In this article, the Education Revolution of the
Republic, which started with the Law on Unification of Education and is on the
threshold of filling the century, was examined and evaluated in a
theoretical/historical perspective with the support of literature and documents
in terms of purpose achievement. Critical findings on the subject are as
follows; a) The educational revolution of which legal reference is The Law on
Unification of Education and the root values are Nationality and laicism, as of
now is the most unproductive revolutionary initiative among the republican
revolutions that appeal to different social life areas, b) This result was led
to prefer a way that was inconsistent with the law of vertical
mutation-transcendence revolutionary growth accompanied by the consciousness of
history in human phenomena through the polar synergy of tradition-innovation
provided by the subjective fallow method c) In this respect, the suppressed
roots got wild underground and blocked the formations above the ground in a
reactive climate caused by the disappearance of nationality and secularism
values at the beginning of the process, d) It is associated with a shadow
system that was activated by the traditionalist theist opportunists exploiting
the nationalism and also the pragmatist-atheist opportunists exploiting the
secularism through taking advantage of the formal system that was battered due
to the fact that it cannot be nourished with its roots. Indeed, both the
life-drained shadow madrasah-Islamic Tekke model is still respected and the
devastating illegal progression continues to derive power from the people, and
the complaisance towards other revanchist opportunists in the same reactive
climate does not make any sense more than a reaction to human/education usurers'
illegal solutions due to the distant relationship of people with formal system
devoid of spiritual legitimacy and the perspective as nature does not accept
any emptiness.
Bu
makalede, Tevhid-i Tedrisat Kanunu ile başlayan ve yüzyılını doldurma eşiğinde
bulunan Cumhuriyetin Eğitim Devrimi, amaç gerçekleştirme başarısı bakımından
literatür ve belgeler desteğinde kuramsal/tarihsel bakış yöntemiyle irdelenmiş
ve değerlendirilmiştir. Vaki değerlendirme sonucu konu hakkında erişilen kritik
bulgular; hukuki referansı Tevhid-i Tedrisat Kanunu, kök değerleri ise Millilik
ve Laiklik olan eğitim devriminin, gelinen durum itibariyle farklı sosyal hayat
alanlarına hitap eden cumhuriyet devrimleri arasında amaç gerçekleştirme
başarısı en sınırlı kalan devrimsel girişim olduğu, bahse konu neticenin beşeri
fenomenlerde tarih bilinci eşliğinde öznel nadas yöntemiyle sağlanan
gelenek-yenilik kutupsal sinerjisi üzerinden dikey mutasyon-aşkınlık-devrimsel
büyüme kanuniyetine aykırı bir yola girilmiş olması, bu meyanda millilik ve
laiklik değerlerinin sürecin başında buharlaşmasıyla oluşan tepkisel iklimde
baskılanmış köklerin toprak altında vahşileşerek toprak üstü oluşumları bloke
etmiş olması, kökten beslenerek kökleri üzerinde büyüyemediği için hırpalanmış
durumdaki formal sistemin mevcudiyet eksikliğinde ise gelenekçi teist
fırsatçıların millilik, pragmatist-ateist fırsatçıların da laiklik damarını
istismar ederek gölge sistem halinde devreye girmesiyle ilişkili olduğudur.
Gerçekten de hem yaşam enerjisi tükenmiş gölge medrese-tekke modelinin hala itibar
görmesi ve halktan güç devşirmeye devam eden korsan yıkıcı gidişatı, hem de
anlam paralizasyonuyla malül aynı tepkisel iklimde diğer rövanşist fırsatçılara
yönelen teveccüh, insanların formal sistemle tinsel meşruiyetten yoksun
mesafeli ilişkisi ve doğanın boşluk kaldırmaması nedeniyle insan/eğitim
tefecilerinin merdiven altı korsan çözümlerine tepkisel akışından öte bir anlam
ifade etmemektedir.
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Journal Section | Research & Theoretical Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | May 22, 2019 |
Submission Date | April 3, 2019 |
Acceptance Date | May 10, 2019 |
Published in Issue | Year 2019 Volume: 8 Issue: 1 |
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
1- APA7 Referencing Style:
As of May 2024, TUHED will follow APA 7 (American Psychological Association) style for referencing and citation. For more information, please refer to the TUHED template and writting guidelines.
2- Early Release:
According to the TUHED's new publication policy, the articles which have completed the evaluation process will be published online-first. It will no longer be necessary for manuscripts to wait until the “next issue”. Early Release articles will receive an international identification code (DOI), and identified page numbers.
3- Ethics Committee Approval:
In accordance with the ULAKBİM decision of 25 February 2020, Ethics Committee Approval must be obtained for studies on people (without age restrictions), this approval must be specified in the Method section of the article and signed Ethics Committee Approval must be uploaded to the system. Applications that do not meet these requirements will not be considered for publication.
4- New Publication Policy
Beginning from Spring 2021 issue TUHED will require all Turkish manuscripts to contain a full-text English translation. Manuscripts submitted in Turkish will be requested to have full-text English translation if they are accepted for publication after the review process.
Turkish History Education Journal site and its metadata are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Permissions beyond the scope of this license is available at COPYRIGHT