Research Article

Political Accountability, Communication and Democracy: A Fictional Mediation?

Number: 30 - MEDYA ve DEMOKRASİ October 25, 2018
TR EN

Political Accountability, Communication and Democracy: A Fictional Mediation?

Abstract

This study aims to give the description of the accountability in political communication, how it works and how it helps the addressees of the political campaigns to understand and control the politicians. While doing this it will also examine if accountability can help to structure a democratic public participation and control. Benefitting from mostly theoretical debates, the article (a) to give insights of the ways political elites use to communicate with the voters (b) how they deal with accountability, (c) to learn their methods of propaganda, (d) and how they structure their personal images? The theoretical background at the end suggests that the politician, particularly in the Turkish context, may sometimes apply artificial (unnatural) communication methods, exaggeration and desire sensational narrative in the media to keep the charisma of the leader and that the accountability and democratic perspective is something to be ignored if the support is increasing. 

Keywords

References

  1. Akay, A. (2012). Siyasal Iletisim Danismanligi (Political Communication Consultancy). Istanbul: Nobel.
  2. Archetti, C. (2014). Politicians, Personal Image and the Construction of Political Identity: A Comparative Study of the UK and Italy. New York: Palgrave.
  3. Barthless, R. and Howard, R. (1993). Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. London: Vintage.
  4. Beus, J. (2005). “Audience Democracy: An Emerging Pattern in Postmodern Political Communication” in Brants, K. and Voltmer, K. (ed), Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy: Challenging the Primacy of Politics. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 19-38.
  5. Birks, D. F. and Southan, J. M. (1990). “The potential of marketing information systems in charitable organisations”, Journal of Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 8. 4: pp. 15–20.
  6. Birsen, H. (2010). “Presentation of Primary News Sources in Local Press”, Erciyes University Communication Faculty Journal, 1.3: pp. 7-22.
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1992). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  8. Bourdieu, P. (2012). On Television. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Communication and Media Studies

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Publication Date

October 25, 2018

Submission Date

June 2, 2018

Acceptance Date

October 25, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Number: 30 - MEDYA ve DEMOKRASİ

APA
Geçer, E. (2018). Political Accountability, Communication and Democracy: A Fictional Mediation? Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 30 - MEDYA ve DEMOKRASİ, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.17829/turcom.429912
AMA
1.Geçer E. Political Accountability, Communication and Democracy: A Fictional Mediation? TURCOM. 2018;(30 - MEDYA ve DEMOKRASİ):1-12. doi:10.17829/turcom.429912
Chicago
Geçer, Ekmel. 2018. “Political Accountability, Communication and Democracy: A Fictional Mediation?”. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, no. 30 - MEDYA ve DEMOKRASİ: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.17829/turcom.429912.
EndNote
Geçer E (October 1, 2018) Political Accountability, Communication and Democracy: A Fictional Mediation? Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi 30 - MEDYA ve DEMOKRASİ 1–12.
IEEE
[1]E. Geçer, “Political Accountability, Communication and Democracy: A Fictional Mediation?”, TURCOM, no. 30 - MEDYA ve DEMOKRASİ, pp. 1–12, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.17829/turcom.429912.
ISNAD
Geçer, Ekmel. “Political Accountability, Communication and Democracy: A Fictional Mediation?”. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi. 30 - MEDYA ve DEMOKRASİ (October 1, 2018): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.17829/turcom.429912.
JAMA
1.Geçer E. Political Accountability, Communication and Democracy: A Fictional Mediation? TURCOM. 2018;:1–12.
MLA
Geçer, Ekmel. “Political Accountability, Communication and Democracy: A Fictional Mediation?”. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, no. 30 - MEDYA ve DEMOKRASİ, Oct. 2018, pp. 1-12, doi:10.17829/turcom.429912.
Vancouver
1.Ekmel Geçer. Political Accountability, Communication and Democracy: A Fictional Mediation? TURCOM. 2018 Oct. 1;(30 - MEDYA ve DEMOKRASİ):1-12. doi:10.17829/turcom.429912

All articles published in the Turkish Review of Communication Studies are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.