The Osce Human Rights Norms An The Decoons-Making Process Of Foreign Policy With A Human Rights Objective; The Case Of Turkey

Fatih Karaosmanoğlu

doi:10.1501/Intrel_0000000060

TR EN

The Osce Human Rights Norms An The Decoons-Making Process Of Foreign Policy With A Human Rights Objective; The Case Of Turkey

Abstract

This article deals with international norms influencing foreign policy of a state. It looks at the extent to which the OSCE human rights norms influence foreign policy. It also presents the results of a questionnaire survey carried out in Turkey. As far as the types of norms are concerned, the OSCE human rights norms have been divided into substantive and non-substantive norms. The following conceptual hypothesis has been constructed: nonsubstantive human rights provisions of the OSCE documents have more influence than substantive ones on foreign policy with a human rights objective. The research has shown that the OSCE human rights norms guide the decision-making process of foreign policy with a human rights objective. It has also shown that non-substantive human rights provisions of the OSCE documents guide the decision-making process of foreign policy with a human rights objective more than substantive human rights provisions. It is, hovvever, important to note the fact that Turkey has human rights problems, and is in the way of becoming Europeanised, has affected the extent of guidance of the OSCE human rights norms in foreign policy

Keywords

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Political Science

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Fatih Karaosmanoğlu This is me

Publication Date

May 1, 2002

Submission Date

January 1, 2002

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2002 Number: 33

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1501/Intrel_0000000060

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA88UD33DW

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Karaosmanoğlu, F. (2002). The Osce Human Rights Norms An The Decoons-Making Process Of Foreign Policy With A Human Rights Objective; The Case Of Turkey. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, 33, 53-75. https://doi.org/10.1501/Intrel_0000000060

AMA

1.Karaosmanoğlu F. The Osce Human Rights Norms An The Decoons-Making Process Of Foreign Policy With A Human Rights Objective; The Case Of Turkey. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations. 2002;(33):53-75. doi:10.1501/Intrel_0000000060

Chicago

Karaosmanoğlu, Fatih. 2002. “The Osce Human Rights Norms An The Decoons-Making Process Of Foreign Policy With A Human Rights Objective; The Case Of Turkey”. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, nos. 33: 53-75. https://doi.org/10.1501/Intrel_0000000060.

EndNote

Karaosmanoğlu F (May 1, 2002) The Osce Human Rights Norms An The Decoons-Making Process Of Foreign Policy With A Human Rights Objective; The Case Of Turkey. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations 33 53–75.

IEEE

[1]F. Karaosmanoğlu, “The Osce Human Rights Norms An The Decoons-Making Process Of Foreign Policy With A Human Rights Objective; The Case Of Turkey”, The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, no. 33, pp. 53–75, May 2002, doi: 10.1501/Intrel_0000000060.

ISNAD

Karaosmanoğlu, Fatih. “The Osce Human Rights Norms An The Decoons-Making Process Of Foreign Policy With A Human Rights Objective; The Case Of Turkey”. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations. 33 (May 1, 2002): 53-75. https://doi.org/10.1501/Intrel_0000000060.

JAMA

1.Karaosmanoğlu F. The Osce Human Rights Norms An The Decoons-Making Process Of Foreign Policy With A Human Rights Objective; The Case Of Turkey. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations. 2002;:53–75.

MLA

Karaosmanoğlu, Fatih. “The Osce Human Rights Norms An The Decoons-Making Process Of Foreign Policy With A Human Rights Objective; The Case Of Turkey”. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, no. 33, May 2002, pp. 53-75, doi:10.1501/Intrel_0000000060.

Vancouver

1.Fatih Karaosmanoğlu. The Osce Human Rights Norms An The Decoons-Making Process Of Foreign Policy With A Human Rights Objective; The Case Of Turkey. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations. 2002 May 1;(33):53-75. doi:10.1501/Intrel_0000000060