EN
TR
The Relationship Between Marital Adjustment and Dimensions of Perfectionism
Abstract
The present study investigated whether dyadic adjustment of 50 married couples differed with respect to three dimensions of peifectionism, and whether there was a relationship between dyadic adjustment and perfectionism. Couples completed Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) and Multidimensional Peifectionism Scale (MPS). One-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted to figure out whether high adjusted and low adjusted groups differed with regard to dimensions of peifectionism. The relationship between dyadic adjustment and dimensions of peifectionism were computed via Pearson Product Moment Correlation Coefficient fonnula. The results of the analyses indicated that the re were no significant differences between high adjusted and low adjusted groups in tenns of three dimensions of peifectionism. Furthennore, no significant relationship wasfowid between marital adjustment and peifectionism.
Keywords
References
- Abbott. D. A. ve Brody, G. H. {1985). The relation of child age, gender, and number of children to the marital adjustment of wives. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 77—84.
- Addis. I. ve Bernard, M. E. (2002). Marital adjustment and irrational beliefs. Journal of Rational Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior The- rapy, 20, 3-13.
- Blankstein. K. R._. Flett, G. L., Hewitt, P. L. ve Eng. A. (1993). Dimensions of perfectionism and ir
- Eş Uyumu ve Mükemmeliyeıçitik
- rational fears: An examination with the fear
- Survey schedule. Personality and Individu—
- al Differences, 15, 323-328.
- Bium. J. S. ve Mehrabian, A. (1999). Personality and temperament correlates of marital satisfacti- on. Journal of Personality, 67, 93-125.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Publication Date
April 17, 2005
Submission Date
May 19, 2013
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2005 Volume: 3 Number: 23
APA
Koydemir, S., Sun Selişık, Z. E., & Tezer, E. (2005). The Relationship Between Marital Adjustment and Dimensions of Perfectionism. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 3(23), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.17066/pdrd.88433
AMA
1.Koydemir S, Sun Selişık ZE, Tezer E. The Relationship Between Marital Adjustment and Dimensions of Perfectionism. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal. 2005;3(23):65-75. doi:10.17066/pdrd.88433
Chicago
Koydemir, Selda, Z. Eda Sun Selişık, and Esin Tezer. 2005. “The Relationship Between Marital Adjustment and Dimensions of Perfectionism”. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal 3 (23): 65-75. https://doi.org/10.17066/pdrd.88433.
EndNote
Koydemir S, Sun Selişık ZE, Tezer E (May 1, 2005) The Relationship Between Marital Adjustment and Dimensions of Perfectionism. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal 3 23 65–75.
IEEE
[1]S. Koydemir, Z. E. Sun Selişık, and E. Tezer, “The Relationship Between Marital Adjustment and Dimensions of Perfectionism”, Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, vol. 3, no. 23, pp. 65–75, May 2005, doi: 10.17066/pdrd.88433.
ISNAD
Koydemir, Selda - Sun Selişık, Z. Eda - Tezer, Esin. “The Relationship Between Marital Adjustment and Dimensions of Perfectionism”. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal 3/23 (May 1, 2005): 65-75. https://doi.org/10.17066/pdrd.88433.
JAMA
1.Koydemir S, Sun Selişık ZE, Tezer E. The Relationship Between Marital Adjustment and Dimensions of Perfectionism. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal. 2005;3:65–75.
MLA
Koydemir, Selda, et al. “The Relationship Between Marital Adjustment and Dimensions of Perfectionism”. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, vol. 3, no. 23, May 2005, pp. 65-75, doi:10.17066/pdrd.88433.
Vancouver
1.Selda Koydemir, Z. Eda Sun Selişık, Esin Tezer. The Relationship Between Marital Adjustment and Dimensions of Perfectionism. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal. 2005 May 1;3(23):65-7. doi:10.17066/pdrd.88433