EVALUATION OF VIRTUAL LABORATORY PACKAGE ON NIGERIAN SECONDARY SCHOOL PHYSICS CONCEPTS

Year 2017, Volume: 18 Issue: 2, 168 - 178, 01.04.2017

Oluwole Caleb Falode Amosa İsiaka Gambarı

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.306567

Cited By: 7

Abstract

The study evaluated accessibility, flexibility, cost and learning effectiveness of researchers-developed virtual laboratory package for Nigerian secondary school physics. Based on these issues, four research questions were raised and answered. The study was a quantitative-based evaluation research. Sample for the study included 24 physics teachers, 35 computer experts and 29 physics students who evaluated the package using a questionnaire and physics achievement test. Data gathered were analyzed using descriptive statistics including mean and standard deviation. Findings from the study revealed that the package was adjudged accessible to students within the school (average mean response of 2.98 out of 5), the flexibility of the package was rated low ( average mean response of 2.35 out of 5), and the package, though expensive to develop (total amount spent = $587.50) was considered profitable considering its unquantifiable educational benefits. Also, there was improvement in the achievement scores of students after learning the physics concepts using the package with mean gain score of 33.45. Based on these findings, it was recommended that, developers of learning packages such as virtual laboratories should ensure high flexibility of the packages in order to improve students’ access to such on mobile devices and internet, and government should assist schools financially by providing needed funds for the development of contextually relevant learning packages as their benefits to students’ learning of physics concepts are enormous.

Keywords

Accessibility, achievement, cost, evaluation, flexibility, physics, virtual laboratory

References

• Atsloom, Z. (2009). E-learning course evaluation proposal using ACTIONS model. Retrieved October 4, 2009, from www.slideshare.net/u059087/proposal-for-course-evaluation Babateen, H. M. (2011). The role of virtual laboratories in science education. Singapore: IACSIT press. 178 Barbour, M. K. & Reeves, T. C. (2009). The reality of virtual schools: A review of the literature. Computers and Education, 52, 402-416. Bartolic-Zlomislic, S. & Bates, A. W. (1999). Assessing the costs and benefits of telelearning: A case study from the University of Columbia. Retrieved November 29, 2013, from http://det.cstudies.ubc.ca/detsite/framewhat-index.html Bates, A. W. (1995). Technology, open learning and distance education. London: Routledge. Bates, A. W. (2000). Managing technological changes: Strategies for college and university leaders. San Franciso: Jossey-Bass. Campbell, J. O., Bourne, J. R., Mosterman, P. J., Nahvi, M., Rassai, R., Brodersen, A. J., Dawant, M. (2004). Cost-effective distributed learning with electronics labs. JALN, 8 (3), 5-10. Falode, O. C. (2014). A Bates’ “ACTIONS” evaluation of virtual physics laboratory package for senior secondary school students in Nigeria. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Educational Technology, University of Ilorin, Nigeria. Farida, M & Ezra, M. (2005). Towards enhancing learning with information and communication technology in Universities. Retrieved December 27, 2014 from http://cit.mak.ac.ug/iccir/downloads/SREC_05/Farida%20Muzaki%20and%20Ezra%20 Mugisa_05.pdf Gambari, A. I. (2010). Effectiveness of computer-assisted instructional package in cooperative settings on senior school students’ performance in physics, in Minna, Nigeria. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Department of Science Education, University of Ilorin. Harry, E. & Edward, B. (2005). Making real virtual lab. The Science Education Review, 2005. Kew, C. S., Jong, S. P., Kim, H. S., Kim, J. H., Park, Y. C. & Ryu, H. I. (2003). Application of virtual reality technology in biology education. Journal of Biological Education, 37 (2), 71-73. Mahmoud, A. & Zoltan, K. (2009). The impact of the virtual laboratory on the hands-on laboratory learning outcomes, a two years empirical study. 20th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference. University of Adelaide, 6-9 December, 2009. Manjit S. S., Selvanathan, N. & Ramesh, S. (2003). Analysis of engineering structures with multimedia technology. Proceedings of the 2nd Technical Postgraduate Symposium, University Malaya. ISBN 983-100-197-4 pp. 662 - 666. Murniza, M., Halimah, B., & Azlina, A. (2010). Virtual laboratory for learning biology – a preliminary investigation. Word Academy of Science engineering and Technology, 1, 272- 575. Nunn, J. (2009). The virtual physics laboratory V 7.0. Retrieved November 13, 2013 from http://www.vplab.co.uk Onasanya, S. A. (2004). Innovations in teaching and learning: computer in education. In I. O. Abimbola and A. O. Abolade (Eds.), Fundamental principles and practice of instruction. Ilorin: Department of Science Education, University of Ilorin. Sadik, A. (2003). Directions for future research in online education. Retrieved 1April 17, 2014, from http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/87481