A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW STUDY ON EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY AND DISTANCE EDUCATION: THE CASE OF TURKEY

Year 2022, Volume: 23 Issue: 2, 58 - 75, 30.03.2022

Gurhan Durak Mahmut Ali Sahın Ozge Oztuzcu Ozge Banur Goktas

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1095750

Abstract

In this study, the purpose was to reveal the content analysis of master’s theses and doctoral dissertations in the field of CEIT between 2018-2020. The field of CEIT could be said to cover the fields of educational technology and distance education. A total of 156 master’s theses and dissertations were examined in order to identify the keywords, academic discipline, research areas, theoretical frameworks, research designs and models, variables and related institutions. According to the research findings, it was seen that quantitative methods were mostly used in the theses and dissertations examined and that mixed methods were used in master’s theses more than in doctoral dissertations. In addition, it was revealed that few of the theses and dissertations had theoretical foundations. K-12 students were mostly preferred as the type of participant, and scales and interviews were most popular as data collection tools. Moreover, the variables of academic performance and effectiveness were mostly used as dependent variables. The present study, which conducted systematic content analysis of master’s and doctoral dissertations in the field of CEIT, is thought to be important in terms of revealing the current situation in the fields of Educational Technology and Distance Education and determining the research trends.

Keywords

CEIT, dissertations, distance education, educational technology, master thesis, systematic content analysis.

References

• Akbaba, A. G. R. S. ve Tunagur, A. G. M. (2018). Bilisim Teknolojilerinin Dil Becerilerinde Kullanimi Uzerine Bir Icerik Analizi. Agri Ibrahim Cecen University Social Sciences Institute, 127–146.
• Alper, A. ve Gulbahar, Y. (2009). Trends and issues in educational technologies: A review of recent research in TOJET. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 124–135.
• Altinpulluk, H. (2018). Turkiye’de Artirilmis Gerceklikle Ilgili Hazirlanan Tezlerin Bibliyometrik Analiz Yontemiyle Incelenmesi. Egitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 8(1).
• Aydin, I. E., Kaya, S., Iskol, S. ve Iscan, A. (2019). Anadolu Universitesi Uzaktan Egitim Bolumunde Yayinlanmis Yuksek Lisans ve Doktora Tezlerinin Icerik Analizi. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 9(3), 430. doi:10.5961/jhes.2019.343
• Azimi, S., Fazelian, P. (2013). New Trends and Approaches in Instructional Design and Technology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,82, 525-528.
• Bozkaya, M., Erdem Aydin, I. ve Genc Kumtepe, E. (2012). Research trends and issues in educational technology: A content analysis of tojet (2008-2011). Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 264–277.
• Bozkurt, A., Ucar, H., Durak, G. ve Idin, S. (2019). The current state of the art in STEM research: A systematic review study. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(3), 374–383. doi:10.18844/ cjes.v14i3.3447.
• Bulut, E. ve Akcaci, D. D. T. (2017). Endustri 4.0 ve İnovasyon Gostergeleri Kapsaminda Turkiye Analizi. Assam Uluslararasi Hakemli Dergi, 7, 50–72.