Research Article

NEED FOR ACCREDITATION AGENCIES AS STAKEHOLDERS IN OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING: CASE OF “AUDAK” IN TURKISH HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM

Volume: 21 Number: Special Issue-IODL July 17, 2020
Elif Toprak *, Asuman Nurhan Sakar
EN

NEED FOR ACCREDITATION AGENCIES AS STAKEHOLDERS IN OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING: CASE OF “AUDAK” IN TURKISH HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM

Abstract

Accreditation agencies are important stakeholders for higher education institutions (HEIs) on the path to quality. They are advisors to suggest the appropriate models and tools for Quality Assurance (QA), according to the mode of delivery and institutional context. This paper gives brief history about integration of Turkey to Bologna process that has shaped the quality approach in the Turkish Higher Education System and explains how national accreditation agencies act to enhance quality in higher education. Secondly, a short literature on quality assurance in open and distance learning is provided with concentration on external evaluation by agencies. The transition to distance learning and e-learning more specifically, offers an opportunity to reorganize institutions for technology enhanced learning and enrich their means for quality assurance. Thirdly, the interpretation of European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG 2015) for quality assurance in distance learning/e-learning and the adaptation of accreditation criteria to monitor compliance with pre-determined learning outcomes is elaborated through different models and benchmarks. As case-study, a new association founded in Turkey, AUDAK (Association for Evaluation and Accreditation of Open and Distance Education Programs) is introduced and its standards are discussed with an eye to the related literature and recent developments in Turkish higher education system.

Keywords

Quality assurance, accreditation, Bologna process, ESG 2015, quality in higher education, quality in open and distance education, quality in distance learning, quality in e-learning

References

  1. Abdous, M. (2009). E-learning quality assurance: a process-oriented lifecycle model. Quality Assurance in Education, 17(3), 281-295.
  2. Angolia, M. G. & Pagliari, L. R. (2016). Factors for successful evolution and sustainability of quality distance education. Quality in Higher Education, 19(3), Fall 2016.
  3. Belawati, T. & A. Zuhairi (2007). The practice of a quality assurance system in open and distance learning: A case study at Universitas Terbuka Indonesia. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(1).
  4. Benson, A. D. (2003). Dimensions of quality in online degree programs. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 145-159. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1703_2
  5. Campbell, C. & van der Wende, M. (2000). International initiatives and trends in quality assurance for European Higher Education.
  6. Eaton, J. S. (2000). Core academic values, quality and regional accreditation: The challenge of distance learning. Council for Accreditation Higher Education (CHEA) Report. USA: Washington, DC.
  7. ENQA. (2015). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). Brussels, Belgium. ISBN: 978-9-08-168672-3
  8. EQUIP. Comparative analysis of the ESG 2015 and ESG 2005. Retrieved from https://enqa.eu/index.php/publications/papers-reports/associated-reports/
  9. Esfijani, A. (2018). Measuring quality in online education: A meta-synthesis. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(1), 57-73. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2018.1417658
  10. Frydenberg, J. (2002). Quality standards in e-learning: A matrix of analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(2), 1-15.
APA
Toprak, E., & Sakar, A. N. (2020). NEED FOR ACCREDITATION AGENCIES AS STAKEHOLDERS IN OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING: CASE OF “AUDAK” IN TURKISH HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(Special Issue-IODL), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770904
AMA
1.Toprak E, Sakar AN. NEED FOR ACCREDITATION AGENCIES AS STAKEHOLDERS IN OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING: CASE OF “AUDAK” IN TURKISH HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM. TOJDE. 2020;21(Special Issue-IODL):29-48. doi:10.17718/tojde.770904
Chicago
Toprak, Elif, and Asuman Nurhan Sakar. 2020. “NEED FOR ACCREDITATION AGENCIES AS STAKEHOLDERS IN OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING: CASE OF ‘AUDAK’ IN TURKISH HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 21 (Special Issue-IODL): 29-48. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770904.
EndNote
Toprak E, Sakar AN (July 1, 2020) NEED FOR ACCREDITATION AGENCIES AS STAKEHOLDERS IN OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING: CASE OF “AUDAK” IN TURKISH HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 21 Special Issue-IODL 29–48.
IEEE
[1]E. Toprak and A. N. Sakar, “NEED FOR ACCREDITATION AGENCIES AS STAKEHOLDERS IN OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING: CASE OF ‘AUDAK’ IN TURKISH HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM”, TOJDE, vol. 21, no. Special Issue-IODL, pp. 29–48, July 2020, doi: 10.17718/tojde.770904.
ISNAD
Toprak, Elif - Sakar, Asuman Nurhan. “NEED FOR ACCREDITATION AGENCIES AS STAKEHOLDERS IN OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING: CASE OF ‘AUDAK’ IN TURKISH HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 21/Special Issue-IODL (July 1, 2020): 29-48. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770904.
JAMA
1.Toprak E, Sakar AN. NEED FOR ACCREDITATION AGENCIES AS STAKEHOLDERS IN OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING: CASE OF “AUDAK” IN TURKISH HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM. TOJDE. 2020;21:29–48.
MLA
Toprak, Elif, and Asuman Nurhan Sakar. “NEED FOR ACCREDITATION AGENCIES AS STAKEHOLDERS IN OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING: CASE OF ‘AUDAK’ IN TURKISH HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 21, no. Special Issue-IODL, July 2020, pp. 29-48, doi:10.17718/tojde.770904.
Vancouver
1.Elif Toprak, Asuman Nurhan Sakar. NEED FOR ACCREDITATION AGENCIES AS STAKEHOLDERS IN OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING: CASE OF “AUDAK” IN TURKISH HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM. TOJDE. 2020 Jul. 1;21(Special Issue-IODL):29-48. doi:10.17718/tojde.770904