Investigating Moral Behaviors 0f College Students With Respect To Empathic Tendency and Self- Monitoring

Year 2007, Volume: 3 Issue: 28, 33 - 47, 11.06.2007

Necla Kapıkıran

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the moral behavior of university students with respect
to empathic tendency and self-monitoring. 636 (female:373, 57 %; male: 273, 43 %) students of the
Faculty of Education in Pamukkale University were randomly selected for this study. Three different scales were used. The Ethics Behavior Rating Scale (Hogan, 1973; Blasi, 1980) was utilized for measuring the moral behavior. The Empathic Tendency Scale (Dökmen, 1988) was administered for measuring the empathic tendency. The Self-Monitoring Scale (Synder, 1974) was used for measuring the monitoring level of their behaviors in social conditions. The analysis of data showed that personal moral character was predicted by the Empathic Tendency Scale and department, and that verbal moral assertiveness was also predicted by empatic tendency and extraversion subscale of The Self-Monitoring. Results have been discussed in the light of literature.

Keywords

-

Üniversite Ögrencilerinde Ahlaki Davranışın Empatik Eğilim ve Kendini Ayarlama Açısından İncelenmesi

Abstract

Bu arastırmanın amacı üniversite ögrencilerinde ahlaki davranısın empatik egilim ve kendini ayarlama açısından incelemektir. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesinden örneklem tesadüfi olarak 636
(Kız:373, % 57;Erkek:273, % 43) ögrenci olarak belirlendi. Üç farklı ölçek kullanılmıstır. Etik Davranısı Degerlendirme Ölçegi (Hogan, 1973; Blasi, 1980) ahlaki davranısı ölçmek için kullanılmıstır. Empatik Egilim Ölçegi (Dökmen, 1988) empatik egilimi belirlemek için kullanılmıstır. Kendini Ayarlama Ölçegi (Synder, 1974) sosyal ortamlarda bireyin davranıslarını ayarlama düzeyini ölçmek için kullanılmıstır. Bulgular kisisel ahlaki karakterin empatik egilim ölçegi ve bölüm degiskenleri
ile anlamlı olarak yordanırken, sözel ahlaki giriskenlik empatik egilim ve dısa dönüklük ile anlamlı olarak yordanmıstır.

Keywords

ANAHTAR SÖZCÜKLER: Ahlaki davranış, empatik eğilim, kendini ayarlama ve üniversite öğrencileri

References

• Astington, J. W. (2004). Bridging the gap between theory of mind and moral reasoning. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 103, 63-72.
• Bacanlı, H. (1997). Kendini ayarlamanın psikolojisi. Istanbul: M.E.B. Yayınları.
• Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V. ve Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychlogy, 71(2), 346-374.
• Baird, J. A ve Astington, J. W.(2004). The Role of mental state understanding in the development of Moral cognition and moral action. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 103, 37-49.
• Barak, A. (1990). Conselor training in empathy by a game procedure. Counselor Education and Supervision, 29, 170-178.
• Bengtsson, H. ve Johnson, L. (1992). Perspective taking, empathy and prosocial behavior in late childhood. Child Study Journal, 22(1),11-22.
• Björqvist, K., Österman, K. ve Kahkiainen, A. (2000). Social intelligence-empathy:agression?. Agression and Violent Behavior. 5(2),191-200.
• Boldizer, J. P., Wilson,K. L. ve Deemer, D. K. (1989). Gender, life experiences and moral judgment development: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 229-238. Borba, M. (2001). Building moral intelligence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. A Wiley İmprint.
• Brems, C. ve Sohl, M. A. (1995). The Role of empathy in parenting strategy choices. Family Relations, 44,189-194.
• Broome, B. J. (1991). Building shared meaning: implications of relational approach to empathy for teaching intercultural communication. Communication Education, 40, 235-249.
• Carlo, G., Koller, S. H. Eisenbeg, N., Da Silva, M. S. ve Frohlich, C. B. (1989). A Cross-national study on the relations among prosocial Moral reasoning, gender role orientations and, prosocial behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 32 (2), 321-240.
• Carlozzi, A. F., Gaa, J. P. ve Liberman, D.V. (1983). Empathy and ego development. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30(1), 113-116.
• Cheng, C. M. ve Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Self-monitoring without awareness using mimicry as a nonconscious affilation strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1170-1179.
• Chlopan, B. E., McCain ,J. L., Carbonell, ve Hagen, R. L. (1985). Empathy: Rewiev of available measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(3), 635-653.
• Corcoran, K. J. (1983). Emotional separation and Empathy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39(5), 667-671.
• Dökmen, Ü. (1994). İletişim Çatışmaları ve Empati. İstanbul, Sistem Yayıncılık.
• Dökmen, Ü. (1988). Empatinin Yeni Bir Modele Dayanılarak Ölçülmesi ve Psikodrama ile Ge- liştirilmesi. A.Ü. Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1-2), 155-190.
• Eisenbeg, N., Fabes, R. A., Murphy, B., Kar- bon, M. Smith, M. ve Maszk, P. (1996). The Relations of children’s dispositional empathy-related responding to their emotionality, regulation and, social functioning. Developmental Psychology, 32(2), 195-209.
• Gallo, D. (1983). Educating for empathy, reason and imagination. Journal of Creative Behavior, 23(2), 98-115.
• Graziano, W. G. ve Bryant, W. H. M. (1998). Self-monitoring and the self-attribution of positive emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 250-261.
• Hill, G. ve Swanson, H. L. (1985). Consruct validity and reliability of the ethical behavior rating scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 285-292.
• Jaffee, S. ve Hyde, J S. (2000). Gender difference in moral orientation : a meta-analysis” Psycholojical Bulletin, 126(5), 703-726.
• Kapıkıran, N. A. ve Kapıkıran, Ş. (1998). İle- tişim becerileri eğitiminin anaokulu öğretmenliği öğ- rencilerinin empatik eğilim ve empatik becerileri üze- rindeki etkisi. IV. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Sempozyu- mu, Denizli: Pamukkale Üniversitesi
• Kapıkıran, Ş. (2005). Üniversite öğrencile- rinde kopya çekme ve dürüstlüğün etik davranışla iliş- kisi. XIV. Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi, Denizli: Pamuk- kale Üniversitesi.
• Knigh, P. (1989). Empathy: Concept, confusion and consequences in a national curriculum. Oxford Rewiev of Education 15(1), 41-53.
• Laible, D.J., Carlo, G. ve Roesch, S.C. (2004).Pathway to self-esteem in late adolesence: The role of parent and peer attachment, empathy, and social behaviours. Journal of Adolesence, 2(6), 703-716.
• Lan, W. ve Repman, J. (1998). Effects of practicing self-monitoring of mathematical problem solving heuristics on impulsive . Journal of Experimental Education, 67(19, 32-53.
• Liew, J, Eisenberg, N., Losoya, S. H., Fabes,R. A., Guthrie,I. K. ve Murphy, B. C. (2003). Children’s phychological indices of empathy and their socioemotinal adjustment:does caregivers’expressivity matter? Journal of Family Pschology, 17(4), 584-597.
• Miller, K. I., Eisenberg, N., Shell, R., ve Fabes, R. A. (1996). Relations of moral reasonning and vicarious emotion ta young children’s prosocial behaviour toward peer and adults. Developmental Psychology, 32(2), 210-219.
• Norris, S.L. ve Zweingeinhaft, R.I. (1999). Self-monitoring, trust, and commitment in romantic relationships. Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 215- 221.
• Niec,L.N. ve Russ, S.W. (2002). Children’s internal representations, empathy, and fantasy play: a validity study of the scods-q. Psychological Assessment, 14 (3), 331-338.
• Özdamar, K.(1997). Paket programlar ileistatistiksel veri analizi I. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniver- sitesi Yay. No:1001
• Reber, A.S. (1985). The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology, England: Penguin Group.
• Prat, M. W., Diessner, R., Pratt, A, Hunsberger, B. V. ve Pancer, S. M. (1996). Moral and social reasoning and perspective taking in later life: a longitudinal study. Psychology and Aging, 11(1), 66-73.
• Reeves, T. G., Bowman, J. T ve Cooley, S. L. (1989). Relationship between the client’s moral development level and empathy of the counseling student. Counselor Education and Supervision, 28, 299- 304.
• Rest, J. T. ve Edwards, L. (1997). Designinig and validitying a measures of moral judgment stage preference and stage consistency approaches. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 5-28.
• Reifman, A., Klein, J. G. ve Murphy, S. T. (1989). Self-monitoring and age. Psychology and Aging, 4 (2), 245-246.
• Riardon, C. A. ve Gross, T. (1994). Self- monitorig,gender, and the personal consequences impression management. American Behavioral Scientist, 37 (5), 715-724.
• Roβnegel, C. (2004). Cognitive load and perspective taking: applying to verbal communication European Journal Social Psychology, 30, 429-445.
• Robinson, J. L., Zahn-Waxler, C. ve Emde, R. N. (1994). Pattern of development in early empathic behavior: environmental and child consitutional inluences. Social Development, 3(2), 125-145.
• Shelton, C. M. ve McAdams, D. P. (1990). In search of an everyday morality: the development of a measure. Adolesence, XXV(100), 923-943.
• Shutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Bobik,C. Coston, T. D., Greeson, C. Jedlicka, C. ve ark. (2001). Emotional intelligence and Interpersonal relations. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 4.
• Stevans, J. (1996). Exploratory and confırmatory factor analysis applied multivarience statistics for the social scince., New Jersey: Lawence Erl. Ass. Pub.
• Synder, M. (1972). İzlenim ayarlamacılığı (self-monitoring) (Çev. Ali Balcı). Hitler isteseydi. Sosyal psikoloji yazıları. Ankara: Gündoğan Yayınları, 152-165.
• Tatlıdil, H. (1992). Uygulamalı çok değişken- li istatistiksel analiz. Ankara: Engin Yay.
• Tamborini, R., Stiff, J. ve Heidel, C. (1990). Reacting to Graphic Horror: A model of empathhy and emotional behavior. Communication Research, 17(5), 616-640.
• Tsang, J. A. (2002). Moral rationalization integration of situational faktörs and psychological proceses in immoral behavior. Review of General Psychology, 4(1), 25-50.
• Valiente, C. N., Eisenberg, R. A., Fabes, S. A, Shaepard, A., Cumberland, A. ve Losoya, S.H. (2004).
• Prediction of children’s empathy-related responding from their effortful control and parent’s expressivity. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 911- 926.
• Van der Mark, I. L., Van der Ijzendoorn, H. M. ve Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2002). Development of empathy in girl during the second years of life: assciations with parenting attachment, and temperament. Social Development, 11(4), 451-467.
• Wark, R. ve Krebs, D. L. (1996). Gender and dilemma differences in real-life moral judgement. Developmental Psychology, 32(2), 220-230.
• Webb, W. M., Marsh, K. L., Schneiderman, W. ve Davis, B. (1989). Interaction between self- monitoring and manipulated of self-awareness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 70-80.
• Wispé, L. (1986). The Distinction between sympathy and empathy to call forth a concept: a world is needed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 314-321. Worjeiszke, B. (2005). Affective concominants of information on morality and competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,10(1), 60-70.
• Worjeiszke, B. (1994). Multiple meanings of behavior connstruing actions in terms of competence on morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 222-232.
• Young , S. K., Fox, N. A ve Zahnx-Waxler, C. (1999). The Relations Between Temperament and Empathy in 2 Years-Olds. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 1189-1197.