DESIGNING E-LEARNING IN MEDICAL EDUCATION: TOWARD A COMPREHENSIVE MODEL

Year 2021, Volume: 22 Issue: 2, 254 - 271, 01.04.2021

Soleiman Ahmady Zohrehsadat Mırmoghtadaıe Nahid Zarıfsanaıey Johan Thor

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.907351

Cited By: 2

Abstract

This study was conducted to present a comprehensive model for designing e-learning in Medical education.
This qualitative study was performed in three stages. First, we used the “critical review” approach proposed
by CarnWell to synthesize a conceptual model from studies that employ e-learning in Medical education.
In the second stage, using Bereday’s comparative method, 30 renowned virtual universities were evaluated.
Finally, after aggregating and summarizing the results of the previous stages, the model was presented.
The results of the study showed that designing e-learning in medical education requires making plans on
national and international levels. Moreover, for qualitative and quantitative improvement of e-learning,
global progress, achievements, and standards should be monitored continuously, and strategic, tactical, and
executive aspects should be rigorously addressed. This comprehensive model for the design and development
of e-learning in medical education is identified as an area requiring further research.

Keywords

e-Learning, medical education, qualitative method, design, critical review

References

• Aboshady, O. A., Radwan, A. E., Eltaweel, A. R., Azzam, A., Aboelnaga, A. A., Hashem, H. A., … Afifi, A. M. (2015). Perception and use of massive open online courses among medical students in a developing country: multicentre cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 5(1), e006804.
• Aboumatar, H. J., Thompson, D., Wu, A., Dawson, P., Colbert, J., Marsteller, J., … Pronovost, P. (2012). Development and evaluation of a 3-day patient safety curriculum to advance knowledge, selfefficacy and system thinking among medical students. BMJ Quality and Safety, 21(5), 416–422. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000463
• Adick, C. (2018). Bereday and Hilker: origins of the ‘four steps of comparison’model. Comparative Education, 54(1), 35–48.
• Afshari, M., Bakar, K. A., Luan, W. S., Samah, B. A., & Fooi, F. S. (2009). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communication technology. International Journal of Instruction, 2(1).
• Agarwal, S., & Lenka, U. (2018). MANAGING ORGANIZATION EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH E-HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TOOL-E-LEARNING: INDIAN CASES A QUALITATIVE APPROACH. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 298–312. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.41.298312
• Ahmady, S., Kohan, N., Bagherzadeh, R., Rakshhani, T., & Shahabi, M. (2018). Validity testing of classroom community scale in virtual environment learning: A cross sectional study. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 36, 256–260.