THE EXTENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF BLENDED LEARNING IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE EDUCATION VIS-A-VIS STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT

Romel C. Mutya; Apreyll-rose L. Masuhay

doi:10.17718/tojde.1107412

EN

THE EXTENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF BLENDED LEARNING IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE EDUCATION VIS-A-VIS STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT

Abstract

This study investigates the extent of implementation of blended learning in senior high school (SHS) science education as to the content, communication, technology, pedagogy, and assessment vis-à-vis students’ academic achievement. In this analytical research design, data were gathered from 182 students and 12 science teachers using stratified random sampling. Gathered data were systematically treated and analyzed utilizing descriptive and inferential statistics such as frequency, percentage count, mean, standard deviation, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Pearson Product-Moment Correlation. Findings revealed the extent of implementation of blended learning in SHS science education as moderately implemented as perceived by the students and teachers. As to the students’ profiles, there was a significant relationship between technology and the parent’s monthly income. There was no significant difference in the extent of implementation of blended learning across all variables as perceived by the teachers. After implementing blended learning, the student’s academic achievement in science was outstanding, and this put forward a significant relationship between content and assessment in their academic achievement. The study concluded that several things should be considered in implementing blended learning in the new normal education. Students’ and teachers’ involvement in the implementation is essential for improving the modality and the school administrators may consider undertaking specific plans and activities such as the need for teachers to attend training, seminars, and workshops related to blended learning implementation.

Keywords

blended learning, distance learning, extent of implementation, new normal, science education

References

Ali, G., Buruga, B. A., & Habibu, T. (2019). Swot analysis of blended learning in public universities of uganda: a case study of muni university. J, 2(4), 410-429.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. Babson College, 231 Forest Street, Babson Park, MA 02457.
Andrews, A. M. (2020). The right mix: A single case study into a blended learning program at Tobrikay Corporation.
Azizan, F. Z. (2010). Blended learning in higher education institution in Malaysia. In Proceedings of regional conference on knowledge integration in ICT (Vol. 10, pp. 454-466). Bamoallem, B., & Altarteer, S. (2021). Remote emergency learning during COVID-19 and its impact on university students perception of blended learning in KSA. Education and Information Technologies, 1-23.
Baragash, R. S., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2018). An empirical study of the impact of multiple modes of delivery on student learning in a blended course. The Reference Librarian, 59(3), 149-162.
Bazelais, P., & Doleck, T. (2018a). Investigating the impact of blended learning on academic performance in a first semester college physics course. Journal of Computers in Education, 5(1), 67-94.
Bazelais, P., & Doleck, T. (2018b). Blended learning and traditional learning: A comparative study of college mechanics courses. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2889-2900.
Beaver, J. K., Hallar, B., Westmaas, L., & Englander, K. (2015). Blended Learning: Lessons from Best Practice Sites and the Philadelphia Context. PERC Research Brief. Research for Action.
Bervell, B., & Arkorful, V. (2020). LMS-enabled blended learning utilization in distance tertiary education: establishing the relationships among facilitating conditions, voluntariness of use and use behaviour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-16.
Bozkurt, A., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2021). Trends and patterns in distance education (2014–2019): A synthesis of scholarly publications and a visualization of the intellectual landscape. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 19-45.

Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner's self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24-32.
Cabero Almenara, J., Llorente Cejudo, M. D. C., & Puentes Puente, Á. (2010). Online students satisfaction with blended learning. Comunicar: Scientific Journal of Media Literacy, 18 (35), 149-156.
Capra, T. (2014). Online education from the perspective of community college students within the community of inquiry paradigm. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 38(2-3), 108-121.
Dakduk, S., Santalla-Banderali, Z., & Van Der Woude, D. (2018). Acceptance of blended learning in executive education. SAGE Open, 8(3), 2158244018800647.
Department of Education. (2020a). Policy guidelines for the provision of learning resources in the implementation of the basic education learning continuity plan. DepEd Order No. 018, s. 2020
Department of Education. (2020b). The basic education learning continuity plan. DepEd Order No. 12, s. 2020
Deschacht, N., & Goeman, K. (2015). The effect of blended learning on course persistence and performance of adult learners: A difference-in-differences analysis. Computers & Education, 87, 83-89.
Dickfos, J., Cameron, C., & Hodgson, C. (2014). Blended learning: making an impact on assessment and self-reflection in accounting education. Education+ Training.
Divayana, D. (2019). The implementation of blended learning with Kelase platform in the learning of assessment and evaluation course. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(17), 114-132.
Edward, C. N., Asirvatham, D., Johar, M., & Md, G. (2018). Effect of blended learning and learners’ characteristics on students’ competence: An empirical evidence in learning oriental music. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2587-2606.
Freeman, W., & Tremblay, T. (2013). Design considerations for supporting the reluctant adoption of blended learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 80.
Ghani, S., & Taylor, M. (2021). Blended learning as a vehicle for increasing student engagement. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2021(167), 43-51.
Ghazal, S., Al-Samarraie, H., & Aldowah, H. (2018). “I am still learning”: Modeling LMS critical success factors for promoting students’ experience and satisfaction in a blended learning environment. IEEE Access, 6, 77179-77201.
Harinarayanan, S., & Pazhanivelu, G. (2018). Impact of School Environment on Academic Achievement of Secondary School Students at Vellore Educational District. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(1), 13-19.
Hesse, L. (2017). The effects of blended learning on K-12th grade students.
Hilmi, D., & Ifawati, N. I. (2020). Using the blended learning as an alternative model of Arabic language learning in the pandemic era. Arabi: Journal of Arabic Studies, 5(2), 117-129.
Jachin, N., & Usagawa, T. (2017). Potential impact of blended learning on teacher education in Mongolia. Creative Education, 8(09), 1481.
Jones, S. (2019). The implications of blended learning in today’s classroom: A look into the history, views, impacts, and research.
Khalid, A. (2015). Blended Learning: Implementation of Online Assessment.
Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-20.
Klentien, U., & Wannasawade, W. (2016). Development of blended learning model with virtual science laboratory for secondary students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 706-711.
Koch, J. V., & McAdory, A. R. (2012). Still no significant difference? The impact of distance learning on student success in undergraduate managerial economics. Journal of Economics and Finance Education, 11(1), 27.
Kwan, Reggie; Fie Tsoi, Mun (2009). Applying TSOI hybrid learning model to enhance blended learning experience in science education. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 6(4), 223–233.
Leboff, G. (2020). Myths of Marketing: Banish the Misconceptions and Become a Great Marketer. Kogan Page Publishers.
Lee, Y. C., Lau, K. C., & Yip, V. W. Y. (2016). Blended learning for building student-teachers’ capacity to learn and teach science-related interdisciplinary subjects: The case of Hong Kong. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal.
Llego, M. A. (2020). DepEd learning delivery modalities for school year 2020-2021. TeacherPH.
Medina, L. C. (2018). Blended learning: Deficits and prospects in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1). Miller, A., Topper, A. M., & Richardson, S. (2017). SUGGESTIONS FORIMPROVING IPEDS DISTANCE EDUCATION DATA COLLECTION.
Mozelius, P. (2017). Problems affecting successful implementation of blended learning in higher education: The teacher perspective. International Journal of Information and Communication Technologies in Education, 6(1), 4-13.
Nguyen, V. A. (2017). Towards the implementation of an assessment-centred blended learning framework at the course level: A case study in a Vietnamese national university. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology. Nguyen, M. H., Gruber, J., Fuchs, J., Marler, W., Hunsaker, A., & Hargittai, E. (2020). Changes in Digital Communication During the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: Implications for Digital Inequality and Future Research. Social Media+ Society, 6(3), 2056305120948255.
Ocak, M. A. (2011). Why are faculty members not teaching blended courses? Insights from faculty members. Computers & Education, 56(3), 689-699.
Onguko, B., Jepchumba, L., & Gaceri, P. (2013). “For us it was a learning experience”: Design, development and implementation of blended learning. European Journal of Training and Development.
Owston, R., York, D. N., & Malhotra, T. (2019). Blended learning in large enrolment courses: Student perceptions across four different instructional models. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 29-45.
Owusu-Fordjour, C., Koomson, C. K., & Hanson, D. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on learning-the perspective of the Ghanaian student. European Journal of Education Studies.
Panjaitan, M., & Tambunan, A. P. (2019, November). Students’ acceptance towards blended learning implementation. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1280, No. 3, p. 032031). IOP Publishing.
Patterson, J. (2016). The 7 Most Important Benefits of Blended Learning. KnowledgeWave
Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185-195.
Prasad, P. W. C., Maag, A., Redestowicz, M., & Hoe, L. S. (2018). Unfamiliar technology: Reaction of international students to blended learning. Computers & Education, 122, 92-103.
Rachmadtullah, R., Marianus Subandowo, R., Humaira, M. A., Aliyyah, R. R., Samsudin, A., & Nurtanto, M. (2020). Use of blended learning with moodle: Study effectiveness in elementary school teacher education students during the COVID-19 pandemic. International journal of advanced science and technology, 29(7), 3272-3277.
Rideout, V., & Katz, V. S. (2016). Opportunity for all? Technology and learning in lower-income families. In Joan ganz cooney center at sesame workshop. Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop. 1900 Broadway, New York, NY 10023. Setiawan, A. (2019). Implementation of Islamic Education Study Program Learning Based on Blended Learning in the Industrial Era 4.0 at IAIN Samarinda. Dinamika Ilmu, 19(2), 305-321.
So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & education, 51(1), 318-336.
Spanjers, I. A., Könings, K. D., Leppink, J., Verstegen, D. M., de Jong, N., Czabanowska, K., & van Merrienboer, J. J. (2015). The promised land of blended learning: Quizzes as a moderator. Educational Research Review, 15, 59-74.
Stockwell, B. R., Stockwell, M. S., Cennamo, M., & Jiang, E. (2015). Blended learning improves science education. Cell, 162(5), 933-936.
Sun, Z., & Qiu, X. (2017). Developing a blended learning model in an EFL class. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 27(1-2), 4-21.
Szeto, E., & Cheng, A. Y. (2016). Towards a framework of interactions in a blended synchronous learning environment: what effects are there on students' social presence experience?. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 487-503.
Tadlaoui, M. A., & Chekou, M. (2021). A blended learning approach for teaching python programming language: towards a post pandemic pedagogy. International Journal of Advanced Computer Research, 11(52), 13.
Umar, A. T., & Majeed, A. (2018). The Impact of Assessment for Learning on Students' Achievement in English for Specific Purposes: A Case Study of Pre-Medical Students at Khartoum University: Sudan. English Language Teaching, 11(2), 15-25.
UNESCO (2020). UNESCO Rallies International Organizations, Civil Society and Private Sector Partners in a Broad Coalition to Ensure #LearningNeverStops. Unesco
Wai, C. C., & Seng, E. L. K. (2014). Exploring the effectiveness and efficiency of blended learning tools in a school of business. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 123, 470-476.
Wai, C. C., & Seng, E. L. K. (2015). Measuring the effectiveness of blended learning environment: A case study in Malaysia. Education and Information Technologies, 20(3), 429-443.
Wang, Y., Han, X., & Yang, J. (2015). Revisiting the blended learning literature: Using a complex adaptive systems framework. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 380-393.
Washington, R. (2016). Enabling Change: Faculty and Student Perceptions of Blended Learning.
Yudhana, S. (2021). The Implementation of Blended Learning to Enhance English Reading Skills of Thai Undergraduate Students. English Language Teaching, 14(7), 1-7.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Romel C. Mutya ^* This is me
0000-0002-7986-2353
Philippines

Apreyll-rose L. Masuhay This is me
0000-0002-2614-9028
Philippines

Publication Date

April 1, 2023

Submission Date

April 22, 2022

Acceptance Date

August 2, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 24 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1107412

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA63LH37PD

APA

Mutya, R. C., & Masuhay, A.- rose L. (2023). THE EXTENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF BLENDED LEARNING IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE EDUCATION VIS-A-VIS STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(2), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1107412

AMA

1.Mutya RC, Masuhay A rose L. THE EXTENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF BLENDED LEARNING IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE EDUCATION VIS-A-VIS STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT. TOJDE. 2023;24(2):47-63. doi:10.17718/tojde.1107412

Chicago

Mutya, Romel C., and Apreyll-rose L. Masuhay. 2023. “THE EXTENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF BLENDED LEARNING IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE EDUCATION VIS-A-VIS STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 24 (2): 47-63. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1107412.

EndNote

Mutya RC, Masuhay A- rose L (April 1, 2023) THE EXTENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF BLENDED LEARNING IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE EDUCATION VIS-A-VIS STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 24 2 47–63.

IEEE

[1]R. C. Mutya and A.- rose L. Masuhay, “THE EXTENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF BLENDED LEARNING IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE EDUCATION VIS-A-VIS STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT”, TOJDE, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 47–63, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.17718/tojde.1107412.

ISNAD

Mutya, Romel C. - Masuhay, Apreyll-rose L. “THE EXTENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF BLENDED LEARNING IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE EDUCATION VIS-A-VIS STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 24/2 (April 1, 2023): 47-63. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1107412.

JAMA

1.Mutya RC, Masuhay A- rose L. THE EXTENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF BLENDED LEARNING IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE EDUCATION VIS-A-VIS STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT. TOJDE. 2023;24:47–63.

MLA

Mutya, Romel C., and Apreyll-rose L. Masuhay. “THE EXTENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF BLENDED LEARNING IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE EDUCATION VIS-A-VIS STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 24, no. 2, Apr. 2023, pp. 47-63, doi:10.17718/tojde.1107412.

Vancouver

1.Romel C. Mutya, Apreyll-rose L. Masuhay. THE EXTENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF BLENDED LEARNING IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE EDUCATION VIS-A-VIS STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT. TOJDE. 2023 Apr. 1;24(2):47-63. doi:10.17718/tojde.1107412

Cited By

Fen Eğitiminde Harmanlanmış Öğrenme Yaklaşımının Kullanımı: Sistematik Bir Derleme

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1498835

The Effectiveness of Innovative Blended Learning Through Meaning (IBLTM) Model to Improve Students' Science Literacy

IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research

https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v5i6.699

Mixed-meta Method Concerning the Effect of Blended Learning Practices on Students’ Academic Achievement in Higher Education Settings

SAGE Open

https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251336646

Impact of Blended Teaching Strategy on Learning Achievement and Retention of Knowledge

International Journal of Education, Culture and Society

https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20251004.11