Differences in Adult Males’ and Females’ Friendships within the Context of the Primary and Secondary Capabilities of Positive Psychotherapy: A Mixed Research

Year 2020, Volume: 10 Issue: 59, 545 - 564, 28.12.2020

Ilgın Çakmak Çiğdem Yavuz Güler

Abstract

Differences in Adult Males’ and Females’ Friendships within the Context of the Primary and Secondary Capabilities of Positive Psychotherapy: A Mixed Research

Abstract

This study aims to examine the differences between adult males’ and females’ friendships in terms of the primary and secondary capabilities that Positive Psychotherapy conceptualizes to reveal concrete realities in interpersonal relationships. The research is based on the convergent parallel pattern of a mixed methods research model. The correlational method is used in Study I, and the phenomenological design is used in Study II. In Study I, 1000 participants (536 females and 464 males) aged between 18 and 65 years, formed the sample. In Study II, 20 adults (10 females and 10 males) aged between 25 and 62 years are in the study group. For the analysis of the data, the SPSS-22 package program is used in Study I, and the MaxQDA Version 2018 computer program is used in Study II. The results indicate that in adult females’ relationships with their closest friends, the capabilities of love, patience, contact, trust, politeness, honesty, sincerity, justice, and reliability are statistically significant, and in adult males relationships with their closest friends, sexuality, achievement/diligence, thrift, and obedience are statistically significant.

Keywords

Friendship, Gender Differences in Friendship, Positive Psychotherapy, Actual Capabilities, Primary and Secondary Capabilities

References

• Ainsworth, M. (1969). Object relations, dependency, and attachment: A theoretical review of infant-mother relationships. Child Development, 40, 969-1025.
• Ainsworth, M.S. & Bell, S.M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, March, 49-65. doi:10.2307/1127388
• Aristoteles (2014). Nikomakhos'a Etik (Çev: F. Akdemir). İstanbul: Say Yayınları.
• Arnett, J.J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469-480. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.5.469
• Arnett, J.J. (2003). Conceptions of the transition to adulthood among emerging adults in American ethnic groups. In: J.J. Arnett and N.L. Galambos, eds. New directions for child and adolescent development: cultural conceptions of the transition to adulthood (No. 100). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 63-75.
• Arnett, J.J. (2006). Emerging adulthood in Europe: A response to Bynner. Journal of Youth Studies, 9, 111-123. doi:10.1080/13676260500523671
• Arnett, J.J. (2007). Emerging Adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for? Child Development Perspectives, 1, 68-73. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00016.x
• Bagwell, C. L., & Coie, J. D. (2004). The best friendships of aggressive boys: Relationship quality, conflict, management, and rule-breaking behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 5–24. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2003.11.004
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
• Belsky, J. (2002). Developmental origins of attachment styles. Attachment & Human Development, 4(2), 166-170. doi:10.1080/14616730210157510
• Berscheid, E. (1994). Interpersonal relationships. Annuval Review, 45,79-129.
• Brown, B. B. & Clasen, D. R., & Eicher, S. A. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 22, 521-530. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.22.4.521
• Blieszner, R., & Adams, R. G. (1992). Adult friendship. Sage Publications.
• Brown, W. H., Odom, S. L., & Conray, M. A. (2001). An intervention hierarchy for promoting young children’s peer interactions in natural environments. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21(3), 162- 175. doi:10.1177/027112140102100304
• Büyükşahin Çevik, G. (2008). Lise 3. sınıf öğrencilerinin arkadaşlık ilişkileri bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(2), 35–50.
• Caldwell, M.A,, & Peplau, L.A. (1982). Sex differences in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 8(1), 721-732.
• Clark, M. L. & Ayers, M. (1993). Friendship expectations and friendship evaluations: Reciprocity and gender effects. Youth & Society, 24(3), 299-313.
• Cole, T., & Bradac, C.C . (1996). A lay theory of relational satisfaction with best friends. Social & Personal Relationships, 13(1), 57 – 83.
• Cope, T. A. (2008). Positive psychotherapy's theory of the capacity to know as explication of unconscious contents. Journal of Religion and Health, 48(1), 79-89. doi:10.1007/s10943-008-9225-7
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed research method approaches, USA: Sage Publications.
• Duncan, B., Miller, S., Wampold, B. & Hubble, M. (2009). The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy? Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 735–754. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735
• Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54(6), 408–423. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.6.408
• Erikson, E. H. (2014). İnsanın 8 evresi (Çev: G. Akkaya). İstanbul: Okuyanus Yayınları.
• Faller, G. (2001). A paradigm shift. A Journal of Pastoral Counseling, 36(7), 7-20.
• Fehr, B. (1996). Friendship processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Fehr, B. (2000). The life cycle of friendship. In C. Hendrick & S. S. Hendrick (Edt.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 71-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Goodwin, C. A. (1996). An Investigations of perceptions of closeness of friendships as correlated to measured closeness of friendships in males aged to 40 to 60. Walden University.
• Greif, G. L. (2009). Buddy System Understanding Male Friendships. Oxford University Press, Inc.
• Hall, J. A. (2011). Sex differences in friendship expectatios : A meta- analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(6) 723–747.
• Hay, D. F., Payne A., & Chadwick, A. (2004). Peer relations in childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 84-108.
• Haynie, D. L. (2002). Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 99–134.
• Heffron, K. & Boniwell, I. (2012). Positive Psychology, theory, research and applications. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
• Hendrick, S. S. (2016). Yakın İlişkiler Psikolojisi. (Çev: A.Dönmez, A. Büyükşahin Sunal). Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
• Henrichs, C. (2012). Psychodynamic positive psychotherapy emphasizes the impact of culture in the time of globalization. Scientific Research Psychology, 3(12), 1148- 1152.
• Hinde, R. A. & Stevenson-Hinde, J. (1987). Interpersonal relationship and child development. Developmental Review, 7(1), 1-21.
• Kant, I. (1997). Lectures on Ethics. UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Kyes, C. L. M. & Lopez, S. J. (2002). Toward a science of mental health: Positive directions in diagnosis and intervention. (In: C.R. Snyder & Lopez) Handbook of Positive Psychology, (pp.26- 44). New York: Oxford University Press
• Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer- Ladd, B., & Coleman, C. C. (1996). Friendship quality as a predictor of young children’s early school adjustment. Child Development, 67, 1103-1118. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01785.x
• Linley, P. A., Stephan, J. (2004). Positive change following trauma and adversity: A review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17(1), 11-21. doi:10.1023/b:jots.000001467 1.27856.7e
• Linley, P. A., Stephan, J., Harrington, S. & Wood, A. M. (2006). Positive psychology: Past present and (possible) future. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(1), 3-16. doi:10.1080/17439760500372796
• Lusk, J., MacDonald, K., & Newman, J. R. (1998). Resource appraisals among self, friend and leader: Implications for an evolutionary perspective on individual differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 685–700. doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00227-4
• Magyar- Moe, J. L. (2009). Therapist’s guide to positive psychological interventions (Practical Resources for the Mental Health Professionals). MA: Academic Press
• Maxwell, K. A. (2002). Friends: The role of peer influence across adolescent risk behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(4), 267-277.
• Mendelson, M. J., & Aboud, F. E. (1999). Measuring friendship quality in late adolescents and young adults: McGill Friendship Questionnaires. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 31, 130–132. doi:10.1037/h0087080
• Neimeyer, R. A. (1993). An appraisal of constructivist psychotherapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 221-234.
• Newcomb, A. F., & Bagwell, C. L. (1995). Children’s friendship relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 306–347.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.306
• Özen, A., Sümer, N., & Demir, M. (2010). Predicting friendship quality with rejection sensitivity and attachment security. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(2), 163–181.doi:10.1177/0265407510380607
• Peseschkian, N. (1990). A Transcultural and interdisciplinary approach to psychotherapy. Psychoter Psychosom, 53, 39-45.
• Peseschkian, N. (1998). Doğu hikâyeleriyle psikoterapi. (Çev: H. Fışıloğlu). İstanbul: Beyaz Yayınları.
• Peseschkian, N. (1999). Pozitif aile terapisi. (Çev: M. Naim). İstanbul: Beyaz Yayınları.
• Peseschkian, N. (2002). Günlük yaşamın psikoterapisi. (Çev: K. Teksöz). İstanbul: Beyaz Yayınları.
• Peseschkian, N. (2015). Pozitif psikoterapiye giriş kuram ve yygulama (Çev: T. Sarı). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Peseschkian, N., & Tritt K. (1998). Positive psychotherapy: Effectiveness study and quality assurance. The European Journal of Psychotherapy, Counseling & Health, 1(1). 93- 104. doi:10.1080/13642539808400508
• Rashid, T. (2008). Positive Psychotherapy. In: S. Lopez (Ed.) Positive Psychology: Exploring the best in the people. Vol. 4, (pp.187-217). CT: Praeger Publishers.
• Rashid, T. (2009). Positive interventions in clinical practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 461–466. doi:10.1002/jclp.20588
• Roberto, K.A., & Scott, J.P. (1986). Equity considerations in the friendships of older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 41(2), 241-247. doi:10.1093/geronj/41.2.241
• Rubin, K., & Bowker, J. (2018). Friendships. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Lifespan Human Development, p:908-910, doi. 10.4135/9781506307633.n339.
• Sandage, S. J., & Hill, P. C. (2001). The virtues of positive psychology: the rapprochement and challenges of an affirmative postmodern perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 31(3), 214-260.
• Sedikides, C., Oliver, M. B., & Campbell, W. K. (1994). Perceived benefits and costs of romantic relationships for women and men: Implications for exchange theory. Personal Relationships, 1(1), 5-21.
• Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410-421. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.5.410
• Sheldon, K. & King L., (2001). Why positive psychology is necessary. American Psychologist, 6, 216-217.
• Tarhan, N. (2013). Duyguların psikolojisi. İstanbul: Timaş Yayınları.
• Underwood, M. K., Rosen, L. H. (2009). Gender, peer relations, and challenges for girlfriends and boyfriends coming together. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33 (2009), 16–20.
• Wettstein, S. W. (1998). Close friendships of middle - aged women as a function of intimacy and attachment style. University of Pittsburgh.
• Verbrugge, L. M. (1977). The structure of adult friendship choices. Social Forces, 56(2), 576. doi:10.2307/2577741
• Zarbatany, L., Conley, R., & Pepper, S. (2004). Personality and gender differences in friendship needs and experiences in preadolescence and young adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 299–310. doi:10.1080/01650250344000514
• Zaggelink, E. (1995). Evolving friendship networks: An individual-oriented approach implementing similarity. Social Networks, 17(2), 83–110. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(94)00246-7