Research Article

Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels

Volume: 19 Number: 1 April 30, 2017
EN

Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare anthropometric characteristics, dynamic balance and physical performances of climbers at recreational and intermediate levels. Climbers were seperated in two groups according to climbing difficulty levels.  A total of 24 male rock climbers; 16 at beginner level (mean ± sd; 26.2 ± 4.2 years, climbing grade; 6a/6a+ ) and 8 intermediate level (mean ± sd; 30.8 ± 4.9 years, climbing grade; 7c/7c+)  participated voluntariliy in the study Measurements were taken from both groups for anthropometric (body height, weight, body fat ratio, skinfolds, humerus breadth, arm span), intermittent finger hang (IFH), bent-arm hang and hand grip strength. Static (open/closed eyes) and dynamic balance was measured with isokinetic balance test on a force platform. Differences between groups were calculated using an independent samples t-test and also Mann-Whitney U test was used for nonparametric values. As a result, advance group has significantly greater values for limits of stability, humerus breadth, ape index and IFH (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between groups for the other balance parameters, anthropometric characteristics and climbing performance factors. In consequence, static balance parameters of rock climbers were found to be similar to those of other elite athletes in the literature. On the other hand, dynamic balance could be considered to be a more important parameter than static balance for climbers by the nature of the sport. 

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Aalto H., Pyykkö I., Ilmarinen R., Kähkönen E., Starck J. Postural stability in shooters. Journal for Oto-rhino-laryngology, 1990; 52(4): 232-8.
  2. 2. Akuthota V., Nadler SF. Core strengthening. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2004; 85(3 Suppl 1): S86-92.
  3. 3. Baláš J., Strejcová B., Malý T., Malá L., Martin AJ. Changes in upper body strength and body composition after 8 weeks indoor climbing in youth. Isokinetic and Exercise Science, 2009; 17(3): 173-9.
  4. 4. Chapman DW., Needham KJ., Allison GT., Edwards DJ. Effect of experience in a dynamic environment on postural control. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2008; 42(1): 16-21.
  5. 5. Era P., Konttinen P., Mehto P., Saarela P., Lyytinen H. Postural stability and skilled performance: a study on top-level and naive rifle shooters. Journal of Biomechanics, 1996; 29(3): 301-6.
  6. 6. Fitzpatrick R., McCloskey DI. Proprioceptive, visual and vestibular thresholds for the perception of sway during standing in humans. The Journal of Physiology, 1994; 478:173-6.
  7. 7. Giles LV., Rhodes EC., Taunton JE. The physiology of rock climbing. Sports Medicine, 2006; 36(6): 529-45.
  8. 8. Goktepe M., Gunay M., Bezci S., Bayram M., Özkan A. Correlations between different methods of vertical jump and static balance parameters in athletes. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 2016;18(1): 147-52.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Tolga Aksıt
EGE UNIV
Türkiye

Gamze Cırık This is me
EGE UNIV
Türkiye

Publication Date

April 30, 2017

Submission Date

February 8, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 19 Number: 1

APA
Aksıt, T., & Cırık, G. (2017). Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 19(1), 11-17. https://izlik.org/JA59KD55DJ
AMA
1.Aksıt T, Cırık G. Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels. Turk J Sport Exe. 2017;19(1):11-17. https://izlik.org/JA59KD55DJ
Chicago
Aksıt, Tolga, and Gamze Cırık. 2017. “Comparison of Static and Dynamic Balance Parameters and Some Performance Characteristics in Rock Climbers of Different Levels”. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise 19 (1): 11-17. https://izlik.org/JA59KD55DJ.
EndNote
Aksıt T, Cırık G (April 1, 2017) Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise 19 1 11–17.
IEEE
[1]T. Aksıt and G. Cırık, “Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels”, Turk J Sport Exe, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 11–17, Apr. 2017, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA59KD55DJ
ISNAD
Aksıt, Tolga - Cırık, Gamze. “Comparison of Static and Dynamic Balance Parameters and Some Performance Characteristics in Rock Climbers of Different Levels”. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise 19/1 (April 1, 2017): 11-17. https://izlik.org/JA59KD55DJ.
JAMA
1.Aksıt T, Cırık G. Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels. Turk J Sport Exe. 2017;19:11–17.
MLA
Aksıt, Tolga, and Gamze Cırık. “Comparison of Static and Dynamic Balance Parameters and Some Performance Characteristics in Rock Climbers of Different Levels”. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, vol. 19, no. 1, Apr. 2017, pp. 11-17, https://izlik.org/JA59KD55DJ.
Vancouver
1.Tolga Aksıt, Gamze Cırık. Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels. Turk J Sport Exe [Internet]. 2017 Apr. 1;19(1):11-7. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA59KD55DJ

Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC).