AIDS haberlerindeki nefret söylemi: “Posta” gazetesi örneği. E-gifder 2014;2(3):317- 349.