Artificial Intelligence in Digital Communication: The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Social Media Platforms, Ethical Violations, and Social Policy Recommendations

Abstract

The study aims to examine the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, which are becoming an increasingly influential factor in digital communication, in social media environments, to identify the ethical violations arising from this use, and to propose social policy recommendations addressing these ethical violations. In this context, a focus group discussion was conducted with twelve new media and communication students. The interview data were analysed using the thematic analysis method in the MAXQDA programme, and three main themes were identified: AI usage, AI on social media, and ethical and social policy recommendations. In the study, which involved 132 codings, findings were reached indicating that AI technologies increase efficiency through rapid access and timeliness, and while offering opportunities for use as teaching materials, they also lead to a loss of creativity, employment problems, and a digital divide. Furthermore, ethical violations have been identified, including that AI increases the production of manipulative content and its illegal use, leading to breaches of data privacy and copyright infringement, as well as undermining trust and credibility. Findings regarding the development of cooperation to prevent these ethical violations, the regulation of legal and controlled use, the creation of new employment opportunities, and the provision of professional and social education in this direction have been presented as a social policy proposal. The necessity of teaching digital media literacy in all educational institutions every year has been particularly emphasised. The study is significant in terms of identifying ethical violations arising from the use of artificial intelligence on social media, proposing social policy recommendations to address these violations, and providing policymakers with a data repository in this field. Within the context of research, it is recommended that developments in this area be monitored and that improvement efforts and protective policies for ethical tenders be developed in light of current data.

Keywords

• New Media and Communication
• Digital Communication
• Artificial İntelligence
• Social Media
• Ethics
• Social Policy

Supporting Institution

There is no institution supporting the work.

Project Number

1882080

Ethical Statement

The ethics declaration form is attached.

Thanks

I would like to thank all members of the journal board, the editorial team, and all my colleagues who contributed to this process, and I wish them every success.

Dijital İletişimde Yapay Zekâ: Sosyal Medya Ortamlarında Yapay Zekâ kullanımı, Etik İhlaller ve Sosyal Politika Önerisi

Abstract

Çalışma, dijital iletişimde giderek etkin bir faktör hâline gelen yapay zekâ (YZ) teknolojilerinin sosyal medya ortamlarında kullanımını, bu kullanımdan kaynaklanan etik ihlallerin tespitini ve bu etik ihlallere yönelik sosyal politika önerisi sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda on iki yeni medya ve iletişim bölümü öğrencisi ile odak grup görüşmesi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Görüşme verileri MAXQDA programında tematik analiz yöntemiyle çözümlenerek YZ Kullanımı, sosyal medyada YZ ve Etik ile sosyal politika önerisi olmak üzere üç ana tema belirlenmiştir. 132 kodlamanın yapıldığı çalışmada YZ teknolojilerinin hızlı erişim ve güncellik ile verimliliği artırdığı, ders materyali olarak kullanılması noktasında fırsatlar sunmasıyla birlikte yaratıcılığın kaybedilmesine, istihdam problemlerine ve dijital uçuruma neden olduğuna dair bulgulara ulaşılmıştır. Ayrıca YZ’nin manipülatif içerik üretimini ve yasa dışı kullanımı artırdığı, veri gizliliği ve telif hakkı ihlaline, güven ve doğruluğun sorgulanmasına neden olduğuna dair etik ihlaller tespit edilmiştir. Bu etik ihlallerin önlenmesine yönelik iş birliğinin geliştirilmesi, hukuksal ve kontrollü kullanımın düzenlenmesi, yeni istihdam alanlarının oluşturulması ve bu yönde mesleki ve toplumsal eğitimin verilmesi yönünde bulgular sosyal politika önerisi olarak sunulmuştur. Dijital medya okuryazarlığı dersinin bütün eğitim kurumlarında her yıl verilmesi gerekliliği özellikle vurgulanmıştır. Çalışma, sosyal medyada yapay zekâ kullanımından kaynaklı etik ihlallerin tespiti, bu ihlallere yönelik sosyal politika önerisi sunması ve politika yapıcılara bu alanda veri havuzu oluşturması açısından önemlidir. Araştırma bağlamında bu alana yönelik gelişmelerin takip edilerek güncel veriler ışığında iyileştirme çalışmalarının ve etik ihlallere yönelik koruyucu politikaların geliştirilmesi öneri olarak sunulmaktadır.

Keywords

• Yeni Medya ve İletişim
• Dijital İletişim
• Yapay Zekâ
• Sosyal Medya
• Etik
• Sosyal Politika

Supporting Institution

Destekleyen kurum yoktur.

Project Number

1882080

Ethical Statement

Etik beyan formu ekte sunulmuştur.

Thanks

Bu sürece katkı sağlayan tüm dergi kurulu üyelerine, editör ekibine ve dergiye emek veren tüm hocalarıma teşekkür eder kolaylıklar dilerim.

References

1. Adorno, T., W. (2007) Kültür Endüstrisi (Çev. Nihat Ülner, Mustafa Tüzel-Elçin Gen) (1.Baskı) İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
2. Aleksieva, M., Mishkova-Yotova, I., & Peneva, M. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and creative writing in primary education: Expanding Rodari‘s Fantasy Binomial Method. International Scientific Multidisciplinary Conference AI-SMART 2025: Conference Proceedings. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/AI.SMART.2025.201
3. Ali, E.H., Kottaparamban, M., Ahmed, F., Usmani, S., Hamd, M., Ibrahim, M., & Hamed, S. (2025). Beyond the human pen: The role of artificial intelligence in literary creation. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities. 6(4). https://doi.org/10.58256/c0ymkm61
4. Apostol, C. (2024). Artificial Intelligence the technology that transcends our imagination.Competitiveness and sustainable development, pp. 98-104. https://doi.org/10.52326/csd2024.15
5. Baldock, J. ve Mitton, L., Manning, N. & Vickerstaff, S. (Eds). (2011). Social policy. Oxford University Press, USA.
6. ASHB (2025) Aile ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığında yapay zekâ destekli yeni dönem https://www.aile.gov.tr/haberler/aile-ve-sosyal-hizmetler-bakanligindayapay-zekâ-destekli-yeni-donem/) (Erişim Tarihi: 19.01.2026).
7. Billson, J. M. (1989). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Clinical Sociology Review, 7(1), 24. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/csr/vol7/iss1/24
8. Boden, M. A. (2016). AI: Its nature and future. Oxford University Press.

9. Bodrov, N. F., & Lebedeva, A. K. (2024). Analysis of the case law establishing circumstances of illegal distribution of generative content created using artificial intelligence. Legal research, (11), 1-25. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2024.11.72540.
10. Bowling, A. (2009). Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services.McGraw-Hill House.
11. Çarıkcı, K., Meral, H., Berkil, S., Çalışır, A., Önala, L., & Arslan, Ö. (2024). Nitel araştırmalarda tematik analiz. Socrates Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Researches, 10(37), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10509707
12. Davidson, S. (2025). The limits of artificial intelligence: July 2025. The Review of Austrian Economics, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-025-00705-2
13. De, D., El Jamal, M., Aydemir, E., & Khera, A. (2025). Social media algorithms and teen addiction: neurophysiological impact and ethical considerations. Cureus,17(1). DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77145.
14. Dean, H. (2012). Social policy. Polity.
15. Debnath, R., Veeraraghavan P, V., & Hapse, N. (2024). AI and Privacy: Ethical concerns in data collection and surveillance. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research. Vol. 6, Issue 6, pp.1-8, E-ISSN: 2582-2160, https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2024/6/32150.pdf
16. Drabiuk, S. (2025). Artificial intelligence and propaganda and disinformation: main challenges. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law. Vol. 5, No:90,https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.90.5.45
17. Ess, C. (2013). Digital media ethics. Polity Press.
18. Farooqi, M.T., Amanat, I., & Awan, S.M. (2024). Ethical considerations and challenges in the integration of Artificial Intelligence in education: A systematic review. Journal of Excellence in Management Sciences. 3 (4), https://doi.org/10.69565/jems.v3i4.314
19. Gambín, Á. F., Yazidi, A., Vasilakos, A., Haugerud, H., & Djenouri, Y. (2024). Deepfakes: current and future trends. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57(3): 64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10679-x
20. Gantulga, Dashzegve. T & Munkhbayasgalan. G (2025). A Study on The factors influencing consumers’ purchase intention toward advertisements created by Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Social Science and Economics Invention. 11 No:12 (25), pp. 171-175 | https://doi.org/10.23958/ijssei/vol11-i12/434
21. Gerashchenko, I. (2025). Artificial intelligence and the problem of unemployment. Theoretical economics. Issue 11, pp. 86-98, https://doi.org/10.52957/2221-3260-2025-11-86-98
22. Gürsoy, S. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Literacy and the Digital Divide: Implications for Financial Investors. J Bus Econo Stud. 2(1): 1-9. DOI: doi.org/10.61440/JBES.2025.v2.52
23. Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California management review, 61(4), 5-14. ttps://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619864925
24. Huang, X. (2025). Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI) Is widening the digital divide. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Vol 115, Issue 9, pp. 2017–2029. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2025.2527316
25. İpek, E. (2022). Sosyal politikanın dünyada ve Türkiye’de tarihsel gelişimi. İpek, E., & Develi, A. (Edr.) Sosyal politikayı keşfetmek: Temel çalışma konuları içinde (ss.1-26). Nobel Yayınevi.
26. Jora, O., Iacob, M., Rosca, V.I., Nedelcu, M.R., Preda, A.F., & Nedef, M. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Artistic Imagination: Revisiting the cultural economy of industrial revolutions. Amfiteatru Economic, 26 (66), pp. 613-632. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2024/66/630
27. Kesavan, E. (2024). A Review on ethical and legal ıssues in artificial ıntelligence and data privacy. International Journal of Innovations in Science, Engineering And Management, 3(4), 94-99. https://doi.org/10.69968/ijisem.2024v3i494-99
28. Krueger, R. A.& Casey, M., A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research.SAGE Publications.
29. Korinek, A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2021). Artificial intelligence, globalization, and strategies for economic development (No. w28453). National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI 10.3386/w28453, http://www.nber.org/papers/w28453
30. Kolesnikov, A., Chapelskyi, Y., Budnyk, V., & Kozhenovskyi, Y. (2025). Transformation of the personal data protection system under the influence of artificial intelligence technology development. Economics. Finances. Law. No:2, Doi: https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2025.2.24
31. Küçükoba, E. (2022). Refah Devleti Bağlamında Sosyal Politika, Sosyal Hizmetin Tarihi Gelişimi ve Türkiye. Toplumsal Politika Dergisi, 3(2), 164-176. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tpd/article/1165199
32. Latzer M., Hollnbuchner K., Just N. & Saurwein F. (2016). The economics of algorithmic selection on the Internet. In Bauer J. M., Latzer M. (Eds.),Handbook on the economics of the Internet (pp. 395–425). https://doi. org/10.4337/9780857939852.00028
33. Lee, S.H. (2025). A Study on the creativity education and future competency development direction of students in the age of Artificial Intelligence: Focusing on the webtoon and animation majors. Korea Institute of Design Research Society. Vol. 10, Issue 1 (34 pp. 474–483, DOI: 10.46248/kidrs.2025.1.474
34. Lewis, D., & Moorkens, J. (2020). A rights-based approach to trustworthy AI in social media. Social media+ Society, 6(3), 2056305120954672. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120954672.
35. Leavy, S. (2018). Gender bias in artificial intelligence: The need for diversity and gender theory in machine learning. In Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on gender equality in software engineering (pp. 14-16). https://doi.org/10.1145/3195570.3195580
36. MEB (2025) Eğitimde Yapay Zekâ Politika Belgesi ve Eylem Planı (2025-2029) https://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2025_06/17092340_ egitimdeyapayzekâpolitikabelgesiveeylemplani202520291.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 19.01.2026).
37. Montag, C., & Elhai, J. D. (2025). The darker side of positive AI attitudes: Investigating associations with (problematic) social media use. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 100613. Vol:22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2025.100613
38. Namey, E., Guest, G., Thairu, L., & Johnson, L. (2008). Data reduction techniques for large qualitative data sets. Handbook for team-based qualitative research, 2(1),137-161. DOI: 10.5040/9798216409670.ch-7
39. Neufeld, K., Ohly, S., Sedefoglu-Ulucak, D., Steinhardt, I., & Mauermeister, S. (2025). Analyzing the role of family socio-economic status, education and work characteristics in times of generative artificial intelligence and digital divide. Career Development International. 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI10-2024-0442
40. Nigar, M., Juli, J. F., Golder, U., Alam, M. J., & Hossain, M. K. (2025). Artificial intelligence and technological unemployment: Understanding trends, technology’s adverse roles, and current mitigation guidelines. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, Vol. 11, Issue 3, 100607. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100607
41. Ocal, A. (2023). Perceptions of AI ethics on social media. 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (ETHICS), 1-1. DOI: 10.1109/ETHICS57328.2023.10155069
42. Pieper, A. (2017) Einführung in Die Ethik. UTB, Printed in Germany.
43. Rachmatullah, H.P. (2026). Juridical Analysis of legal responsibility for the dissemination of deepfake content on social media. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains.7 (1)https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v7i1.2174
44. Sayar, B. (2022). Yapay Zekâ ve Haber Birlikteliğinde Robot Spiker Evresi. Genel, M., G.(Edr.) Yeni Medya Araştırmaları–3 içinde (ss. 59-77), Berikan Yayınevi.
45. Sharma, S., & Kumar, N. (2023). The future of education: Implications of Artifıcial Intelligence integration in learning environments. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Educational Development, 11(5), 129-133. ISSN: 2320-8708, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374294670
46. Samuel-Okon, A.D., & Abejide, O.O. (2024). Bridging the digital divide: Exploring the role of artificial intelligence and automation in enhancing connectivity in developing Nations. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports. 26(6), 165-177, SSRN 4839447. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4839447
47. Seabra, A., Cavalcante, C., & Lifschitz, S. (2025). From surveillance to manipulation: how data collection enables targeted disinformation. Anais Estendidos do XL Simpósio Brasileiro de Bancos de Dados (SBBD). (pp. 302-313). SBC. https://doi.org/10.5753/sbbd_estendido.2025.248200
48. Sivrić, I., Grbavac, I., & Markić, D. (2025). Artifıcial Intelligence and Media: Manipulation through photography and deepfake technology. Identiteti – Kulture – Jezici. pp. 63-87, no:1, https://doi.org/10.47960/3029-3103.2025.11.63
49. Skandali, D. (2025). Social Media Ethics: Balancing Transparency, AI Marketing, and Misinformation. Encyclopedia. (3), https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5030086
50. STB (2021). Türkiye Ulusal Yapay Zekâ Stratejisi (2021–2025). https://bilgem.tubitak.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/TR-UlusalYZStratejisi2021-2025-1.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 19.01.2026).
51. STB (2024) Ulusal Yapay Zekâ Stratejisi 2024-2025 Eylem Planı https://www.sanayi.gov. tr/assets/pdf/UlusalYapayZekâStratejisi2024-2025EylemPlani.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 19.01.2026).
52. Tkach, D. (2025). Ethics of Personalization: Where is the boundary between useful recommendation and manipulation? Artificial Intelligence. 30(4):24-34,https://doi.org/10.15407/jai2025.04.024
53. Türten, B. (2024). Yapay Zekâ ve sinema: Film yapımında olanaklar ve fırsatlar. Anadolu ve Balkan Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(14), 399-425. https://doi.org/10.32953/abad.1539736
54. Vavrin, S. (2026). Artificial Intelligence and disinformation in public relations: challenges and countermeasures. Mediatization Studies. Vol. 9, pp. 97-115, http://dx.doi. org/10.17951/ms.2025.9.97-115
55. Yaşar, L (2024). Yapay Zekânın Halkla İlişkiler Eğitimi Üzerindeki Dönüştürücü Etkisi içinde, Adıgüzel, Y. & Bostancı M. (Ed)., Dijital İletişimi Anlamak-5 içinde (58-71). Palet Yayınları
56. Zverev, V., Bushkov, V., Khrushkov, B., Sarychev, V., Ostaltsev, O., & ProkopovychTkachenko, Y. (2025). Artıfıcıal ıntellıgence and cybercrıme: new challenges and prospects for legal regulatıon. Contemporary Issues in Artificial Intelligence. 1. https://doi.org/10.69635/ciai.2025.11
57. Zhao, Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence and education: end the grammar of schooling. ECNU Review of Education, 8, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311241265124