KARYA KHERSONESOSU'NDA PERA İKİ TİP KALE/KALE YERLEŞİMİ

E. Deniz Oğuz Kırca

TR EN

KARYA KHERSONESOSU'NDA PERA İKİ TİP KALE/KALE YERLEŞİMİ

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, kırsal-bölgesel arkeoloji alanına katkı potansiyeli olan Bozburun Yarımadası'nda Karya Khersonesosu /Rodos Perası , olasılıkla Geç Klasik-Erken Hellenistik Dönem'den itibaren ve ardı sıra özellikle Rodos hâkimiyetine rastlayan süreçte gelişimini tamamlayıp olgunluğa eriştiği düşünülen demosların başta Tymnos, Thysannos, Hygassos, Phoinix olmak üzere örgütlenme biçimini, savunma sistemi bağlamında yorumlamaktır.2009-2012 yılları arasında, havadan arkeoloji uygulamalarıyla eş zamanlı yürütülen genel arazi taraması sonucunda belgelenen ve GIS çalışmalarıyla ele alınan tahkimli alanların, yönetsel Akropoller ve askeri açıdan tamamıyla savunma amaçlı iki tipte tasarlandığı, bunların sırasıyla, demos merkezleri ve territoryumlarında belirleyici olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Bununla beraber, her iki tip tahkimli düzenin de yer yer Karya mimari öğe ve tekniklerini yansıtması, bu kalelerin erken dönemlerden itibaren kullanılmış olduğuna dair izler taşıdığını göstermektedir.

Keywords

Karya Khersonesosu, Rodos Perası, Kale/ Kale Yerleşimi, Savunma Sistemi

TWO MODELS OF FORTRESSES/FORTRESS SETTLEMENTS IN THE CAR CHERSONESOS

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to interpret, within the context of the defensive network, the manner of organization of the demoi Tymnos, Thysannos, Hygassos, Phoinix, being in the first place , which are deemed to have completed their development process possibly beginning from the Late Classical-Early Hellenistic periods and attained maturi¬ ty in the course of the Rhodian suzerainty, in the Bozburun Peninsula which has a potential to contribute to the ield of rural-regional archaeology. It was observed that the fortiied areas, which were documented through the extensive surveys that were simultane¬ ously carried out with aerial archaeology applications and discussed with the help of GIS studies in 2009-2012, were designed as two types- in the administrative Acropolises and military aspect entirely as defense oriented and were determinant, respectively, on the demoi centers and territoriums. Notwithstanding, that both of the fortified patterns reveal the typical Carian architectural features and techniques have overtones that they could have been occupied in the earlier periods.

Keywords

Carian Chersonesos, Rhodian Peraea, Fortress / Fortress Settlement, Defensive Network

Abstract

References

BAŞGELEN, N. 2005. Eski Haritalarda Batı Anadolu/Western Anatolia in Ancient Maps. İstanbul.
BEAN, G.E. 1971. Turkey Beyond the Meander: An Archaeological Guide. London.
BEAN, G.E. 1979. Aegean Turkey. London.
BEAN, G.E. 2000. Eskiçağ'da Menderes'in Ötesi/Turkey Beyond the Meander (Çev. P. Kurtoğlu). İstanbul.
BERTHOLD, R.M. 1984. Rhodes in the Hellenistic Age. Ithaca and London.
BOARDMAN, J. 1999. The Greeks Overseas: Their Early Colonies and Trade. 4th ed. London.
BRESSON, A. 1991. Recueil des Inscriptions de la PéréeRhodiene (Pérée Intégrée). Paris.
CANKARDEŞ-ŞENOL, G. 2006. Klasik ve Helenistik Dönemde Mühürlü Amfora Üreten Merkezler ve Mühürleme Sistemleri. İstanbul.
COHEN, G.M. 1995. The Hellenistic Settlements in Europe, the Islands, and Asia Minor. Berkeley.
CONSTANTAKOPOULOU, C. 2007. The Dance of the Islands: Insularity, Networks, The At¬ henian Empire, and the Aegean World. Oxford.

COOK, J.M. 1962. The Greeks in Ionia and the East. London.
DOĞER, E. 2004. Antik Çağ'da Bağ ve Şarap. İstanbul.
FLORANCE, A. 1966. Geographical Lexicon of Greek Coin Inscriptions. Chi¬ cago.
FRASER, P.M/BEAN G.E. 1954. The Rhodian Peraea and Islands. London.
GROSE, S.W. 1929. Fitzwilliam Museum- Catalogue of the Mclean Collec¬ tion of Greek Coins (Vol. 3): Asia Minor, Farther Asia, Egypt, Africa. Cambridge.
HEAD, B.V. 1963. Historia Numorum: A Manual of Greek Numismatics. London.
HORNBLOWER, S. 1982. Mausolus. Oxford.
HORNBLOWER, S/SPAWFORTH, A. 2003. The Oxford Classical Dictionary. 3rd ed. Oxford.
KARANTZALI, E. 2001. The Mycenaean Cemetery at Pylona on Rhodes. England.
KÜÇÜKEREN, C.C. 2007. Ege'de Bir Anadolu Uygarlığı: Karya (Karuwa/Karka/ Karkişa/ Krk). İstanbul.
LLOYD, S. 1997. Türkiye'nin Tarihi: Bir Gezginin Gözüyle Anadolu Uygarlıkları/Ancient Turkey: A Traveller's History of Ana¬ tolia (1989) (Çev. E. Varinlioğlu). Ankara.
MARCHESE, R.T. 1989. The Historical Archaeology of Northern Caria: A Study in Cultural Adaptations. BAR International Series 536. Oxford.
MEE, C. 1982. Rhodes in the Bronze Age. Warminster.
MERITT, B.D/WADE-GERY, H.T/Mc GREGOR, M.F. 1939- 1949- 1950- 1953. The Athenian Tribute Lists. Vols 1-4. Princeton, New Jersey.
McNICOLL, A.W. 1997. Hellenistic Fortifications From the Aegean to the Euphrates. Oxford.
SEVİN, V. 2001. Anadolu'nun Tarihi Coğrafyası. Ankara.
SOUYOUDZOGLOU-HAYWOOD, C. 1999. The Ionian Islands in the Bronze Age and Early Iron Age 3000-800 B.C. Liverpool.
ŞAHİN, M.Ç. 1976. The Political and Religious Structure in the Territory of Stratonikeia in Caria. Ankara.
TORR, C. 1885. Rhodes in Ancient Times. London.
UMAR, B. 1999. Karia: Bir Tarihsel Coğrafya Araştırması ve Gezi Reh¬ beri. İstanbul.
ÜZEL, A. 2007. The Display of Hekatomnid Power in Karian Settlements Through Urban Imagery (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ankara.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Hellenistic Period Archeology, Classical Period Archeology

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

E. Deniz Oğuz Kırca This is me

Publication Date

January 1, 2015

Submission Date

June 1, 2014

Acceptance Date

November 1, 2014

Published in Issue

Year 2015 Number: 18

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA63LA44GP

APA

Kırca, E. D. O. (2015). KARYA KHERSONESOSU’NDA PERA İKİ TİP KALE/KALE YERLEŞİMİ. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, 18, 125-141. https://izlik.org/JA63LA44GP

AMA

1.Kırca EDO. KARYA KHERSONESOSU’NDA PERA İKİ TİP KALE/KALE YERLEŞİMİ. TÜBA-AR. 2015;(18):125-141. https://izlik.org/JA63LA44GP

Chicago

Kırca, E. Deniz Oğuz. 2015. “KARYA KHERSONESOSU’NDA PERA İKİ TİP KALE KALE YERLEŞİMİ”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, nos. 18: 125-41. https://izlik.org/JA63LA44GP.

EndNote

Kırca EDO (January 1, 2015) KARYA KHERSONESOSU’NDA PERA İKİ TİP KALE/KALE YERLEŞİMİ. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi 18 125–141.

IEEE

[1]E. D. O. Kırca, “KARYA KHERSONESOSU’NDA PERA İKİ TİP KALE/KALE YERLEŞİMİ”, TÜBA-AR, no. 18, pp. 125–141, Jan. 2015, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA63LA44GP

ISNAD

Kırca, E. Deniz Oğuz. “KARYA KHERSONESOSU’NDA PERA İKİ TİP KALE KALE YERLEŞİMİ”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi. 18 (January 1, 2015): 125-141. https://izlik.org/JA63LA44GP.

JAMA

1.Kırca EDO. KARYA KHERSONESOSU’NDA PERA İKİ TİP KALE/KALE YERLEŞİMİ. TÜBA-AR. 2015;:125–141.

MLA

Kırca, E. Deniz Oğuz. “KARYA KHERSONESOSU’NDA PERA İKİ TİP KALE KALE YERLEŞİMİ”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, no. 18, Jan. 2015, pp. 125-41, https://izlik.org/JA63LA44GP.

Vancouver

1.E. Deniz Oğuz Kırca. KARYA KHERSONESOSU’NDA PERA İKİ TİP KALE/KALE YERLEŞİMİ. TÜBA-AR [Internet]. 2015 Jan. 1;(18):125-41. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA63LA44GP

Publisher

https://tuba.gov.tr/en

Vedat Dalokay Caddesi No: 112 Çankaya 06670 ANKARA

34410

^{TÜBA-AR Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Archaeology (TÜBA-AR) does not officially endorse the views expressed in the articles published in the journal, nor does it guarantee any product or service advertisements that may appear in the print or online versions. The scientific and legal responsibility for the published articles belongs solely to the authors.}

^{Images, figures, tables, and other materials submitted with manuscripts must be original. If previously published, written permission from the copyright holder must be provided for reproduction in both print and online versions. Authors retain the copyright of their works; however, upon publication in the journal, the economic rights and rights of public communication -including adaptation, reproduction, representation, printing, publishing, and distribution rights- are transferred to the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA), the publisher of the journal. Copyright of all published content (text and visual materials) belongs to the journal in terms of usage and distribution. No payment is made to the authors under the name of copyright or any other title, and no article processing charges are requested. However, the cost of reprints, if requested, is the responsibility of the authors.}

^{In order to promote global open access to scientific knowledge and research, TÜBA allows all content published online (unless otherwise stated) to be freely used by readers, researchers, and institutions. Such use (including linking, downloading, distribution, printing, copying, or reproduction in any medium) is permitted under the}^{Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License}^{, provided that the original work is properly cited, not modified, and not used for commercial purposes. For permissions regarding commercial use or licensing exceptions, please contact the journal.}

KARYA KHERSONESOSU'NDA PERA İKİ TİP KALE/KALE YERLEŞİMİ

Abstract

Keywords

TWO MODELS OF FORTRESSES/FORTRESS SETTLEMENTS IN THE CAR CHERSONESOS

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

IZ

Cite