Student Teachers’ Perceptions on Educational Technologies’ Past, Present and Future

Year 2018, Volume: 19 Issue: 1, 136 - 146, 01.01.2018

Derya Orhan Goksun Ozan Fılız Adile Askim Kurt

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.382782

Cited By: 3

Abstract

The aim of this study is to reveal Computer Education and Instructional Technologies student teachers’, who are in a distance teacher education program, perceptions on past, present and educational technologies of future via infographics. In this study, 54 infographics, which were created by student teachers who were enrolled in Special Teaching Methods II course at spring semester of 2013-2014 academic years, were analyzed. The infographics were analyzed via document review technique. These themes are “Educational technologies of past” (f=241), “Educational technologies of present” (f=240) and “Educational technologies of future” (f=158). Student teachers mentioned the most frequently “CD” (f=34) and “Television” (f=32) oriented to educational technologies of past. The most frequent views on educational technologies of present were “Smartboard” (f=24) and “Online Courses” (f=23). The most frequent opinion of student teachers about the educational technologies of future is “Holograms” (f=26) and “Virtual classroom” (f=22).

Keywords

Infographics, educational technologies, classrooms of future

References

• Akkoyunlu, B. (2002) Educational technology in Turkey: Past, present and future, Educational Media International, 39(2), 165-174. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education. An introduction to theory and methods. Allyn & Bacon, A Viacom Company, 160 Gould St., Needham Heights, MA. Bozkurt, A. (2015). Kitlesel acik cevrimici dersler (Massive open online courses-MOOCs) ve sayisal bilgi caginda yasamboyu ogrenme firsati [Massive open online coursesMOOCs and lifelong learning opportunity in digital age]. Acikogretim Uygulamalari ve Arastirmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 56-81. Chen, C. H. (2008). Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration? Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 65–75. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualtative research (4rd Edition). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press. Ertmer, P.A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39. Firat, M. (2016). 21. Yuzyilda Uzaktan Ogretimde Paradigma Degisimi [Paradigm Shift in Distance Education in the 21st Century]. Journal of Higher Education & Science 6(2), 142-150. Glesne, C. (2013). Nitel arastirmaya giris [Foundations of qualitative research]. (A. Ersoy ve P. Yalcınoglu, Trans.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık (Original work published 2011.) Green, K. C., & Gilbert, S. W. (1995). Great expectations: Content, communications, productivity, and the role of information technology in higher education. Change: The magazine of higher learning, 27(2), 8-18. Jimoyiannis, A., Tsiotakis, P., Roussinos, D., & Siorenta, A. (2013). Preparing teachers to integrate Web 2.0 in school practice: Toward a framework for Pedagogy 2.0. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2). Meyer, E. K. (1997). Designing infographics. Hayden Books. Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Kereluik, K. (2009). Looking back to the future of educational technology. TechTrends, 53(5), 49. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. (3rd Edition). Sage Publication. 145 Pressey, S. L. (1963). Teaching machine (and learning theory) crisis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47(1), 1-6. Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: A history of instructional media. Educational technology research and development, 49(1), 53-64. Rodriguez, C. O. (2014). MobiMOOC 2012: a new tree structure for the delivery of connectivist MOOCs. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 41-49. Smiciklas, M. (2012). The power of infographics: Using pictures to communicate and connect with your audiences. Que Publishing. Siklar, E., & Ozdemir, A. (Eds.). (2013). Istatistik-II [Statistics II]. Ankara: Anadolu Universitesi Yayinlari. Vannatta, R. A., & Nancy, F. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 253-271. Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 173–207.