Evaluation of an Associate Degree Distance Program Based on Students’ Perceptions of the Program Components

Year 2019, Volume: 20 Issue: 4, 160 - 184, 01.10.2019

H. Mustafa Donmez , Ayhan Hakan

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.640576

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the Public Relations and Publicity associate degree distance program available to students through Open Education Faculty at Anadolu University, Turkey. The study used Erden’s (1998) component-oriented model and a convergent mixed methods design employing an online questionnaire form. The study population included students who had “active student” status in the program during the spring semester 2017. The study sample consisted of 412 students, who submitted complete questionnaire forms. The responses to the closed-ended questions were analyzed using descriptive statistical tools and responses to the open-ended questions were analyzed using descriptive coding. The results showed that the participants had a high level of overall satisfaction with the program, and they particularly had more positive attitudes towards the e-learning platform among all the components. However, they had less positive attitudes towards the textbooks and the measurement and evaluation processes. In addition, the participants who stated that they used the e-learning platform had more positive attitudes towards all the components than the other groups in general. In the light of the results, some suggestions were made to improve the program like reviewing some of the program components such as the textbooks and measurement and evaluation practices.

Keywords

Open and distance learning, program evaluation, component-oriented program evaluation, participant-oriented program evaluation

References

• Aluka, F. R., Shonubi, O. K. (2014). Going beyond Kirkpatrick’s training evaluation model: The role of workplace factors in distance learning transfer. Africa Education Review 114, 638–657. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/18146627.2014.935007. Altan, M. Z. (2014). Turkiye’nin egitim cikmazi: Girisimci ogretim-girisimci ogretmen [Turkey’s educational dilemma: Entrepreneur education- entrepreneur teacher], (2nd ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi. Anadolu University. (2016). 2016-2017 ogretim yili guz donemi Acikogretim sistemine iliskin ogrenci gorusleri [Students’ views on the open education system in fall semester of 2016-2017 academic year]. Eskisehir: Anadolu University. Anadolu University. (2017). Acikogretim sistemi programlardaki ogrenci sayilarinin farkli kriterlere gore dagilimi [The distribution of the numbers of students in open education programs according to different criteria]. Eskisehir: Anadolu University. Anadolu University. (2018a). Anadolu University information package. Retrieved from http://abp.anadolu. edu.tr/tr Anadolu University. (2018b). Research and development unit for learning technologies 2017-2018 annual report. Eskisehir: Anadolu University. Anderson, J. & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 12 3, 80-97. Ascough, R. S. (2002). Designing for online distance education: Putting pedagogy before technology. Teaching Theology & Religion, 5(1), 17-29. Ayvaz, Z. (2001). Egitim programi ve unsurlari [Educational program and its components]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey. Balci, A. (1995). Sosyal bilimlerde arastirma, yontem, teknik ve ilkeler [Research, methods, techniques and principles in social sciences]. Ankara: 72 TDFO. Baraz, G. (2005). Buro yonetimi ve sekreterlik onlisans programinin degerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of office management and executive assistant training program]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey. Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W. & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43-50. 178 Bas, T. (2001). Anket [The questionnaire]. Ankara: Seckin. Bayrak, B. & Erden, A. M. (2007). The evaluation of science curriculum. Kastamonu Journal of Education, 15(1), 137-154. Retrieved from http://www.kefdergi.com/pdf/15_ 1/137.pdf Boody, R. M. (2009). A Rationale for participant evaluation. Educational Research Quarterly, 32(3), 47–59. Retrieved from https://search.proqAUOst.com/docview/216197994?pq-origsite=gscholar Braimoh, D. (2003). Institutional and programme evaluation. In S. Panda (Ed.), Planning and management in distance education (pp. 209-218). London: Kogan Page. Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum. Boston: Heinle and Heinle. Buyuk, K., Kumtepe, A. T, Uca Gunes, E. P., Kocdar, S., Karadeniz, A., Ozkeskin, E. E., Gunes, I., Kara, Y. & Ozturk A. (2018). Uzaktan ogrenenler ve ogrenme malzemesi tercihleri [Distance learners and their learning material preferences]. Eskisehir: Anadolu University. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Cousins, J. B. & Earl, L. (Eds.). (1995). Participatory evaluation in education: Studies in evaluation use and organizational learning. London: Falmer. Cetinsaya, G. (2014). Buyume, kalite, uluslararasilasma: Turkiye yuksekogretimi icin bir yol haritasi [Growth, quality, internationalization: a roadmap for Turkey’s higher education]. Ankara: Turkish Council of Higher Education. Daniel, J. S. (1996). Mega-universities and knowledge media: Technology strategies for higher education. UK: Psychology Press. Duan, W., Gu, B. & Whinston, A. B. (2008). Do online reviews matter?-An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems, 45(4), 1007-1016. Eksioglu, S., & Taspinar, M. (2014). Evaluation of modular education program implementation in vocational and technical high schools. International Journal of Human Sciences, 11(2), 1203-1223. Retrieved from https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3095 Erden, M. (1998). Egitimde program degerlendirme [Program evaluation in education]. (3rd ed.). Ankara: Ani. Erturk, S. (2013). Egitimde program gelistirme [Program development in education]. (6th ed.). Ankara: Edge Akademi. Esgice, M. (2015). Acik ve uzaktan egitim ogrencilerinin okul birakma sebepleri [Reasons for open and distance education students’ drop-out]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey. Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R. & Worthen, B. R. (2004). Program evaluation. alternative approaches and practical guidelines. (3rd ed.). USA: Pearson Education, Inc. Garrett, R. (2016). The state of open universities in the Commonwealth: A perspective on performance, competition and innovation. Burnaby: Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from http:// oasis.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/2048/2016_Garrett_State-of-Open-Universities. pdf?seqAUOnce=1&isAllowed=y Hakan, A. (1991). Egitim onlisans programinin degerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of Education associate degree program]. Eskisehir: Anadolu University. Hakan, A. (1996). Uzaktan ogretim yontemiyle egitim veren Anadolu Universitesi fakultelerinin tanitimi ve Bati Avrupa acikogretim programlarinin degerlendirilmesi [Presentation of the distance education faculties of Anadolu University and evaluation distance education programs in Western Europe]. Eskisehir: Anadolu University. Hakan A., Ozgur A. Z., Toprak, E., Aydin, S., & Firat, M. (2013). Acikogretim ogrencilerinin ozellikleri ile ogrenme ve iletisim ortamlarina iliskin egilimleri [Characteristics of open education students and their tendencies in learning and communication environments]. Eskisehir: Anadolu University