SECOND LIFE: A THREE-DIMENIONAL VIRTUAL WORLD FOR DEVELOPING THAI EFL LEARNERS’ ENGLISH COMMUNICATION SKILLS

Year 2020, Volume: 21 Issue: Special Issue-IODL, 49 - 60, 17.07.2020

Hambalee Jehma

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770909

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This quasi-experimental research aims to investigate if applying the Second life, a virtual platform, in the English communication classroom is highly effective. Other factors such as the gender differences, the difference of majors of study, and the number of hours spent on computers were also investigated. The Second life has been employed as a research tool in the study for developing English as a foreign language undergraduate students’ English communication skills. The samples of this study were 40 undergraduate students from two different majors, social sciences and science, divided into16 males and 24 females. They were studying English course at the university as a compulsory subject. The students took the TOEIC test as the pre-test before the semester starts. They were, then, asked to practice their English communication skills by typically interacting with the English contents, having discussion in the Second Life platform virtually outside of the classroom. After the TOEIC test was taken again at the end of the semester as the post-test and the data has been analyzed by t-test and ANOVA, the findings show that students with different backgrounds which were genders, fields of study, and hours of spending the computers have indifferent mean scores in their communication skills. It means all the students have developed their English communication skills. Applying the Second Life in English Communication classroom for EFL learners is highly recommended.

Keywords

English communication skills, Second life, Thai EFL learners, Virtual classroom

References

• Bainbridge, W. S. (2007). The scientific research potential of virtual worlds. Science, 317 (5837). 472-476.
• Baran, B., Cukurbasi, B. Polak, C. & Dogusoy, B. (2012). Second life users’ profiles and views about educational potential of second life: A case of Turkey. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 253-263.
• Braman, J. Vincenti, G. Arboleda, A. Jinman, A (July 2009) Learning Computer Science Fundamentals through Virtual Environments. Online Communities and Social Computing. HCI International Conference. San Diego, CA, USA
• Brooks, A. (2016). Teaching language via Second life: The good, the bad, and the future. NYS TESOL Journal, 3(1), 41-46.
• Casner-Lotto, J., & Barrington, L. (2006). Are They Really Ready to Work? Employers’ Perspectives on the Basic Knowledge and Applied Skills of New Entrants to the 21st Century US Workforce. Partnership for 21st Century Skills.
• Chamot, A. U. (1983). Toward a functional ESL curriculum in the elementary school. Tesol Quarterly, 17(3), 459-472.
• Chapman, M. (2003). TOEIC: Tried but undertested. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 7(3), 2-7.
• Chiang, T.H. C., Yang, S.J. H., Huang, C.S. J., & Liou, H.-H. (2014). Student motivation and achievement in learning English as a second language using Second Life. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 6(1), 1-17.
• Couto, S. M. (2011). Second life: Anxiety-free language learning? Proceedings in the International Conference of ICT for Language Learning.
• Fetscherin, M. and Lattemann, C. (2008), “User Acceptanceof Virtual Worlds.” Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 9 (3), 231 – 242.
• Gaukrodger, B. & Atkins, C. (2013). Second life calling: Language learning communicating across the world. Proceedings in the 30th Ascilite Conference.
• Hassan, R. F., Dzakiria, H. & Idrus, R. M. (2016). Students perception on using second life virtual platform to improve English Language proficiency. The European Proceedings go Social and Behavioural Sciences.
• Hismanoglu, M. (2012). Integrating second life into an EFL classroom: A new dimension in foreign language learning and teaching, International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 3(4), 100-111.
• Ince, E. et al. (2014). 3-dimensional and interactive Istanbul university virtual laboratory based on active learning methods. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 1-20.
• Lan, Y.J. & Lin, Y. T. (2016). Mobile seamless technology enhanced CSL oral communication. Educational Technology & Society, 3 (335-350).
• Linden Lab. (2009). Second Life [Computer Software]. Available at http://secondlife.com/
• Makena Technologies. (2009). There [Computer software]. Available at http://there.com/
• Metaversum GmbH. (2009). Twinity [Computer software]. Available at http://twinity.com/
• Murphy, J. M. (1991). Oral communication in TESOL: Integrating speaking, listening, and pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 25(1), 51-75.
• Powers, D. E., & Powers, A. (2015). The incremental contribution of TOEIC® Listening, Reading, Speaking, and Writing tests to predicting performance on real-life English language tasks. Language Testing, 32(2), 151-167.
• The Schome Community (2007), “The schome-NAGTY Teen Second Life Pilot Final Report: A Summary of Key Findings and Lessons Learnt.”
• Wang, C. X., Calandra, B., Hibbard, S. T. McDowell Lefaiver, M. L. (2012). Learning effects of an experimental EFL program in Second Life. Educational Tech Research Dev, 60, 943-961.
• Zamel, V., & Sheikh‐Ibraham, A. L. (1985). Clear Speech: Pronunciation and Listening Comprehension in American English. TESOL Quarterly, 19(3), 585-591.
• Zhang, Y. (2009). Reading to Speak: Integrating Oral Communication Skills. In English Teaching Forum (Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 32-34). US Department of State. Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Office of English Language Programs, SA-5, 2200 C Street NW 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20037.