Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Comparison of Leadership Styles of University Students in Terms of Their Demographic Characteristics

Year 2020, , 105 - 110, 29.02.2020

Osman Kılıç , İsmet Boz , Uğur Başer

https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.676527

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to determine the Kurt Lewin’s leadership styles of college students and also
to determine whether their leadership styles differ with their demographic characteristics or not. The participants were 384
students sampled from the total student population of Ondokuz Mayıs University in Turkey, based on Cochran’s sample size
determination formula for categorical data collection instruments. Overall, 49.2% of the respondents were democratic leaders
34.9% were autocratic, and 15.9% were laissez-faire style leaders. The Chi-square test, conducted on the variables of
leadership style and demographic characteristics of students, revealed significant effects of gender and parents' place of
residence but was independent of other factors. Female respondents and respondents coming mostly from rural and suburban
areas tended to be more democratic leaders in comparison with male respondents and respondents coming from more densely
populated or metropolitan areas. The study suggests that similar researches should be conducted to determine the influence of
leadership style on the performance of workers employed in different businesses in Turkey.

Keywords

Leadership leader leadership styles higher education student

References

  • Barlett, J.E., Kotrlik, J.W., Higgins, C.C., 2001. Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1): 43-50.
  • Beebe, S.A., Masterson, J.T., 1994. Communicating in small groups: Principles and practices. Fourth Edition, Harper Collins College Publishers, New York.
  • Cochran, W.G., 1977. Sampling Techniques. Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Eagly, A.H., Carli, L.L., 2003. The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6): 807-834.
  • Eagly, A.H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C., 2001. The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4): 781-797.
  • Eagly, A.H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C., Van Engen, M.L., 2003. Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4): 569-591.
  • Eagly, A.H., Johnson, B., 1990. Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2): 233-256.
  • Eagly, A.H., Karau, S.J., Johnson, B.T., 1992b. Gender and leadership style among school principals: A meta-analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(1): 76-102.
  • Eagly, A.H., Makhijani, M.G., Klonsky, B.G., 1992a. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1): 3-22.
  • Erçetin, S., 1998. Lider Sarmalında Vizyon. Önder Matbaacılık Ltd. Şti., Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Gilley, A., 2005. The Manager as Change Leader. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Gilley, A., Dixon, P., Gilley, J.W., 2008. Characteristics of leadership effectiveness: Implementing change and driving innovation in organizations. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 19(2): 153-169.
  • Gökulu, G., 2010. City Safety and relationship between urbanization and crime. Atatürk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 24(1): 209-226. (in Turkish).
  • Karasu, M.A., 2008. The effect of Turkey’s urbanization dynamics on crime. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 57(4): 255-281. (in Turkish).
  • Kartal, S.K., 1978. Kentleşme ve İnsan: Kentleşme Sürecinde İnsan Tutum ve Davranışlarında Meydana Gelen Değişmeler: Çankırı Köylerinden Ankara'ya Göç Edenler Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Türkiye ve Orta Doğu İdaresi Enstitüsü Yayınları, No. 175.
  • Kellerman, B., 2007. What every leader needs to know about followers. Harvard Business Review, 85(12): 84-91.
  • Kotter, J.P., 1996. Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
  • Lewin, K., Lippitt, R. White, R.K., 1939. Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates”. Journal of Social Psychology, 10: 271-299.
  • Nadler, D.A., 1997. Champions of Change: How Ceos and Their Companies Are Mastering The Skills of Radical Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Nworgu, B.G., 1991. Educational Research: Basic Issues and Methodology. Ibadan, Wisdom Publishers.
  • Prawl, W., Medlin, R., Gross, J., 1984. Adult and Continuing Education Through The Cooperative Extension Service. Extension Division, University of Missouri, Columbia.
  • Sykes, W., 2012. Visions of Hope: Leadership. Open Writings, (http://www.openwriting.com/archives/visions_of_hope/), (Accessed: 29.12.2018).
  • Tatlıdil, E., 2009. Identity of cities and citizens; the case of Izmir. Ege Akademic Review, 9(1): 319-336. (in Turkish).
  • Tead, O., 1935. The Art of Leadership. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
  • Tosun, K., 1992. İşletme Yönetimi: Genel Esaslar. Savaş Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Turan, M.T., Beşirli, A., 2008. Impacts of urbanization process on mental health. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 9(4): 238-243. (in Turkish).
  • Ulu, A., Karakoç, İ., 2004. The influence of urbanization on city identity. Journal of Planning, 29(3): 59-66. (in Turkish).
  • Winston, B.E., Patterson, K., 2006. An integrative definition of leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 1(2): 6-66.

Comparison of Leadership Styles of University Students in Terms of Their Demographic Characteristics

Year 2020, , 105 - 110, 29.02.2020

Osman Kılıç , İsmet Boz , Uğur Başer

https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.676527

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to determine the Kurt Lewin’s leadership styles of college students and also
to determine whether their leadership styles differ with their demographic characteristics or not. The participants were 384
students sampled from the total student population of Ondokuz Mayıs University in Turkey, based on Cochran’s sample size
determination formula for categorical data collection instruments. Overall, 49.2% of the respondents were democratic leaders
34.9% were autocratic, and 15.9% were laissez-faire style leaders. The Chi-square test, conducted on the variables of
leadership style and demographic characteristics of students, revealed significant effects of gender and parents' place of
residence but was independent of other factors. Female respondents and respondents coming mostly from rural and suburban
areas tended to be more democratic leaders in comparison with male respondents and respondents coming from more densely
populated or metropolitan areas. The study suggests that similar researches should be conducted to determine the influence of
leadership style on the performance of workers employed in different businesses in Turkey.

Keywords

Leadership leader leadership styles higher education student

References

  • Barlett, J.E., Kotrlik, J.W., Higgins, C.C., 2001. Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1): 43-50.
  • Beebe, S.A., Masterson, J.T., 1994. Communicating in small groups: Principles and practices. Fourth Edition, Harper Collins College Publishers, New York.
  • Cochran, W.G., 1977. Sampling Techniques. Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Eagly, A.H., Carli, L.L., 2003. The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6): 807-834.
  • Eagly, A.H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C., 2001. The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4): 781-797.
  • Eagly, A.H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C., Van Engen, M.L., 2003. Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4): 569-591.
  • Eagly, A.H., Johnson, B., 1990. Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2): 233-256.
  • Eagly, A.H., Karau, S.J., Johnson, B.T., 1992b. Gender and leadership style among school principals: A meta-analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(1): 76-102.
  • Eagly, A.H., Makhijani, M.G., Klonsky, B.G., 1992a. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1): 3-22.
  • Erçetin, S., 1998. Lider Sarmalında Vizyon. Önder Matbaacılık Ltd. Şti., Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Gilley, A., 2005. The Manager as Change Leader. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Gilley, A., Dixon, P., Gilley, J.W., 2008. Characteristics of leadership effectiveness: Implementing change and driving innovation in organizations. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 19(2): 153-169.
  • Gökulu, G., 2010. City Safety and relationship between urbanization and crime. Atatürk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 24(1): 209-226. (in Turkish).
  • Karasu, M.A., 2008. The effect of Turkey’s urbanization dynamics on crime. Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 57(4): 255-281. (in Turkish).
  • Kartal, S.K., 1978. Kentleşme ve İnsan: Kentleşme Sürecinde İnsan Tutum ve Davranışlarında Meydana Gelen Değişmeler: Çankırı Köylerinden Ankara'ya Göç Edenler Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Türkiye ve Orta Doğu İdaresi Enstitüsü Yayınları, No. 175.
  • Kellerman, B., 2007. What every leader needs to know about followers. Harvard Business Review, 85(12): 84-91.
  • Kotter, J.P., 1996. Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
  • Lewin, K., Lippitt, R. White, R.K., 1939. Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates”. Journal of Social Psychology, 10: 271-299.
  • Nadler, D.A., 1997. Champions of Change: How Ceos and Their Companies Are Mastering The Skills of Radical Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Nworgu, B.G., 1991. Educational Research: Basic Issues and Methodology. Ibadan, Wisdom Publishers.
  • Prawl, W., Medlin, R., Gross, J., 1984. Adult and Continuing Education Through The Cooperative Extension Service. Extension Division, University of Missouri, Columbia.
  • Sykes, W., 2012. Visions of Hope: Leadership. Open Writings, (http://www.openwriting.com/archives/visions_of_hope/), (Accessed: 29.12.2018).
  • Tatlıdil, E., 2009. Identity of cities and citizens; the case of Izmir. Ege Akademic Review, 9(1): 319-336. (in Turkish).
  • Tead, O., 1935. The Art of Leadership. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
  • Tosun, K., 1992. İşletme Yönetimi: Genel Esaslar. Savaş Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Turan, M.T., Beşirli, A., 2008. Impacts of urbanization process on mental health. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 9(4): 238-243. (in Turkish).
  • Ulu, A., Karakoç, İ., 2004. The influence of urbanization on city identity. Journal of Planning, 29(3): 59-66. (in Turkish).
  • Winston, B.E., Patterson, K., 2006. An integrative definition of leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 1(2): 6-66.
There are 28 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Osman Kılıç 0000-0002-0129-4034

İsmet Boz 0000-0001-7316-9323

Uğur Başer 0000-0003-4961-2764

Publication Date February 29, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020

Cite

APA Kılıç, O., Boz, İ., & Başer, U. (2020). Comparison of Leadership Styles of University Students in Terms of Their Demographic Characteristics. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(1), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.676527
AMA Kılıç O, Boz İ, Başer U. Comparison of Leadership Styles of University Students in Terms of Their Demographic Characteristics. TÜTAD. February 2020;7(1):105-110. doi:10.19159/tutad.676527
Chicago Kılıç, Osman, İsmet Boz, and Uğur Başer. “Comparison of Leadership Styles of University Students in Terms of Their Demographic Characteristics”. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi 7, no. 1 (February 2020): 105-10. https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.676527.
EndNote Kılıç O, Boz İ, Başer U (February 1, 2020) Comparison of Leadership Styles of University Students in Terms of Their Demographic Characteristics. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi 7 1 105–110.
IEEE O. Kılıç, İ. Boz, and U. Başer, “Comparison of Leadership Styles of University Students in Terms of Their Demographic Characteristics”, TÜTAD, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 105–110, 2020, doi: 10.19159/tutad.676527.
ISNAD Kılıç, Osman et al. “Comparison of Leadership Styles of University Students in Terms of Their Demographic Characteristics”. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi 7/1 (February 2020), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.676527.
JAMA Kılıç O, Boz İ, Başer U. Comparison of Leadership Styles of University Students in Terms of Their Demographic Characteristics. TÜTAD. 2020;7:105–110.
MLA Kılıç, Osman et al. “Comparison of Leadership Styles of University Students in Terms of Their Demographic Characteristics”. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, vol. 7, no. 1, 2020, pp. 105-10, doi:10.19159/tutad.676527.
Vancouver Kılıç O, Boz İ, Başer U. Comparison of Leadership Styles of University Students in Terms of Their Demographic Characteristics. TÜTAD. 2020;7(1):105-10.

TARANILAN DİZİNLER

14658    14659     14660   14661  14662  14663  14664        

14665      14667