ZAZA DİLİNDE ERGATİF SİSTEMİN TARİHİ GELİŞİMİ

Year 2016, Volume: 4 Issue: 8, 63 - 87, 15.06.2016

İlyas Arslan

Abstract

Bu makalede Ergatif Sistemin İrani dillerdeki tarihi gelişimi ile birlikte Zaza dilindeki

yapısı incelenmektedir. Zaza dilinin ait olduğu kuzeybatı İrani diller alt grubu ön planda

olmakla beraber bazı özelliklerinden dolayı diğer birkaç İrani dil de mercek altına alınmaktadır.

Geçmiş zamanlardan yazıtları kalmış en eski İrani dillerden başlanarak özellikle günümüzde

konuşulan yeni İrani dillere kadar olan gelişimleri irdelenmektedir. İrani diller eski, orta ve yeni

İrani diller olmak üzere üç aşamada ele alınmaktadır. Zaza dili hem morfolojik hem de sentaktik

olarak ergatif sisteme uyumluluğu açısından ayrıntılı olarak test edilmektedir.

Keywords

Zaza, Ergatif, İrani Diller

References

• Aldridge, Edith. 2008. Generative Approaches to Ergativity. In: Language and Linguistics Compass 2 (5), 966–995. Arkadiev, Peter. M. (2008). Differential Argument Marking in Two-Term Case Systems and its Implications for the general theory of Case Marking. In: Studies in natural language and linguistic theory 72, S. 151-17 Bavant, Marc. 2008. Proto-Indo-European Ergativity. Still to be Discussed. In: Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 44 (4), S. 433–447. Bisang, Walter. 2002. Argument structure and its morphosyntactic representation: Nominatife/accusative, ergative/absolutive, active/inactive, direct/inverse. Vortrag zu 7th Summer School of the German Linguistic Society. Online: http://www.phil-fak.uniduesseldorf. de/summerschool2002/Bisang5.PDF. Böhm, Roger. 2001. Ergativität – Accusativität ... und Notionalgrammatisches. In Hackmack, ed., 53-64. Online: http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/iaas/workshop/ergativ/boehm.pdf. Butt, Miriam. & Deo, Ashwini. 2001. Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. In KURDICA Newsletter for Kurdish Language and Studies 5: 1-18. Korrigierte Version (2005) auf http://ling.unikonstanz. de/pages/home/butt/main/papers/ia-erg.html. Butt, Miriam. 2006. The Dative-Ergative Connection. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6, O. Bonami & P. Cabredo Hofherr (eds.) pp. 69–92. Butt, Miriam & Poudel, Tikaram. 2007. Distribution of the Ergative in Nepali. Leipzig: University of Konstanz. DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) Projekt- SFB 471, Project A24. Bynon, Theodora. 1979. The ergative construction in Kurdish. In Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 42 (02): 211- 224. Bynon, Theodora. 2005. Evidential, raised Possessor, and the historical source of the ergative construction in Indo-Iranian. In Transactions of the philological Society 103:1-72. Cheung, Johnny. 2007. Etymological Dictionary of the Iranian Verb. Leiden: Brill (Leiden Indo-European etymological dictionary series, 2). Online: http://azadegan.info/files/Etymological_Dictionary_of_the_Iranian_Verb.pdf. Dixon, Robert M. W. 1977. The Syntactic Development of Australian Languages. In Li, Charles N.,ed., 365-415. Dixon, Robert M. W. 1987. Studies in Ergativity. In Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics 71:1-16. Dixon, Robert M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press (Cambridge studies in linguistics, 69). Dixon, Robert M. W. 1995. Ergativity. Reprinted. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press (Cambridge studies in linguistics, 69). Gippert, J. 1996. Die historische Entwicklung der Zaza-Sprache. In Ware: Pêseroka Zon u Kulturê Ma: Dımıli-Kırmanc-Zaza 10:148-154. Gippert, J. 2008. Zur dialektalen Stellung des Zazaki. Die Sprache 47/1, 2007/2008: 77-107. Hackmack, Susanne & Karl Heinz Wagner, eds. 2001. Ergativ. (Bremer Linguististik Workshop 1). 53-64. Bremen: Universität Bremen, IASS. Online verfügbar: http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/iaas/workshop/ergativ/. Haig, Geoffrey L.G. 2004. Alignment in Kurdish: a diachronic perspective. Unveröffentlichtes Habilitationsschrift. Universität Kiel. Haig, Geoffrey L.G. 2008. Alignment change in Iranian languages (Empirical approaches to language typology ; 37). Berlin [u.a.] : Mouton de Gruyter. Holmberg & Odden. 2004. Ergativity and Role-Marking in Hawrami. In SWL 1, August 5-8 University of Leipzig & Max Plank Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology. Johns, A. Massam, D. & Ndayiragije J. (Eds.). 2006. Ergativity. Emerging Issues. Dordrecht: Springer. Jügel, Thomas. 2009. In Orientalia Suecana LVIII: 142-158. Karimi, Yadgar. 2012. The Evolution of Ergativity in Iranian Languages. In Asta Linguistica Asiatica 2:23-44. Kefer, Michel. 1986. Ergativität und syntaktische Relationen. In Burkhard, ed., 121-132. Laka, Itziar. 2006. Deriving split ergativity in the progresive: The case of Basque, In Johns, ed., 173-196. Legate, Julie Anne. 2002. Warlpiri: Theoretical Implications. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Lubotsky, A. & De Vaan, M. In: Gzella (ed) 2009:160-174. Matsumoto, Katsumi. 1993. Problems of Ergativity in Indo-European. In Journal of Indo-European Studies 21:303-329. McGrogor, William B. 2009. Typology of Ergativity. In Language and Linguistics Compass: 480-508. Melikishvili, Irine. 2008. Georgian as an Active/Ergative Split Language. In Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences 2:138-147 Online: http://www.science.org.ge/2-2/Melikishvili.pdf. Mirdehghan & Jahangiri. 2005. Split-Ergative Morphology in Hindi/Urdu, Pashto & Balochi Languages. In J. Humanities 12 (3): 93-122. Otsuka, Yuko. 2000. Syntactic Ergativity in Tongan: Resumptive Pronouns Revisited. Mānoa: University of Hawaii at Mānoa. Otsuka, Yuko. 2006. Syntactic Ergativity in Tongan: In Johns, ed., 79-110. Peterson, J. 1999. Grammatische Relationen im Pali und die Entstehung von Ergativität im Indoarischen. In Historische Sprachforschung / Historical Linguistics 112:227-263. Plank, Frans (ed). 1979. Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations. London: Academic Press. Polinsky, Maria. 2007. Ergativity.handout.Sept 07.doc, Online: http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/mpolinsky/files/ergativity.MIT_.handout.pdf. Polinsky, Maria & Gallo, Carlos Gómez & Graff, Peter & Kravtchenko, Ekaterina. 2012. Subject preference and ergativity. In: Lingua 122:267–277. Pirejko, L.A. 1979. On the Genesis of the Ergative Construction in Indo-Iranian. In: Plank 1979: 481-489. Primus, Beatrice. 1999. Cases and Thematic Roles - Ergative, Accusative and Active (Linguistische Arbeiten). Tübingen: Niemeyer. Primus, Beatrice. 2003. Ergativität im Deutschen? Das Deutsche im Rahmen der relationalen Typologie. Koreanische Zeitschrift für Germanistik 86:13-38. Online http://kgg.german.or.kr/kr/kzg/kzgtxt/86-02.pdf. Selcan, Zülfü. 1998. Grammatik der Zaza-Sprache: Nord-Dialekt (Dersim-Dialekt). Berlin: Wissenschaft & Technik. Selcan, Zülfü. 2013. Zur historischen Entwicklung der Zaza Sprache. In Acta Orientalica 74: 157-218. Stolz, Christina. 2000. Ergativität in Mayasprachen. Vorgetragen bei Bremer Linguistik Workshop. Online: http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/iaas/workshop/ergativ/cstolz.pdf. Stroński, Krzysztof. 2009. Approaches to Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. In Lingua Posnaniensis 51: 77-118. Stroński, Krzysztof. 2010. Variation of Ergativity Patterns in Indo-Aryan. In Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46:237–253. Trask, Robert L. 1979. On the origins of ergativity. In Plank., ed., 385-404. Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1981. Grammatical relations in ergative languages. Studies in Language 5:361–94. Wechsler, Stephen & Arka, I. W. 1998. Syntactic Ergativity in Balinese: an Argument Structure Based Theory. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 387-441. Onliner: http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~wechsler/Balinese-NLLT.pdf.