Comparison of Teachers and Counselors' Ideas About Co 1laboration in Dealing with Students' Behaviour Problems in Primary Schools

Volume: 3 Number: 25 April 17, 2006
  • Meral Atıcı
EN TR

Comparison of Teachers and Counselors' Ideas About Co 1laboration in Dealing with Students' Behaviour Problems in Primary Schools

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare teachers' and school counsellors' ideas about collaboration in dealing with students' behaviour problems. The study was conducted with 17 teachers and six school counsellors by using interview as a qualitative research method. Results show ed that teachers ask help from school counsellors to manage behaviour problems. They refer the child to counsellor and apply counsellor's suggestions for dealing with misbehaviour. School counsellors reported that they do consu1tation with teachers to help them to cope with problem behaviour, by doing individual counselling with the child, interviewing with parents, interviewing with parents and the child together, making suggestions for teachers, organising workshop for teachers and doing group counselling. Great majority ofteachers agreed that they work collaboratively with school counsellors, apply their suggestions and they get positive results. Generally teachers and counsellors seemed to satisfy with teacher-counsellor collaboration. School counsellor also emphasised that if teachers are volunteered to work co-operatively they quickly get positive outcomes in solving problems.

Keywords

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Meral Atıcı This is me

Publication Date

April 17, 2006

Submission Date

May 21, 2013

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2006 Volume: 3 Number: 25

APA
Atıcı, M. (2006). Comparison of Teachers and Counselors’ Ideas About Co 1laboration in Dealing with Students’ Behaviour Problems in Primary Schools. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 3(25), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.17066/pdrd.08094
AMA
1.Atıcı M. Comparison of Teachers and Counselors’ Ideas About Co 1laboration in Dealing with Students’ Behaviour Problems in Primary Schools. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal. 2006;3(25):55-68. doi:10.17066/pdrd.08094
Chicago
Atıcı, Meral. 2006. “Comparison of Teachers and Counselors’ Ideas About Co 1laboration in Dealing With Students’ Behaviour Problems in Primary Schools”. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal 3 (25): 55-68. https://doi.org/10.17066/pdrd.08094.
EndNote
Atıcı M (May 1, 2006) Comparison of Teachers and Counselors’ Ideas About Co 1laboration in Dealing with Students’ Behaviour Problems in Primary Schools. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal 3 25 55–68.
IEEE
[1]M. Atıcı, “Comparison of Teachers and Counselors’ Ideas About Co 1laboration in Dealing with Students’ Behaviour Problems in Primary Schools”, Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, vol. 3, no. 25, pp. 55–68, May 2006, doi: 10.17066/pdrd.08094.
ISNAD
Atıcı, Meral. “Comparison of Teachers and Counselors’ Ideas About Co 1laboration in Dealing With Students’ Behaviour Problems in Primary Schools”. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal 3/25 (May 1, 2006): 55-68. https://doi.org/10.17066/pdrd.08094.
JAMA
1.Atıcı M. Comparison of Teachers and Counselors’ Ideas About Co 1laboration in Dealing with Students’ Behaviour Problems in Primary Schools. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal. 2006;3:55–68.
MLA
Atıcı, Meral. “Comparison of Teachers and Counselors’ Ideas About Co 1laboration in Dealing With Students’ Behaviour Problems in Primary Schools”. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, vol. 3, no. 25, May 2006, pp. 55-68, doi:10.17066/pdrd.08094.
Vancouver
1.Meral Atıcı. Comparison of Teachers and Counselors’ Ideas About Co 1laboration in Dealing with Students’ Behaviour Problems in Primary Schools. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal. 2006 May 1;3(25):55-68. doi:10.17066/pdrd.08094

!! From 30 November 2023, English language proofreading will be required for accepted articles to ensure language quality.