THE RELATION BETWEEN DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS' MOTIVATION AND SATISFACTION

Volume: 16 Number: 2 April 3, 2015
Dimitrios Goulımarıs
EN

THE RELATION BETWEEN DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS' MOTIVATION AND SATISFACTION

Abstract

The aim of the present study, within the frame of self-determination theory (SDT),
was triple: a) to examine the structural validity of the “Situational Motivation Scale”
(SIMS) in the field of distance education, b) to investigate the correlation between
the subscales of the motivation and satisfaction of students who attend distance
education classes and c) to examine the possibility of predicting the subscales of
satisfaction from the subscales of motivation in the open and distance education.
The sample consisted of 144 students who participated in the course of “Arts II:
Overview of Greek Music and Dance” of the Hellenic Open University. For the
purposes of the study, two scales were used: a) The modified Greek version
(Papaioannou et al., 2007) of the “Situational Motivation Scale” (SIMS) (Guay et al.,
2000), b) The modified Greek version (Theodorakis, & Bebetsos, 2003; Bebetsos, &
Theodorakis, 2003) of the “Scale of Satisfaction” (Chelladurai & Riemer, 1997).
The results of the research are considered positive for the adjustment of the
instrument measuring the motivation of students in distance education. Identified
regulation and intrinsic motivation presented high values, as much as the two
subscales of satisfaction: personal outcome and leadership. Extrinsic motivation
presented middle levels and the subscale amotivation, very low levels. The subscale
personal outcome is connected positively to the self-determined forms of motivation
and negatively to those which are less self-determined.
Finally, it has been found that intrinsic motivation and amotivation are subscales
which predict personal outcome and leadership. In conclusion, the findings of this
research allow a better understanding of the motivation process, which explains the
satisfaction of the students, while attending a class.

Keywords

Distance education, motivation, satisfaction, leadership, personal outcome

References

  1. Alexandris, K. & Palialia, E. (1999). Measuring customer satisfaction in fitness centres in Greece: Αn exploratory study. Managing Leisure, 4, 218-228.
  2. Anastasiadis, P., & Karvounis, L. (2010). Students’ opinions in the postgraduate module EKP 65 "Open and Distance Education" for the role and the mission of the Tutor Counsellor in Hellenic Open University.(in Greek). The Journal for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology, 6 (1 & 2), 79-91.
  3. Bebetsos, E. & Goulimaris, D. (2014). Personal outcome and leadership as defining factors of satisfaction in the context of the course “Arts II: Overview of Greek music and dance” of the Hellenic Open University. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 12-23.
  4. Bebetsos, E., & Theodorakis, N. (2003). Athletes’ satisfaction among team handball players in Greece. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97, 1203-1208.
  5. Chelladurai, P., Inamura, H., Yamaguchi, Y., Oinuma, Y., & Miyauchi, T. (1988) Sport leadership in a cross-national setting: the case of Japanese and Canadian university athletes. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 10, 374-389.
  6. Deci, Ε. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.
  7. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2004). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E. Deci, & R. Ryan (Eds), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester N.Y.: The University of Rochester Press.
  8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The what and the why of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
  9. Deci, E. L.,& Ryan, R. (1991). A motivational approach to self integration in personality. In R.A. Dienstbier (Ed), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation:
  10. Perspectives on motivation, (pp.237-288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska. Deci, E. L.,& Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
APA
Goulımarıs, D. (2015). THE RELATION BETWEEN DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION AND SATISFACTION. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.50678
AMA
1.Goulımarıs D. THE RELATION BETWEEN DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION AND SATISFACTION. TOJDE. 2015;16(2):13-27. doi:10.17718/tojde.50678
Chicago
Goulımarıs, Dimitrios. 2015. “THE RELATION BETWEEN DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION AND SATISFACTION”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 16 (2): 13-27. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.50678.
EndNote
Goulımarıs D (April 1, 2015) THE RELATION BETWEEN DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION AND SATISFACTION. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 16 2 13–27.
IEEE
[1]D. Goulımarıs, “THE RELATION BETWEEN DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION AND SATISFACTION”, TOJDE, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 13–27, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.17718/tojde.50678.
ISNAD
Goulımarıs, Dimitrios. “THE RELATION BETWEEN DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION AND SATISFACTION”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 16/2 (April 1, 2015): 13-27. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.50678.
JAMA
1.Goulımarıs D. THE RELATION BETWEEN DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION AND SATISFACTION. TOJDE. 2015;16:13–27.
MLA
Goulımarıs, Dimitrios. “THE RELATION BETWEEN DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION AND SATISFACTION”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 16, no. 2, Apr. 2015, pp. 13-27, doi:10.17718/tojde.50678.
Vancouver
1.Dimitrios Goulımarıs. THE RELATION BETWEEN DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS’ MOTIVATION AND SATISFACTION. TOJDE. 2015 Apr. 1;16(2):13-27. doi:10.17718/tojde.50678

Cited By