Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels

Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1 30 Nisan 2017
PDF İndir
EN

Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels

Öz

The aim of the present study was to compare anthropometric characteristics, dynamic balance and physical performances of climbers at recreational and intermediate levels. Climbers were seperated in two groups according to climbing difficulty levels.  A total of 24 male rock climbers; 16 at beginner level (mean ± sd; 26.2 ± 4.2 years, climbing grade; 6a/6a+ ) and 8 intermediate level (mean ± sd; 30.8 ± 4.9 years, climbing grade; 7c/7c+)  participated voluntariliy in the study Measurements were taken from both groups for anthropometric (body height, weight, body fat ratio, skinfolds, humerus breadth, arm span), intermittent finger hang (IFH), bent-arm hang and hand grip strength. Static (open/closed eyes) and dynamic balance was measured with isokinetic balance test on a force platform. Differences between groups were calculated using an independent samples t-test and also Mann-Whitney U test was used for nonparametric values. As a result, advance group has significantly greater values for limits of stability, humerus breadth, ape index and IFH (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between groups for the other balance parameters, anthropometric characteristics and climbing performance factors. In consequence, static balance parameters of rock climbers were found to be similar to those of other elite athletes in the literature. On the other hand, dynamic balance could be considered to be a more important parameter than static balance for climbers by the nature of the sport. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Aalto H., Pyykkö I., Ilmarinen R., Kähkönen E., Starck J. Postural stability in shooters. Journal for Oto-rhino-laryngology, 1990; 52(4): 232-8.
  2. 2. Akuthota V., Nadler SF. Core strengthening. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2004; 85(3 Suppl 1): S86-92.
  3. 3. Baláš J., Strejcová B., Malý T., Malá L., Martin AJ. Changes in upper body strength and body composition after 8 weeks indoor climbing in youth. Isokinetic and Exercise Science, 2009; 17(3): 173-9.
  4. 4. Chapman DW., Needham KJ., Allison GT., Edwards DJ. Effect of experience in a dynamic environment on postural control. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2008; 42(1): 16-21.
  5. 5. Era P., Konttinen P., Mehto P., Saarela P., Lyytinen H. Postural stability and skilled performance: a study on top-level and naive rifle shooters. Journal of Biomechanics, 1996; 29(3): 301-6.
  6. 6. Fitzpatrick R., McCloskey DI. Proprioceptive, visual and vestibular thresholds for the perception of sway during standing in humans. The Journal of Physiology, 1994; 478:173-6.
  7. 7. Giles LV., Rhodes EC., Taunton JE. The physiology of rock climbing. Sports Medicine, 2006; 36(6): 529-45.
  8. 8. Goktepe M., Gunay M., Bezci S., Bayram M., Özkan A. Correlations between different methods of vertical jump and static balance parameters in athletes. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 2016;18(1): 147-52.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Tolga Aksıt
EGE UNIV
Türkiye

Gamze Cırık Bu kişi benim
EGE UNIV
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Nisan 2017

Gönderilme Tarihi

8 Şubat 2017

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2017 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Aksıt, T., & Cırık, G. (2017). Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 19(1), 11-17. https://izlik.org/JA59KD55DJ
AMA
1.Aksıt T, Cırık G. Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise. 2017;19(1):11-17. https://izlik.org/JA59KD55DJ
Chicago
Aksıt, Tolga, ve Gamze Cırık. 2017. “Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels”. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise 19 (1): 11-17. https://izlik.org/JA59KD55DJ.
EndNote
Aksıt T, Cırık G (01 Nisan 2017) Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise 19 1 11–17.
IEEE
[1]T. Aksıt ve G. Cırık, “Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels”, Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, c. 19, sy 1, ss. 11–17, Nis. 2017, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA59KD55DJ
ISNAD
Aksıt, Tolga - Cırık, Gamze. “Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels”. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise 19/1 (01 Nisan 2017): 11-17. https://izlik.org/JA59KD55DJ.
JAMA
1.Aksıt T, Cırık G. Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise. 2017;19:11–17.
MLA
Aksıt, Tolga, ve Gamze Cırık. “Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels”. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, c. 19, sy 1, Nisan 2017, ss. 11-17, https://izlik.org/JA59KD55DJ.
Vancouver
1.Tolga Aksıt, Gamze Cırık. Comparison of static and dynamic balance parameters and some performance characteristics in rock climbers of different levels. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise [Internet]. 01 Nisan 2017;19(1):11-7. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA59KD55DJ
Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi (TJSE) Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.