Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Bilgi İçin Enformasyon: Eğitim Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin İnternet Tabanlı Seçici Öğrenme Alışkanlıkları Üzerine Bir Durum Çalışması

Year 2019, , 90 - 111, 30.01.2019
https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.496012

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin
internet tabanlı seçici öğrenme alışkanlıklarını nitel temelde derinlemesine
incelemektir. Enformasyon edinimini izleyen bir internet tabanlı seçici öğrenme
sürecini ele almak üzere bir bütüncül tek durum çalışması yürütülmüştür. 2015
yılında Türkiye’de bir devlet üniversitesinin ikinci sınıfında öğrenim görmekte
olan ve üç farklı anabilim dalından 37 katılımcının yer aldığı araştırmanın
veri kaynakları gözlem kayıtları, alan notları, katılımcı günlükleri ve görüşme
sorularına verilen yanıtlardan oluşmaktadır. Dört haftalık bir sosyal gözlem
ile enformasyon arayışı davranışı ve izleyen süreçte olası bir seçici öğrenme
amaçlı bilgi edinimi konusunda veri toplanmıştır. Gözlemlerin ardından tipik
durum örneklemesine uyan bir yordamla iki aşamalı görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiş;
seçici öğrenmeye yönelen katılımcılarla gerçekleştirilen odak grup
görüşmesinden yararlanılarak enformasyon arayışı davranışı aşamasında kalan
katılımcılarla işbirlikli yapılandırılmış görüşme gerçekleştirilmiştir.
Enformasyon arayışı davranışı eğilimi ve seçici öğrenme amaçlı bilgi edinme,
betimsel analiz süreçlerinin iki ana teması olarak ön plana çıkmıştır.
Araştırmanın bulguları alt-temalar ve işaret ettikleri kavramlar eşliğinde
yorumlanmış ve bir dizi doğurguya dikkat çekilmiştir. Araştırmada detaylı arama
yapmak isteğinin seçici öğrenmeye yönelmede bir eşik olduğu, enformasyon
arayışı davranışından seçici öğrenmeye geçişte katılımcıların sözlük kullanan
ve özelleşmiş arama yapmaya çalışan katılımcılarla etkileşim kurma eğilimi
olduğu, doğrudan bir eğitim verilmese de seçici öğrenme eğiliminde olan
katılımcıların kaynak aramada da kendilerince uygun gördükleri fakat aynı
zamanda genel kabul gören kriterlere (Web sitesinin kaynak gösterip
göstermediği, içeriğin kabul görüp göremeyeceği ve kullanılabilirlik)
ulaşabildikleri sonuçları ortaya çıkmıştır. Aynı zamanda seçici öğrenmeye
yönelmede alan kapsamında kalma koşuluyla konu seçiminde serbest bırakılmanın
önemli bir etken olduğu sonucuna ulaşılırken, konu seçiminde tamamen serbest
olmak her iki grup için de iş görmemiştir. Çalışma araştırma alanı, paydaşlar
ve güncel uygulamalara ilişkin önerilerle sonlandırılmıştır.

References

  • Ackoff, R.L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16, 3-9.
  • Al-Suqri, M.N. (2011). Information-seeking behavior of social science scholars in developing countries: A proposed model. The International Information& Library Review, 43, 1-14.
  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
  • Bellinger, G., Castro, D. & Mills, A. (2004). Data, information, knowledge, wisdom. Retrieved from http://www.systems-thinking.org/dikw/dikw.htm
  • Bernstein, J.H. (2011). The data-information-knowledge-wisdom hierarchy and its antithesis. NASKO, 2(1), 68-75
  • Choo, C.W. (2001). The knowing organization as learning organization. Education+Training, 43(4), 197-205.
  • Clark, D. (2004). Understanding and performance. Retrieved from http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/performance/understanding.html
  • Fidel, R. (1991). Searchers’ selection of search keys: I. The selection routine. II. Controlled vocabulary or free-text searching. III. Searching styles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 490-527.
  • Garson, J.R. (2006). Psychiatric disorders and biological dysfunctions: Some philosophical questions concerning psychiatry. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Graduate School of the University of Texas, ATX.
  • Jones, E.E. & Kohler, R. (1958). The effects of plausibility on the learning of controversial statements. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57, 315-320.
  • Henderson, A. M. E., Sabbagh, M.A. & Woodward, A.L. (2012). Preschoolers’ selective learning is guided by the principle of relevance. Cognition. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.006
  • Hsiyeh-Yee, I. (1993). Effects of search experience and subject knowledge on the search tactics of novice and experienced searchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(3), 161-174.
  • Hyldegard, J. (2009). Beyond the search process-Exploring group members’ information behavior in context. Information Processing and Management, 45, 142-158.
  • Kabakci, I., Fırat, M., İzmirli, S. & Kuzu, E.B. (2010). Opinions of Teachers on Using Internet Searching Strategies: An Elementary School Case in Turkey. Turkish Online Journal Of Qualitative Inquiry, 1(1), 49-61.
  • Manning, C., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Web search basics. In Introduction to Information Retrieval (pp. 385-404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809071.020
  • McDonald KP, Ma L (2015) Dress nicer=know more? Young children’s knowledge attribution and selective learning based on how others dress. PLoS ONE, 10(12).
  • Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook. Beverly Hills: Sage.
  • Miller, E. (2011). Indeterminacy and interview research: Co-constructing ambiguity and clarity in interviews with an adult learner of English. Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 43-59.
  • Mills, A. J., Durepos, G. & Wiebe, E. (2010). Encyclopedia of case study research. London: Sage.
  • Nunes, J.M. & Fowell, S.P. (1996). Developing educational hypermedia applications: a methodological approach. Information Research, 2(2). Retrieved on March 27, 2014 from http://www.informationr.net/ir/2-2/paper15.html
  • Postman, L., Bruner, J.S. & McGinnies, E. (1948). Personal values as selective factors in perception. Journal Of Abnormal and Social Psychology,43, 148-153.
  • Stuckey, H. L. (2015). The second step in data analysis: Coding qualitative research data. Journal of Social Health Diabetes, 3, 7-10.
  • Weiss, S.J. (2012). Selective associations. In (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 2983-2987). NY: Springer.
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  • Zeleny, M. (1987). Management support systems: towards integrated knowledge management. Human Systems Management, 7(1), 59-70.
  • Zhou, M. (2013). A Systematic Understanding of Successful Web Searches in Information-based Tasks. Educational Technology& Society, 16(1), 321–331.

Information for Knowledge: A Case Study on Education Faculty Students’ Internet-based Selective Learning Habits

Year 2019, , 90 - 111, 30.01.2019
https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.496012

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to scrutinize education
faculty students’ internet-based selective learning habits on a qualitative
basis. A single-case holistic case study was conducted on an internet-based
selective learning process following information retrieval. Participants were
37 sophomore students enrolled at three different departments of a state
university in Turkey. Research data were collected in 2015 through observation
records, field notes, participant diaries and interview questions. A four-week
observation procedure was implemented in order to collect data on information
search behavior and knowledge acquisition on the purpose of selective learning.
Two stepwise-interviews were carried out based on typical sampling
understandings: a co-constructed interview was conducted with the participants
browsing only for information retrieval, using the data originated from the
focus group interview on selective learning. Predisposition towards information
retrieval and knowledge acquisition for selective learning were the two main
themes derived from the data, and descriptive analysis was used to address
these themes. The findings were interpreted in company with the
subthemes-concepts structure and a series of implications were drawn based on
the results of the study. The results of the study showed that a tendency to
detailed search behavior is a threshold for selective learning. Participants
with a tendency to learn selectively wanted to interact with the participants
using online dictionaries and trying to conduct a specified search process.
Although they were not given extra information about any criterion within the
scope of the study, selective learners were capable of applying and discussing
the search criteria (ie. whether a website cited any reference, the content
credibility and usability) echoed by themselves. While
being free to select the search topic in the field of study is an important motive
for selective learning, being completely free for searching and reporting a
topic does not work for both two groups. The study ends with some suggestions
for future research, stakeholders and current practice.

References

  • Ackoff, R.L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16, 3-9.
  • Al-Suqri, M.N. (2011). Information-seeking behavior of social science scholars in developing countries: A proposed model. The International Information& Library Review, 43, 1-14.
  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
  • Bellinger, G., Castro, D. & Mills, A. (2004). Data, information, knowledge, wisdom. Retrieved from http://www.systems-thinking.org/dikw/dikw.htm
  • Bernstein, J.H. (2011). The data-information-knowledge-wisdom hierarchy and its antithesis. NASKO, 2(1), 68-75
  • Choo, C.W. (2001). The knowing organization as learning organization. Education+Training, 43(4), 197-205.
  • Clark, D. (2004). Understanding and performance. Retrieved from http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/performance/understanding.html
  • Fidel, R. (1991). Searchers’ selection of search keys: I. The selection routine. II. Controlled vocabulary or free-text searching. III. Searching styles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42, 490-527.
  • Garson, J.R. (2006). Psychiatric disorders and biological dysfunctions: Some philosophical questions concerning psychiatry. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Graduate School of the University of Texas, ATX.
  • Jones, E.E. & Kohler, R. (1958). The effects of plausibility on the learning of controversial statements. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57, 315-320.
  • Henderson, A. M. E., Sabbagh, M.A. & Woodward, A.L. (2012). Preschoolers’ selective learning is guided by the principle of relevance. Cognition. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.006
  • Hsiyeh-Yee, I. (1993). Effects of search experience and subject knowledge on the search tactics of novice and experienced searchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(3), 161-174.
  • Hyldegard, J. (2009). Beyond the search process-Exploring group members’ information behavior in context. Information Processing and Management, 45, 142-158.
  • Kabakci, I., Fırat, M., İzmirli, S. & Kuzu, E.B. (2010). Opinions of Teachers on Using Internet Searching Strategies: An Elementary School Case in Turkey. Turkish Online Journal Of Qualitative Inquiry, 1(1), 49-61.
  • Manning, C., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Web search basics. In Introduction to Information Retrieval (pp. 385-404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809071.020
  • McDonald KP, Ma L (2015) Dress nicer=know more? Young children’s knowledge attribution and selective learning based on how others dress. PLoS ONE, 10(12).
  • Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook. Beverly Hills: Sage.
  • Miller, E. (2011). Indeterminacy and interview research: Co-constructing ambiguity and clarity in interviews with an adult learner of English. Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 43-59.
  • Mills, A. J., Durepos, G. & Wiebe, E. (2010). Encyclopedia of case study research. London: Sage.
  • Nunes, J.M. & Fowell, S.P. (1996). Developing educational hypermedia applications: a methodological approach. Information Research, 2(2). Retrieved on March 27, 2014 from http://www.informationr.net/ir/2-2/paper15.html
  • Postman, L., Bruner, J.S. & McGinnies, E. (1948). Personal values as selective factors in perception. Journal Of Abnormal and Social Psychology,43, 148-153.
  • Stuckey, H. L. (2015). The second step in data analysis: Coding qualitative research data. Journal of Social Health Diabetes, 3, 7-10.
  • Weiss, S.J. (2012). Selective associations. In (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 2983-2987). NY: Springer.
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  • Zeleny, M. (1987). Management support systems: towards integrated knowledge management. Human Systems Management, 7(1), 59-70.
  • Zhou, M. (2013). A Systematic Understanding of Successful Web Searches in Information-based Tasks. Educational Technology& Society, 16(1), 321–331.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mehmet Ersoy 0000-0002-0724-2825

Publication Date January 30, 2019
Submission Date December 12, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

APA Ersoy, M. (2019). Information for Knowledge: A Case Study on Education Faculty Students’ Internet-based Selective Learning Habits. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 90-111. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.496012
AMA Ersoy M. Information for Knowledge: A Case Study on Education Faculty Students’ Internet-based Selective Learning Habits. TOJQI. January 2019;10(1):90-111. doi:10.17569/tojqi.496012
Chicago Ersoy, Mehmet. “Information for Knowledge: A Case Study on Education Faculty Students’ Internet-Based Selective Learning Habits”. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry 10, no. 1 (January 2019): 90-111. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.496012.
EndNote Ersoy M (January 1, 2019) Information for Knowledge: A Case Study on Education Faculty Students’ Internet-based Selective Learning Habits. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry 10 1 90–111.
IEEE M. Ersoy, “Information for Knowledge: A Case Study on Education Faculty Students’ Internet-based Selective Learning Habits”, TOJQI, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 90–111, 2019, doi: 10.17569/tojqi.496012.
ISNAD Ersoy, Mehmet. “Information for Knowledge: A Case Study on Education Faculty Students’ Internet-Based Selective Learning Habits”. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry 10/1 (January 2019), 90-111. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.496012.
JAMA Ersoy M. Information for Knowledge: A Case Study on Education Faculty Students’ Internet-based Selective Learning Habits. TOJQI. 2019;10:90–111.
MLA Ersoy, Mehmet. “Information for Knowledge: A Case Study on Education Faculty Students’ Internet-Based Selective Learning Habits”. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 10, no. 1, 2019, pp. 90-111, doi:10.17569/tojqi.496012.
Vancouver Ersoy M. Information for Knowledge: A Case Study on Education Faculty Students’ Internet-based Selective Learning Habits. TOJQI. 2019;10(1):90-111.