Multimedial Study Guide of Field Hydropedological Measurements

Abstract

Soil hydropedological data measured in situ provide an essential base for basic and also applied research in hydrological, water management, landscape and environmental disciplines. Quality of the measured data is a critical value determining the quality of results and derived conclusions. The knowledge and practical experience of the technician performing the measurements is presenting the "human factor", which affects the quality of measured data most.  The Multimedial Study Guide of Field Hydropedological Measurements (further referred to as “the Guide”) was created to present and explain selected field measurements determining soil physical and hydro-physical properties in a comprehensive, didactical and user-friendly way. The following topics are introduced: i) Soil sampling (disturbed and undisturbed soil samples), ii) Soil moisture content measurement using indirect non-destructive methods, iii) Determination of tensiometric soil water potential, iv) Measurement of saturated soil hydraulic conductivity in-situ with available groundwater level in measured layer and without available groundwater level in measured layer, v) Measurement of unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity, and vi) Basic presentation of lysimetry. The Guide was for students, and also for academic workers and other interested members of the public. The English version enables everyone to use these guidelines and carry out each particular measurement, as well as evaluate and present the measured data correctly. The students of the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague use this Guide as a regular learning material in subjects dealing with soil and water relationship since 2012. Now, the 2nd revised edition is presented. The Guide is available on the internet (http://hydropedologie.agrobiologie.cz) and DVD (on request).

Keywords

• Hydropedology,study guide,field measurement

References

1. Ankeny, M.D., Ahmed, M., Kaspar, T.C., Horton, R., 1991. Simple field method for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 55: 467–470.
2. Anonymous, 1999. Soil Taxonomy. A Basic of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting soil Survey. USDA Handbook No: 436, Washington D.C. USA.
3. Anonymous, 2006. World References Base for Soil Resources, FAO/ISRIC. World Soil Rep., No. 103. Rome.
4. Anonymous, 2014. Decagon Devices, Inc. (2005). Minidisk infiltrometer. User’s manual. 23 p. www.decagon.com (Access date: 28.07.2014).
5. Báťková, K., Matula, S., Miháliková, M., 2013. Multimedial study guide of field hydropedological measurements. 2nd Revised Edition [on-line]. English Version. Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic, No pagination, Available on: http://hydropedologie.agrobiologie.cz. ISBN: 978-80-213-2434-3.
6. Ernst, L.F., 1950. A new formula for the calculation of the permeability factor with the auger hole method. T.N.O. Groningen 1950. Translated from the Dutch by H. Bouwer, Cornell Univ. Ithaca, N.Y., 1955.
7. Hooghoudt, S.B., 1936. Bepaling van den doorlaatfactor van den grond met behulp van pompproeven, (z.g. boorgatenmethode). Verslag Landbouwk, Onder Zoek, 42: 449-541.
8. Hvorslev, M., 1951. Time lag and soil permeability in groundwater observations. Waterways Experiment Station. Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army, Bulletin No. 36, Vicksburg, Mississippi, USA.

9. Kirkham, D., Van Bavel, C.H.M., 1948. Theory of seepage into auger holes. Soil Science of America Proceedings, 13: 75–82.
10. Matula, S., Kozáková, H., 1997. A simple pressure infiltrometer for determination of soil hydraulic properties by in situ infiltration measurements. Rostlinná Výroba, 43: 405-413.
11. Matula, S., Miháliková, M., Mráz, A., Von Unold, G., Chala, A.T., Hrkalová, M., Doležal, F., 2014. Experience with installation and performance of a small smart field lysimeter SFM UMS (in Czech). In: Brych, K., Tesař, M. (eds.), Hydrology of a Small Basin 2014, Held from April 22nd to April 24th in Prague, Institute of Hydrodynamics ASCR in Prague.
12. Parr, J.R., Bertrand, A.R., 1960. Water infiltration into soils. Advances in Agronomy, 12: 311-363.
13. Perroux, K.M., White, I., 1988. Designs for disc permeameters. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 52: 1205–1215.
14. Philip, J.R., 1957. The theory of infiltration: 4. Sorptivity and algebraic infiltration equations. Soil Science, 84: 257-264.
15. Reynolds, W.D., Elrick, D.E., 1991. Determination of hydraulic conductivity using a tension infiltrometer. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 55(3): 633- 639.
16. Špongrová, K., Kechavarzi, C., Dresser, M., Matula, S., Godwin, R.J., 2009. Development of an automated tension infiltrometer for field use. Vadose Zone Journal, 8: 810–817.
17. Vandervaere, J.P., Peugeot, C., Vauclin, M., Angulo- Jaramilo, R., Lebel, T., 1997. Estimating hydraulic conductivity of crusted soils using disc infiltrometers and minitensiometers. Journal of Hydrology, 188-189, 203-223.
18. Wooding, R.A., 1968. Steady infiltration from a shallow circular pond. Water Resources Research, 4: 1259- 1273.
19. Zhang, R., 1997. Determination of soil sorptivity and hydraulic conductivity from the disk infiltrometer. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61: 1024- 1030.