Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2025, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 1 - 11, 25.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.48053/turkgeo.1517771

Abstract

References

  • Akdeniz, H. (2004). Opportunities that digital orthophoto maps can provide in crisis management, Journal of Geodesy, Geoinformation and Land Management, (91), 13-20.
  • ASPRS, (2014). American society for photogrammetry and remote sensing, Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data, USA, 3-9.
  • Ayhan, E., Erden, Ö., & Atay, G. (2007). The effect of the digital elevation model on orthophoto production, 11th Turkish Mapping Scientific and Technical Congress, Ankara, 2-6.
  • Cankurt, İ. (2016). Comparison of position determination techniques in GPS/IMU systems. (Master thesis). Aksaray University, Aksaray, Turkey (in Turkish).
  • Daramola, O., Olaleye, J., Ajayi, O.G., & Olawuni, O., (2017). Assessing the geometric accuracy of UAV-based orthophotos. South African Journal of Geomatics, 6 (3), 395-406.
  • Dev, M., Veerabhadrappa, S. M., Kainthola, A., & Jha, M. K. (2023). Production of orthophoto map using mobile photogrammetry and comparative assessment of cost and accuracy with satellite imagery for corridor mapping: a case study in Manesar, Haryana, India. Annals of GIS, 29(1), 163-176.
  • Jacobsen, K. (2011). Geometric Property of Large Format Digital Camera DMC II 140. Photogrammetrie-Fernerkundung Geoinformation, 2, 71–79.
  • Kapnias, D., Milenov, P. & Kay, S. (2008). Guidelines for best practice and quality checking of ortho imagery. Joint Research Centre, (3.0).
  • Karasaka, L., Karabörk, H., Güntel, A. & Esitrgen, F. (2017). Geometric analysis of digital aerial images, International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 4 (1), 36-42.
  • Madani, M., Dörstel, C., Heipke, C. & Jacobsen,K. (2004). DMC practical experience and accuracy assessment. In Proceedings of XXth ISPRS Congress Commission II, Istanbul, Turkey. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Science, 35, 396–401.
  • Mutluoğlu, Ö. & Ceylan, A. (2005). Location accuracy and cost comparison in digital orthophoto maps, Selcuk University Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 20 (1), 35-42.
  • Nikolakopoulos, K. G., Kyriou, A., Koukouvelas, I. K., Tomaras, N., & Lyros, E. (2023). UAV, GNSS, and InSAR data analyses for landslide monitoring in a mountainous village in western Greece. Remote Sensing, 15(11), 2870.
  • Özbalmumcu, M. (2007). Basic principles of orthophoto map production by photogrammetric method, benefits and usage areas of orthophoto, Turkish National Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Association IV. Technical Symposium, İstanbul, 1-11.
  • Pathak, S., Acharya, S., Bk, S., Karn, G., & Thapa, U. (2024). UAV-based topographical mapping and accuracy assessment of orthophoto using GCP. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 6(1), 1-8.
  • Pulido Mantas, T., Roveta, C., Calcinai, B., di Camillo, C. G., Gambardella, C., Gregorin, C., ... & Cerrano, C. (2023). Photogrammetry, from the land to the sea and beyond: A unifying approach to study terrestrial and marine environments. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(4), 759.
  • Rábago, J., & Portuguez-Castro, M. (2023). Use of drone photogrammetry as an innovative, competency-based architecture teaching process. Drones, 7(3), 187.
  • Rossi, T.A. (2004). Application Of Digital Photogrammetric Methods İn The Of Land Cover Change On The Coastal Dunes Of Warren Dunes State Park, Berrien Country, (PhD thesis). The Michigan State University, Michigan.
  • Seo, D. M., Woo, H. J., Hong, W. H., Seo, H., & Na, W. J. (2024). Optimization of Number of GCPs and Placement Strategy for UAV-Based Orthophoto Production. Applied Sciences, 14(8), 3163.
  • Spreckels, V., Fischer, C., Schlienkamp, A. & Syrek, L. (2005). Photogrammetric stereoplotting capabilities of Vexcel UltracamD digital aerial imagery, ISPRS Hannover Workshop 2005 “High-Resolution Earth Imaging for Geospatial Information”, At Hannover, Germany.
  • Şahin, İ. (2013). Process optimization in bulk orthophoto production, (PhD thesis). Yıldız Teknik University, İstanbul, Turkey (in Turkish). Vega, F.A., Ramirez, F.C. & Carricondo, P.M. (2017). Assessment of photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation GCPss number using unmanned aerial vehicle, Measurement Journal, 221-227.
  • Wolf, P. (1974). Elements of photogrammetry, Mc Graw Hill Publication, USA.
  • Yıldız, M.A., Karabörk, H. & Yıldız, F. (2015). Using digital orthophoto products as a basis for geographic information systems in spatial projects, Turkish National Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Association VIII. Technical Symposium, Konya, 449-455.
  • Yılmaz, A. (2002). Accuracy research of digital elevation models produced from different sources, (PhD thesis), Yıldız Teknik University İstanbul (in Turkish).
  • Zhang, J., Xu, S., Zhao, Y., Sun, J., Xu, S., & Zhang, X. (2023). Aerial orthoimage generation for UAV remote sensing. Information Fusion, 89, 91-120.

Accuracy Investigation on Orthophotos Produced from Digital Aerial Imagery Recorded from Different Altitudes

Year 2025, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 1 - 11, 25.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.48053/turkgeo.1517771

Abstract

A digital orthophoto is a topographic image that has a fixed scale like a map and on which values such as coordinates and lengths can be read, which is obtained by eliminating the errors caused by tilts and rotations in aerial images and minimizing the point shifts caused by height differences in the terrain. Digital orthophotos offer more flexible, cost-effective, and higher-quality outputs than classical methods. There is no decrease in the quality of the image as in the analog technique, and it can also be presented quickly and easily in the digital environment. The geometrical accuracy of orthophoto maps used in geomatics applications is of even greater importance. This study compared the orthophoto maps, that have a fixed scale like maps, obtained from digital aerial photographs at a ground sample distance of 7, 15 and 25 cm in 2011 in the campus area of Aksaray University, in terms of their positional accuracy. Orthophoto mosaic images were created using “Erdas LPS” software. When the accuracy are compared, it was found that digital orthophoto maps produced at three different ground sample distances gave us similar results for standard techniques. It was also concluded that the positional accuracy of orthophoto maps for all three ground sample distances was suitable for use as reference and as a base in all application areas, except for those requiring very high accuracy.

References

  • Akdeniz, H. (2004). Opportunities that digital orthophoto maps can provide in crisis management, Journal of Geodesy, Geoinformation and Land Management, (91), 13-20.
  • ASPRS, (2014). American society for photogrammetry and remote sensing, Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data, USA, 3-9.
  • Ayhan, E., Erden, Ö., & Atay, G. (2007). The effect of the digital elevation model on orthophoto production, 11th Turkish Mapping Scientific and Technical Congress, Ankara, 2-6.
  • Cankurt, İ. (2016). Comparison of position determination techniques in GPS/IMU systems. (Master thesis). Aksaray University, Aksaray, Turkey (in Turkish).
  • Daramola, O., Olaleye, J., Ajayi, O.G., & Olawuni, O., (2017). Assessing the geometric accuracy of UAV-based orthophotos. South African Journal of Geomatics, 6 (3), 395-406.
  • Dev, M., Veerabhadrappa, S. M., Kainthola, A., & Jha, M. K. (2023). Production of orthophoto map using mobile photogrammetry and comparative assessment of cost and accuracy with satellite imagery for corridor mapping: a case study in Manesar, Haryana, India. Annals of GIS, 29(1), 163-176.
  • Jacobsen, K. (2011). Geometric Property of Large Format Digital Camera DMC II 140. Photogrammetrie-Fernerkundung Geoinformation, 2, 71–79.
  • Kapnias, D., Milenov, P. & Kay, S. (2008). Guidelines for best practice and quality checking of ortho imagery. Joint Research Centre, (3.0).
  • Karasaka, L., Karabörk, H., Güntel, A. & Esitrgen, F. (2017). Geometric analysis of digital aerial images, International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 4 (1), 36-42.
  • Madani, M., Dörstel, C., Heipke, C. & Jacobsen,K. (2004). DMC practical experience and accuracy assessment. In Proceedings of XXth ISPRS Congress Commission II, Istanbul, Turkey. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Science, 35, 396–401.
  • Mutluoğlu, Ö. & Ceylan, A. (2005). Location accuracy and cost comparison in digital orthophoto maps, Selcuk University Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 20 (1), 35-42.
  • Nikolakopoulos, K. G., Kyriou, A., Koukouvelas, I. K., Tomaras, N., & Lyros, E. (2023). UAV, GNSS, and InSAR data analyses for landslide monitoring in a mountainous village in western Greece. Remote Sensing, 15(11), 2870.
  • Özbalmumcu, M. (2007). Basic principles of orthophoto map production by photogrammetric method, benefits and usage areas of orthophoto, Turkish National Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Association IV. Technical Symposium, İstanbul, 1-11.
  • Pathak, S., Acharya, S., Bk, S., Karn, G., & Thapa, U. (2024). UAV-based topographical mapping and accuracy assessment of orthophoto using GCP. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 6(1), 1-8.
  • Pulido Mantas, T., Roveta, C., Calcinai, B., di Camillo, C. G., Gambardella, C., Gregorin, C., ... & Cerrano, C. (2023). Photogrammetry, from the land to the sea and beyond: A unifying approach to study terrestrial and marine environments. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(4), 759.
  • Rábago, J., & Portuguez-Castro, M. (2023). Use of drone photogrammetry as an innovative, competency-based architecture teaching process. Drones, 7(3), 187.
  • Rossi, T.A. (2004). Application Of Digital Photogrammetric Methods İn The Of Land Cover Change On The Coastal Dunes Of Warren Dunes State Park, Berrien Country, (PhD thesis). The Michigan State University, Michigan.
  • Seo, D. M., Woo, H. J., Hong, W. H., Seo, H., & Na, W. J. (2024). Optimization of Number of GCPs and Placement Strategy for UAV-Based Orthophoto Production. Applied Sciences, 14(8), 3163.
  • Spreckels, V., Fischer, C., Schlienkamp, A. & Syrek, L. (2005). Photogrammetric stereoplotting capabilities of Vexcel UltracamD digital aerial imagery, ISPRS Hannover Workshop 2005 “High-Resolution Earth Imaging for Geospatial Information”, At Hannover, Germany.
  • Şahin, İ. (2013). Process optimization in bulk orthophoto production, (PhD thesis). Yıldız Teknik University, İstanbul, Turkey (in Turkish). Vega, F.A., Ramirez, F.C. & Carricondo, P.M. (2017). Assessment of photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation GCPss number using unmanned aerial vehicle, Measurement Journal, 221-227.
  • Wolf, P. (1974). Elements of photogrammetry, Mc Graw Hill Publication, USA.
  • Yıldız, M.A., Karabörk, H. & Yıldız, F. (2015). Using digital orthophoto products as a basis for geographic information systems in spatial projects, Turkish National Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Association VIII. Technical Symposium, Konya, 449-455.
  • Yılmaz, A. (2002). Accuracy research of digital elevation models produced from different sources, (PhD thesis), Yıldız Teknik University İstanbul (in Turkish).
  • Zhang, J., Xu, S., Zhao, Y., Sun, J., Xu, S., & Zhang, X. (2023). Aerial orthoimage generation for UAV remote sensing. Information Fusion, 89, 91-120.
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Photogrametry
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Aydan Yaman 0000-0001-8739-066X

Hacı Murat Yılmaz 0000-0002-9725-5792

Publication Date March 25, 2025
Submission Date July 17, 2024
Acceptance Date October 8, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 5 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Yaman, A., & Yılmaz, H. M. (2025). Accuracy Investigation on Orthophotos Produced from Digital Aerial Imagery Recorded from Different Altitudes. Turkish Journal of Geosciences, 5(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.48053/turkgeo.1517771