BibTex RIS Cite

OLUZ HÖYÜK’TE HAOMA KÜLTÜRÜNÜN İLK DEĞERLENDİRMESİ

Year 2018, Issue: 22, 161 - 172, 01.01.2018
https://izlik.org/JA26UN96YF

Abstract

Oluz Höyük’ün Anadolu Demir Çağı arkeolojisi ve antik tarihinde bugüne değin rastlanılmamış birtakım bulguları muhafaza etmekte olduğunu farketmemizi sağlamıştır. 2B ve 2A Mimari Tabakaları’nda MÖ 425-200 yerel Anadolu kültürüne yabancı Akhaimenid Pers ögelerinin saptanması ile kazı stratejisinde değişikliğe gidilmiştir. Bu değişiklik sonucu 2B ve 2A Mimari Tabakaları’nda yoğunlaşan çalışmalarında açığa çıkmaya başlayan bulgular, Oluz Höyük Geç Demir Çağı’nı karakterize eden Akhaimenid kültürünün dinsel, askeri ve arkeoetnisite temelinde Anadolu’nun tarihsel sürecine ciddi etkiler yapmış olduğuna işaret etmeye başlamıştır.Antik İran’da ortaya çıkan dini törenler ve bunların sürekliliği ile ilgili olarak bunları birbiri ile karşılaştırmamız ve gözden geçirmemiz önem taşımaktadır. Zerdüşt Dini törenleri için önem taşıyan materyallerden biri de Haoma’dır. Bu makalede Haoma kullanımı, Oluz Höyük ve çevresinden elde edilmiş arkeolojik bulgular ışığında ele alınmış ve incelenmiştir

References

  • ABDULLAEV, K. 2010. “Sacred Plants and the Cultic Beverage Haoma”, Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, Duke University Press 30/3: 329-340.
  • Avesta, Zoroastrian religious book. DÖNMEZ, Ş. 2017.
  • Amasya –Oluz Höyük Kuzey - Orta Anadolu’da Bir Akhaimenid (Pers) Yerleşmesi. 2009 – 2013 Dönemi Çalışmaları Genel Değerlendirmeler ve Önsonuçlar. Oluz Höyük Kazı Sonuçları Serisi 2. Amasya.
  • EDULJEE, K, E. 2015. Nutrition Were Ancient Zoroastrians & Aryans Vegetarian? West Vancouver.
  • FLATTERY, D. 1989. Haoma and Harmaline. Berkley.
  • GACHECHILADZE, L. / KANDELAKI, T. 2004. The Vine, Wine and the Georgians. Tbilisi.
  • HE, Z. 2011. “Is Shuma the Chinese Analog of Soma / Haoma?”, A Study of Early Contacts between Indo-Iranians and Chinese by William Paterson University, Sino-Platonic Papers. 216:1-39.
  • HEIM, R. 1963. Les Champignons Toxiques et Hallucinogénes. Paris.
  • HINNELLS, J. R. 1975. Persian Mythology. London.
  • HINTZE ZARTOSHTY, A. 2013. Change and Continuity in the Zoroastrian Tradition an Inaugural Lecture. London.
  • JAN, E.M. 1913. “The Soma-Haoma Problem: Introductory Overview and Observations on the Discussion”, Harward University Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies 9/1: 1-47.
  • JENSEN, T. 1995. Religions History: Rituals, Mythology, Iconography. Nora. Denmark.
  • JENSEN, T. 1996. Personified by the Plant and The Beverage. Stockholm University. Nederland.
  • JIVANII JAMSHEDJI, M. 1937. The Religious Ceremonies and Customs of the Parsees. Ed: Jehangir. B, Karani’s Sons Book-Sellers. India.
  • JIVANJI JAMSHEDJI, M. 1911. “Haoma in Avesta”, the Anthropological Society of Bombay. The British India Press: 225-243.
  • KOTWAL, F. 1991. A Persian Offering: the Yasna. Zoroastrian High Liturgy. Paris.
  • MAHMOUDIAN, M. / JALILPOUR, H. 2002. “Toxicity of Peganum Harmala: Review and A Case Report”, Razi Institute for Drug Research (M.M.), Department of Pathology (H.J), Tehran, Iran. 1/1, 1-4.
  • MIRAJ, S. 2016. “A Review Study of Therapeutic Effects of Peganum Harmala”, Scholars Research Library, Der Pharmacia Lettre 8/13: 161-166.
  • OMIDSALAR, M. 2012. “Esfand: A Common Weed found in Persia, Central Asia, and the Adjacent Areas”, Encyclopedia Iranica 8/6: 580- 584.
  • SARIANIDI, V. 2003. “Margiana and Soma-Haoma”, Journal of Vedic Studies (EJVS) 9: 15-47.
  • SELTZER, R. 1987. Religions of Antiquity. New York.
  • SÖDERBLOM. N, 1908. Främmande religionsurkunder. Stockholm.
  • SÖDERLIND, U. 1989. Haoma - A Religious Intoxicating Beverage. Books of The East, American Edition.
  • STOPHLET FLATTERY,D. / SCHWARTZ, M. 1989. “Haoma and Harmaline”, Historical and Geographical Availability of Harmel, Near Eastern Studies, University of California Press 21: 67-95
  • VAN DER TORN, K. 1995. Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible. Haoma. New York

FIRST EVALUATION OF HAOMA CULTURE IN OLUZ HÖYÜK

Year 2018, Issue: 22, 161 - 172, 01.01.2018
https://izlik.org/JA26UN96YF

Abstract

Oluz Höyük had made us distinguish some evidence regarding Anatolian Iron Age archaeology and ancient history that we haven’t noticed until today. With detection of Achaemenid Persian elements on 2B and 2A Architectural Layers 425-200 BC which were alien to the local Anatolian culture, a change of excavation strategy had become necessary. As a result of this changes, the evidence uncovered on the work intensified in 2B and 2A Architectural Layers had proved that the Achaemenid culture that characterized the Oluz Höyük Late Iron Age had serious impact on the Anatolian historical process on the basis of religion, military and archaeo-ethnicity. Due to the various ritual ceremony in ancient Persia and the continuation of these celebrations, it is now helpful to review and compare them with each other to clarify some issues. One of the materials used in the Zoroastrianism ritual ceremony is Haoma. In this article, the study of the use of Haoma is based on the archaeological data obtained from Oluz Höyük and its environment

References

  • ABDULLAEV, K. 2010. “Sacred Plants and the Cultic Beverage Haoma”, Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, Duke University Press 30/3: 329-340.
  • Avesta, Zoroastrian religious book. DÖNMEZ, Ş. 2017.
  • Amasya –Oluz Höyük Kuzey - Orta Anadolu’da Bir Akhaimenid (Pers) Yerleşmesi. 2009 – 2013 Dönemi Çalışmaları Genel Değerlendirmeler ve Önsonuçlar. Oluz Höyük Kazı Sonuçları Serisi 2. Amasya.
  • EDULJEE, K, E. 2015. Nutrition Were Ancient Zoroastrians & Aryans Vegetarian? West Vancouver.
  • FLATTERY, D. 1989. Haoma and Harmaline. Berkley.
  • GACHECHILADZE, L. / KANDELAKI, T. 2004. The Vine, Wine and the Georgians. Tbilisi.
  • HE, Z. 2011. “Is Shuma the Chinese Analog of Soma / Haoma?”, A Study of Early Contacts between Indo-Iranians and Chinese by William Paterson University, Sino-Platonic Papers. 216:1-39.
  • HEIM, R. 1963. Les Champignons Toxiques et Hallucinogénes. Paris.
  • HINNELLS, J. R. 1975. Persian Mythology. London.
  • HINTZE ZARTOSHTY, A. 2013. Change and Continuity in the Zoroastrian Tradition an Inaugural Lecture. London.
  • JAN, E.M. 1913. “The Soma-Haoma Problem: Introductory Overview and Observations on the Discussion”, Harward University Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies 9/1: 1-47.
  • JENSEN, T. 1995. Religions History: Rituals, Mythology, Iconography. Nora. Denmark.
  • JENSEN, T. 1996. Personified by the Plant and The Beverage. Stockholm University. Nederland.
  • JIVANII JAMSHEDJI, M. 1937. The Religious Ceremonies and Customs of the Parsees. Ed: Jehangir. B, Karani’s Sons Book-Sellers. India.
  • JIVANJI JAMSHEDJI, M. 1911. “Haoma in Avesta”, the Anthropological Society of Bombay. The British India Press: 225-243.
  • KOTWAL, F. 1991. A Persian Offering: the Yasna. Zoroastrian High Liturgy. Paris.
  • MAHMOUDIAN, M. / JALILPOUR, H. 2002. “Toxicity of Peganum Harmala: Review and A Case Report”, Razi Institute for Drug Research (M.M.), Department of Pathology (H.J), Tehran, Iran. 1/1, 1-4.
  • MIRAJ, S. 2016. “A Review Study of Therapeutic Effects of Peganum Harmala”, Scholars Research Library, Der Pharmacia Lettre 8/13: 161-166.
  • OMIDSALAR, M. 2012. “Esfand: A Common Weed found in Persia, Central Asia, and the Adjacent Areas”, Encyclopedia Iranica 8/6: 580- 584.
  • SARIANIDI, V. 2003. “Margiana and Soma-Haoma”, Journal of Vedic Studies (EJVS) 9: 15-47.
  • SELTZER, R. 1987. Religions of Antiquity. New York.
  • SÖDERBLOM. N, 1908. Främmande religionsurkunder. Stockholm.
  • SÖDERLIND, U. 1989. Haoma - A Religious Intoxicating Beverage. Books of The East, American Edition.
  • STOPHLET FLATTERY,D. / SCHWARTZ, M. 1989. “Haoma and Harmaline”, Historical and Geographical Availability of Harmel, Near Eastern Studies, University of California Press 21: 67-95
  • VAN DER TORN, K. 1995. Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible. Haoma. New York
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Authors

Mona Soba This is me

Publication Date January 1, 2018
IZ https://izlik.org/JA26UN96YF
Published in Issue Year 2018 Issue: 22

Cite

APA Soba, M. (2018). FIRST EVALUATION OF HAOMA CULTURE IN OLUZ HÖYÜK. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, 22, 161-172. https://izlik.org/JA26UN96YF
AMA 1.Soba M. FIRST EVALUATION OF HAOMA CULTURE IN OLUZ HÖYÜK. TÜBA-AR. 2018;(22):161-172. https://izlik.org/JA26UN96YF
Chicago Soba, Mona. 2018. “FIRST EVALUATION OF HAOMA CULTURE IN OLUZ HÖYÜK”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, nos. 22: 161-72. https://izlik.org/JA26UN96YF.
EndNote Soba M (January 1, 2018) FIRST EVALUATION OF HAOMA CULTURE IN OLUZ HÖYÜK. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi 22 161–172.
IEEE [1]M. Soba, “FIRST EVALUATION OF HAOMA CULTURE IN OLUZ HÖYÜK”, TÜBA-AR, no. 22, pp. 161–172, Jan. 2018, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA26UN96YF
ISNAD Soba, Mona. “FIRST EVALUATION OF HAOMA CULTURE IN OLUZ HÖYÜK”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi. 22 (January 1, 2018): 161-172. https://izlik.org/JA26UN96YF.
JAMA 1.Soba M. FIRST EVALUATION OF HAOMA CULTURE IN OLUZ HÖYÜK. TÜBA-AR. 2018;:161–172.
MLA Soba, Mona. “FIRST EVALUATION OF HAOMA CULTURE IN OLUZ HÖYÜK”. TÜBA-AR Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi, no. 22, Jan. 2018, pp. 161-72, https://izlik.org/JA26UN96YF.
Vancouver 1.Mona Soba. FIRST EVALUATION OF HAOMA CULTURE IN OLUZ HÖYÜK. TÜBA-AR [Internet]. 2018 Jan. 1;(22):161-72. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA26UN96YF

Publisher

34406

Vedat Dalokay Caddesi No: 112 Çankaya 06670 ANKARA

 

34047   34057     34410   34061

 

TÜBA-AR Turkish Academy of Sciences Journal of Archaeology (TÜBA-AR) does not officially endorse the views expressed in the articles published in the journal, nor does it guarantee any product or service advertisements that may appear in the print or online versions. The scientific and legal responsibility for the published articles belongs solely to the authors.

Images, figures, tables, and other materials submitted with manuscripts must be original. If previously published, written permission from the copyright holder must be provided for reproduction in both print and online versions. Authors retain the copyright of their works; however, upon publication in the journal, the economic rights and rights of public communication -including adaptation, reproduction, representation, printing, publishing, and distribution rights- are transferred to the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA), the publisher of the journal. Copyright of all published content (text and visual materials) belongs to the journal in terms of usage and distribution. No payment is made to the authors under the name of copyright or any other title, and no article processing charges are requested. However, the cost of reprints, if requested, is the responsibility of the authors.

In order to promote global open access to scientific knowledge and research, TÜBA allows all content published online (unless otherwise stated) to be freely used by readers, researchers, and institutions. Such use (including linking, downloading, distribution, printing, copying, or reproduction in any medium) is permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License, provided that the original work is properly cited, not modified, and not used for commercial purposes. For permissions regarding commercial use or licensing exceptions, please contact the journal.