Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Aşk Biçemleri, İlişki Doyumu ve Yalnızlık: Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerine Bir Çalışma

Year 2017, Volume: 7 Issue: 48, 0 - 0, 03.10.2017

Abstract

Yalnızlık, bireylerin iyi oluşunu olumsuz etkileyen fakat aşk ve ilişki doyumu ile azalan bir durum olarak değerlendirilmektedir çoğunlukla. Ancak son dönemde romantik ilişkilerin yalnızlık duygusunu ortadan kaldırmayabileceğini gösteren çalışmalar aşk ve yalnızlık ilişkisine farklı bir bakış açısı getirmektedir. Bu çalışmada da üniversite öğrencilerinin aşk biçemlerinin yalnızlığı doğrudan ve ilişki doyumları aracılığı ile yordayıp yordamadığını değerlendirmek amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Rehberlik ve Psikolojik Danışmanlık Anabilim Dalında öğrenim gören 125 öğrenciye UCLA yalnızlık ölçeği, ilişki doyumu ölçeği ve aşka ilişkin tutumlar ölçeği uygulanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde faktör analizi ve yapısal eşitlik modellemesi kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar tutkulu aşkın yalnızlığı azalttığını, ilişki doyumunu artırdığını, oyun gibi aşkın yalnızlığı artırdığını, ilişki doyumunu düşürdüğünü, ilişki doyumunun da yalnızlığı azalttığını göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte, tutkulu aşk, oyun gibi aşk ve ilişki doyumunun yalnızlık üzerindeki etkisinin oldukça zayıf olduğu görülmektedir. Bu durum yalnızlık duygusunun, toplulukçu kültürlerde aşk ve romantik ilişkiden görece bağımsız olabileceğinin bir işareti olarak değerlendirilmektedir.

References

  • Andersson, L. (1982). Interdisciplinary study of loneliness-with evaluation of social contacts as a means towards improving competence in old age. Acta Sociologica, 25(1), 75-80.
  • Bernardon, S., Babb, K., Hakim-Larson, J. ve Gragg, M. (2011). Loneliness, attachment and the perception and use of social support in university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 43(1), 40-51.
  • Brennan, T. (1982). Loneliness at adolescence. L. Peplau ve D. Perlman (Ed.), Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research and Therapy içinde (s. 269-290). NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Büyükşahin, A. ve Hovardaoğlu, S. (2004). Çiftlerin aşka ilişin tutumlarının Lee’nin çok boyutlu aşk biçimleri kapsamında incelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 19(54), 59-72.
  • Corral, S. ve Calvete, E. (2000). Machiavellianism: Dimensionality of the mach IV and its relation to selfmonitoring in a Spanish sample. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 3(1), 3-13.
  • Curun, F. (2001). The effects of sexism and sex role orientation on romantic relationship satisfaction [Cinsiyetçilik, cinsiyet rolü yöneliminin ilişki doyumu üzerine etkileri] (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Cutrona, C. (1982). Transition to college: Loneliness and the process of social adjustment. L. Peplau ve D. Perlman (Ed.), Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research and Therapy içinde (s. 291-309) NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Demir, A. (1989). UCLA Yalnızlık ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Psikoloji Dergisi, 6(22), 1-6.
  • Diener E. ve Lucas R. E. (2000). Explaining differences in societal levels of happiness: relative standards, need fulfillment, culture, and evaluation theory. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(1), 41-78.
  • Galinha, I. C., Oishi, S., Pereira, C. R., Wirtz, D. ve Esteves, F. (2014). Adult attachment, love styles, relationship experiences and subjective well being: Cross-cultural and gender comparision between Americans, Portuguese and Mozambicans. Social Indicators Research, 119(2), 823-852.
  • Grote, N. ve Frieze, I. (1998). Remembrance of things past: Perception of marital love from its beginnings to the present. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(1), 91-109.
  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. ve Black, W. L. (1998). Multivariate data analyses. NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Hazan, C. ve Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524.
  • Hendrick, S., Hendrick, C. ve Adler, N. L. (1988). Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction and staying together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 980-988.
  • Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S. ve Dicke, A. (1998). The love attitudes scale: Short form. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 147-159.
  • Hendrick, C. ve Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 392-402.
  • Hendrick, C. ve Hendrick, S. (1990). A relationship-specific version of the love attitudes scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(4), 239-254.
  • Jones, W. H., Freemon, J. E. ve Goswick, R. A. (1981). The persistence of loneliness: Self and other determinants. Journal of Personality, 49(1), 27-48.
  • Jöreskog, K. ve Sörbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8: Structural equation model with simplis command language. NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1999). Yeni insan ve insanlar. İstanbul: Evrim Yayınevi.
  • Kanemasa, Y., Taniguchi, J., Daibo, I. ve Ishimori, M. (2004). Love styles and romantic love experiences in Japan. Social Behavior and Personality, 32(3), 29-48.
  • Karlsson, E. ve Archer, T. (2007). Relationship between personality characteristics and affect: Gender and affective personality. Individual Differences Research, 5(1), 44-58.
  • Kirkpatrick, L. A. ve Hazan, C. (1994). Attachment styles and close relationships: A four year prospective study. Personal Relationships, 1(2), 123-142.
  • Knutson, K. ve Woszidlo, A. (2014). The associations between family disengagement, support, loneliness, and stress in young adults attending college. Family Science, 5, 20-29.
  • Lee, J. A. (1973). The colors of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. Don Mills, Ontario: New Press.
  • Lee, J. A. (1974). The styles of loving. Psychology Today, October, 44-51.
  • Lee, J. A. (1988). Love styles. R. Sternberg ve M. Barnes (Ed.), The psychology of love içinde (s. 38-67). New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Levy, M. B. ve Davis, K. E. (1988). Love styles and attachment styles compared: Their relations to each other and to various relationship characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 439-471.
  • Lin, L. ve Huddleston Casas, C. A. (2005). Agape love in couple relationships. Marriage and Family Review, 37(4), 29-48.
  • Masuda, M. (2003). Meta-analyses of love scales: Do various love scales measure the same psychological constructs. Japanese Psychological Research, 45(11), 25-37.
  • Meeks, B. S. Hendrick, S. S. ve Hendrick, C. C. (1998). Communication, love and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(6), 755-773.
  • Montgomery, M. J. ve Sorell, G. T. (1997). Differences in love attitudes across family life stages. Family Relations, 46, 55-61.
  • Neto, F. ve Pinto, M. C. (2003). The role of loneliness, gender and love status in adolescents’ love styles. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 11(3), 181-191.
  • Özdemir, Y. ve Çok F. (2011). Ailede özerk ilişkisel benlik ölçeklerinin lise öğrencileri için uyarlanması ve psikometrik özellikleri. İlköğretim Online, 10(1), 121-132.
  • Peplau, L. A. ve Perlman, D. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. L. Peplau ve D. Perlman (Ed.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy içinde (s. 1-18). NY: John Wiley &Sons.
  • Perlman D. ve Peplau L. A. (1981). Toward a social psychology of loneliness. R Gilmour ve S. Duck (Ed.), Personal relationship 3: Personal relationships in disorder. London: Academic Press,
  • Rokach, A. (1989). Antecedents of loneliness: A factorial analysis. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 123(4), 369-384.
  • Rokach, A. ve Bauer, N. (2004). Age, culture and loneliness among Czech and Canadians. Current Psychology: Development, Learning and Personality, 23(1), 3-23.
  • Rotenberg, K. L. ve Korol, S. (1995). The role of loneliness and gender in individuals’ love styles. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(3), 537-546.
  • Rubenstein, C. M. ve Shaver, P. (1982). The experience of loneliness. L. Peplau ve D. Perlman (Ed.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy içinde (s. 206-223). NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Russell, D., Peplau, L. A. ve Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472- 480.
  • Seepersad, S., Choi, M. ve Shin, N. (2008). How does culture influence the degree of romantic loneliness and closeness. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 142(2), 209-220.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Triangulating love. R. J. Sternberg ve M. L. Barnes (Ed.), The psychology of love içinde (s. 119-138). New Hawen: Yale University Press.
  • Sullivan, B. F. ve Schwebel, A. I. (1995). Relationship belief and expectations of satisfaction in marital relationships: Implications for family practitioners. Family Journal, 3(4), 298-305.
  • Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks.
  • Uzun Özer, B. ve Tezer, E. (2008). Aşka ilişkin tutum biçimlerinin olumlu ve olumsuz duyguları yordayıcılığı. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(30), 19-29.
  • Vedes, A., Hilpert, P., Nussbeck, F. W., Randall, A. K., Bodermann, G. ve Lind, W. R. (2016). Love styles, coping and relationship satisfaction: A dyadic approach. Personel Relationships, 23(2016), 84-97. doi:10.1111/pere.12112
  • Wei, M., Russel, D. W. ve Zakalik, R. A. (2005). Adult attachment, social self-efficacy, self-disclousure, loneliness and subsequent depression for freshmen college students: A longitudinal study. Counseling Psychology, 52(4), 602-614.
  • Weiss, R. S. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotion and social isolation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Woodhouse, S. S., Dykas, M. J. ve Cassidy, J. (2012). Loneliness and peer relations in adolescence. Social Development, 21(2), 273-293.
  • Zeigler-Hill, V., Britton, M., Holden, C. ve Besser, A. (2015). How will I love you? Self esteem instability between self esteem instabilitymoderatesthe association between self-esteem level and romantic love styles. Self and Identity, 14(1), 118-134.
Year 2017, Volume: 7 Issue: 48, 0 - 0, 03.10.2017

Abstract

References

  • Andersson, L. (1982). Interdisciplinary study of loneliness-with evaluation of social contacts as a means towards improving competence in old age. Acta Sociologica, 25(1), 75-80.
  • Bernardon, S., Babb, K., Hakim-Larson, J. ve Gragg, M. (2011). Loneliness, attachment and the perception and use of social support in university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 43(1), 40-51.
  • Brennan, T. (1982). Loneliness at adolescence. L. Peplau ve D. Perlman (Ed.), Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research and Therapy içinde (s. 269-290). NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Büyükşahin, A. ve Hovardaoğlu, S. (2004). Çiftlerin aşka ilişin tutumlarının Lee’nin çok boyutlu aşk biçimleri kapsamında incelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 19(54), 59-72.
  • Corral, S. ve Calvete, E. (2000). Machiavellianism: Dimensionality of the mach IV and its relation to selfmonitoring in a Spanish sample. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 3(1), 3-13.
  • Curun, F. (2001). The effects of sexism and sex role orientation on romantic relationship satisfaction [Cinsiyetçilik, cinsiyet rolü yöneliminin ilişki doyumu üzerine etkileri] (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Cutrona, C. (1982). Transition to college: Loneliness and the process of social adjustment. L. Peplau ve D. Perlman (Ed.), Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research and Therapy içinde (s. 291-309) NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Demir, A. (1989). UCLA Yalnızlık ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Psikoloji Dergisi, 6(22), 1-6.
  • Diener E. ve Lucas R. E. (2000). Explaining differences in societal levels of happiness: relative standards, need fulfillment, culture, and evaluation theory. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(1), 41-78.
  • Galinha, I. C., Oishi, S., Pereira, C. R., Wirtz, D. ve Esteves, F. (2014). Adult attachment, love styles, relationship experiences and subjective well being: Cross-cultural and gender comparision between Americans, Portuguese and Mozambicans. Social Indicators Research, 119(2), 823-852.
  • Grote, N. ve Frieze, I. (1998). Remembrance of things past: Perception of marital love from its beginnings to the present. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(1), 91-109.
  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. ve Black, W. L. (1998). Multivariate data analyses. NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Hazan, C. ve Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524.
  • Hendrick, S., Hendrick, C. ve Adler, N. L. (1988). Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction and staying together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 980-988.
  • Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S. ve Dicke, A. (1998). The love attitudes scale: Short form. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 147-159.
  • Hendrick, C. ve Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 392-402.
  • Hendrick, C. ve Hendrick, S. (1990). A relationship-specific version of the love attitudes scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(4), 239-254.
  • Jones, W. H., Freemon, J. E. ve Goswick, R. A. (1981). The persistence of loneliness: Self and other determinants. Journal of Personality, 49(1), 27-48.
  • Jöreskog, K. ve Sörbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8: Structural equation model with simplis command language. NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1999). Yeni insan ve insanlar. İstanbul: Evrim Yayınevi.
  • Kanemasa, Y., Taniguchi, J., Daibo, I. ve Ishimori, M. (2004). Love styles and romantic love experiences in Japan. Social Behavior and Personality, 32(3), 29-48.
  • Karlsson, E. ve Archer, T. (2007). Relationship between personality characteristics and affect: Gender and affective personality. Individual Differences Research, 5(1), 44-58.
  • Kirkpatrick, L. A. ve Hazan, C. (1994). Attachment styles and close relationships: A four year prospective study. Personal Relationships, 1(2), 123-142.
  • Knutson, K. ve Woszidlo, A. (2014). The associations between family disengagement, support, loneliness, and stress in young adults attending college. Family Science, 5, 20-29.
  • Lee, J. A. (1973). The colors of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. Don Mills, Ontario: New Press.
  • Lee, J. A. (1974). The styles of loving. Psychology Today, October, 44-51.
  • Lee, J. A. (1988). Love styles. R. Sternberg ve M. Barnes (Ed.), The psychology of love içinde (s. 38-67). New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Levy, M. B. ve Davis, K. E. (1988). Love styles and attachment styles compared: Their relations to each other and to various relationship characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 439-471.
  • Lin, L. ve Huddleston Casas, C. A. (2005). Agape love in couple relationships. Marriage and Family Review, 37(4), 29-48.
  • Masuda, M. (2003). Meta-analyses of love scales: Do various love scales measure the same psychological constructs. Japanese Psychological Research, 45(11), 25-37.
  • Meeks, B. S. Hendrick, S. S. ve Hendrick, C. C. (1998). Communication, love and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(6), 755-773.
  • Montgomery, M. J. ve Sorell, G. T. (1997). Differences in love attitudes across family life stages. Family Relations, 46, 55-61.
  • Neto, F. ve Pinto, M. C. (2003). The role of loneliness, gender and love status in adolescents’ love styles. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 11(3), 181-191.
  • Özdemir, Y. ve Çok F. (2011). Ailede özerk ilişkisel benlik ölçeklerinin lise öğrencileri için uyarlanması ve psikometrik özellikleri. İlköğretim Online, 10(1), 121-132.
  • Peplau, L. A. ve Perlman, D. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. L. Peplau ve D. Perlman (Ed.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy içinde (s. 1-18). NY: John Wiley &Sons.
  • Perlman D. ve Peplau L. A. (1981). Toward a social psychology of loneliness. R Gilmour ve S. Duck (Ed.), Personal relationship 3: Personal relationships in disorder. London: Academic Press,
  • Rokach, A. (1989). Antecedents of loneliness: A factorial analysis. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 123(4), 369-384.
  • Rokach, A. ve Bauer, N. (2004). Age, culture and loneliness among Czech and Canadians. Current Psychology: Development, Learning and Personality, 23(1), 3-23.
  • Rotenberg, K. L. ve Korol, S. (1995). The role of loneliness and gender in individuals’ love styles. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(3), 537-546.
  • Rubenstein, C. M. ve Shaver, P. (1982). The experience of loneliness. L. Peplau ve D. Perlman (Ed.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy içinde (s. 206-223). NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Russell, D., Peplau, L. A. ve Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472- 480.
  • Seepersad, S., Choi, M. ve Shin, N. (2008). How does culture influence the degree of romantic loneliness and closeness. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 142(2), 209-220.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Triangulating love. R. J. Sternberg ve M. L. Barnes (Ed.), The psychology of love içinde (s. 119-138). New Hawen: Yale University Press.
  • Sullivan, B. F. ve Schwebel, A. I. (1995). Relationship belief and expectations of satisfaction in marital relationships: Implications for family practitioners. Family Journal, 3(4), 298-305.
  • Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks.
  • Uzun Özer, B. ve Tezer, E. (2008). Aşka ilişkin tutum biçimlerinin olumlu ve olumsuz duyguları yordayıcılığı. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(30), 19-29.
  • Vedes, A., Hilpert, P., Nussbeck, F. W., Randall, A. K., Bodermann, G. ve Lind, W. R. (2016). Love styles, coping and relationship satisfaction: A dyadic approach. Personel Relationships, 23(2016), 84-97. doi:10.1111/pere.12112
  • Wei, M., Russel, D. W. ve Zakalik, R. A. (2005). Adult attachment, social self-efficacy, self-disclousure, loneliness and subsequent depression for freshmen college students: A longitudinal study. Counseling Psychology, 52(4), 602-614.
  • Weiss, R. S. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotion and social isolation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Woodhouse, S. S., Dykas, M. J. ve Cassidy, J. (2012). Loneliness and peer relations in adolescence. Social Development, 21(2), 273-293.
  • Zeigler-Hill, V., Britton, M., Holden, C. ve Besser, A. (2015). How will I love you? Self esteem instability between self esteem instabilitymoderatesthe association between self-esteem level and romantic love styles. Self and Identity, 14(1), 118-134.
There are 51 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Eylem Gökçe Türk This is me

Aylin Demirli Yıldız

Publication Date October 3, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 7 Issue: 48

Cite

APA Gökçe Türk, E., & Demirli Yıldız, A. (2017). Aşk Biçemleri, İlişki Doyumu ve Yalnızlık: Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 7(48).

!! From 30 November 2023, English language proofreading will be required for accepted articles to ensure language quality.