VATANDAŞ KATILIMI SÜRECİNİN TASARIMI

Abstract

Vatandaşların kendilerini etkileyen kararlara katılmaları, hem alınan kararların niteliği hem de yönetimlerin meşruiyeti açısından büyük önem arz etmektedir. Günümüzde vatandaşların düşüncelerini ya da ihtiyaçlarını dikkate almadan gerçekleştirilen hizmetlerin ve verilen kararların tam anlamıyla başarılı olması beklenemez. Doğrudan vatandaş katılımı uygulamaları, temsili demokrasinin tek başına bazı sorunlara çözüm olamadığının anlaşılmaya başlamasıyla birlikte yaygınlık kazanmıştır. Bu çerçevede birçok doğrudan vatandaş katılım teknikleri ortaya çıkmış ve yönetimler kendileri için en uygun katılım tekniğini uygulamaya başlamışlardır. Ancak aynı vatandaş katılım tekniğine yer vermelerine karşın bazı yönetimlerin önemli kazanımlar elde ederken bazı yönetimlerin ise önemli kazanımlar elde edemediği görülmüştür. Bu durum ise araştırmacıları, katılım sürecinin tasarımının, bu farklılıkta önemli rol oynayan faktörlerden biri olduğu sonucuna götürmüştür.

Bu makalede öncelikle vatandaş katılımına ilişkin geniş literatür özetlenmiş daha sonra ise günümüzde doğrudan vatandaş katılımının başarısında önemli bir araç olarak kabul edilen ve Türkçe literatürde fazla yer verilmeyen vatandaş katılım sürecinin tasarımına ilişkin kavramsal çerçeve incelenmiştir.

Keywords

• Doğrudan demokrasi,vatandaş katılımı

References

1. Arnstein, S. (1969), ‘A Ladder of Citizen Participation’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216-224.
2. Callahan, Kathe (2007), ‘Elements of Effective Governance: Measurement, Accountability and Participation’, Public Administration and Public Policy/126, New York/London: Taylor & Francis, 149-172.
3. Choguill, Marisa B. Guaraldo (1996), ‘A Ladder of Community Participation for Underdeveloped Countries’, Habitat International, Vol. 20, No. 3, 431-444.
4. Collins, Kevin and Ison, Raymond (2006), ‘Dare we jump off Arnstein’sladder?’,Social learning as a new policy paradigm, In: Proceedings of Path (Participatory Approaches in Science & Technology) Conference, 4-7 June 2006,http://oro.open.ac.uk/8589/1/Path_paper_Collins_Ison.pdf , Erişim: 20.02.2016.
5. Conner, Desmond M. (1988), ‘A New Ladder of Citizen Participation’, National Civic Review, Volume 77, Issue 3, 249-257.
6. Cornwall, Andrea (2008), ‘Unpacking ‘Participation’: Models, Meanings and Practices’, Community Development Journal, Vol. 43, No. 3 , July, 269-283.
7. Creighton, L. James (2005), The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions Through Citizen Involvement, United States of America: Jossey- Bass. Ekonomik Kalkınma ve İşbirliği Örgütü (OECD) (2001), Citizens as Partners: OECD Handbook on Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy Making, Gramberger, Marc, http://www.internationalbudget.org/wp-content/uploads/Citizens-as-Partners-OECD-Handbook.pdf, 25.10.2016.
8. Fung, Archon (2003), ‘Survey Article: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences’, The Journal of Political Philosophy, Volume 11, Number 3, 338-367.

9. Fung, Archon (2006), ‘Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance’, Public Administration Review, 66 (S1), 66-75.
10. Gershman, Shayna Debra (2013), ‘An Evaluation of Public Participation Techniques Using Arnstein’s Ladder: The Porland Plan’, A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning. http://ufdcimages.uflib.ufl.edu/UF/E0/04/56/90/00001/GERSHMAN_S.pdf,Erişim: 28.02.2016.
11. http://www.participatorymethods.org/method/levels-participation, Erişim: 26.10.2016.
12. Innes, Judith E. and Booher, David E. (2004), ‘Strategies for the 21.st Century’, Planning Theory & Practice, Volume 5, No. 4, 419-436.
13. Karlsson, Martin (2012), ‘Democratic Legitimacy and Recruitment Strategies in Eparticipation Projects’, Charalabidis, Yannis and Koussouris, Sotirios (Ed.), Empowering Open and Collaborative Governance,http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-27219-6#page-1, Erişim: 01.10.15.
14. Lancer Julnes, Patria de (2012), ‘Engaging Hispanics in Governance: A Social Constructivist Interpretation’, Schachter, Hindy Lauerand Yang, Kaifeng (Ed.), The State of Citizen Participation in America, United States of America: Information Age Publishing, 195-224.
15. Lukensmeyer, Carolyn J. and Jacobson, Wendy (2013), Bringing Citizen Voices to the Table: A Guide for Public Managers, United States of America: Jossey-Bass.
16. Nabatchi, Tina (2012a), A Manager’s Guide to Evaluating Citizen Participation, Fostering Transparency and Democracy Series, IBM Center fort the Business of Government,http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan048340.pdf, Erişim: 26.02.2016.
17. Nabatchi, Tina (2012b) ‘Putting the ‘Public’ Back in Public Values Research: Designing Participation to Identify and Respond toValues’, Public Administration Review, Volume 72, Issue 5, 699-708.
18. Nabatchi, Tina and Amsler, Lisa Blomgren (2014), ‘Direct Public Engagement in Local Government’, American Review of Public Administration, Vol.44, No.4, 63-88.
19. Nabatchi, Tina and Matt Leighninger (2015a), Public Participation for 21st Century Democracy, United States of America: Jossey-Bass.
20. Nabatchi, Tina, Emma Ertinger and Matt Leighninger (2015b), “The Future of Public Participation: Better Design, Better Laws, Better Systems”, Conflict Resolution Quarterly, Volume 33, Issue S1, 35-44.
21. Piotrowski, Suzanne and Liao, Yuguo (2012), ‘The Usability of Government Information’, Schachter, Hindy Lauer and Yang, Kaifeng (Ed.), The State of Citizen Participation in America, United States of America: Information Age Publishing, 77-100.
22. Pretty, J. N. (1994), ‘Alternative Systems of Inquiry for Sustainable Agriculture’, IDS Bulletin, Vol. 25, No.2, 37-48.
23. Roberts, Nancy C. (2008), ‘The Age of Direct Citizen Participation’, Nancy C. Roberts (ed.), An ASPA Classics Volume, United States of America: M.E. Sharpe, 3-9.
24. Thomas, John Clayton (1995), Public Participation in Public Decisions: New Skills and Strategies for Public Managers, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
25. Tjahjono, Heru; Bisri, Mohammad; Ganis, Eko (2014), ‘Public Participation Towards The Formulation of Enviroment-friendly City Policy in Tulungagung’, International Journal of Applied Sociology, 4(3), 74-81.
26. Tritter, Jonathan Quetzaland; McCallum, Alison (2006), ‘The Snakes and Ladders of User Involvement: Moving Beyond Arnstein’, HealtyPolicy, 76, 156-168.
27. Türkiye Ekonomi Politikaları Araştırma Vakfı (TEPAV) (2014), Yönetişim ve Katılım,http://www.tepav.org.tr/upload/files/1408538775-7.Yonetisim_ve_Katilim.pdf, Erişim: 25.10.15.
28. Uluslararası Vatandaş Katılım Örgütü (IAP2) (2007b), IAP2's Code of Ethics for Public Participation Practitioners, http://www.iap2.org/?page=8, Erişim: 20.06.2016.
29. Yardim, M (2016). “Multicultural Societies and Human Dignity: Human Rights Education”, The İnternational Journal of Humaties & Social Studies, 4(11), 1-5.
30. White, Sarah C. (1996), ‘Depoliticizing Development: The Uses and Abuses of Participation’, Development in Practice, Vol. 6, No. 1, 6-15.
31. Wilcox, David (2003), ‘The Guide to Effective Participation’,http://phobos.ramapo.edu/~vasishth/Readings/Wilcox-Guide_To_Effective_Participation.pdf, Erişim: 02.05.2016.