Attitudes Toward Online Communications In Open And Distance Learning

Year 2012, Volume: 13 Issue: 4, 333 - 346, 01.12.2012

İrem Erdem Aydın

Abstract

This article intended to reveal the results of a survey study in which the students’ attitudes toward online communication in open and distance learning were investigated. In the study, affects of the students’ gender and computer experience on their attitudes were also examined. A total of 626 subjects participated in the study and ‘Online Communication Attitude Scale’, developed by Ledbetter, was adapted as the data collection instrument. Mean, standard deviation, independent t-test, one-way analysis of variance and Tukey HSD tests were used to analyze the data gathered. The results of the study indicated that students have in general positive attitudes toward online communication in ODL. Also, it showed that there is a significant difference in ‘miscommunication’, ‘social connection’ and ‘ease’ dimensions of online communication between the males and the female students. The female students see online environments as open to communication errors. On the other hand, the study supported the literature about the affect of the students’ computer experience and their attitudes toward online communication in ODL.

Keywords

Online Communication, Attitudes, Open And Distance Learning, Gender Differences, Computer Experience, The Internet Experience

References

• Altun, A., Gürcan, Z., & Yıldırım, U. N. (2004). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin bilgisayar dersine ilişkin algıları [Primary school students perceptions regarding computer literacy course].
• Paper presented at IV.Uluslararası Eğitim Teknolojileri Sempozyumu, Sakarya University. Altun, T., Yigit, N., & Alev, N. (2007). İlköğretim fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının bilgisayar destekli fen öğretimine karşı tutumları [Attitudes of the primary school science teachers toward computer-based science education]. Paper presented at 1. Ulusal
• İlköğretim Kongresi,15 – 17 Kasım, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara. Arslan, A. (2006). Bilgisayar destekli eğitim yapmaya ilişkin tutum ölçeği [Computer- based education attitude scale]. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 33.
• Askar, P., Yavuz, H., & Köksal, M. (1992) Students’ perceptions of computer assisted instruction environment and their attitudes towards computer assisted learning,
• Educational Research, 34(2), 133-139. Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2007). Self-efficacy and college students' perceptions and use of online learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 175-191.
• Bebetsos, E., & Antoniou, P. (2008). University students’ differences on attitudes towards computer use: Comparison with students’ attitudes towards physical activity. Interactive
• Educational M ultimedia, 17, 20-28. Retrieved February 3, 2009 from http://greav.ub.edu/iem/index.php?journal=iem&page=article&op=view&path[]=130& path[]=198
• Beckers, J., & Schmidt, H. (2001). The structure of computer anxiety: a six factor model.
• Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 35–49. Brown, S., Fuller, R. M., & Vician, C. (2002). Who is afraid of virtual world? The role of anxiety in computer–mediated communication use and satisfaction. Journal of The Association for Information System, 5(2), 81-109.
• Busch. T. (1995). Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitude towards computers.
• Journal of Educational Computing Research. 12(2), 147-158. Burnett, P.C. (1984). Measuring behavioral indicators of self-esteem in the classroom.
• Journal of Humanistic Education & Development, 37, 107-114. Büyükoztürk, S., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün O. E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi
• Campbell, S. W., & Neer, M. R. (2001). The relationship of communication apprehension and interaction involvement to perception of computer-mediated communication.
• Communication Research Reports, 4, 391-398. Caplan, S. E (2002). Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 553-575.
• Chua, S.L., Chen, D., & Wong, A. F. L (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 609-623.
• Çelik, H. C., & Ceylan, H. (2009). Lise öğrencilerinin matematik ve bilgisayar tutumlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından karşılaştırılması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26, 92-101.
• Dambrot, F. H., Watkins-Malek, M. A., Silling, M., Marshall, R., & Garver, J. (1985).
• Correlates of sex differences in attitudes toward and involvement with computers. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 27(1), 71-86. Darlega J., Valerian, & Allen, C. L. (1977). Self-disclose. New York: General Learning Press.
• Easton, K., & Damodaran, L. (1981). The needs of the commercial user. In M. J. Coombs &
• J. L. Atly (Eds.), Computer skills and the user interface (pp. 115–139). New York: Academic Press. Fahy, P. J., & Ally, M. (2005). Student learning style and asynchronous computer- mediated conferencing(CMC) interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, (1), 5-22.
• Fančovičová, J., & Prokop, P. (2008). Students’ attitudes toward computer use in
• Slovakia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(3), 255- Fulford, C.P., & Zhang, S. (1993). Perception of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 8-21.
• Gercek, C., Köseoglu, P., Yılmaz, M., & Soran, H .(2006). Öğretmen adaylarının bilgisayar kullanımına yönelik tutumlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Examination of the student teachers’ attitudes toward use of computers according to various variables]. H.U. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 130- 139.
• Inceoglu, M (2004).Tutum algı iletişim [Attitude, perception, communication]. Ankara: Kesit Tanıtım.
• Jonassen, D. H., & Kwon, H. I. (2001). Communication patterns in computer-mediated vs. face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research & Development, (10), 35-52.
• Joinson, A. N., & Paine, C. B. (2007). Self-disclosure, privacy and the Internet. In A. N.
• Joinson, K. Y. A. Jourard, S.M. (1971) Self-disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self. New York: Krieger
• Kennewell, S., & Morgan, A. (2003). Student teachers’ experiences and attitudes towards using interactive whiteboards in the teaching and learning of young children. Presented at the IFIP Working Groups 3.5 Conference: Young Children and Learning Technologies.
• UWS Parramatta. Retrieved July 16, 2007 http://crpit.com/confpapers/CRPITV34Kennewell1.pdf
• Köse, S., & Gezer, K. (2006). Buldan (Denizli) ilçesi lise öğrencilerinin bilgisayara yönelik tutumları. Paper presented at Buldan Sempozyumu, 24-26 Kasım. Retreived May 15, from http://buldanmyo.pamukkale.edu.tr/kitap/2.oturum/4.pdf
• Kubiatko, M., &Halakova, Z. (2009). Slovak high school students‟ attitudes to ICT using in biology lesson, Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 743–748
• Kyriakidou, M., Chrisostomou, C., & Bank, F. (2000). Primary teachers’ attitude to the use of ICT: A comparative study between Cyprus and the UK. Paper presented at the Lahti, Finland.
• Liu, Y. (2002). The impacts of frequency and duration of messaging on relational development in computer-mediated communication. In M. A. Fitzgerald, M. Orey, & R. M.
• Branch (Eds.), Educational M edia and Technology Yearbook 2002, Vol. 27 (pp. 33-51).
• Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited. Liu, M., & Reed, W. M. (1992). Teacher education students and computers:
• Gender, major, prior computer Experience, occurrence and anxiety. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(4). Lee, D. (1997). Factors influencing the success of computer skills learning among in- service teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 139-141.
• Levine, T., & Donitsa, S. S. (1997). Commitment to learning: Effects of computer experience, confidence and attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(1), 105.
• Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, C. (1984). Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scales. Educational and Psychological M easurement, 44(3), 501-505.
• Marcoulides, G. A. (1988). The relationship between computer anxiety and computer achievement. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 151-158.
• McCarson, L. R. (2005). Measuring communication apprehension, writing apprehension and group satisfaction levels in face to face and virtual settings. Annual Review of
• Undegraduate Research School of Humanities and Social Science, 4(1), 32. Joinson, A. N., McKenna, K. Y. A., Postmes, T. and Reips, U-R. (2007). Psychology and the Internet: Introduction. In A. N Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes & U-D. Reips
• (Eds). Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology (pp. 1-6). Oxford University Press. Meyer, I. (2002). Computer w ords. Macmillan English Dictionary.
• M. R. Balogun (2011). Student-teachers’ competence and attitudes toward information and communication technology: A case study in a Nigerian University. Contemporary
• Educational Technology, 2(1), 18-36. Necessary, J. R., & Parish, T. S. (1996). The relationship between computer usage and computer-related attitudes and behaviors. Education, 116(3), 384-387.
• Offir, B., Bezalel, R., & Barth, I. (2007). Introverts, extroverts, and achievement in a distance learning environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(1), 3-19.
• Omar, M. (1992). Attitudes of college students towards computers: A comparative study in the United States and the Middle East. Computers in Human Behavior, 8, 249–257.
• Roussos, P. (2007). The Greek computer attitudes scale: construction and assessment of psychometric properties. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 578–590.
• Saparniene, D., Merkys, G., & Saparnis, G. (2005). Students' attitudes toward computer:
• Statistical types and their relationship with computer literacy. Paper presented at the , University College, Dublin, Ireland, September 7-10, 2005.
• Scott, C. R., &Rockwell, S. C. (1997). The effect of communication, writing and technology apprehension on likelihood to use new communication technologies.
• Communication Education, 46, 44-62. Scott, C. R. & Timmerman, C.E. (2005). Relating computer, communication and computer-mediated communication apprehensions to new communication technology use in the workplace. Communication Research, 32(6), 683-713.
• Schaumburg, H. (2001). Fostering girls’ computer through laptop learning – Can mobile computers help to level out the gender difference? Retrieved July 17, 2011 from http://www.notesys.com/Copies/necc01.pdf
• Schliesman, T., & Ayres, J. (1999). The relationship between computer time and communication apprehension/communication competence among adolescent. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
• Selwyn, N. (1999). Students‟ attitudes towards computers in sixteen to nineteen education. Education and Information Technologies, 4(2), 129–141.
• Salih, M. (2005). Sosyal psikoloji [Social psychology]. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Smith, B., Caputi, P., &Rawstone. (2000). Differentiating computer experience and attitude towards computers: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, , 59-81.
• Spitzberg, B. H. (2006). Preliminary development of a model and measure of computer mediated communication (CMC) competence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2).
• Taghavi, S.E. (2006). The effects of age, access to a computer, and college status on computer attitudes. Journal of Information Technology Impact, 6(1), 1-8.
• Teo, T. (2008). Pre-service teachers‟ attitudes towards computer use: A Singapore survey. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4):413-424.
• Tezci, E. (2010) Attitudes and knowledge level of teachers in ICT use: The case of Turkish teachers. International Journal of Human Sciences 7(2).
• Watson, B. R. (2007). Speaking up in the 21 st Century: The effect of communication apprehension and Internet self-efficacy on use of social networking websites. Unpublished dissertation. Graduate School of Journalism at the University of Missouri-Colombia.
• Wrench, J. S., & Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2007). Computer-mediated communication competence, apprehension, self-efficacy, perceived confidence and social presence, (4), 355-378.
• Young, B. J. (2000). Gender differences in student attitudes towards computers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 204-216.
• Yuen, H. & Ma, K. (2001). Teachers’ computer attitudes: Factors influencing the instructional use of computers. White paper. The University of Hong Kong. Retrieved May , 2011 from http://stu.hksyu.edu/~wkma/ref/Yuen_Ma_2001.pdf